Masion Close
 La Vie en Rose
 Sex Vacation

Thread: FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

+ Add Report
Page 17 of 2029 FirstFirst ... 7 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 27 67 117 517 1017 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 255 of 30434
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #30194
    Quote Originally Posted by HappyTour  [View Original Post]
    As I mentioned repeatedly in my previous posts that Selin (Celine) and Stacy are my current top favorites in Sharks. It seems that you start to smear them? LOL.

    Actually I am very happy if you guys don't like them. I would have more chance to get them.

    Yes, they both are expensive. 150/30 or 200/60. I did spend quite much money on them. Since I booked them in multiple-hour sessions, the average rate could be more cost-effective. I could easily cum 2-3 times and very relaxed and enjoyable during longer sessions.

    BTW, I am not bored with Catelea. I promised her to book her five-hours in next visit.
    I feel a bit guilty about my french friend when I told him about Celine when she was more fresh and for 100/30 at Oase, so, knowing how I m picky, he dreamed about her to pay 150/30 for only very average. Stacy asked him same, but he didn't go. I don't pay for such looks. Keep on paying for average, when I pay less expensive for much more woman images and higher level in bed than Katalea. If I fucked her like my Russian, she would cry.

  2. #30193
    Quote Originally Posted by HappyTour  [View Original Post]
    As I mentioned repeatedly in my previous posts that Selin (Celine) and Stacy are my current top favorites in Sharks. It seems that you start to smear them? LOL.

    Actually I am very happy if you guys don't like them. I would have more chance to get them.

    Yes, they both are expensive. 150/30 or 200/60. I did spend quite much money on them. Since I booked them in multiple-hour sessions, the average rate could be more cost-effective. I could easily cum 2-3 times and very relaxed and enjoyable during longer sessions.

    BTW, I am not bored with Catelea. I promised her to book her five-hours in next visit.
    I see now that the Salin I reviewed is the Celine / Seline that you all were speaking about.

    Now I understand for sure why she felt like she was worth more. We have guys who actually believe her or perhaps led her to believe this. She is the perfect example of a WG made to cater to entry level paid sex hobbyist. Pretty with a friendly personality but in the bedroom she is completely limited.

    I think I compared sex with her to the sex you have with your girlfriend from high school when no one really do what they were doing. The girl did not know how to properly suck a dick, just basic. Her hips had no rhythm when riding, not even much stamina. And when doggy or mish, she kept trying to hold the cock to prevent deep entry.

    She is the perfect example of what used to be a 50 euro optic fuck but now we have guys paying 200 per hour for this? She gets booked for multiple hours? What's happening in these long rooms? Watching Pokemon cartoons?

  3. #30192
    Quote Originally Posted by EscapeArtist  [View Original Post]
    Red Punk-Emo Melissa

    Mid to second half of twenties, former superstar but now looks a bit emaciated, tired even. Breast and butt are still near ideal but have lost their former pop, face more worn. Still a good room and much better deal when considering her asking price is no longer 50% above the others. She was good, but not that good. A- face and former A body but now more of a Be+ or perhaps A- body for my taste. Classy personality by Eastern European hooker standards. Service was A- but maybe A or A+ for guys who like a girl who can carry a conversation. She would probably make a good escort.

    Classic Blond Lori, formerly Loredona.

    Almost or is 25 yo, probably my favorite Sharks girl at the moment, nothing bad to say about her. All services offered. Offers both put-a-baby-in-me energy sex as well as Pornstar capabilities. She's a Be+ or A- face and an A- body for my facial / body preferences. Longer legs would put her over the top for me. Her torso is a little long for her legs. Maybe even a little more boobage would be nice. To me, she looks better when she has less make up / eyelash. Slightly hardened and a little bit cynical personality is in line with a civilian girl I would date in real life. A+++ service with me and generally overall good reviews from others, particularly from the German guys, probably because she got her start at a tiny local club near by. I have heard that she has had some mediocre rooms with non-regulars but have never heard of anyone saying they had a straight up bad room. Would like to try her older sister, Ginger, who is even prettier but is brunette with bigger boobs. Similar personality that is almost like a chill-AF American girl. It's a pleasure when they make their short tours, a shame that they are not there more often.

    Spinner brunette Yvette

    Now approaching 30 yo if not already, is a former regular. She now looks way too coked out, slightly anorexic, but 8 years of somewhat regular service affords me anything I want in the room. Former Be+ optics but now more of a Be- and perhaps even lower on days she's worn out. Personality is pretty great though, very inquisitive, tries to build a connection outside of the room first. Unfortunately her English has declined since the pandemic, perhaps from all the cocaine. Good thing she remains an A+ service with both GFE and PSE capabilities. Sensual and seductive is also in her repertoire. She does amazing things with a bottle of lotion. Let's me put any appendage in any hole. She's never a bad option when the line up is slim at the later hours when I'm needing reliable service for a difficult finish on my last room of the day. Small girl who can handle hard sex for a long time with enough energy to ride on top for more than just 2 minutes. Any appendage, any hole. Front, back, top, bottom, upside down. True spinner.

    Babysitter Blond Salin

    Tiny cheerleader looking type. Bright and pretty face with small breasts. Plump, baby-fat butt but not too big. 19 or 20 years old. Flirty and bubbly personality. Nothing remarkable for service. Would have been a great 50 e optic fuck years ago but for 100 e, her service is trash. Imagine being a high school guy and fucking a freshman girl. Would not repeat at current pricing.

    MILF Brunette ?Carolina?

    Late 20's, medium height, run-of-mill breast. Standard curves. Not old looking but would be a MILF category by porno standards. Seductive approach, promises the world in the room but in reality, not terrible, just standard service. Holds positions for too short of time. Too many "change positions". Too quick to go to doggy. Nothing intimate, nothing PSE. Also would have been a satisfactory 50 e room back in the day. Would not repeat at current pricing.

    See title. Same for those with grievances regarding price discussions.

    Let's start a trend. I gave some reviews of recent girls, maybe you can add some too. Funny though, a poster with some snarkiness, recently challenged me to post a review to which I directed him to a long review I just posted only 3 days prior. I couldn't seem to find yours though. Contributions regarding girls from someone like you who has a significant amount of experience would definitely be helpful to all and would definitely pump up the ratio of posts about specific girls to tangential discussions. I've noticed your gravitation toward AO clubs. I'm not into most of the girls at those types of clubs but I do appreciate the occasional AO find at a regular club. Personally, I would find that insight to be of particular interest, but would appreciate any insight into specific girls from a monger with as much experience as yourself.

    I'm with you though, let's jumpstart this trend of regular posters reviewing specific girls. We would get a better picture of quality and pricing for other regular mongers, not just reviews from infrequent mongers paying tourist prices with tourist standards.

    I actually don't have a lot of new girls at Sharks, much due to not trying many new girls since refusing the 200 e per hour rate and certainly not the ridiculous 150 per 30 m rate, with the few attempts at new girls turning out pretty unsatisfactory. Now with girls even asking 250 e for "premium" service with no bonafide extras, it's obvious they will keep hiking prices as guys keep paying them. Burning 50 e on an optic fuck or a Did-Not-Finish room is occasionally acceptable for me, but burning 100-200 e to try new girls with a higher probability of mediocre service than in years past is just silly for people other than young dudes or new mongers who haven't been in the hobby long enough to know how much great sex you can have in an FKK. Some think they know, but from what I've read about the girls I know, they're measuring by a different standard of expectations.

    It might be futile, and some don't like the price discussions, but I don't mind being the guy to constantly keep reminding lurkers who read but don't post of the exploitative price trends for a decline in services, hopefully pushing the silent readers in the direction of exploring other options rather than just feeding the Frankfurt Big Five / Big Three price exploitation machine. Guys keep paying at each increase, girls keep showing up at Sharks where you have to pay double near by rates, taking talent from other places. But like Switzerland, despite higher prices earned per room, girls would stop working there because when they could not make enough rooms consistently every day. Talked to a girl last weekend who said she makes more working at 50 euro German clubs than at 120 chf /138 e Swiss clubs so she chose the cheaper club settling for lower rates but more rooms. At Sharks, keep feeding the machine and girls keep taking advantage. But unlike Switzerland, the current situation leaves the monger with a bunch of overpriced yet over-fucked girls. Terrible situation all around.

    Anyway, here's a call to action for the guys requesting less tangents and more reviews. Are they men of action who actually fix problems or just complaining Karens asking to have a word with the manager?
    Even her face is aging, but Melissa is worthing highest value among this list for me, when so long time Loredana face is on same level for me than Brenda and too much tattoes, not my image for women. I m much more excited by woman images and I prefer so much more quality than quantity with average looks, when emptying is waste of money, when I want to pay only to dream. When at Sharks or Globe, so difficult for me to find only one attractive among quantity, but at GG, I have to organize between my 2 woman images telling me about the other and now also Arabic glamour, for those who ever experienced the fire of Arabic women. Really not same experience from few tours and being so often, I remember on 2016 when I was 5 days per week, but since covid lockdown, I became much pickier, not finding only one to pay for at Globe and cultural to pay only for quality, when I hate to waste for only average. Many girls might be right when telling me brothels are not for me, being too different they tell, probably why I don t want brothels friends, feeling too different for what I look for and behavior. Not at Sharks since Summer, but I still find quality and for 150/60+ with more than 10 rooms with both, so no reason to pay more expensive for lower image and GFE potential. Italia was funny turning angry on last time when she wanted I relax her for her day, but I have social hard work with her.

  4. #30191

    Tip

    Wait, wait. What about tip. I remember you guy was arguing over to tip or not to tip. Don't forget to tip. Can't wait until 300 for 30 minutes. The more you tip the sooner we will get there.

  5. #30190
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirioja  [View Original Post]
    My French friend was asked yesterday 150/30 for FK by Celine . . . . and Stacy. He didn't go, he was right, when I had 150/60 so GFE with a more impressive look elsewhere in Germany. These little Romanian types turned really crazy, when we can get German escorts for less expensive.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirioja  [View Original Post]
    He tried Celine for 150/30 , among quite poor casting for him, when he is less demanding than me for look and image. He was disappointed by quality, for too expensive, when Celine was more fresh with lighter make up for less expensive at Oase. Fortunately, he had better girls for less expensive on this week end at Sharks. Nadine is back. Most expensive don t mean the best at Sharks.
    Quote Originally Posted by HappyTour  [View Original Post]
    Stacy usually sits at the bar in front of the waterfalls near the German corner,
    Quote Originally Posted by HappyTour  [View Original Post]
    Currently Celine is the cutest girl in Sharks. She deserves 200/60.
    .
    As I mentioned repeatedly in my previous posts that Selin (Celine) and Stacy are my current top favorites in Sharks. It seems that you start to smear them? LOL.

    Actually I am very happy if you guys don't like them. I would have more chance to get them.

    Yes, they both are expensive. 150/30 or 200/60. I did spend quite much money on them. Since I booked them in multiple-hour sessions, the average rate could be more cost-effective. I could easily cum 2-3 times and very relaxed and enjoyable during longer sessions.

    BTW, I am not bored with Catelea. I promised her to book her five-hours in next visit.

  6. #30189
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirioja  [View Original Post]
    My French friend was asked yesterday 150/30 for FK by Celine who was more fresh with less make up and less expensive at Oase, and Stacy. He didn't go, he was right, when I had 150/60 so GFE with a more impressive look elsewhere in Germany. These little Romanian types turned really crazy, when we can get German escorts for less expensive.
    He tried Celine for 150/30 , among quite poor casting for him, when he is less demanding than me for look and image. He was disappointed by quality, for too expensive, when Celine was more fresh with lighter make up for less expensive at Oase. Fortunately, he had better girls for less expensive on this week end at Sharks. Nadine is back. Most expensive don t mean the best at Sharks.

  7. #30188
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirioja  [View Original Post]
    Sharks is for quantity you like, when I much prefer only 1 quality and I love to repeat weekly, but I agree most Sharks girls are now bad value for money compare to value still can be found elsewhere in Germany and prettier. Prettiest and best are now not for the most expensive. When I work into my deep GFE, I was asked yesterday: if you like a girl and if she stopped to work here, could you have her for GF outside? Weird embarrassing question while sex, so I answered: I live in Paris, when deep Rhur German escort who was a superstar, so busy in business, asking so much to meet, maybe she doesn't find another bad guy she can trust enough to ask to make her squirting, when we showered so much, laughing so much in bed. Can t experience such with too expensive Sharks little Romanians. My tip is extra for kissing mean few low level kiss, when those who are able to kiss like woman don't ask, but will tell you if you kiss good and ask for again if they like.
    For over 40 years, the purpose of an FKK as envisioned by the original concept at the original club Bernds, Rest in Peace, is to pay an entry, see a girl, have some public action. Fuck her in public or in private, Relax for some time, Socialize, Fuck another, maybe join in on some group stuff, have a drink or two as originally the girl would provide a beverage from the bar. Prices were supposed to be standard for all girls. None of this "not all girls are worth the same rate" nonsense. And for over 20 years, the purpose of internet paid sex forums has been to share information about sex workers, details of service, location, pricing, logistics.

    The purpose of FKK sauna clubs was never to romance a single hooker. The atmosphere was also a social living room atmosphere with a bar, pool, and sauna, to sex, relax, and socialize. Original mongers were actually intellectuals, not quite high society, but intellectuals who had discussions and socialized between sessions. Pricing was standard, not determined by perceived individual value. Likewise, the purpose of internet paid sex forums was to make use of advice and information provided by others, not to boost personal ego by scoffing at heeding, considering or following information and advice from others.

    I do have sympathy for people who can no longer cum more than once in a day. It's a sad reality all men eventually face as we get old. At that point, I suppose quantity becomes less important because when you only have one bullet in the chamber, you have to reduce the number of rooms as that one precious cum becomes more and more important. After all, you don't want to blow your single load on a mediocre room.

    But when you have some extra cum to spare, extra bullets in the chamber, then you can add variety, spray a little more rather than snipe in solitude. This makes quantity of women more attractive and affords a monger the ability add some lesser girls to the rotations. The loyal, single girl, reclusive monger is better suited to prowl the private scene, enjoying his own company, and paying variable prices of that world as he deems fit.

    At FKK sauna clubs, I like to have one number one GFE superstar at each club and at least 2 more optic fucks in order to get the full FKK experience. An ideal FKK day would be when the first room is pornstar experience with cum in mouth or cum on face / tits: quality. Then one or two optic-rabbit-frog fucks, lower quality of service can be forgiven in these rooms: quantity. Finally a longer room with the best GFE girl finishing with a cream pie to end the day: quality.

    When nature forces you to only have one finish, then I suppose quality is what I would choose also. Until then, both quality and quantity adds to a great FKK experience, the way it was meant to be.

  8. #30187
    Quote Originally Posted by EscapeArtist  [View Original Post]
    Yessir, but wait no more. I hope you find my recent review of a club not named Sharks helpful and inspire feedback from contributors who hope to contain the madness promoted by mongers who feed into the deterioration of the FKK scene by allowing Sharks hustlers to exploit mongers, bless their hearts, who just don't know any better. You may also find similar reviews in the Gold, Venus, and Oase threads. But if you really want it, I'm sure you can find my not so nice review of Sharks from a month or so ago too.

    Kind regards.
    Sharks is for quantity you like, when I much prefer only 1 quality and I love to repeat weekly, but I agree most Sharks girls are now bad value for money compare to value still can be found elsewhere in Germany and prettier. Prettiest and best are now not for the most expensive. When I work into my deep GFE, I was asked yesterday: if you like a girl and if she stopped to work here, could you have her for GF outside? Weird embarrassing question while sex, so I answered: I live in Paris, when deep Rhur German escort who was a superstar, so busy in business, asking so much to meet, maybe she doesn't find another bad guy she can trust enough to ask to make her squirting, when we showered so much, laughing so much in bed. Can t experience such with too expensive Sharks little Romanians. My tip is extra for kissing mean few low level kiss, when those who are able to kiss like woman don't ask, but will tell you if you kiss good and ask for again if they like.

  9. #30186
    My French friend was asked yesterday 150/30 for FK by Celine who was more fresh with less make up and less expensive at Oase, and Stacy. He didn't go, he was right, when I had 150/60 so GFE with a more impressive look elsewhere in Germany. These little Romanian types turned really crazy, when we can get German escorts for less expensive.

  10. #30185

    Great idea. But change by example rather than with complaints.

    Quote Originally Posted by Neurosynth  [View Original Post]
    Let's not confuse meta-discussion with actual content. More discussion of girls, less discussion about discussion.
    Red Punk-Emo Melissa

    Mid to second half of twenties, former superstar but now looks a bit emaciated, tired even. Breast and butt are still near ideal but have lost their former pop, face more worn. Still a good room and much better deal when considering her asking price is no longer 50% above the others. She was good, but not that good. A- face and former A body but now more of a Be+ or perhaps A- body for my taste. Classy personality by Eastern European hooker standards. Service was A- but maybe A or A+ for guys who like a girl who can carry a conversation. She would probably make a good escort.

    Classic Blond Lori, formerly Loredona.

    Almost or is 25 yo, probably my favorite Sharks girl at the moment, nothing bad to say about her. All services offered. Offers both put-a-baby-in-me energy sex as well as Pornstar capabilities. She's a Be+ or A- face and an A- body for my facial / body preferences. Longer legs would put her over the top for me. Her torso is a little long for her legs. Maybe even a little more boobage would be nice. To me, she looks better when she has less make up / eyelash. Slightly hardened and a little bit cynical personality is in line with a civilian girl I would date in real life. A+++ service with me and generally overall good reviews from others, particularly from the German guys, probably because she got her start at a tiny local club near by. I have heard that she has had some mediocre rooms with non-regulars but have never heard of anyone saying they had a straight up bad room. Would like to try her older sister, Ginger, who is even prettier but is brunette with bigger boobs. Similar personality that is almost like a chill-AF American girl. It's a pleasure when they make their short tours, a shame that they are not there more often.

    Spinner brunette Yvette

    Now approaching 30 yo if not already, is a former regular. She now looks way too coked out, slightly anorexic, but 8 years of somewhat regular service affords me anything I want in the room. Former Be+ optics but now more of a Be- and perhaps even lower on days she's worn out. Personality is pretty great though, very inquisitive, tries to build a connection outside of the room first. Unfortunately her English has declined since the pandemic, perhaps from all the cocaine. Good thing she remains an A+ service with both GFE and PSE capabilities. Sensual and seductive is also in her repertoire. She does amazing things with a bottle of lotion. Let's me put any appendage in any hole. She's never a bad option when the line up is slim at the later hours when I'm needing reliable service for a difficult finish on my last room of the day. Small girl who can handle hard sex for a long time with enough energy to ride on top for more than just 2 minutes. Any appendage, any hole. Front, back, top, bottom, upside down. True spinner.

    Babysitter Blond Salin

    Tiny cheerleader looking type. Bright and pretty face with small breasts. Plump, baby-fat butt but not too big. 19 or 20 years old. Flirty and bubbly personality. Nothing remarkable for service. Would have been a great 50 e optic fuck years ago but for 100 e, her service is trash. Imagine being a high school guy and fucking a freshman girl. Would not repeat at current pricing.

    MILF Brunette ?Carolina?

    Late 20's, medium height, run-of-mill breast. Standard curves. Not old looking but would be a MILF category by porno standards. Seductive approach, promises the world in the room but in reality, not terrible, just standard service. Holds positions for too short of time. Too many "change positions". Too quick to go to doggy. Nothing intimate, nothing PSE. Also would have been a satisfactory 50 e room back in the day. Would not repeat at current pricing.

    See title. Same for those with grievances regarding price discussions.

    Let's start a trend. I gave some reviews of recent girls, maybe you can add some too. Funny though, a poster with some snarkiness, recently challenged me to post a review to which I directed him to a long review I just posted only 3 days prior. I couldn't seem to find yours though. Contributions regarding girls from someone like you who has a significant amount of experience would definitely be helpful to all and would definitely pump up the ratio of posts about specific girls to tangential discussions. I've noticed your gravitation toward AO clubs. I'm not into most of the girls at those types of clubs but I do appreciate the occasional AO find at a regular club. Personally, I would find that insight to be of particular interest, but would appreciate any insight into specific girls from a monger with as much experience as yourself.

    I'm with you though, let's jumpstart this trend of regular posters reviewing specific girls. We would get a better picture of quality and pricing for other regular mongers, not just reviews from infrequent mongers paying tourist prices with tourist standards.

    I actually don't have a lot of new girls at Sharks, much due to not trying many new girls since refusing the 200 e per hour rate and certainly not the ridiculous 150 per 30 m rate, with the few attempts at new girls turning out pretty unsatisfactory. Now with girls even asking 250 e for "premium" service with no bonafide extras, it's obvious they will keep hiking prices as guys keep paying them. Burning 50 e on an optic fuck or a Did-Not-Finish room is occasionally acceptable for me, but burning 100-200 e to try new girls with a higher probability of mediocre service than in years past is just silly for people other than young dudes or new mongers who haven't been in the hobby long enough to know how much great sex you can have in an FKK. Some think they know, but from what I've read about the girls I know, they're measuring by a different standard of expectations.

    It might be futile, and some don't like the price discussions, but I don't mind being the guy to constantly keep reminding lurkers who read but don't post of the exploitative price trends for a decline in services, hopefully pushing the silent readers in the direction of exploring other options rather than just feeding the Frankfurt Big Five / Big Three price exploitation machine. Guys keep paying at each increase, girls keep showing up at Sharks where you have to pay double near by rates, taking talent from other places. But like Switzerland, despite higher prices earned per room, girls would stop working there because when they could not make enough rooms consistently every day. Talked to a girl last weekend who said she makes more working at 50 euro German clubs than at 120 chf /138 e Swiss clubs so she chose the cheaper club settling for lower rates but more rooms. At Sharks, keep feeding the machine and girls keep taking advantage. But unlike Switzerland, the current situation leaves the monger with a bunch of overpriced yet over-fucked girls. Terrible situation all around.

    Anyway, here's a call to action for the guys requesting less tangents and more reviews. Are they men of action who actually fix problems or just complaining Karens asking to have a word with the manager?

  11. #30184
    Let's not confuse meta-discussion with actual content. More discussion of girls, less discussion about discussion.

  12. #30183

    3 trips, 4 months

    I have been to Sharks 3 times in the last 4 months. Remarkably similar experiences every time. (All 100 4 30) Here are my notes for your consideration:

    1. Nico: Sits at the far end of the bar. She was my first. Excellent experience. She is curvy and natural. Smiles and makes sure you have a good time: WIR: Yes.

    2. Mina: Sits at the pole to the right as you enter. Small, think, short, and also an excellent experience. No kissing, but she is quite fun to hang out with. WIR: Yes.

    3. Bebe: By far the most attractive of anyone I have been with there. But it was only ok. Optic only. WIR: Maybe.

    4. Renata: Lips, tattoos, nipple piercings, and a genuinely fun and positive attitude. WIR: Maybe.

    5. Brenda: Think, huge naturals. (They hang a little). Very sweet and a good room. WIR: Yes.

    6. Katalya: Tall, thin, attractive. Mechanical. Spent all her time checking the condom. WIR: No.

    7. "C". A random I met by the aquarium. One of the beat rooms I have had. Nice, service oriented, real, down to earth. WIR: Yes. She asked I do not use your whole name here. She is very attractive, but not quite a stunner like many. I recommend her though.

    8. Met Stacy, but she was busy. She looked delicious.

    9. Could not find America.

    10. Lastly, there was a MILF / GMILF with huge cans by the bar near the restaurant. I wish I had stamnia for a fourth room, as there was something about her I liked.

    Thanks to the forum for all the data to help my visits.

  13. #30182
    When I give my information, I find it rewarding if other users "follow" and have a good experience. Or even if they heed warnings and avoid bad experiences. "Following" seems to be inherently built in to the purpose of forums meant to disperse information and spark discussions on a particular topic of interest, in this case, good and bad providers / clubs. Unless of course, the purpose of the forum is for readers to not follow advice or ignore previous experiences of other people who share similar hobbies. For example, some monger will give an entire club a great review because he's fixated by one girl. Or say if a monger have a very specific weakness for certain types of women. I mean some mongers will rave about a completely unattractive woman if she is able to blind his eyes by making him special. However, some rare mongers are able to give great advice tailored to specific tastes. I remember an older Colombian guy I met at Oase. He owned his own brothel in Colombia so maybe that was why he was able to accurately recommend 3 girls he figured I would like just after an hour of conversation. I went with 2 of them and he was dead on. On the other hand, I had a terrible experience at Living Room when one monger, who at the time I thought had considerable knowledge about the hobby, recommended a girl who turned out to be my worst room ever at the formerly great Living Room. Somehow the guy recommended a dead fish at a club that was known for GFE and girls catering to customers who took long rooms.

    On that note, I miss the days where you could practice good selection at Sharks and have a GFE experience for 50 e or spend 100 e for an hour and experience "get-her-pregnant" style sex. Now 100 e gets you 20 minutes of suck and fuck. 150 e may get you less than an hour of moderate effort and girls ask 200 e for the promise of their 22 year old girl version of a premium experience.

    TLDR summary,

    1. Following is inherently built into the purpose of these forums.

    2. What information and from what source to follow should be considered.

    3. Sharks is a tourist trap threatening the entire FKK scene.

    4. Perhaps more reviews of Sharks to promote bad shoppers to keep going to Sharks is a good thing as to keep these types of mongers from spilling over to the rest of the scene.

  14. #30181
    Quote Originally Posted by GiuseppeTrigli  [View Original Post]
    I am happy your laugh, really.

    Now I wait for a your recent review.

    Thank you.
    Yessir, but wait no more. I hope you find my recent review of a club not named Sharks helpful and inspire feedback from contributors who hope to contain the madness promoted by mongers who feed into the deterioration of the FKK scene by allowing Sharks hustlers to exploit mongers, bless their hearts, who just don't know any better. You may also find similar reviews in the Gold, Venus, and Oase threads. But if you really want it, I'm sure you can find my not so nice review of Sharks from a month or so ago too.

    Kind regards.

    Quote Originally Posted by EscapeArtist  [View Original Post]
    (On 31.01. 2024)

    NRW clubs hardly ever get any reviews.

    Penelope's been in my cheap club rotation for quite a while. Just like other clubs of the sort, don't expect Hessen decadence or optical quality but in a line up of 40 or so, there's usually 10 or so girls I find doable. Of those, 2-3 are automatically on my to-do list. Expect most rooms to be optic fuck quality without GFE or deep kiss but at the same time, those same rooms are usually not starfish / deadfish either. Girls just don't really do the "groom your customer for GFE long room" thing. Half the girls, I would never touch. Another 25% are the "last girl at the bar and you'll fuck anything because you're drunk and horny" type.

    The good thing is that you don't get all of the touristy upsells because well, there aren't that many tourists visiting the Dortmund area. BBBJ is pretty standard. DATY is hit and miss. And as mentioned, assume no for DFK. Optically, a handful of girls would make the top 10 at Sharks.

    Adella is a solid 8, maybe even a 9 for some guys. Perfect silhouette with tiny waste and ideal ass. Her tits are fake but maybe the best fake boobs you can ask for. I tried hard, but couldn't feel the silicone bag. Long hair brunette with pretty face but likely augmented lips. No kissing in short rooms but is likely on the table for longer rooms. She was occupied for at least 5 hours in a long room with a client. I doubt guys spend that much time in a room if FK was not offered...

  15. #30180
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirioja  [View Original Post]
    Not Laura, but Lara. DE since so long time at Sharks. 100/30 without real kissing or DATY is not good value, when I got elsewhere 2 real GFE 150/60 rooms with prettier on this week end. So GFE, Italia turned angry when I couldn't make her cum, when she wanted, interesting time, even not so relaxing. Making shaking Russian body was more relaxing.
    Yes Lara, correct.

    You are true: this is not a good value, I will not repeat.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Escort News
escort directory


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape