"Germany
Masion Close

View Survey Results: Is Stanley Ho a Serial Antagonist?

Voters
61. You may not vote on this poll
  • No, I believe he's completely innocent.

    2 3.28%
  • No, but I believe he should try to moderate the tenor of his reports.

    6 9.84%
  • No, I believe his writing style provokes people, but not to the point of requiring action.

    8 13.11%
  • Yes, and I believe he should be restricted to his own thread.

    10 16.39%
  • Yes, and I believe he should be suspended from posting for 30 days.

    5 8.20%
  • Yes, and I believe he should be permanently banned from the Forum.

    30 49.18%
Escort News
 Sex Vacation

Thread: Is Stanley Ho a Serial Antagonist?

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #34
    [QUOTE=Rtrdengr][QUOTE=DayNight]Do not feed trolls! If they get no attention they will starve.

  2. #33

    Is he from Singapore?

    Something tells me he is. It the style some Singporeans learn. He's a very insecure guy and probably doesn't have many friends

  3. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Levitian
    I thought he was actually funny.

    AG is contributing very actively. And, I have to admit, I sometimes also get a little bit annoyed by AG's action reports.
    I don't quite understand why does AG's success bothers you. He's doing everyone on the forum a service by posting experiences.

  4. #31
    Who is Stanley Ho? Could you show me examples of his writing? I am curious.

  5. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by David Xyzzy 1
    New members should start with good posts, then flex their fingers on wit when they have established a rapport with the group.David
    This should be in Reports of Distinction

  6. #29

    consequences

    Impersonating the real Stanley Ho would earn you greater consequences. The real Stanley Ho do not resort to this type type of criticism. If he finds out about you, you will be in greater trouble.

    Try to be a bit more civilize when in the company of others and learn how to behave like an adult. Now go to your room. No Dinner tonight.

  7. #28

    Farewell Stanley Ho

    Thanks for your generous, thoughtful and timely contributions. Your wealth of excellent information will be sorely missed here.

    When you get a life beyond taunting others, come back and see us again.

    We are not altogether unforgiving, and as you can see from the results of this poll, until you provide something of use, the vast majority of us will request to have you banned.

    We look forward to your return under a new guise. Might I suggest, 'The Vulture', or 'Long CU', or some such name may be appropriate....

    Best wishes...

  8. #27

    Bias toward banning

    Infrequent satire can be a pleasant diversion, and a demonstration of the wit of our members. Constant satire and sarcasm is a distraction, and has no place in such a well run forum.

    New members should start with good posts, then flex their fingers on wit when they have established a rapport with the group.

    David

  9. #26

    Let's adopt DayNight's idea

    [QUOTE=DayNight]Do not feed trolls! If they get no attention they will starve.[QUOTE]

  10. #25

    Stanley Ho

    I read the remaining 3 posts, and I think that his posts are provoking, but no action is required. Certainly not after 4 posts (3 still existing).

    We had much more serious problems compared to this in the Thailand forum in the past.


    Giotto

  11. #24

    Here Comes the Judge.

    To Judge Jackson.

    I think there are not enough posts by Mr Ho to find this defendant guilty of "serial antagonism".

  12. #23

    Mr. Ho

    I better put in my two cents before the poll closes. I voted that his posts are provoking, but no action is required.

    I find it amusing that anybody actually took the posts seriously. It was obvious to me from the start that he just does not believe AG's reports about virgins and freebies and used a satirical approach to illustrate his POV.

    I am a firm believer that everybody is entitled to their opinion regardless of whether we agree with them or not. The question is whether this forum is the appropriate place for the opinion or not.

    OAH

  13. #22
    I only saw 2 or 3 of Stanley's posts but what I did read seemed like a mildly amusing and none-too-subtle spoof. I'm guessing one heavy duty contributor here, while helpful and knowledgable, is extremely sensitive to perceived criticism and far too easily offended. But if it's come to the point where that contributor is threatening to take his bat and ball and go home unless Stanley gets the bullet, then I say fire at will!

    Additional.
    I generally keep to the Photo Gallery and Shanghai sections. Having nothing better to do at the moment I perused the whole Stan Ho saga, and beyond, in the various cities' sections.

    Now, at the risk of getting it from every direction (including the moderator for an off-topic point), I have to say I'm a little concerned by some of the posts by Asian Gambler and his longtime personal friend, Japan Man. Is anybody else here seeing sinister undertones within some of the posts of these 2 contributors, as I am?
    Last edited by Comrade 2255; 06-23-06 at 11:37. Reason: 'additional'

  14. #21

    Kissin' Buddies.

    Jackson. Maybe you could put Stanley in the same bed as Long Cu, then they can keep each other happy.

  15. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Jackson

    ===============================================

    Hi Rtrdengr,

    That's essentially how I saw the situation, but after I received approximately 10 complaints, including some suggestions from some members that they would stop participating in the Forum if I didn't delete everything Stanley Ho ever wrote, I decided it was easier posting the poll that to continue to try to preach patience.

    Thanks,

    Jackson
    I would not want those posts deleted or moved out of the context for the benefit of experience on bad examples, but I would highly recommend you to mark them as such!

    Quote Originally Posted by daynight
    Do not feed trolls! If they get no attention they will starve.
    See, this is not HIS problem. It's YOUR problem coz YOU react to it and make it a problem.
    I don't really care if he's kicked out or not. From the first sentence I know if a report is usefull or not. If not I don't go on.
    You know and I know. I was even lucky enough not to have time to read anything at the time he posted. It may still be misleading and waste peoples time by clustering up the thread. So there is nothing wrong with putting someone in the box who has nothing to contribute. You dont put water (or even dirt) into other people's fine wines.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
escort directory


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape