German FKK Clubs - Lounge and chat area

[Pessimist]

Normally I have my company phone which has unlimited data and voice usage globally. But I also have a 2nd phone that is on my personal plan. When I travel abroad I power down my personal device or use it in WiFi only or even use my company phone to tether my personal phone. I need my personal phone because I don't like to do my amorous activities including checking out ISG from my business phone.

Occasionally I have paid international on my personal device. But as you said overage charges are excessive. Since there is no prior agreement between you and them, your telco carrier is at liberty to suck every last ounce of your blood.

One solution is to sign up for a international plan before you leave. I have Verizon but I know AT&T has a similar plan and very likely Sprint and TMo do too. They charge 10 bucks a day for unlimited data and voice usage. Verizon also has a monthly plan which costs 50 I think. So if you are in DE more than 5 days, can sign up for that as opposed to the daily $10 plan.

I have not used a local sim which is probably much cheaper. However I am not sure how easy it is for an American tourist to obtain a temporary or even a permanent German SIM. Worth exploring. Perhaps you should buy a unlocked phone first and then load it with a local sim at the airport, assuming registration is not onerous.

[Kosher Kowboy]

I don't know how European phone plans work if within the EU if there is unlimited data or not so maybe this applies more to the guests from North America and Asia. I just opened my e-mail and saw my Sprint Bill (forgot to pay it last month) was not double it's usual two month price but just over triple. I get hit with whatever this shit is:

Overage: 2.5807 GB Additional Wireless Data Roaming. Germany.

Overage: 0.0517 GB Additional Wireless Data Roaming. Netherlands.

I set my phone to the proper settings per Sprint support. They told me a few months ago to turn all my e-mails, apps etc. Off ' auto grab' so you actually have to open the app or the email for it to pull data and turn off the notifications as well on all messenger apps; he said just turning the phone off won't prevent this ' grabbing. '.

I am on average 7-12 days in Germany a month now with two very long stays planned this year. Do I need to buy a German phone like some shit burner phone and pay with minutes as you go and install the apps I need? One of the Gypsies tells me her phone is a pre-paid everything which sounds like a TracPhone type thing here where you just buy refill cards.

Sprint tried to sell me some plan that is like $120 more per month but I think they are upselling me!

If anyone knows the solution to this please feel free to make any suggestions. My SMS to folks in the states, WhatsApp, Facebook IM, AOL and Gmail as well as the internet are what I mainly use and where there is Wifi including riding on The Creampie Express and other trains I use I am on WiFi too although it switches to ' LTE' or ' 3 G' often without me noticing. Same in the hotel; Sprint tells me this is not the phone that the hotel WiFi is too many users on it will also boot folks and / or since it requires log ins if you are logged in to your laptop and phone it will boot one or the other. Perhaps he is bullshitting me on that too. He told me a SIM card won't make a difference but perhaps he is bullshitting on that too in order to sell me a new plan.

Sorry I am not technically up to date, I am still living in the Ice Age when it comes to this stuff.

[Pessimist]

Good points. Different guys are into different types of girls. Some enjoy fucking tattooed trashy type girls, some like me prefer without tattoos classic beauty types. Those liking tattooed girls are closer to the reality, as you say this is a vice market. Too bad for guys like me as classy beautiful girls without tattoos are becoming rare these days. But when I do find one (eg last month), she provides ten times better sex with me than few of the trashy ones I happen to be ever with. Of course, YMMV as usual.

I too prefer no tat girls. But I wonder if the sex is better with one vs the other. To your claim that the no tat girl provided 10 times better sex, it may simply be that you are 10 times more attracted to her cleaner skin tone and looks and this drives your excitement levels up; and sex feels more pleasurable.

We all know that the human brain is the biggest sex organ in the body and dick and pussy are more extensions of that organ.

But on purely sexual service issues, is there any true correlation between tats or lack of and service talent / enthusiasm / energy level of the girl? I doubt it. On this thread, the guys who like tattooed girls are claiming that such girls provide better service and guys preferring no tat girls think such girls provide better services. Surely both groups of these guys can't be right, can they? Does one group of girls suck better, take the whole dick in mouth, apply more spit, kiss more and with tongue, have better oral hygiene, take doggie better without arching and so on and on? Very very doubtful that girls can split into 2 different service levels on all those parameters just using tattoo as a variable. In my view, guys have visual preference for one or the other, and they simply extrapolate their own excitement thus derived from optimal optics to an overall service level.

[Gino02]

Eurh ... I for one donate my hard-earned money to lover girls (that's why I am on this forum). But I still consider I know what's best for me. What is best for me is getting what I want. I assume the same for these girls.

I also hinted that tattoed girls are statistically more likely to provide awsome service. Who needs girls who are "responsible"? Being "more responsible" is not conducive to good service in girls IMO. Neither is having a college degree or being a teetotaller. This is a vice market.

Maybe tattooed girls understand their body is done anyway once they hit 40. So why not enjoy it while it lasts? This is cleverer than take student loans into their thirties to become unemployed, complain there are no more good men and desperately try to get pregnant after 45.

Good points. Different guys are into different types of girls. Some enjoy fucking tattooed trashy type girls, some like me prefer without tattoos classic beauty types. Those liking tattooed girls are closer to the reality, as you say this is a vice market. Too bad for guys like me as classy beautiful girls without tattoos are becoming rare these days. But when I do find one (eg last month), she provides ten times better sex with me than few of the trashy ones I happen to be ever with. Of course, YMMV as usual.

[XXL]

You mean these tattooed working girls, e. G. In FKKs, know what's better for them financially? Same girls who would rather make 300 e in a day by sticking to upselling routines than making 1000 e per day by providing good standard services? Or donating their hard earned money to pimps and lover boys?

Eurh ... I for one donate my hard-earned money to lover girls (that's why I am on this forum). But I still consider I know what's best for me. What is best for me is getting what I want. I assume the same for these girls.

I also hinted that tattoed girls are statistically more likely to provide awsome service. Who needs girls who are "responsible"? Being "more responsible" is not conducive to good service in girls IMO. Neither is having a college degree or being a teetotaller. This is a vice market.

Maybe tattooed girls understand their body is done anyway once they hit 40. So why not enjoy it while it lasts? This is cleverer than take student loans into their thirties to become unemployed, complain there are no more good men and desperately try to get pregnant after 45.

[Takedown]

Try doing a survey across FKKs and see which girls are financially well positioned after working even as little as one year. You will see the effect of different personalities between girls with and without tattoos. In my experience, girls without tattoos are more responsible types about their future, exactly why they don't like to put some intentional permanent scars or marks on their body that is nearly impossible to remove when that goes bad years later or they don't like anymore, besides potentially losing business.

To be fair, in the WG population, over 50% if not 75-80% of the girls have tattoos. I can't think of a "responsible" WG that didn't have a tattoo. My thoughts are that your claim only holds up if you're thinking from a western, civilian, 20th century state of mind. The problem is that we're talking about Eastern European, 21st century working girls.

[Rithro]

Hello everyone. I need to be in Germany for the first time ever and am trying to determine in which city I should spend my free time in to visit a FKK Club. Of Munich, Hamburg and Frankfurt which would you recommend?

I second Gino's recommendation. Thirty km north of Frankfurt Hbf is Oase. Thirty km south is Sharks. Within Frankfurt are Mainhattan and Palace. Of these, I've only been to Sharks, but had a good time.

NRW-I just visited LivingRoom for the first time and I was fortunate enough to have some fantastic sex with a stunning young woman. I wrote a report from the perspective of a first-timer here:

http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/...234&viewfull=1#post2314234.

When I go back I want to try GoldenTime based on recommendations. Last year I visited Samya, just south of Koeln, and enjoyed it. Would go back.

[Pistons]

The big tattoo lining the breasts may be for hiding a conspicuous breast implant scar.

I like tattoos because to me they mean a girl has mileage and is a wicked sex machine. I think girls would not get tattoos if mongers generally disliked tattoos. Girls usually know which side their bread is buttered on.

It all depends on the tattoo. Most tattoos are pretty harmless. But at certain sizes they harm more than less.

It is like kitch body art if done right, or a drunk bikers gut, if done wrong. I have seen both, on girls and guys. And sometimes I wonder if the line is drawn at 50%. Or maybe the bad examples just stand out more.

[Gino02]

Girls usually know which side their bread is buttered on.

You mean these tattooed working girls, e. G. In FKKs, know what's better for them financially? Same girls who would rather make 300 e in a day by sticking to upselling routines than making 1000 e per day by providing good standard services? Or donating their hard earned money to pimps and lover boys?

Try doing a survey across FKKs and see which girls are financially well positioned after working even as little as one year. You will see the effect of different personalities between girls with and without tattoos. In my experience, girls without tattoos are more responsible types about their future, exactly why they don't like to put some intentional permanent scars or marks on their body that is nearly impossible to remove when that goes bad years later or they don't like anymore, besides potentially losing business.

[Gino02]

Hello everyone. I need to be in Germany for the first time ever and am trying to determine in which city I should spend my free time in to visit a FKK Club. Of Munich, Hamburg and Frankfurt which would you recommend?

Frankfort first, then drive around NRW smaller clubs. Not much in Munchen.

[On The Side]

Hello everyone. I need to be in Germany for the first time ever and am trying to determine in which city I should spend my free time in to visit a FKK Club. Of Munich, Hamburg and Frankfurt which would you recommend?

[XXL]

Liya Silver is a more recent example of tattoos diminishing a very pretty picture. I just hope that she doesn't expand her collection.

The big tattoo lining the breasts may be for hiding a conspicuous breast implant scar.

I like tattoos because to me they mean a girl has mileage and is a wicked sex machine. I think girls would not get tattoos if mongers generally disliked tattoos. Girls usually know which side their bread is buttered on.

[Samplerr]

I have seen several beautiful girls mutilate themselves with tattoos which pains me. They were quite beautiful before they got it, and they knew they were beautiful. Janine Lindemulder was a famous porn star 20 years ago. She was super gorgeous, you should check out her Penthouse spread from 1988. For a while she did girl girl only. Then she got into drugs, bad marriages and got tattoos. Then she looked hideous.

Liya Silver is a more recent example of tattoos diminishing a very pretty picture. I just hope that she doesn't expand her collection.

[Pessimist]

You could also say the same thing about anything that adorns or enhances one's appearance (Rolex, designer suit, expensive sports car, luxury handbag, having WG as arm candy in public, plastic surgery, weightlifting). If one is truly honest with themselves, they should have some sort of deficiency. That said any of the aforementioned, including tattoos, if taken to extremes, might suggest a more serious problem.

There is a generational conflict when it comes to tattoos: millennial 47 percent, versus boomers 13 percent. 15 percent of millennial have at least five tattoos (most of the NBA, Neymar, Messi, etc.) If someone is of the boomer generation and has a tattoo, then chances are they wanted to communicate to the world that they were an outsider, gang-affiliated or member of Motley Crue.

https://www.axios.com/millennials-ar...0ca981d74.html

Generally I agree with the gist of your post. As I said below, in my own opinion tats are more correlated to class, education and income level. Is it also related to age? Perhaps. Maybe there is a greater acceptance of tats among the younger. I would say, people in performing arts and expressive fields are more likely to get tats too. Rock stars and heavy metal guys may always have had them, people doing waitressing jobs are more likely than girls going to corporate law.

[Pessimist]

I've found that tutes with tats are quite likely to provide some dirty, PSE sex with anal more often being on the menu. This is what I like, so I tend to be drawn to otherwise pretty girls who may be tatted up. I don't think that a tattoo necessarily detracts from a girl's beauty. It may, or it may not. For me, it depends. Whereas, I think some guys are just turned off by tattoos altogether. I am not, especially since I have experienced a strong link between tats and PSE sessions.

I personally prefer zero tats. However, a few small tats artfully done and not distracting from the overall skin tone are OK. What does suck is that some girls plaster themselves with badly done, massive sized tats all over arms and front. That takes away from the beauty otherwise. Tats on skin are like noise in music to me. Well placed and not too distracting is tolerable. Too much, the noise overwhelms the music.

As for correlation of tats to PSE sex, I don't know if I can refute anecdotal evidence. In my view, any such correlation is small. The one thing though is that with age, girls are more likely to get more tats and as they age they are also more likely to accept anal and other PSE services as they get less business due to wanting looks.