FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

[UShobbyist]

I went with very white skin Ayleen in 2018, she is not the best looking but her service is exceptional.

She worked in FKK mainhattan for about 5 years before she worked in Sharks. She had natural c cup tits when she worked in Mainhattan. She claimed that she was from Greece. LOL.

[Turgid]

.... But for this FKK service, it's very different. I actually prefer a girl who is fresh and amateurish and has very little experience (this makes sense from evolutional point of view). But this is just a difference in personal preference.

Such girls can be capricious with behaviors and idiosyncrasies resulting from inexperience that are incompatible with the P4P environment which can destroy my mood. I prefer to meet them as non-pros where I can mold them into agreeable sex partners.

[Saturn11]

Really? Different Sena? See below your post not while ago.

There is Senna, dark hair who around 26 from Moldova who sits near where Cami, Shirin & Romana sit, has worked there longer than those 3 though. I've only met her recently but she has given me very good service. I thought that was who Sirioja meant orginially but then as you quoted he said, blond white skin German ex Palace so clearly not her!

With so many girls it can be tough to know who you actually went with, plus they change their names, as you pointed out Celine is now Shirin and there is the ex-Oase Celine. I think Chloe called herself Catalea originally.

[HappyTour]

Sharing online info with girls to weasel a lower rate is a real dick move that slowly undermines the veracity of the board.

From above statement We could draw a conclusion that A 50 euros gap restricts cheap Charlie's comprehension and imagination. That guy doesn't understands what I mean.

[Sirioja]

Really? Different Sena? See below your post not while ago.

I knew Sena is 30+ yo service oriented woman with large tattoos. Not exact my type but might be your type.

Tara 30+ yo lady with silicone bra. Not natural but service-oriented women too.

As I remember you dislike tattoos and silie in your posts. Didn't you changed your taste?

But I always respect ladies. I know Tara and Sena. They are friendly.

I wonder if we visit same Sharks. Sena. Ro and Tara. Ro have almost no tattoo, 0 for Tara, 1 small for Sena. Also no silicon nor acid in lips, compare to Kity. Both are so far higher for sex than your so average top girls but maybe they are better for hugging or kissing neck than for caucasian sex, when I m sorry to be a fucker with a real size. Also, I doubt Alina or Sabrina would ask me 200/60 , when they ask me sometimes if I want. Melissa should also not be for 200/60 . Low level Bibi / Samira or Simona ask expensive. Sharks rule for You seems the most expensive for the lowest level, when can easily find German escorts for 200/60 or even less if they like You return to them. I hate to pay more expensive for lower quality and I would never buy a Dacia, when not my quality. But I had great elegant sensual Romanian natural woman types I repeated so often. More than 30 rooms with some. I look forward finding a new one.

[Sirioja]

Thanks very much Siri for sharing your philosophy. I now understand your English (I call it Siriojan) very well. I think Top 4 should be Katalea / Catalea, Kitty, Maria, Kloe / Chloe. I never met 3 of them, so it look forward seeing them.

It's interesting that we have different view on service value. When I go to a massage or dentist, Yes, I value them by their skill and the length of experience. But for this FKK service, it's very different. I actually prefer a girl who is fresh and amateurish and has very little experience (this makes sense from evolutional point of view). But this is just a difference in personal preference.

My first criteria to choose a girl when I m the pickiest according to girls is her image, not only her look, but after discovering, this is not enough to repeat, when I m a weekly repeating specialist. I can t say Kity or Katalea are on high level when they ask 200/60 or more, way too expensive for their level. For 150/60 , can find far higher level at Sharks and elsewhere. Same like in Switzerland, expensive don t mean quality at Sharks for others than Asians and tourist behavior. Kloe is too professionnal for me. Maria is mostly interesting for me to speak and I love so much to hear Russian, so erotic while sex for me. Looks at Sharks really don t impress me since mid June. More quantity than quality for me, so I visit once every 2 months rather than weekly, most often with 0 room like on 2 last visits on party.

[Sirioja]

I went with very white skin Ayleen in 2018, she is not the best looking but her service is exceptional.

I confirm not what I call a beauty and when she had big naturals, she really didn t need silicon. Long time in business.

[Turgid]

..... I can add Ayleen (Austria) for her sex appeal.....

I went with very white skin Ayleen in 2018, she is not the best looking but her service is exceptional.

[HappyTour]

Sena are not German.

Really? Different Sena? See below your post not while ago.

I knew Sena is 30+ yo service oriented woman with large tattoos. Not exact my type but might be your type.

Tara 30+ yo lady with silicone bra. Not natural but service-oriented women too.

As I remember you dislike tattoos and silie in your posts. Didn't you changed your taste?

But I always respect ladies. I know Tara and Sena. They are friendly.

Sena, blond white skin German ex Palace were for 100/60 for full GFE on 2021 after covid.
I had many times Katalea for 150/60 , the only one on 2021 . Rate really increased on 2022 . Supermodel 1,85.. . . .

[HappyTour]

I have 6 days visits in October and November. So my lineup and price information in my reports more or less provided current status at Sharks.

I agree with David1266 that anyone could share his top girls list if it is different from mine.

Further more, anyone could also disclose the names of girls in my list who quote me 200/60 but offer him 150/60. Then next time if I meet these girls again I would show evidence to these girls that they still accept 150/60. It would help all of us to keep price down and avoid surcharge. Otherwise. . .

I doubt some guys have not visited clubs for long time but still tirelessly engaged in posting to argue with others.

So I have to agree with Shark16 that Too many fake handles around ISG.

My answer was about this affirmation: "They all quote at least 100/30 200/60". I don't see what is subjective in this.

Too many fake handles around here.

[David1266]

First, we don t all have same eyes. Katalea, Kity, Kloe are quite pretty but many others on his list are not pretty for me when I m not into little Romanians looking like schoolgirl. I m much more excited by woman images and behavior in bed. Kloe appeared too professionnal for me. Katalea is now limited for sex, Kity is not interesting for sex, other than when she says she doesn t work like others. All 3 are too expensive for their potential for my GFE, when asking 200 or more for FK for 1 hour which is higher quality for me than 30 fast minutes. I m a foreigner, but for everything in my life, I m only interested by quality and I don t think they are highest quality at Sharks, compare to Sena. Ro or Tara. Ro who are for less expensive and so far higher level in bed, with really great BJ for one when she wants to please You back. Matter if You play tourist just hugging, or a bit professionnal like at job and a fucker, when I hate to waste my money for only average level. At GG, I get more elegant and higher GFE for less than 150 for 1 hour in the most beautiful rooms in FKK land. Why would I pay more expensive to get lower quality at Sharks or Globe. 0 room on my 2 last visits at Sharks, on Saturday or Sunday party. 0 room on my 2 2023 Globe visits, but I m more picky and demanding, from my past girlfriends, than most in FKK land. For example, I almost can t find anymore attractive escorts among Ukrainians and Russians in Paris, so I let You imagine for little Romanians at Sharks or Globe. On the other hand, I see some pretties at Oase, Nadia, Andra, 3 I don t like much behavior. At Sharks, seem now best quality is not among most expensive, when I doubt little Simona can compete in bed with Sena, as I doubt I could enter in her.

Thanks very much Siri for sharing your philosophy. I now understand your English (I call it Siriojan) very well. I think Top 4 should be Katalea / Catalea, Kitty, Maria, Kloe / Chloe. I never met 3 of them, so it look forward seeing them.

It's interesting that we have different view on service value. When I go to a massage or dentist, Yes, I value them by their skill and the length of experience. But for this FKK service, it's very different. I actually prefer a girl who is fresh and amateurish and has very little experience (this makes sense from evolutional point of view). But this is just a difference in personal preference.

[David1266]

Girls' quote is subjective too. They change price depending on customers (rich travelers vs local people, for example), or how busy it is.

But in general, top girls always quote me at least 100/30, 200/60 also, although I never met Catalea or Maria.

Thanks for providing names, this is very helpful. I never heard of Ayleen before. She is different from Julia who is a Romanian who speaks fluent Austrian, right?

My answer was about this affirmation: "They all quote at least 100/30 200/60". I don't see what is subjective in this.

If we speak about Optics Top 3, yes that it's something else and it can change everyday, depending on my mood. But I tend to be agree with Happytour on this subject : Maria (ukr), Catalea (ro), Kitty (ro) or Ariana (sp) are beautiful. I can add Ayleen (Austria) for her sex appeal, Kendra (ro) for her pretty teeny look. The same for Ginger. Melissa, Senna or Stacy have also something special and attractive. This is what I think today. Tomorrow I can have a total different choice, depending on my subjectivity.

[GuyFromParis]

Happytour is specifically using a phrase "I believe", which means that it's his subjective opinion and he is NOT stating that as "universal fact" as you claim. "Beauty" is always subjective.

But these three girls are also mentioned by many others as top girls.

Anyway, can you also share your Optics Top3 if it's different from Happytour's list? Optics, not sex skill top 3.

My answer was about this affirmation: "They all quote at least 100/30 200/60". I don't see what is subjective in this.

If we speak about Optics Top 3, yes that it's something else and it can change everyday, depending on my mood. But I tend to be agree with Happytour on this subject : Maria (ukr), Catalea (ro), Kitty (ro) or Ariana (sp) are beautiful. I can add Ayleen (Austria) for her sex appeal, Kendra (ro) for her pretty teeny look. The same for Ginger. Melissa, Senna or Stacy have also something special and attractive. This is what I think today. Tomorrow I can have a total different choice, depending on my subjectivity.

[Sirioja]

Valeria. It at GG for 140/60 . Sena. Ro, Tara. Ro at Sharks for 150/60 . I keep my best for me when she is old Germans superstar. Zayra. Ro and Melisa. Ro at Freubad.

Zayra who is ex Imperium refuse public sex, maybe why she left Imperium, but Valeria. It seems now to perform in kino, for sure losing elegance even elegant glamourous look.

[Sirioja]

This Happytour list is very helpful for newbie like me. I noticed that You (Siri) judge girls based on their "sex skill", you are very demanding like "Sex Connoisseur". But Optics and "sex skill" are different. I am curious, if you pick Top 3 girls purely on "optics", without considering sex skill on bed, who would be? For majority of people, I believe optics is more important than sex skill.

First, we don t all have same eyes. Katalea, Kity, Kloe are quite pretty but many others on his list are not pretty for me when I m not into little Romanians looking like schoolgirl. I m much more excited by woman images and behavior in bed. Kloe appeared too professionnal for me. Katalea is now limited for sex, Kity is not interesting for sex, other than when she says she doesn t work like others. All 3 are too expensive for their potential for my GFE, when asking 200 or more for FK for 1 hour which is higher quality for me than 30 fast minutes. I m a foreigner, but for everything in my life, I m only interested by quality and I don t think they are highest quality at Sharks, compare to Sena. Ro or Tara. Ro who are for less expensive and so far higher level in bed, with really great BJ for one when she wants to please You back. Matter if You play tourist just hugging, or a bit professionnal like at job and a fucker, when I hate to waste my money for only average level. At GG, I get more elegant and higher GFE for less than 150 for 1 hour in the most beautiful rooms in FKK land. Why would I pay more expensive to get lower quality at Sharks or Globe. 0 room on my 2 last visits at Sharks, on Saturday or Sunday party. 0 room on my 2 2023 Globe visits, but I m more picky and demanding, from my past girlfriends, than most in FKK land. For example, I almost can t find anymore attractive escorts among Ukrainians and Russians in Paris, so I let You imagine for little Romanians at Sharks or Globe. On the other hand, I see some pretties at Oase, Nadia, Andra, 3 I don t like much behavior. At Sharks, seem now best quality is not among most expensive, when I doubt little Simona can compete in bed with Sena, as I doubt I could enter in her.