Comment on Forum Rules Here

[IndianCurries]

Hi Forum Admins,

I have a question around prohibition of writing names (of any kinds) in codes. IMHO, the advantage of writing names in codes is that the search string is unable to find it.

Usually, LE don't go and read each and every page of the forum and will do a search option. Writing in codes will help people who are reading and will not be part of search queries. I don't think so, writing in codes does any way to avoid writing correct name; it is to avoid word being caught in search strings.

Let me know if it makes sense.

Thanks,

IC

[Member #4364]

Gents, I'm such a long time in that forum; is it possible to explain me.

How to finish my postings?

Sorry, maybe I'm too stupid, but I can't find a solution, only the edit form.

To create a normal text.

The original text with hughe letters and stopping every line is hmhhh.

[Stroker Ace88]

Jackson,

IMO threads should only be created by admin staff at the request of a senior member. Having an open platform will quickly result in all kinds of personal topics diluting ISG. Such is the case when an ISG member recently saw fit to create the same thread in three SEA countries asking for contact info on lactating women. Total garbage IMO.

http://www.internationalsexguide.inf...28#post1361128

http://www.internationalsexguide.inf...30#post1361130

http://www.internationalsexguide.inf...31#post1361131

What if everyone made several threads to post a question? There would be 500+ threads for some of the more popular countries and it would be impossible to find any real info. I would like to see threads created by admin only and members who desire to have a thread created can post a request in the Suggest New Topics Section. Any other member who has a question or wants info should post in General Info, each country has one.

Also recently a new thread was created in the Philippines section,"Video Links". While some members may see the advantages of adding a video thread, the risk outweighs the benefit. With the new proposed internet rules ISG might be classified as a file-sharing website and could potentailly face legal action for hosting content that's deemed to be copyrighted material. Just a heads-up.

http://www.internationalsexguide.inf...03-Video-links

[Bimbo Boy]

Quote Originally Posted by Illogic.

Man I have shit load of photos but that is the problem I have with posting photos on this site after a 17 hours they are now property of Jackson (which is unfair) and he won't remove them if you request.

Quote Originally Posted by Member #3428.

Which is why many of the long time posters don't post photo's. I have video and pictures of girls from many countries, and when I did post I posted them so blacked out or hidden that no one can figure out who they are, and that ruins it. So many of us just are not posting photo's.

A few years ago a dickhead posted a photo of a Brazilian working girl who was a friend of mine. He did not take the care of blocking her face. When she knew about it she was horrified, as she is a mother and her family doesn't know that she is in the hobby.

She asked me to help her remove it since she doesn't speak English. I made a request to Jackson, following his procedure. I gave him ALL the required documents, including her ID scan, signed request in Portuguese translated in English and other proofs. In spite of this Jackson NEVER removed the photo.

This is not nice Jackson, you acted dirty there. One photo less out of thousands doesn't reduce the monetary value of your website.

B. B.

[11Bravo]

Just to point out a contradiction with respect to editing:

On the FAQ it states that edits can be made for 25 hours:

http://www.internationalsexguide.inf...g_questions_04

2. Senior Members may edit their reports for 25 hours after the report has been posted.

But editing is actually only available for 60 minutes.

FAQ needs to be updated.

[Member #3428]

Man I have shit load of photos but that is the problem I have with posting photos on this site after a 17 hours they are now property of Jackson (which is unfair) and he won’t remove them if you request.

I belong to another forum in which you can’t edit your posts after 30 mins but you keep full control over your photos indefinitely and that is the way it should be. Photos are a touchy issue these are not porn stars or actors but real people with normal lives.

A lot of these girls’ families don’t know what they do for living. Then you got guys who never try to hide the girls identity (this should be a rule) so fucking what if they are a pro. They have families. I highly doubt their mother, father or brother would love to get passed a photo of them sucking dick or swallowing nut or posting nude in front of some old sex tourist. I am done posting photos unless some more control is levied out.

Which is why many of the long time posters don't post photo's. I have video and pictures of girls from many countries, and when I did post I posted them so blacked out or hidden that no one can figure out who they are, and that ruins it. So many of us just are not posting photo's.

It is not that we do not have them, or want to post, it is that we are ready to release control of them. Plus many of the girls we do have photos of we keep them in our rolodex for future use. Many of the girls I know talk to each other and know of ISG. Some were even told my handle. So it gets touchy at times.

Have NO clue to fix the issue, but it is an issue.

[Admin]

But couldn't you have a cut-off point around 25 well written post which didn't need to be modified, at which you no longer moderate that user's posts in advance? I can see that it is important in the beginning, but once you've proven that you can write better than a 6th-grader... You get my drift. (And the three dots were appropriate there, so don't moderate them, please...) (And there too!)

CB,

That's exactly how it works now.

Every member gets upgraded to Senior member automatically after 6 months and 25 posts.

Simultaneous to this upgrade, if they've never been edited, then they also get upgraded to unmoderated status.

Thanks,

Jackson

[Carlos Primeros]

Dear Jackson,

I noticed that you are edditing all reports - that is a lot of work and I can not imagine that this is easy.

In the past you had established a different rule - you had senior members where reports were not edited, they went straigth to the forum. Do you want to go back to this rule or do you want to keep up with all this edditing?

Carls

==============================================

Hi Carls,

What I want is for everybody to write like they have at least a 6th grade education.

Thanks,

Jackson

[Charles Browne]

Hi Charles Browne,

Great idea, except for one thing: Most people's idea of moderating is simply deleting antagonistic posts. However, on this forum moderating means editing several hundred reports every day so that they conform to the forums posting guidelines, including re-writing posts that are written in all small lettering, posts written in all CAPITAL LETTERS, posts written without any punctuation marks, posts written without any spacing between the paragraphs, posts written with multiple periods throughout the text, posts written so poorly that they are undecipherable, posts with broken quote tags, posts written with no spacing between the sentences, posts with email address, posts written with impossibly poor grammer, etc.

Oh, I see. You thought it was just by accident that so many members write so well. ROTFLMAO!

Anyway, that's why I don't have any moderators.

Now, if you can tell me how I can get all of the forum members to write like they have at least a 6th grade education, then I wouldn't need to to all this work every day, but I know from experience that people write whatever way they want to, so if I want a readable forum, I've have to edit the posts myself.

Thanks,

Jackson

Dear Jackson,

It is tempting to call you a control-freak, but I will not I happen to be in agreement with you about the importance of good language in posts. "Readability", structure, coherence - all are important.

But couldn't you have a cut-off point around 25 well written post which didn't need to be modified, at which you no longer moderate that user's posts in advance? I can see that it is important in the beginning, but once you've proven that you can write better than a 6th-grader... You get my drift. (And the three dots were appropriate there, so don't moderate them, please...) (And there too!)

The other points, about email addys, broken tags and capital letters, are issues which could just as well be dealt with ex post facto. Or don't you agree?

You really do think ex post facto moderation would be a great idea except for the language issues and editing problems? I won't call you a control freak, but it is certainly very anal retentive. Which I respekt and am afflicted by myself.

Sincerely

Charlie

[Admin]

I think it would be a good idea to moderate posts "ex post facto" rather than in advance. Of course, there could be flame-wars and off-topic thread drift and other issues as a result of such a policy change, but the advantages far outhweigh the drawbacks imho:

1) It would facilitate "quick question"-"quick response"

2) It would mean that discussions could go on for a longer time, and questions be dealt with in greater depth, since people wouldn't lose interest quite so fast.

3) The waiting time from post to publication seriously antagonises people used to other forums without such impediments to communication. Seriously; how much fun is it to wait for 12-24 hours before you see a post, and then another 12-24 hours before you might get a reply.

All in all, this forum would jump to life if posts were moderated "ex post facto". And there are certainly lots of people with too much spare time on their hands and their wits about them who would undoubtedly be willing to act as moderators for the discussions about their own countries or home towns or continents even. It works on other forums with even more controversial topics discussed, so why shouldn't it work here?

Hi Charles Browne,

Great idea, except for one thing: Most people's idea of moderating is simply deleting antagonistic posts. However, on this forum moderating means editing several hundred reports every day so that they conform to the forums posting guidelines, including re-writing posts that are written in all small lettering, posts written in all CAPITAL LETTERS, posts written without any punctuation marks, posts written without any spacing between the paragraphs, posts written with multiple periods throughout the text, posts written so poorly that they are undecipherable, posts with broken quote tags, posts written with no spacing between the sentences, posts with email address, posts written with impossibly poor grammer, etc.

Oh, I see. You thought it was just by accident that so many members write so well. ROTFLMAO!

Anyway, that's why I don't have any moderators.

Now, if you can tell me how I can get all of the forum members to write like they have at least a 6th grade education, then I wouldn't need to to all this work every day, but I know from experience that people write whatever way they want to, so if I want a readable forum, I've have to edit the posts myself.

Thanks,

Jackson

[Charles Browne]

I think it would be a good idea to moderate posts "ex post facto" rather than in advance. Of course, there could be flame-wars and off-topic thread drift and other issues as a result of such a policy change, but the advantages far outhweigh the drawbacks imho:

1) It would facilitate "quick question"-"quick response"

2) It would mean that discussions could go on for a longer time, and questions be dealt with in greater depth, since people wouldn't lose interest quite so fast.

3) The waiting time from post to publication seriously antagonises people used to other forums without such impediments to communication. Seriously; how much fun is it to wait for 12-24 hours before you see a post, and then another 12-24 hours before you might get a reply.

All in all, this forum would jump to life if posts were moderated "ex post facto". And there are certainly lots of people with too much spare time on their hands and their wits about them who would undoubtedly be willing to act as moderators for the discussions about their own countries or home towns or continents even. It works on other forums with even more controversial topics discussed, so why shouldn't it work here?

[UrbanWildlife]

Hello Jackson,

It would be nice if our reports could be posted more rapidly. On the Colombian forum as of right now, the last reports posted were over 24 hours ago. This is unacceptable from a posters point of view, or from the view of someone looking for today's information. I know it is your forum and you can post reports whenever the fuck you want, but at the same time you provided us this thread to voice our comments which is exactly what I am doing.

===============================================

Greetings UrbanWildlife,

As a documented Serial Antagonist, I don't give a fuck what you think about the operation of this forum.

Personally, I wish you'd quit this forum permanently.

Thanks,

Jackson

[Everhard]

Hi,

I noticed that more and more members post a report of distinction to their own reports!

For me, you can't be both judge and judged, so this should not be allowed.

The consequence is that the reports of distinction threads get filled up with poor quality reports of egocentrical members ...

Any comments ?

Latrell

Yeah, I for one concur! The report of distinction feature is sooo 20th century.... If I ran the forum I would do like this.

1 Enable the post rating feature. Yes this exists (http://www.vbulletin.com). This means that well written reports get credit and authors of poor reports understand they have to do better.

2 Only allow moderator(s) award with report of destinction. (The post rating could came in handy.)

[Latrell2]

Hi,

I noticed that more and more members post a report of distinction to their own reports!

For me, you can't be both judge and judged, so this should not be allowed.

The consequence is that the reports of distinction threads get filled up with poor quality reports of egocentrical members ...

Any comments ?

Latrell

[Romano V]

Contents Relevant references (nonexhaustive examples):

- Escort or prostitute based in the whole world

- Evenings and spectacles etc.

- To put the subjects in the good heading In all the cases, the initial message of a wire will have to comprise information on the city and the country where the girl mentioned is based

The messages which are included in the categories below do not have their place on the forum and will be systematically removed.

If a member owed regularly poster of the messages being included in this category it will be informed and in the event of repetition banished of this forum for a certain duration or definitively.

The messages being included in the following categories or comprising the following mentions will be systematically unobtrusive without others:

- the trolls (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29)
- personal attacks
- the "Flame War" (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flame)
- messages except subject posed with an aim of diverting the discussion or of attracting it in a different subject
- abusive messages and/or in racist matter
- repetitive spams and messages in several subjects
- Or any message being connected with the categories mentioned the messages defaming a girl as for her health or another element of this kind will be systematically unobtrusive.

Moreover their author will be able to see itself banishing temporarily or definitively this forum. The members of this forum must as abstain from publishing the messages entirely in heavy type, color, characters larger or smaller as the standard.
These possibilities are there to make it possible to emphasize important sentences or words, and not systematically certain people.

Some best mongers can be moderators for each country local or specific to control name of threads and comments and what is true or false in each city. To my mind i live in France near Switzerland and i am a specialist for Eastern Europe so i can be moderator only for Europe if Jackson is agree.