Montreal

[MtlLocal]

By July's end when all the working girls finally come back, I expect price raises from almost every escort out there.

Agency rates will likely be $250 for all with stars at 270 or 280. And there won't be an indy in sight on merb lower than $300 hour.

A lot of john's may find themselves essentially forced out of pay for play, or searching for alternatives. It is going to be an interesting year from a sociological stand point. Hell, I guess it has already.

[HarvestBoi]

I can confirm that many escorts in MTL read ISG. Remember some girls can't stomach reading reviews, though. This is understandable, imagine what they would say about us!

I have a story which I will relate soon about why I know that the provider network's knowledge about ISG is bigger than you think.

ISG is not that popular in Montreal. I think some of our local participants like Jalimon and Cloudsurf came over because they heard they were being .

[Mighty Spearsman]

ISG is not that popular in Montreal. I think some of our local participants like Jalimon and Cloudsurf came over because they heard they were being mentioned.

Nala Baez is a buxomous spinner who has been around for a few years. I believe she was with the now defunct agency Mike's Mansion. She seems to post revealing photos on and off. I seem to remember one time she posted a facial shot. I could be wrong. In any event, many of the escorts alternate between very revealing shots and less revealing shots. Who knows why? Perhaps, they have a mood where they feel private. Maybe they post revealing shots to gin up business.

Buxomous is right! It's hard to believe that someone as tiny as Nala has boobs as big as she does, especially since they appear to be all natural.

I was being a little facetious in my last post, I seriously doubt if Nala is trolling the Internet all day to see if her name has been mentioned, especially since she's just re-started working this past Monday.

But she does work through an agency escortsxo dot com that features 48 ladies on their website, so I wouldn't be surprised that one of that agency's employees reviews the Internet for comments on their employees. Perhaps someone from the agency noticed my post and told Nala to re-open her Twitter account.

Wyatt, you are also correct in pointing out that escorts alternate between revealing and non-revealing shots. This includes Nala although I have yet to discover a full facial shot of her. Interestingly, someone named Dasha Ivanov also works for escortsxo and has her face blurred out on that web site, but Dasha has a Twitter account that shows her full face all the time and also posts totally revealing crotch and rear photos that look like they could have been taken from one of the video porn web sites.

[Hacsek]

The math is for exposure to other people in a chain. If one man with COVID DFKs a woman and then you DFK with her, that is a exposure to COVID. I believe Jalimon said that a session is one on one and low risk. That doesn't make much sense to me.

As I have said here, the risks are very low for most of the population. In fact, some of us could be asymptomatic ourselves.

I think what he meant was that because it is one on one and not in a group setting like a club or concert where you are exposed to many people that may be carriers the risk is low.

However if she has the virus at the infectious stage your chance of getting it is probably 100% whether you DFK or not as you are up close and personal for an hour or more.

[Member #4665]

If you are good-looking and / or charming, perhaps they are thinking of only you during the session. Unfortunately when they are with me, they are thinking of being with Jalimon.

Yes one time I was with one of the girls and of course I'm just a client, she was saying she was my friend too, we should hang out sometime, all those sweet things she was telling me, and then when she started moaning she said " oh jalimon" instead of "oh and "my real name.""

[Jalimon2]

If you are good-looking and / or charming, perhaps they are thinking of only you during the session. Unfortunately when they are with me, they are thinking of being with Jalimon.

In life I love people with sarcasm and humility. You nailed it here haha.

Cheers.

[Jalimon2]

The math is for exposure to other people in a chain. If one man with COVID DFKs a woman and then you DFK with her, that is a exposure to COVID. I believe Jalimon said that a session is one on one and low risk. That doesn't make much sense to me.

As I have said here, the risks are very low for most of the population. In fact, some of us could be asymptomatic ourselves.

I still say the risk are very low in a one on one session. The chance of you or the girl to be infected are very low because there is only 2 people in the room. When there is much more like a restaurant, subway, etc. The risk increase by 10 fold. Remember this virus fly in the air quite long time. It's not and std.

But I did wrote that if one of the 2 is affected by the virus (of course asympomaticaly if not he / she would not be there!) then you are screwed. DFK or not does not matter. Spending 1 h in a closed area with someone infected will do it and get you infected.

[WyattEarp]

I posted the above yesterday. This morning, I checked Twitter and lo and behold, Nala Baez's Twitter account is no longer private (although the profile photo still shows an older, mid-torso-only image). Coincidence? Or does Nala read ISG?

I can't speak for Canada, but here in the US I know of many SWs who regularly read USA SG, ISG and other boards to see what's being said about them. A couple of them are even members themselves. A female provider in Hong Kong used to write some of the most informative posts on ISG's Hong Kong page (not sure if she's still posting).

Still looking forward to seeing Nala in Montreal once the border re-opens to tourists; hopefully, she won't move to Toronto for the summer like she did last year.

ISG is not that popular in Montreal. I think some of our local participants like Jalimon and Cloudsurf came over because they heard they were being mentioned.

Nala Baez is a buxomous spinner who has been around for a few years. I believe she was with the now defunct agency Mike's Mansion. She seems to post revealing photos on and off. I seem to remember one time she posted a facial shot. I could be wrong. In any event, many of the escorts alternate between very revealing shots and less revealing shots. Who knows why? Perhaps, they have a mood where they feel private. Maybe they post revealing shots to gin up business.

[Mighty Spearsman]

...Strangely, within 24 hours of my posting that I had enjoyed reading Nala of escortsxo dot com's Twitter account (information that is posted on her escortsxo web page), she changed the setting on her account to Private and her profile photo from a recent full-body photo with her face partially blurred to a photo that only shows her mid-torso. Coincidence? Or did I accidentally scare her off?

I posted the above yesterday. This morning, I checked Twitter and lo and behold, Nala Baez's Twitter account is no longer private (although the profile photo still shows an older, mid-torso-only image). Coincidence? Or does Nala read ISG?

I can't speak for Canada, but here in the US I know of many SWs who regularly read USA SG, ISG and other boards to see what's being said about them. A couple of them are even members themselves. A female provider in Hong Kong used to write some of the most informative posts on ISG's Hong Kong page (not sure if she's still posting).

Still looking forward to seeing Nala in Montreal once the border re-opens to tourists; hopefully, she won't move to Toronto for the summer like she did last year.

[WyattEarp]

But the one who are serious about it, who like sex as much as money, it can be really good.

If you are good-looking and / or charming, perhaps they are thinking of only you during the session. Unfortunately when they are with me, they are thinking of being with Jalimon.

[WyattEarp]

I disagree with your math. It assumes too much likelihood of transmission in my opinion.

The math is for exposure to other people in a chain. If one man with COVID DFKs a woman and then you DFK with her, that is a exposure to COVID. I believe Jalimon said that a session is one on one and low risk. That doesn't make much sense to me.

As I have said here, the risks are very low for most of the population. In fact, some of us could be asymptomatic ourselves.

[Jalimon2]

How much do you guys think they can make?

A newspaper article quoted that a top earner could make between 30000 and 90000 a year. But not everyone has those types of skills and talents. Examples: above-average good looks (talent), being able to relate well with the customers (skill), make customers feel welcome (skill), and being okay with being known around the city or "famous" (skill). Plus they have to be hard workers because to make that much it's a full schedule. Obviously a superstar can make more than most other competitors. Not everyone is a superstar.

The vast majority do this only part time. To earn a bit to pay for school, appartment, avoid to work at long hours at Starbuck and / or unfortunately to afford their crazy lifestyle.

But the one who are serious about it, who like sex as much as money, it can be really good.

I was a regular of one who worked 18 months. She reached 150 k and retired to focus on finishing school. I know one that has 2 condo's that are fully paid. She's 23! Just do the math a popular girl can ask 350/ hour, see 3 client a day, 5 days a week and she racks up 165 k in a year.

The wise one will declare a chunk of revenue to pay taxes. They know it's a must to eventually go back to normal life.

[Mongerer88]

As I said earlier, we shouldn't be exaggerating the impact of COVID unless you are over 70, very overweight or have a weakened immune system.

The numbers you posted up above did make me think. If a girl can be an asymptomatic carrier for on average 14 days, DFKing 5-6 guys a day four times week is 280-336 guys over the preceding two weeks. If you see 5-7 girls on a visit, you are exposed to 1,400-2350 other people via DFKing. Even if we allow for 50% overlap of men, that's 700-1175 people.

I disagree with your math. It assumes too much likelihood of transmission in my opinion.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/70-people...213700577.html

You are more likely to get it singing in the church choir than having sex with an escort.

I would substitute getting a BBBJ for DFK to get a full erection just in case, since it is logical than DFK is a super-spreader activity.

[Jalimon2]

I'm here south of Canada and ever since mid March I have not DFK'd any escorts which was my choice. Being north of sixty I am rather spooked and DFK seems to be the riskiest activity.

I should have express myself better. From what we know now about the virus is the most contagion occurs in public closed areas with a lot of people where you stay for a particular amount of time. Like a restaurant, a stadium, a theatre, a packed subway etc.

With an SP you are one on one in a private area. So the risks are very very low. But you are staying for a good amount of time. So if one of the 2 is infected the other will be also by the end. DFK, mask, washing hands, shower. Won't matter. You will get it unless you are immune.

So if you decide to do a session accept the risk and go full out at it with DFK and all.

[WyattEarp]

My point and situation exactly. But a session without DFK is hardly worth it for me and certainly not worth a trip north. And don't underestimate the risk to the girls who will be DFKing 5-6 guys a day. Hence I was musing about the idea of a trade in service levels.

One encounter is only one point of contact but the activity is pretty sure to pass the virus if either of you have it. On a typical trip to MTL I might see 5-7 girls.

But nobody really knows the risk. When this started I made a top 10 list in my head of those in my circle who would be in grave danger. 2 of them got infected but recovered quite nicely. Go figure.

As I said earlier, we shouldn't be exaggerating the impact of COVID unless you are over 70, very overweight or have a weakened immune system.

The numbers you posted up above did make me think. If a girl can be an asymptomatic carrier for on average 14 days, DFKing 5-6 guys a day four times week is 280-336 guys over the preceding two weeks. If you see 5-7 girls on a visit, you are exposed to 1,400-2350 other people via DFKing. Even if we allow for 50% overlap of men, that's 700-1175 people.