"Germany
OK Escorts Barcelona
Escort News
escort directory

Thread: FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

+ Add Report
Page 711 of 2030 FirstFirst ... 211 611 661 701 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 721 761 811 1211 1711 ... LastLast
Results 10,651 to 10,665 of 30442
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #19792
    Some quite busy girls left to more expensive business on FRA tour, because too many girls at Sharks and not enough business, they say.

    Another FRA club is quite interesting at the moment, with woman types.

  2. #19791

    Trip report

    It has been a while since last time I was in Sharks, Came around 6 pm on Thursday night. To be honest, Thursday is really not a good day for girls or guys. Girls to guys ratio are 5:1 and most of the girls are not that popular on this forum. All the girls just sit around and looked around, because there were not many customers around. The weather was great but too bad Sharks shut down outside BBQ last week. Friday was better, more girls and guys. Arrived around 7 pm and it was busy. Sessioned with Helen and Francesca. Is it me or what, just feel like girls do not move very often now in Sharks. There was a couple of time when I girls approach me and when I turn around and they see my face, they would say:" Oh, it is you again, bye". For people who is wondering if Amelia and her twin sister, they are back.

    Sharks is really lack of talent those days, miss the good old days two, three years ago or even one year ago. Before the management decided to let all girls come to work without any screening, the number of girls just increased exponentially.

    Anyway, talked to the bartenders and girls I used to know, make me feel like it is good to come back. Not sure for other guys who come to sharks, maybe they live close by so they could hang out with their friends, maybe they have their favorite girls. But for me, I am that kind of person like to go to one place for a long time and also establish some friendly relationship with staff and some of the girls in Sharks even though flying 8 hours one way from the US is a real pain in the neck.

  3. #19790
    Quote Originally Posted by MaxSquatter  [View Original Post]
    I've always liked some pubic hair on women. It seems to be trending more now. I've been to several FKK's but never seen a pube on a woman. Any pube sightings at Sharks? Haha.
    I too have always liked such, I remember the days when their hair used to poke thru their bikinis on the beaches and pools growing up and loved it. Probably my favorite porn star back than, Hyapatia Lee (sp?) and many others had large puffy bushes and I always liked the visuals of their soaked pubes either in dripping cum or their own natural juices. Not sure how many guys would remember but these were the days of I think was called the Betamax prior to DVDs and the remote control was a hand held attached to a cord, was kind of annoying compared to today's technology. However, not really my thing anymore although might be a pleasant surprise one day in DE to find such; perhaps there are some girls known for bushes.

    I know a lot of American escorts over the years have told me pubic lice / crabs are one reason they constantly shave more so wax to avoid razor burns as to limit the chances of crotch critters. A friend once told me a very well known Shark in fact told him she often with hairy clients would take a paper towel out and make a hole in the center and put it over his cock for both the blowjob to avoid hair in the mouth and also when riding them as not to constantly grind on hair.

    This was actually ironically told to me also by one of the mob bosses in Mainhatten she and others often do this. She also told me they like to be on top not only to control the speed and depth of the penetration of guys cocks but also to not ride the bottom 2 inches or so to avoid their skin coming in contact with hair if no paper towel is being used as a barrier. She also told me they like to ride hairy guys preferably followed by doggie and missionary last as it allows for the least grinding of hair in to their pussy regions.

  4. #19789
    No room with her but Roxy, sitting under fishes, has really lovely and sweet behavior. If she behave the same for sex, for club rate, if you like her look, a nice girl.

  5. #19788

    Planning a Sharks trip Oct 19 and 20.

    It looks like I will be in Frankfurt on Oct 19 and 20. This will be my 4th trip. Anyone else from here in attendance that weekend? I usually take some time in between rooms and the girls tend to leave me alone when they see I am not looking. Might be nice to have someone to chat with during the down time.

    I saw a report that Roxy is back, so I am looking forward to seeing her again. Anyone know what happened to Emina? Short blond hair and a member of the fish tank crew. Last I saw her was in March.

  6. #19787

    Pubes?

    I've always liked some pubic hair on women. It seems to be trending more now. I've been to several FKK's but never seen a pube on a woman. Any pube sightings at Sharks? Haha.

  7. #19786
    Quote Originally Posted by Optimist  [View Original Post]
    So many times I have been unhappy with optics, when really it was all in my head for the reasons you say. I think estimates of optics are 50% mood related. Having said that, as with "superstar" or "catastrophe" girls there is some general consensus: for example, optics wise Sharks is better than Dietzenbach. But Sharks vs Oase vs World is not so easy (although most agree that the larger line up at the first two gives better optics).
    Mood definitely plays a factor when assessing optics, but it can only do so much. I'd liken it to comparing wines. If someone poured me glasses from a 100 EUR bottle and a 150 EUR bottle, it would be hard for me to differentiate. Mood might influence how I evaluate each. But if someone poured me a really cheap wine, I would be able to instantly identify it as lower quality. The taste would be so markedly inferior to the other two, that I'd come to the same conclusion even if my mood was extremely good.

    Quote Originally Posted by BananaBoi  [View Original Post]
    I notice guys indicating lineups are bad when 1 or 2 of their favorite girls aren't there.
    With regards to "favorites status", I've seen it where one monger's opinion about a specific WG's optics can change within a short period of time (2-3 months). I was sitting with another monger recently and he started talking about how pretty a WG's face was. I remember thinking "She looks exactly like she did three months ago. But last time, you told me she was not attractive enough for you to session". The only thing that changed is the fact that this WG now smiles more at this particular monger or flirts with him more. I've seen the opposite happen as well.

    When assessing optics, I try my best to focus on optics (not how good the service was, not how nice a WG is to me, not if she is my favorite). When I used to rate Sharks as the best LU, it was due to Lea and Diana. The former was a favorite. The latter I only sessioned once. But I found myself staring at both all the time. Even though Lea and I had a falling out and we ignore each other now, I still stare at her when she is not looking. And I have no problem admitting she is still the top optic for me in FKK land.

    One or two WGs make a difference with regards to how I see the LU, because sometimes they are only 2-5 that really stand out optically. So if someone were asking me to compare the optics between Sharks and Acapulco, I would probably instinctively compare the top five Sharks WGs against the top five Acapulco WGs. If top two are on holiday, well that makes a difference. At really small clubs, two girls missing will have a significant impact.

  8. #19785
    Quote Originally Posted by Optimist  [View Original Post]
    Exactly. That's why I encourage new members to make their own explorations to find out what suits them.

    So many times I have been unhappy with optics, when really it was all in my head for the reasons you say. I think estimates of optics are 50% mood related. Having said that, as with "superstar" or "catastrophe" girls there is some general consensus: for example, optics wise Sharks is better than Dietzenbach. But Sharks vs Oase vs World is not so easy (although most agree that the larger line up at the first two gives better optics).
    3 or 5 years back it was difficult to choose but today for me \shark is the best, Oase and World can t renew enough their LU so many veteran girls in World like Alina, Dianna, Alexandra. And too many cheating girls like Cheyenne or Raissa. For me the only is Shark even the LU is also getting worse.

  9. #19784
    Quote Originally Posted by McAdonis  [View Original Post]

    Mongers preferences can be extremely different. I only learned this AFTER I started to speaking to other mongers and really listening (many had to explain their viewpoints to me more than once). Sometimes extremely small things that seem trivial and unimportant to you, can make a huge difference to how someone else might perceive the line-up. In other words, most mongers cannot objectively evaluate the LU for looks. A single bad experience or a good experience can cloud their judgement.

    I don't think I can objectively evaluate Sharks LU for optics. I recently attended Sharks twice within a six day span. On the latter visit, I counted about 15 WGs who I had previously done before. But of those 15, many were not repeatable or I had just done them recently and I wasn't in the mood yet to repeat them again. I did not find any fresh, young attractive ones. This caused me to leave the club that day with the impression that the optics are "down", because nobody excited me that day. But if I had been a newbie attending Sharks that first time, my perception of the optics would have been completely different. I would have been excited by the optics because I would have had 15 WGs on my to-do-list.
    Exactly. That's why I encourage new members to make their own explorations to find out what suits them.

    So many times I have been unhappy with optics, when really it was all in my head for the reasons you say. I think estimates of optics are 50% mood related. Having said that, as with "superstar" or "catastrophe" girls there is some general consensus: for example, optics wise Sharks is better than Dietzenbach. But Sharks vs Oase vs World is not so easy (although most agree that the larger line up at the first two gives better optics).

  10. #19783
    Quote Originally Posted by LaBambaBoy  [View Original Post]
    Optimist, makes sense to me. My next trip (months away) I'll have a car, and since I already experienced Sharks and Mainhattan, I am going to explore some of the smaller clubs. Dietz for sure (sounds like exactly my kind of seedy, an interesting alternative to the RLD), and then maybe Caribic or Bahama or Palace. Perhaps a visit to Treff188? Then capping it all off with a trip to Oase, or a night back at Sharks. Finca I had not heard of- 2 hour drive is not unreasonable.

    Very tough to see what will appeal without going yourself, I understand that. I would say one thing that matters is how I will fare speaking English only, ugly american that I am. But yeah, I learned long ago you have to allow for bad experiences if you want to have new experiences.
    As far as I know English is sufficient almost everywhere in the FFM area. Less so in some of the smaller NRW clubs. Of course a few words of German or Romanian makes a good impression in some clubs.

    Enjoy your exploring.

