FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

[PussyLiccker]

And when you don't have pleasure or chemistry with the girl, you refuse to classify her as attractive or good looking. Too egocentric in classifying girls as pretty. I am willing to classify Janine as good looking even if I never have any chemistry with her and never take her.

For my taste, Pamela had a far more attractive face than say Dina. Neither had the body that was really my spec. When classifying looks, the service level is just not relevant at all. Chemistry is partly relevant but we should try to evaluate looks dispassionately regardless of chemistry.

I can see that Evita is good looking to others, even she doesn't appeal that much to me personally. Sidonia might be good looking to some, mainly staring at the tits. LOL. Aurelia I can say is really cute pretty, regardless of her service level which varies a lot.

I dunno if that is really true. I think when he finds a girl he finds attractive he will say it, but also will say if she is not GFE. He will say Evita is pretty although he has never been with her with chemistry not being there.

I dunno who Pamela is, but I thought Dina did have an attractive face. Her looks are for those that like blond look. She does have a jewel of an eye which I think is the draw. For me the body was the reason I was not too into her. If she had a nice body, she would certain be up there. I dunno who Aurelia is still. Her body descriptions doesn't sound like my type. I'm not into close to anorexic. I like a bit of waste or wide hips (curvy), and pelvis that caves in. Also, tits at least Bee (bee+ or Cee ideal) preferably with big diameter rather than small diameter pointy cones. Don't have to be huge, big are fine. Height, preferably tall 170-175, but if petite, proportional body to head. Don't mind silicones either as long as they are not hard. Basically I look for ideal birth givers. LOL.

[Syzygies]

If not attracted by look, I can't have pleasure, even girl is very skillful like I was said for Pamela ...

And when you don't have pleasure or chemistry with the girl, you refuse to classify her as attractive or good looking. Too egocentric in classifying girls as pretty. I am willing to classify Janine as good looking even if I never have any chemistry with her and never take her.

For my taste, Pamela had a far more attractive face than say Dina. Neither had the body that was really my spec. When classifying looks, the service level is just not relevant at all. Chemistry is partly relevant but we should try to evaluate looks dispassionately regardless of chemistry.

I can see that Evita is good looking to others, even she doesn't appeal that much to me personally. Sidonia might be good looking to some, mainly staring at the tits. LOL. Aurelia I can say is really cute pretty, regardless of her service level which varies a lot.

Shark16 is right that different aspects should get independent point score. You can't just give an overall score. It means little. I would treat all of these as separate: Face, Body, Service technique skills, Chemistry/GFE/fun/attitude, so at least 4 evaluation categories for me.

e.g. Bella: Face 9, body 8, skills 4, attitude 2.
Pamela: Face 8, body 5, skills 9, attitude 10.
Sascha: Face 7.5, body 7, skills 6, attitude 4.5
All gone girls.

[Ortos]

I picked the Pallas Hotel as my accommodation for this visit. I shall try and avoid it in the future.

Can you give details about why you find Pallas Hotel problematic? It might help somebody who is considering using this hotel in the future. Thanks.

[PussyLiccker]

I could not come in a 30 minutes session once in a blue moon. However, I always climax in one hour sessions. You try to tell us that you could not come in one hour session because you banged too many girls in one day. Why did you want to waste your money?

Can you explain to us why you take so damn long? Do you fuck for 1 HR non-stop? Is fucking lots of girls too gay for you?

[Member #4581]

Hmm I was not aware that I owed you any explanation of how I wasted my money. I will take note of what you said, and provide explanations accordingly.

Secondly, I did not try to tell you anything, I said exactly whatever I said. It is not very complicated. Perhaps you can fuck ten girls in a day and cum each time. I don't and I bet 99% of the people here don't.

Finally, plenty of people take multiple sessions for a variety of reasons, and they might not all finish in all the sessions. If you had been reading the reports here, there are several examples (one such example right here on this page). You might consider that a waste, and you are free to feel that way, but that does not make it so for others.

I could not come in a 30 minutes session once in a blue moon. However, I always climax in one hour sessions. You try to tell us that you could not come in one hour session because you banged too many girls in one day. Why did you want to waste your money?

[PussyLiccker]

I am capable of admitting some girl has a pretty face even if I don't like her personality.

Yes looks are involved in chemistry but the reverse is less so. A girl can be a good looking b*tch. Oase Marie was good looking but I had very low chemistry with her. She was just too business like. I can still admit she was good looking even if we did not go together well at all.

I think that goes for anybody. If she looks good, there is no denying it no matter how bad her attitude or service is. Marie looked pretty plain to me so I wasn't too eager to seek her out. People has pointed her out and told me she looks good, but just wasn't my type. How was she business like? Cassandra on the other hand was just my type, I had no hesitation. But, if there are no stand out girls in the crowd, it's not an easy choice. I just go with who ever is good enough looking if I'm looking to session. If I see a stand out girl, I will go with her to scratch the itch. We get spoiled when we have seen some stunning girls. Especially if you run into ones that provides good services.

Chemistry is certainly important. If a good looking girl provides avg service, unlikely to repeat. Repeaters are ideally great lookers that provide high services. Optics has a lot of weight for me. Even with string of good reports, I probably won't session a girl if she's not my type.

[Faceless78]

I think you guys forget "service" from your ranking systems. So, she is hot model material optically speaking and a superfriendly BFF, but is absolutely clueless about how to provide good sex. Would you repeat? To me looks, attitude and service are equally important. A good review should include all these elements. Also, a service review is just not about what services that were provided, but HOW the services were delivered (was the BBBJ any good? What fun is DFK without "passion"/illusion?).

From ISG's excellent abbreviations:

L / A / S Looks / Attitude / Service:
A subjective ranking system. Each criteria separately ranked, from lowest (1) to highest (10). Examples: 2/9/8 = Unnattractive, but very friendly and good sex. 10/5/4 = Model material, but a poor attitude, and mediocre sex.

- S16
Who still struggle to understand what Sirioja means by not finding "attractive" girls ...

I remember someone has brought up sth similar once, a ranking system like 5/6/7. The reason this kind of thing doesn't get popular is simple. First "we guys" never forget the service. Number of those who only care about face and body is rather small, normal people will pay attention to services and attitude. Read more posts then you'll see; also one big reason is that my 7/7/7 could be your 5/5/5 or 9/9/9. People sometimes get confused even when we only use simple words like pretty, slim, tall, young, how can we get all agreed on a specific score? You must know that people have different tastes and girls don't necessarily provide same service to everyone.

The best way is always go and find out by yourself.

[UShobbyist]

Why do yo say that? When I visit clubs - given that I am in Germany only a few times a year, I tend to visit 4 days straight - and do take 4,5 sessions each day, and on the very last day I end taking 6 or 7 since I am a bit sad that I will be leaving in a few hours. And yes, roughly half of those sessions are 30 min type, but the others are at least an hour, and sometimes more. But as HB said, the number of goals scored is rather low. In 4 days, can't be more than 7 to 8. Perhaps it could have been more in my younger days, but my glory youth is long past alas.

I could not come in a 30 minutes session once in a blue moon. However, I always climax in one hour sessions. You try to tell us that you could not come in one hour session because you banged too many girls in one day. Why did you want to waste your money?

[Frozty]

Wednesday, 7 October.

I arrived at Sharks at around 2. 30 pm after a less than smooth journey. Everything worked ok until I landed in Frankfurt at 11, but many annoying delays followed. Some self-inflicted.

Anyhow, I paid my 50 and washed up. The breakfast spread was disappointing, so I only had a few bites.

I hung out for a while chatting with, and saying no to, quite a few girls. Sylvanna was particularly insistent, and struggled to take "no, thanks" for an answer. She looked pissed off, to be honest.

First punt was Natalia, Ro. It was still earlier than I was planning my first session, but I really liked her look and sweet disposition. A petite body and very pretty face / smile, was too tempting to turn down. We took an hour and I enjoyed an ok session. She was great, but the chemistry was not quite right, possibly due to my fatigue from my journey.

I had been eyeing a blonde girl on and off for most of the afternoon, sure that it was Roxanna, but then not so sure. I had not seen her since July 2014, so the boob job and straight hair in a bun confused me. She obviously didn't remember me! Jessica showed up a little later and cleared things up. I met her at the same time, but she remembered my name, some of my life story, how many sessions we'd had, in which rooms and that Roxanna had joined us for one of the sessions. I find it remarkable when girls recall all this information.

After a while, I spent some time with Jessica. We fooled around on a couch for an hour or so and then spent another 90 minutes in the small mirror room. It was a really good session and Jessica made a real effort to please.

I had some dinner, which was ok, and left at 8 pm. I was disappointed not to see Luna (maybe she's on vacation), and now must decide whether to return to Sharks tomorrow or visit somewhere else. The lineup was good, but the girls were not very busy. There were quite a few more girls that I would be happy to session with. I suppose my problem is that I don't really like the Sharks environment when it is too cold for the garden. Plenty of men in attendance, but not so many taking the girls.

I picked the Pallas Hotel as my accommodation for this visit. I shall try and avoid it in the future.

[Shark16]

I think you guys forget "service" from your ranking systems. So, she is hot model material optically speaking and a superfriendly BFF, but is absolutely clueless about how to provide good sex. Would you repeat? To me looks, attitude and service are equally important. A good review should include all these elements. Also, a service review is just not about what services that were provided, but HOW the services were delivered (was the BBBJ any good? What fun is DFK without "passion"/illusion?).

From ISG's excellent abbreviations:

L / A / S Looks / Attitude / Service:
A subjective ranking system. Each criteria separately ranked, from lowest (1) to highest (10). Examples: 2/9/8 = Unnattractive, but very friendly and good sex. 10/5/4 = Model material, but a poor attitude, and mediocre sex.

- S16
Who still struggle to understand what Sirioja means by not finding "attractive" girls ...

[Sirioja]

There are plenty of attractive girls most times I attend. You obviously can't separate looks from chemistry. What you really mean is there are so few girls that you have any chemistry with. I can get a nice GFE from several attractive girls at Oase, meaning chemistry is going okay For me.

For me, 3 girls is my normal maximum and sometimes less. I can't see the point in so many sex sessions in a day. I try to have not too many absolutely "must do" girls. "Must do" girls leads to disappointment of missing out. Better to have multiple options. Most "must do" girls have left the clubs. Often they don't last long and disappear extremely quickly, before you ever get a chance to get bored with them.

Which is better? To fuck 7 girls in a single day, or to have 7 fucks spread over a week period? The first option is what we call "glut and famine". Not ideal at all and for me a waste of money. I prefer longer sessions rather than so many.

If not attracted by look, I can't have pleasure, even girl is very skillful like I was said for Pamela or smiling friendly Kelly. Just my tastes. When a girl attract me and is friendly, then I will try to get the best from her.

I have my experience to meet a girl as often she worked for 1 year.

I also prefer to take time to foreplay with girls rather than many rabbit fucking. If I lived in Germany, I would have FKK diner most of evenings and a GFE 1 hour room for "dessert" , before going to bed. For my many kilometers week end, when I have 1 good GFE room, I m just happy, even I prefer to have more.

[Exodus8]

So its more than obvious. Looks and chemistry are two different things. There are girls that I think are superb for chemistry, but I just don't repeat due to face or body not quite turning me on enough.

Different things, its the combination that makes you session with a particular girl.

Personally I must feel attracted to the girl lookwise (minimum requirements) for me to even consider taking her not to mention interact hence wouldn't know if the chemistry will be good.

Conclusion is that I might session with a hot biatch but not with a ugly angel, LOL. Ofcourse most of the time I try to find girls that fit both criteria.

Maybe some guys only care about looks, service or behavior in general.

[Syzygies]

Looks are involved in chemistry. There would be no chemistry without attraction. So he means it's a rarity to find an attractive girl that provides the services he's looking for. We don't all have the same taste or attraction to the same girls, so this depends on the particular girls we target. If our picks turn out to be the ones that don't provide a good time in the room or way too business oriented (upsellers), we can look elsewhere as there are plenty of clubs out there.

I am capable of admitting some girl has a pretty face even if I don't like her personality.

Yes looks are involved in chemistry but the reverse is less so. A girl can be a good looking b*tch. Oase Marie was good looking but I had very low chemistry with her. She was just too business like. I can still admit she was good looking even if we did not go together well at all.

I can admit Janine is good looking even if I never even talked to her once. Bella was an extremely pretty girl but chemistry was so bad, I cancelled after 15 minutes.

Some guys report a wonderful time with girls that are very average looking at best, perhaps even ugly to me.

So its more than obvious. Looks and chemistry are two different things. There are girls that I think are superb for chemistry, but I just don't repeat due to face or body not quite turning me on enough.

[Nille Copenhagen]

Looks are involved in chemistry. There would be no chemistry without attraction.

For me chemistry is more important than looks, but when both element are good the experience get to a higher level. And the more you know each other the better it gets.

Therefore I prefer longer sessions, sometime it felt like we have known each other for a while. I had very good chemistry with Scarlet, Helli, Madelena, Sidonia, Mia.

Basically I try to have good vibes with all the girls.

[Member #4581]

Why do yo say that? When I visit clubs - given that I am in Germany only a few times a year, I tend to visit 4 days straight - and do take 4,5 sessions each day, and on the very last day I end taking 6 or 7 since I am a bit sad that I will be leaving in a few hours. And yes, roughly half of those sessions are 30 min type, but the others are at least an hour, and sometimes more. But as HB said, the number of goals scored is rather low. In 4 days, can't be more than 7 to 8. Perhaps it could have been more in my younger days, but my glory youth is long past alas.

All those guys must be 50/30 guys. LOL.