Bangkok Massage Parlors - ANNIES ONLY!

[WhiteTiger666]

I arrived in Bangkok last Saturday early afternoon and stayed at the Majestic Grande hotel. I had already planned that I would need a complete massage experience after the long haul flight. Since Annie's is right across the street from the hotel, the choice was easy.

Apart from #24 who seems to be out on a long time assignment (lucky bastard who took her.) I had #41, #47, #8 and #9 on my list of candidates. The fishbowl was pretty full at the time, but most girls were very much on the chubby side. There was a very gorgeous girl (#36?) there, but she constantly looked away which tells me she is not interested to work at the moment and is an indicator for me for a disappointing performance.

From my todo list #8 was there so I chose her.

She was active and smiling at me (?) in the fish bowl so that seemed to indicate a good chance for a great session.

She led me back to the room and prepared the bath. I ordered drinks for us which she went to get.

First some body to body action on the wet mattress with lots of foam. A bit of tit fucking, BBBJ, and she could have gotten me off pretty quickly but stopped. I could have taken a bit more or longer soapie action but she moved to the bathtub pretty quickly. I probably could have insisted for more time on the mattress but decided to just go with the flow. We had a some great time washing each other and everything that can be fun in the tub. She also included just the right amount of ass stroking and probing for me throughout the whole time. Great!

After a first pop in the tub we went to dry off and moved to the bed. She started a nice relaxing massage for about 30 minutes then I decided that we needed to get more serious. More BBBJ, multiple positions, all the works, nice experience to the finish all around. During all this time she was friendly, smiling, joking, just a nice girl.

2500 baht standard fee plus 200 baht tip. Well worth the experience!

[BionicMan]

The mistery still surrounds #14, described as "100% tomboy" by Aye, debated in here on what that could imply. Still with no outcome.

I doubt the description comes from the haircut only. Can't be!

[Lord Necros]

Thank you guys.

44, to me, seems both very plain and attractive at the same time. Hence the attraction. _

[Felix297]

I was lucky to have time with number 44 last Sunday. She was the highlight of my trip to Thailand. I couldn't easily remember her name so I called her little doll. She did everything so right & her attitude was perfect. She worked hard at pleasing me, and it was the best soapy session I've had.

[Tobyg]

Hi folks. Has anyone here been with number 44?

I checked Annie's site and she looks like the prettiest of the lot.

Hows her service and does she offers anal?

I went with 44 a couple of years ago and I'd give her a 7. 5/10. She was ok and I wouldn't have a problem with repeating the experience.

[SirWilliam4]

Hi folks. Has anyone here been with number 44?

I checked Annie's site and she looks like the prettiest of the lot.

Hows her service and does she offers anal?

I had one session with #44 about a year ago. Sorry, can't remember her name. I'd say she is a far cry from the "prettiest of the lot". Certainly attractive though. Nothing really "wrong" with her, per se. Attractive. Pleasant. Virtually flat chested (but okay with me). Courteous. Went through all the standard motions. Yet, it all felt businesslike, scripted, and rote in some way. Perhaps it was just a matter of chemistry. I didn't feel it; perhaps she didn't either. Haven't got a clue about A+. Didn't attempt to go there. Not my interest really. For my session. And only my session. I'd say looks about 7. 5/10. Service 6/10. Obviously not a repeat for me. Maybe someone else would have a different. And hopefully more enjoyable. Experience.

Maybe we'll hear some other opinions from some of the others that have seen her.

Enjoy Annies. It's a lot of fun.

SW

[Lord Necros]

Hi folks. Has anyone here been with number 44?

I checked Annie's site and she looks like the prettiest of the lot.

Hows her service and does she offers anal?

[Paul Kausch]

This can be a quite real scenario. Keep the foot in both shoes.

Aye is a businesswoman. Let's not forget that!

I think you are right about that. She is a business woman.

[BionicMan]

Aey's low ratings may be a wise move on her part. She states the girl is popular and gets repeat customers. If this is the case she would certainly want to keep her on staff. She also reports that some customers are disappointed. Perhaps she is just warning guys who have never been with her that they may wish to consider another lady. She has a damned if I do damned if I don't problem. She'll get some customers mad if she gets rid of the girl. She gets other customers mad when they chose the girl and discover she's a lousy fuck.

This can be a quite real scenario. Keep the foot in both shoes.

Aye is a businesswoman. Let's not forget that!

[Paul Kausch]

In the past TV ratings were based on quality, ie the survey covered "how much did you like it", nowadays the ratings are based on "viewer quantities", that means f* nothing. And that expanded everywhere. So it happens a girl with Lowe service is popular. Either her customers are masochists (liking being given a low service) or. Aye is masochist rating a girl a bad 2 and turning away potential customers (for her) We all know YMMV, but would anyone pick up a 2 with a low service description? I don't think so. So very true chemistry is important, but that factors after the choice. The choice is often a blind date.

We could exchange scores of posts discussing the difficulties in creating valid attitudinal ratings. I do not think asking the general public how much it likes a program measures the artistic quality of a TV programs. The general public has terrible tastes.

Aey's low ratings may be a wise move on her part. She states the girl is popular and gets repeat customers. If this is the case she would certainly want to keep her on staff. She also reports that some customers are disappointed. Perhaps she is just warning guys who have never been with her that they may wish to consider another lady. She has a damned if I do damned if I don't problem. She'll get some customers mad if she gets rid of the girl. She gets other customers mad when they chose the girl and discover she's a lousy fuck.

I've had ladies at Annie's tell me many of their customers just want to relax, fool around with the lady in the tub, get a massage on the bed and have a little physical contact with a naked young lady. They say these customers really aren't that interested in having sex to completion. I've also had MP girls working at a variety of different venues claim the majority of their customers can barely get it up and either don't cum or can only cum by jacking off on the girl. It would be interesting to be a fly-on-the-wall in an MP, observe what really goes on in the rooms and listen in on the conversations the ladies have among themselves.

[BionicMan]

Whatever man. I'm just quoting what Aey has written on the website. My main point was there is no apparent logic.

One things I've noticed about the world in general is there is no relationship between quality and popularity. This certainly applies to films, TV programs, music and restaurants, to name a few aspects of life.

Perhaps if one looks deeper there is logic behind what Aey has written. Might she be mocking the customers who like this lady even though she provides lousy service?

In the past TV ratings were based on quality, ie the survey covered "how much did you like it", nowadays the ratings are based on "viewer quantities", that means f* nothing. And that expanded everywhere. So it happens a girl with Lowe service is popular. Either her customers are masochists (liking being given a low service) or. Aye is masochist rating a girl a bad 2 and turning away potential customers (for her) We all know YMMV, but would anyone pick up a 2 with a low service description? I don't think so. So very true chemistry is important, but that factors after the choice. The choice is often a blind date.

[FruitNinja]

Your example turns the logic away as such a description, if true, should not give a rating of 2. As simple as that.

And how many are the repeat customers?

Of course I do not want to run into tedious questions, but more and more I can't understand the rating at Annie's.

Rating WG is crazy. I spent 4 days with a spinner from Bacarra who is a pain in the ass. But that PITA is hr own style of playfulness. Although I get it a lot of guys would be put off. On the fourth day when my cock was giving out after a month of non-stop fucking she made it perfectly clear that she didn't get off and she didn't appreciate it."papa finish, me no" Ha! I took care of the problem. Most guys would have been put off but that's just her personality. How do you rate personality.

The ratings are a starting point but I got to tell ya, I don't care what the ratings are if you a slob and disrespectful (and I'm not talking about anyone here) your experience will vary. At the end of the day they are human beings and need to be treated with respect. Regardless the path they have taken. Hey! If I could sell my body I would, but nobody is looking for a 50 something male hooker. Ha!

I even take reviews here with a grain of salt. One cannot predict chemistry. And at the end of the day even though it's a transactional relationship one cannot discount basic human nature. Personally I have been to Annies a number of times. Never had a bad experience.

Cheers

[Mooris7]

Let's lump Annie's and the two Dr BJ venues together, as they are connected and use the same format to present and evaluate each lady. Have you tried enough ladies enough times to say with certainly that the write-ups are hogwash? I saw two ladies at Annie's and one at Dr BJ's Salon in December and I'd say the descriptions were reasonably accurate. Consultant P at BJ's establishment was as she was described and even looked just like her pictures. And lo and behold that flawless skin in the photos is really flawless and not a product of Photoshop. One of Annie's ladies (#41) looked like an older, darker (what a surprise) and more slender version of her website photos. New photos are needed. Perhaps the lady doesn't want the photos updated. She was as described except the description doesn't mention that she has a very entertaining, cheeky sense of humor. Aor (#24) in my opinion only resembles her photos. She told me she knew she needed new photos to reflect her breast augmentation. You can go back to the photos of her I posted in January and compare them to the website photos. I took many photos of her and one thing I noticed is that she looks like a different lady in some of the photos I took. The camera lens, lighting and posing of the subject can make a big difference. As for the description, she was definitely a lot of fun; and her techniques were good but not great. Her main appeal was the fact that she will let you do anything you damn well please to her and seemed to really enjoy it.

The one thing I will say is that I have never had any complaints about the photos not looking the same except for #15. Even the ladies I tried before the ones I mentioned in my review of Annies today always looked the same or very similar in their pics. I am talking about the overall Annies experience has gone way down hill from before.

[Mooris7]

I have been going to Annies for some time now. A few months ago I had a great session with this girl. Very GFE, great tits-not too big and not too small. Her best feature is her nice firm ass. She has white skin which appeals to me way more than the dark skin ladies. If you are who partakes in the less safe practices in our hobby I get the feeling she will comply but with a small tip. She gives a great massage and was unhurried during the session with DFK On the menu but may be YMMV. I tried booking her again many times but I was always told she was not working. Recently I was finally able to book her again. The session started off about the same as before. Great massage, BBBJ in the tub with the standard body slide before hand. Great sex on the bed in all positions. All was great until I was told my session was over. I checked my watch and it had only been about an hour. I questioned her and she said as per the log book it was over. I always glance at the time when I arrive in the room so to note when my time is up. After 15 minutes of chit chat as I was getting dressed, clearly not happy she finally went to check. She came back and apologized about her mistake but now another 30 minutes was wasted of my time. We ended up having a quickie only because I was a little pissed and wanted her to earn her money. Now this girl is not new anymore and I'm afraid she has become jaded. I have seen #15, 23, 24, 25, 43? In my impression there seems to be a pattern of short changing the customers of time. With the exception of #24 who was clearly not in the same league as the other girls. She will be missed. The last I checked on the site it says she is away on a 3 month booking which is completely false. We will never see this lady at Annies again. When they are young, care free, amd making money they don't think about their health. Sadly she is now paying the price. #25 and 15 were a complete waste of my time and number 43 I think was just ok. The facilities at Annies are in diar need of repair. When business is good the staff are rude and don't seem to care about customers when we phone in to book. When business is slow the fish bowl is packed with girls and then they become a little more polite. I used to really love this place and have seen many other girls not listed here but these were just my latest. Recently good sessions at Tulip, Cherry, Addict, and Nateree have made me dicide that Annies will no longer see my business. I will miss the soapie end which used to be one of the best parts. So I will bid farewell to the rude mommasan, the fake Aey reviews, run down rooms, short changing time, and the lazy Farang staff sitting at the bar. There are far better choices now in Bangkok where we don't have to deal with this crap.

[Paul Kausch]

With the lack of good English and Asian style reasoning these Aey reviews of the girls are hog wash. If you believe the reviews of the establishment it self then I have one hell of a bridge for sale if you want to waste your money. This is exactly why we all use this board. We don't need to rely on Annies recommendations. We rely on our fellow members to post reviews for us to use when deciding which provider to use. So, why are we having this ridiculous conversation again about the Annies rating system. Don't believe any of it!

Let's lump Annie's and the two Dr BJ venues together, as they are connected and use the same format to present and evaluate each lady. Have you tried enough ladies enough times to say with certainly that the write-ups are hogwash? I saw two ladies at Annie's and one at Dr BJ's Salon in December and I'd say the descriptions were reasonably accurate. Consultant P at BJ's establishment was as she was described and even looked just like her pictures. And lo and behold that flawless skin in the photos is really flawless and not a product of Photoshop. One of Annie's ladies (#41) looked like an older, darker (what a surprise) and more slender version of her website photos. New photos are needed. Perhaps the lady doesn't want the photos updated. She was as described except the description doesn't mention that she has a very entertaining, cheeky sense of humor. Aor (#24) in my opinion only resembles her photos. She told me she knew she needed new photos to reflect her breast augmentation. You can go back to the photos of her I posted in January and compare them to the website photos. I took many photos of her and one thing I noticed is that she looks like a different lady in some of the photos I took. The camera lens, lighting and posing of the subject can make a big difference. As for the description, she was definitely a lot of fun; and her techniques were good but not great. Her main appeal was the fact that she will let you do anything you damn well please to her and seems to really enjoy it.