Comment on Forum Rules Here

[ZEUS_420]

Sup Bro?

I've been out of contact for 18 months but, now I'm back. I'm wondering what happened to all the posts we had contributed about the scene here in the states? I'm sure you remember me. Feel free to e-mail me.

Hasta

ZEUS_420

Hi Zeus 420,

Please visit www.usasexguide.info

Thanks,

Jackson

[Brotherrabitt]

Hi there,

I would appreciate if somebody could please explain to me the precise reasons why photo's with recognisable faces are allowed ?

I have been reading the site admin's threads and can not find the reasons/logic. I have read Jacksons' post on the Moroccon thread some time ago re photo's of muslim women, where it was stated that faces need not to be blacked-out or words to that effect.

I am not trying to start an argument, or passing a moral judgement on those who do post photo's with recognisable faces, I am only trying to understand the reasons.

If the reasons are listed somewhere and I missed them, I apologise and kindly ask you to direct me to the proper location.

Thanks

Pleasure

[Silver Shadow]

Jackson:

I am in no way a computer whiz, and I don't know how this could be accomplished, but is there no way to divide the posters who actually put up a picture, and the people who want to "comment" on it?

Could a posting without a photo attachment be directed to a "comment" site?

It's really boring for many of us (from comments already made) to scan through a lot of observations on one or another post.

Maybe this is the way you have planned it, and I certainly defer to your judgement, but I believe a large percentage of us really don't care about the carpers' opinions.

Please think about this in your future planning.

Jim

[Crazy Jim Wood]

I second this motion. Every post in a photo thread with no attachment should be automatically deleted.

Hi
I want that every post in the threads named "photo gallery" should have an attachment to them, preferably a photo.

I e there should be a constraint that if there is nothing attached to the post one shouldn't be able to post in those threads.

Today when I look att the photo gallery thread for Dominican republic on the first 15 posts only 2 of them have actual photos in them. The rest is discussions (basically BS).

[Member #2479]

Dear Mr Jackson

I don't want a sermon on barebacking by other members, I don't want to listen to that shit here, please make it against the rules, if you don't enlist that rule I will not post anymore pictures.

Thank you

[Swede Thing]

Hi
I want that every post in the threads named "photo gallery" should have an attachment to them, preferably a photo.

I e there should be a constraint that if there is nothing attached to the post one shouldn't be able to post in those threads.

Today when I look att the photo gallery thread for Dominican republic on the first 15 posts only 2 of them have actual photos in them. The rest is discussions (basically BS).

[Silver Shadow]

Hi Jackson:

I've tried to check posts from others, and got nowhere with the "Search" function.

I've even tried putting myself through this Search process, and only came up with a list of sites I had visited, not where I had posted photos.

Am I doing something wrong?

Jim

[The Traveler]

El Suave,

I don't know if there is an easier way than a forum search by user name to find out about your posts, but there is indeed an easy way to find out about your posted pics.

This link will work for everybody and will show you all your posted pics

http://www.internationalsexguide.inf...ditattachments

The upload statistics at the top of the page will also show you the number of your attachments/pics.


Hope that helps a bit

[El Suave]

Folks,

I’m trying to upgrade to senior member, the upgrade app asks how many times your reports were edited or deleted by the administrator, and how many were edited or deleted amongst your last 10 reports. Moreover, it asks how many photos have you posted along with substantive reports.

Now is there an easy way to look up all of the above? I’ll be damned if I’ll go fishing through every page to find the correct answers. Even if you do a search by username, you still get broad threads you’ve to fish in. Anyone on the easy way, or is there no easy way?

[Santa]

Hello Jackson.

There has been a debate concerning the photo rules on the China thread that deserves your attention. It is concerning "commentaries by persons who do not post pictures", are they allowed. See the photo gallery thread for the past 2 weeks.
Also, "photos of male genitals", are they allowed. Please see my post on today's date in the Beijing thread.

I remember reading your rules and guidelines a long time ago, but now I cannot find them. Where are they?

[Gudel]

Here's a suggested (and will probably be ignored!) rule!: Mongers need to know some damn geography! Its pathetic to see a post about an SW/AMP in one area that is NOWHERE NEAR the area of that forum (e.g. a post about Pomona, CA in the "Los Angeles" section!). Of course if this board was more "geography-friendly", this would not be a problem. Then again, if the MODERATOR actually paid attention to what the problem is, and FIXED IT, it would not be a problem!

I agreed with this gentleman. Similar problem with Santa Barbara forum, people who are living an hour and a half away posting it there!

At least in your case Pomona is about 25 miles away from LA. Non geographic compliant posters in the Santa Barbara forum are living 60 to 80 miles away!

I love poon, but there is little point of driving 80 miles and come back for another 80 miles to just get one pop. Very annoying indeed, please make it stop, show them the light to the "Other Area's forum.

[Eltib]

Thanx,

I'm glad I brought some excitement to the forum.

Rolly,

That said, the Thai Photo Gallery is beyond help. At least eltib's movie posting temporarily stalled the long missives. I miss the pics of the Thai humpers a lot.


Jackson,

Thanks for a great site and all the work you do for us.

Peace

[Terry Terrier]

Hello Jackson

I have noted increased use of the word 'skank', referring to prostitutes, on the Forum. Am I the only poster who finds this word derogatory and de-humanising? Surely, it should be put on the banned list.

On a different and more important topic, I see that the performance of the new software is improving daily. We all appreciate the great work.

TT

[Rocky Mtn Man]

repetative postings in the photo sections are a waste of band width. the area should be for photos. even i have done the "atta boy" thing to some pictures although it is very rare that i do. the only exception is if there is a picture of children in the photo section. i think this should be brought to the attention of the poster that it is in bad taste.

there is no place for picts of kids in a web site devoted to sex. i know it is sometimes hard to tell the differece between a 16 and an 18 year old girl, but if the child is obviously 10 to 14 it is usually easy to tell. as far as i am concerned it does not matter the situation, even if it is a harmless pict of kids at the beach building a sand castle. it either belongs at a disney site, or a ****files site.

i dont know how you would police this jackson. maybe it is impractical, maybe not, but i think it should be done.

rmm

[Member #2001]

Who cares about California anyway.

Maybe I will post everywhere and anywhere on that board just to confuse, and irritate you. What do you think about that redneck?