Thread: German FKK Clubs - Lounge and chat area
+
Add Report
Results 11,116 to 11,130 of 25016
-
05-08-19 19:57 #13901
Posts: 1385Originally Posted by Prizzo0528 [View Original Post]
Fkks are a different animal. There are very few 9's and 10's in terms of facial beauty. But there is no deception or bait and switch because you can see the girl buck naked. Prices can't be beat. Most importantly, if you are wrong about a specific girl no sweat, cut your loss short in half hour, shower and back in the business to choose another or another or one more from a hundred girls. I have not paid personally the 500 to 800 that some London escorts demand per hour. For that amount, you can fuck 6 girls in FKK.
Also, I see fewer number of tit jobs in FKKs. Romanian girls are somewhat petite and small chested on average which suits me.
That said, London is one of the better places for escort usage. Quality is generally high but so are the prices.
-
05-08-19 06:45 #13900
Posts: 22248Originally Posted by Prizzo0528 [View Original Post]
-
05-08-19 05:10 #13899
Posts: 1280It's the Bergmann's rule.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergmann%27s_rule
Suggesting that people are taller at the equator and the poles is obviously ludicrous and unfounded. Inuits who live at the poles are short. South Americans and southeast Asians are short. Only some tribes in Africa boast average heights of six footers but that is the exception rather than the rule.
Originally Posted by Neurosynth [View Original Post]
-
05-08-19 03:44 #13898
Posts: 2712Do Both. They Are Different
Originally Posted by Prizzo0528 [View Original Post]
The experiences couldn't be more different and are both great. First I should say that although some bash the Romanian girls I am a Ro-girl fan. All my FKK girls and all my London girls are Ro-girls so this is really apples to apples.
In performance and looks you will do well either place. If it is all about performance and looks, then London is more reliable. This is because if you use a good agency like Diva, all the girls have reviews. If you go with a girl who is well reviewed and said to look like her pics or better you are pretty much guaranteed that to be the case. In the FKK of course the optics are self explanatory being in person but the in room can be quite variable. Usually good, but just not as reliable as well reviewed London hotties.
That said, I consider the looks and performance bars to be exceeded in either locale. But what differs is the experience. FKK is the king of the world experience. Sit, enjoy a cocktail, survey the beautiful women knowing you can have any one at the flick of a finger. Wow. Nothing like it. King of the world baby.
On the other hand if you want intimate GFE that feels real, there is nothing like bringing a bottle of wine to a girls room and making out on the very bed she will sleep in later that night. It is an intimate experience to be invited into her space and share it for a few hours. And the best girls will bring the GFE right along with it.
So do yourself a favor and do both. They are both great in their own way.
Oh and put Brazil on your list if u have not been. Yet another great format (the Boate) and the girls are second to none.
-
05-08-19 01:47 #13897
Posts: 1159Originally Posted by Pistons [View Original Post]
https://is.muni.cz/el/1431/jaro2015/..._variation.pdf
It looks to me like the further north the taller. (Allowing, of course, for all the typical notions regarding variation in statistics, as well as non-genetic differences such as food supply.).
I wouldn't be surprised if evolution would shorten people in hotter climates. If you scale the human body (or any object really) up the ratio of surface area to volume decreases. So cooling increases as a power of two, but heat production will increase as a power of three.
The impact of that is that larger people transfer their total heat more slowly. In cold climates that's what you would want. In hot climates you would want the opposite; for heat to transfer more quickly, thus smaller bodies.
-
05-08-19 00:16 #13896
Posts: 7321Originally Posted by Sirioja [View Original Post]
-
05-07-19 17:36 #13895
Posts: 8Oase or Sharks.
I will be in Frankfurt for one night in end of June. Looking to spend sometime in one FFK, considering sharks and Oase. Need recommendations for regulars who have recently gone to these places and guide which one to go to. Reading reports sharks has better optics but more sharky behavior from girls? I am looking for longer sessions with a few girls rather than 30 min ones. Also if going to Sharks, is that easily accessible using public transport?
Thanks for the help.
-
05-07-19 07:09 #13894
Posts: 22248Originally Posted by Pistons [View Original Post]
From what locals seemed so happy to tell me, not sure YY will open soon, people living around don't seem to like this business.
Will be happy for Aca to stay alive, even when Kate ask me, no reason to return.
About condoms, no need to get a good BJ in NRW or Hessen, when girls like You, they will to please You back and some run for CIM business.
-
05-07-19 06:53 #13893
Posts: 22248Originally Posted by ChinesePower [View Original Post]
-
05-07-19 02:29 #13892
Posts: 7321Originally Posted by Steve9696 [View Original Post]
-
05-06-19 23:24 #13891
Posts: 11Quality of FKK girl vs London escorts.
I'll be visiting a FKK for the first time (probably Sharks) in July. I'll also be in London for a few nights and will be trying out their highly esteemed escort scene. I've been reviewing various websites and some of the girls are stunning. Many of the client reviews confirm this.
I'm wondering if any of you have experienced the London escort scene and would be willing to share how the quality of girls compares. I always like to set my expectations ahead of time, and from reading some of the posts on the various FKK sites on ISG I wonder if I might be better served just canceling my trip to Germany and indulging with a few more London escorts.
Money is only somewhat of s factor, but experiencing a perfect 10 in the bedroom supersedes.
Thanks in advance.
PK.
If the girls are generally as good looking at FKK as they are compared to the London escort scene, it will help with my expectations.
-
05-06-19 22:13 #13890
Posts: 6686Originally Posted by Neurosynth [View Original Post]
-
05-06-19 20:05 #13889
Posts: 1159Originally Posted by Pistons [View Original Post]
I can't address the case in Japan, but there are epigenetic effects that are almost Lamarckian in their effect. I. e. Environmental effects can alter the expression of genes in a way that can be inherited across generations.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/31/s...ine-genes.html
(The applicability here is, of course, speculative. But it is not implausible.)
-
05-06-19 16:32 #13888
Posts: 363TED talks- a WG
From 2016.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJRBx0JjM_M
-
05-06-19 14:57 #13887
Posts: 1385Originally Posted by SinglePro [View Original Post]
Club managements should focus on running a tight ship, know their customers, and make sure they are able to provide what their customers want.
In my view, the clientele is changing. And club managers need to focus on this changing mix and pay attention.
First, the international mix has clearly gone up over time.
I know that members will pooh pooh the importance of internationals and whether they matter at all. They do for some clubs.
The big Frankfurt clubs have been dependent on international mix for a while. It is not just the Male attendance, but also WGs who are dependent on them. A trained Asian hunter can make 500 off a big spending Asian man in a single session. To her it does not matter if the Male attendance per day declines from 250 to 200. She just needs 4 or 5 big spenders per week that can hand over 400 to 500 each and her week is done. If the club is able to attract a decent number of such men, it can also retain 30 to 40 Asian hunters. So there is a symbiotic relationship there. Given that at least 30% to 40% of club revenues come from WGs, club managers should focus on this aspect. Mainly they need to make sure their girls have enough business and are happy. Unhappy girls leave the club and that in turn turns off the Male demand.
Some niche clubs like Bernds will survive for a long time but then again they know their customers.
Like in many industries, this business too has the potential to bifurcate into a few niches. Fly in tourists want to focus on a few mega clubs. They have a huge fixed cost of airfare and hotel and vacation days used up etc so they do not want to risk going to a middling club, find that the service sucks or there is a lot of sharky upselling or worse yet, doors closed. They want predictable clubs, reasonable pricing, a large LU to choose from, even positive reviews on sites like ISG to incent their travel, ease of transportation and good and inexpensive hotels nearby. It does not matter to them if they need to pay 10 or 20 tip on a 50 session. What does matter is that you spend 2000 on flight and hotel and have only 40 average looking girls with lousy service.
I am not a local but if I were, I would probably want a low entry fee, easy commute close to my home, and some reliable girls. I would not necessarily need to visit a club because I can also do local escorts, RLD, other things. And I am not looking to binge fuck 5 girls per visit, but have one or two sessions per visit and repeat this on a consistent, weekly basis. This does help those smaller niche clubs that cater to those needs.
The ones that are caught in the middle are those with no defined clientele, average facilities, weak LU and uncaring managements that do not grasp changing dynamics of the market.