  11. #19782
    Quote Originally Posted by Jnpr30  [View Original Post]
    There is the aspect that our tastes do not match. A guy that likes Brazilian and latino types might go into a club, see girls fully to his liking and very likely I would not like that same place given that my preference tends to be young, fresh faced, smaller butt, small tit, slender petite, cute faced types.

    Then there is the other aspect that guys somehow can't separate optics and service objectively. As BB said below. This is something that guys ought to be able to do, but somehow don't. So, they go into a club, don't get good service, don't see their fav girls and report that optics are down. I agree with BB, optics in a club don't change significantly day to day in a short amount of time, except for the larger number of girls on the weekend.

    Sometimes I read here that optics in Sharks are down, or that ooh suddenly a lot of hot gazelles are in the club and then I visit the club in a day or two after that, and to me not much has changed from my prior visit 3 or 4 months ago and looks and service levels are broadly the same.
    Sorry but today in Shark you have a lot of veteran prostitutes even they are young they worked before in several other clubs, why I can say that it is just that I am retired, therefor plenty of time to visit clubs, and saw them in the other clubs. Last week was sunny and believe me under the sun light many girls were looking under 5, fake boobs, fat, some belly, Botox, hair extension, skin problem only a very few were beautiful for me which means young, fresh, more or less new in the business, nice skin, no bobox or sili, in summary a natural beauty not fake. The new law and the improvement of the economical situation is reducing the number of new girls entering the business. Some of them prefer a sugar daddy or doing escort and not getting fucked 10 or 15 times per day by any kind of guy able to put 50 or 100 euro on the table.

  12. #19781
    There is the aspect that our tastes do not match. A guy that likes Brazilian and latino types might go into a club, see girls fully to his liking and very likely I would not like that same place given that my preference tends to be young, fresh faced, smaller butt, small tit, slender petite, cute faced types.

    Then there is the other aspect that guys somehow can't separate optics and service objectively. As BB said below. This is something that guys ought to be able to do, but somehow don't. So, they go into a club, don't get good service, don't see their fav girls and report that optics are down. I agree with BB, optics in a club don't change significantly day to day in a short amount of time, except for the larger number of girls on the weekend.

    Sometimes I read here that optics in Sharks are down, or that ooh suddenly a lot of hot gazelles are in the club and then I visit the club in a day or two after that, and to me not much has changed from my prior visit 3 or 4 months ago and looks and service levels are broadly the same.

  13. #19780
    I notice guys indicating lineups are bad when 1 or 2 of their favorite girls aren't there. We can be at the same club 2 days in a row and first night is great and second night bad yet the lineups are essentially the same less 1 or 2 favorites missing. It wasn't like there were a few new hot girls on the first night opposed to the second visit.

  14. #19779
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBuddy69  [View Original Post]
    I've never been to Oase but in sharks, the looks of the girls are not so different than in Acapulco.
    I only report what others have told me. I think that many who have been to both Acapulco and Sharks would disagree with you.

    Mongers preferences can be extremely different. I only learned this AFTER I started to speaking to other mongers and really listening (many had to explain their viewpoints to me more than once). Sometimes extremely small things that seem trivial and unimportant to you, can make a huge difference to how someone else might perceive the line-up. In other words, most mongers cannot objectively evaluate the LU for looks. A single bad experience or a good experience can cloud their judgement.

    I don't think I can objectively evaluate Sharks LU for optics. I recently attended Sharks twice within a six day span. On the latter visit, I counted about 15 WGs who I had previously done before. But of those 15, many were not repeatable or I had just done them recently and I wasn't in the mood yet to repeat them again. I did not find any fresh, young attractive ones. This caused me to leave the club that day with the impression that the optics are "down", because nobody excited me that day. But if I had been a newbie attending Sharks that first time, my perception of the optics would have been completely different. I would have been excited by the optics because I would have had 15 WGs on my to-do-list.

  15. #19778
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBuddy69  [View Original Post]
    I've never been to Oase but in sharks, the looks of the girls are not so different than in Acapulco. The facilities are clearly superior bur I don't give a shit about the sauna or the swimming pool.
    Hessen was high level in 2014 to Summer 2016 , without upselling at Sharks or World or Mainhattan, except at Oase and Palace, but since September 2016 I find prettier girls in NRW and at YY NL, with higher level in bed, full GFE for 50/30 mn.

    Hessen is now touristic land, average level is for tourists, girls are on clients demanding level.

    Fortunately, anywhere, can sometimes find a girl You make improve for You, but beauties are more and more rare in Germany, to be motivated to spend money. Gap is wider and wider with Globe level, when some little girls ask for nearly same rate, do they think they are top beauty or top performer? From my little experience, smart and high level girls don't upsell, and I had many top girls in NRW or Hessen.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
 Sex Vacation


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape