"Germany
Masion Close
Escort Frankfurt
Escort News
 Sex Vacation
The Velvet Rooms

Thread: Montreal

+ Add Report
Page 121 of 380 FirstFirst ... 21 71 111 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 131 171 221 ... LastLast
Results 1,801 to 1,815 of 5700
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #3900
    Quote Originally Posted by TNewton  [View Original Post]
    From my experience, I would agree with WyattEarp's assessment. Several times in Montreal I have read an over the top review on the green board, and met the reviewed girl who was a lot less passionate than the review. You can always caveat a response with YMMV. Or maybe the reviewers are way more handsome than the average client (LOL). I do suspect the agencies take care of the favored clients who they know write reviews on the green board. Some of the more popular reviewers will even write on the SP's review thread. Her bookings really took off when I wrote my review.

    The SP's usually ask at the start - "Where are you from?" If you are not local, do they really have to make that extra effort? But I have noticed another trend, even among the popular reviewers. Some girls who are praised in their first six months for all the extras, start to do a lot less thereafter. It is almost as if they figure out they can get away with doing a lot less and still have a satisfied client.
    You're darn right that YMMV. Can you imagine having 3-4 guys a day 3-4 times a week and being into every appointment? The "where are you from part" sure is true at the FKKs. I don't think I have a problem in Montreal with it but it has been awhile.

    The rookie that lost steam after her first 6 months in the sex industry is probably true. Beware of raving reviews. They are not always shills but the girl may have just lost steam. Hobbyists are afraid to post a bad review after reading 6 months of glowing reviews. This reminds me of Janny of Delights. She had a few pages of great reviews and outstanding pictures. The booker, Steve, tried to talk me out of her but I insisted and I had a bad time. I wrote a negative review which was contested by the white knights of the green-board (I hate you) and the booker. However, the PMs and eventually the some of the hobbyists that authored the outstanding reviews stepped forward and admitted, the girl had lost steam and was going through the motions only for the money.

    When this happens, you have the obligation to write the review. The only good review Janny got after this was from a green-board antagonist of mine who I doubt ever actually saw her. She was terrible and no longer into it and retired soon after my review started a shit storm.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jalimon2  [View Original Post]
    The idea is to NEVER pretend you will get all you have read in reviews. Reviewers are like golfers. They lie! Haha So yes be weary. Myself I usually tell the girl upfront she can leave DFK to her personal if she wishes to. Guess what about 70% of the time I then get only LFK. But other 30% full all out blown DFK. DFK is the most intimate and difficult service to provide for these girl. I always remember that when I see these girls.

    Cheers,
    There is LFK and DFK and then there is the ugly girl that I recently met in Toronto that had her lips pressed so tightly together that you couldn't pry them open with a crowbar. Again, like Janny above, she had lost her drive to perform a long time ago and was showing up only to collect a pay check. I reviewed her and took the heat from the white knights (I fucking hate you guys) and took more heat from the psychotic, lying, man-hating, ***** of an agency owner on the Red Board and Twitter (I hate that *****). But guess what? The escort in question retired and is no longer ruining hobby trips and wasting our collective hard earned wages.

    Shave, whiten your teeth, make sure you have nice breath and no body odor and learn to like LFK. I think LFK is sexy. Sometimes girls try to stick their tongue down my throat. I much prefer the rhythmic dancing and teasing of LFK that leads to sporadic but sensual DFK. To me, French kissing is like a dance. (This is me trying to wax poetically.).

    But the bottom line is if you have a bad date write the review. The girls either wake up and get back to work or they sometimes leave the business. Either way, this is better then letting them skate and give half-ass sessions just for the money.

  2. #3899
    Quote Originally Posted by TNewton  [View Original Post]
    From my experience, I would agree with WyattEarp's assessment. Several times in Montreal I have read an over the top review on the green board, and met the reviewed girl who was a lot less passionate than the review. You can always caveat a response with YMMV. Or maybe the reviewers are way more handsome than the average client (LOL). I do suspect the agencies take care of the favored clients who they know write reviews on the green board. Some of the more popular reviewers will even write on the SP's review thread. Her bookings really took off when I wrote my review..
    It's happened to me too. I've walked out a few times with a "hmm, that went a little different than the reviews said it would. " And it's been with the same crew of reviewers. Not blaming anyone, just saying there's a pattern and maybe we are looking for two different things in our encounters which is fine.

    This whole notion about providers changing their policy about certain services, yes I can absolutely see that with certain things, but for kissing, LOL, dudes I think if a girl wants to kiss you, she will kiss you, and do it as passionately as she desires. It is YMMV in its purest form as it's the most basic display of intimacy. It is the most variable extra as to me from my experience it's very difficult to gauge from other reviewers whether I'll get it. I've just gotten to the point where if I like pics and reviews are decent enough I'll take a leap of faith and go for it. I did that with Scarlett and had a blast. No regrets.

    With respect to Scarlett and Amanda, yes there are reports of kissing being withheld. It's not that they don't like kissing guys I'm sure Wyatt. To put it bluntly, and not trying to be a dick cause I got minimal with Scarlett, but it's that they just weren't feeling it with those guys who wrote the reviews, LOL. It's called life. Should it hinder you from booking them, that's for you to figure out, cause you may be the guy to get DFK galore. I would indicate that they are both premium providers, and as a consumer I would hope LFK is offered minimum, but hey, it's their biz, not here to tell anyone how to handle it.

    I feel a lot of guys need grow gonads sometimes and just go for it. It's pretty fucking awesome walking out and knowing your at the better end of the YMMV spectrum.

    On the flip side, I thinks it's pretty shitty for a white knight to come down on a guy who says he went to see a provider got denied a service and says he was disappointed in a respectful way. There was a most disgusting display of this where a guy got a CBJ where a white knight went and asked the provider what's up and then put it somewhat on display on the board for everyone to know about the original poster. The white knight was being a tool, plain and simple. I woulda let the agency handle it.

    Amanda got a recent comment in her thread where a guy voiced disappointment about not getting DFK nothing disrespectful, but another poster kinda asked the OP "where in the reviews do you see DFK?" Again, $20 difference not a big deal for some, but some blokes work hard for their dinero, she's a tough bird to book and is really hot from reports. I think a lot of guys would be disappointed especially if they are paying a little more. Juuuuuust saying. I thought it was more than fair for the OP to voice that respectfully in the thread. I think it's more than fair for her to do whatever she want with whom ever she wants too. Its about putting the info out there for blokes to make an informed decision so this cuts down on revenge reviews.

  3. #3898
    Targeted April at Vog, Heaven at euphoria, Audrey at velvet. So you see my preference, taller, busty (prefer natural, but natural busty and slim waist is gem).

    Browse through the line up and have a few alternatives, gents, please give your 2 cents if you have first hand experiences with these (some of them do not even have photos online). I have a week in Montreal starting next Monday and can be flexible, so I just shoot booker a sms or email asking for the lady and say flexible? Or should I wait to see agencies' next week schedule and then start contacting?

    Vog kim.

    Euphoria Amanda Casey.

    Xo Hannah, Peyton.

  4. #3897
    SinglePro had some questions about a few providers I have seen. My experience:

    Lily (Euphoria) - nice pretty girl. LFK only.

    Lana (XXtase) - I posted some comments on Lana. Nice bubbly, talkative girl. Good service but very young acting (which is good if that is your thing.).

    Tania (Euphoria) - Overall good experience. Russian like Lana, but less bubbly more business -like. Or maybe I should say more mature less college coed like.

  5. #3896
    From my experience, I would agree with WyattEarp's assessment. Several times in Montreal I have read an over the top review on the green board, and met the reviewed girl who was a lot less passionate than the review. You can always caveat a response with YMMV. Or maybe the reviewers are way more handsome than the average client (LOL). I do suspect the agencies take care of the favored clients who they know write reviews on the green board. Some of the more popular reviewers will even write on the SP's review thread. Her bookings really took off when I wrote my review.

    The SP's usually ask at the start - "Where are you from?" If you are not local, do they really have to make that extra effort? But I have noticed another trend, even among the popular reviewers. Some girls who are praised in their first six months for all the extras, start to do a lot less thereafter. It is almost as if they figure out they can get away with doing a lot less and still have a satisfied client.

  6. #3895
    Quote Originally Posted by WyattEarp  [View Original Post]
    What's frustrating is to find out how a girl like Scarlett can work for so long, before someone will say "hey, she hates kissing of any sort". Or now we find out another star like Amanda isn't much of a kisser. How long has Amanda been working? I remember our friend P-C told me he didn't have a great session with her.

    When the Toronto mongers rave about a DFK princess, they mean it. (I will be raving about one soon.) Perhaps Toronto has too many agencies, too many girls and is too spread out for misinformation to take hold.
    WyattEarp people have been solidly booking Scarlet because she is one hell of a performer. Saw her like 6-7 times. I do not know where you read that she hates kissing of any sort. It's not true. But she's not one you see if that is really important to you.

    I go to Toronto 2-3 times per year. You will have to make more homework there to make sure you get BBBJ and not CBJ and full DFK and not LFK. Still a great city for the hobby.

    Quote Originally Posted by ChubzyMaximus  [View Original Post]
    With respect to the kissy, kissy. Its been erratic and sporadic for me in MTL vs other markets to be honest. I mean sure, there's the "obligatory" bullshit where the SP knows she's kinda getting graded on it and will throw it in at beginning and maybe before walking out the door, I'm starting not to count these cause it's called GFE for a reason. But then there are the SP's who give you a good make out session and look for it consistently during FS. So when guys say in their review they got DFK, I'm always weary and you should be too. I wonder what's their definition?.
    Good post Chubzy. The idea is to NEVER pretend you will get all you have read in reviews. Reviewers are like golfers. They lie! Haha So yes be weary. Myself I usually tell the girl upfront she can leave DFK to her personal if she wishes to. Guess what about 70% of the time I then get only LFK. But other 30% full all out blown DFK. DFK is the most intimate and difficult service to provide for these girl. I always remember that when I see these girls.

    Cheers,

  7. #3894

    New to this board and hobby.

    Quote Originally Posted by CloudSurf  [View Original Post]

    You didn't ask about Effy. Read her review thread and see if she is your type. She is a21 year old Part Chinese college girl. Her service is off the chart PSE.

    Lots of DFK with all kinds of kinky stuff.
    May I ask where I can find info or her website?

  8. #3893
    Quote Originally Posted by WyattEarp  [View Original Post]
    I'll pay some due respect to Montreal locals like cloudsurf and others. It's very well possible that as MTL regulars and having a pronounced internet footprint the new agency girls are given some instruction by the agency to treat this guy like a boyfriend. This guy can raise your profile and your bookings out of the gate. This is not a criticism at all. These guys have earned their stripes and great service.

    What's frustrating is to find out how a girl like Scarlett can work for so long, before someone will say "hey, she hates kissing of any sort". Or now we find out another star like Amanda isn't much of a kisser. How long has Amanda been working? I remember our friend P-C told me he didn't have a great session with her.

    When the Toronto mongers rave about a DFK princess, they mean it. (I will be raving about one soon.) Perhaps Toronto has too many agencies, too many girls and is too spread out for misinformation to take hold.
    With respect to kissing. Girls can change. Or not offer depending on the john.

    Amanda recently changed her policy.

    I have gotten DFK from both. Not tonsil wrestling. But tongue and passion.

  9. #3892
    [Message to Admin deleted]

    EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited to remove a message directed to the Forum Admin.

    The open Forum is not the appropriate venue to contact the Forum Administration regarding individual questions, complaints or comments about the administration of the Forum. Instead, please use the Contact Us link at the bottom of this page to send me an email voicing your complaints about the administration of the Forum, and I will respond as quickly as possible. Thanks!

  10. #3891
    Quote Originally Posted by ChubzyMaximus  [View Original Post]
    With respect to the kissy, kissy. Its been erratic and sporadic for me in MTL vs other markets to be honest. I mean sure, there's the "obligatory" bullshit where the SP knows she's kinda getting graded on it and will throw it in at beginning and maybe before walking out the door, I'm starting not to count these cause it's called GFE for a reason. But then there are the SP's who give you a good make out session and look for it consistently during FS. So when guys say in their review they got DFK, I'm always weary and you should be too. I wonder what's their definition.?
    I'll pay some due respect to Montreal locals like cloudsurf and others. It's very well possible that as MTL regulars and having a pronounced internet footprint the new agency girls are given some instruction by the agency to treat this guy like a boyfriend. This guy can raise your profile and your bookings out of the gate. This is not a criticism at all. These guys have earned their stripes and great service.

    What's frustrating is to find out how a girl like Scarlett can work for so long, before someone will say "hey, she hates kissing of any sort". Or now we find out another star like Amanda isn't much of a kisser. How long has Amanda been working? I remember our friend P-C told me he didn't have a great session with her.

    When the Toronto mongers rave about a DFK princess, they mean it. (I will be raving about one soon.) Perhaps Toronto has too many agencies, too many girls and is too spread out for misinformation to take hold.

  11. #3890
    Quote Originally Posted by WyattEarp  [View Original Post]
    Did Chubzy first use Willis in the form of a question? I thought he was riffing on the 80's cultural catchphrase "whatchu talkin about Willis?
    Naw.

    He used it to when saying Jalimon bring over willis to this board during our ban.

  12. #3889
    Quote Originally Posted by SinglePro  [View Original Post]
    Does each of these girls provide long duration of passionate and intense DFK with tongue (NOT just a quick kiss that lasts only few seconds) which is the key thing for many mongers? Paige doesn't seem to provide that, does she? I read that Lilly of Euphoria is also very YMMV in DFK, mostly quick LFK. Right?

    I have not seemed to read any review for these ladies. Anyone? I wonder if it's likely that many guys prefer to keep these ladies for themselves by not reviewing them.

    Kassy. Vog.

    Lana. XXXtase.

    Tania. Euphoria.

    By the way, can anyone point me to a site where we can view the face of Sasha Johansen discussed in many posts below? Her Indy website photos don't show her face. Since she charges so much, it would be sensible to see if you're really attracted to her face before making an appointment even though she has a hot body and provides GFE services. It has happened to me many times after I read about the rave reviews of many providers' services and bodies, I became disappointed when I saw their faces.
    With respect to the kissy, kissy. Its been erratic and sporadic for me in MTL vs other markets to be honest. I mean sure, there's the "obligatory" bullshit where the SP knows she's kinda getting graded on it and will throw it in at beginning and maybe before walking out the door, I'm starting not to count these cause it's called GFE for a reason. But then there are the SP's who give you a good make out session and look for it consistently during FS. So when guys say in their review they got DFK, I'm always weary and you should be too. I wonder what's their definition? Some girls do it well and really do make you feel like you "forgot it was a service" the only two active ones I can think of for me are Lola of euphoria and Evelyn of euphoria. I can't remember with Sasha to be honest cause there's other stuff I remember more vividly, LOL. The retired Elena / Daria was by far the gold standard for me in MTL.

    From all reviews, you may want to add Laura of euphoria and Jessica of XXxtase to your list.

  13. #3888
    This is ISG Forum, if you have to tell other guys something about what they wrote in other forums do it, but in that forum.

    Admin3

  14. #3887
    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingBy1  [View Original Post]
    You're ignoring the question. Why the nickname willis? Are you some kind of tree hugger? Or a nature boy.
    Did Chubzy first use Willis in the form of a question? I thought he was riffing on the 80's cultural catchphrase "whatchu talkin about Willis?

  15. #3886
    Quote Originally Posted by SinglePro  [View Original Post]
    By the way, can anyone point me to a site where we can view the face of Sasha Johansen discussed in many posts below? Her Indy website photos don't show her face. Since she charges so much, it would be sensible to see if you're really attracted to her face before making an appointment even though she has a hot body and provides GFE services. It has happened to me many times after I read about the rave reviews of many providers' services and bodies, I became disappointed when I saw their faces.
    I've met Sasha several times at parties. I didn't find her facially that attractive for my taste. A lot of guys would argue about my taste. LOL.

    I doubt very much that you would find any face pics of her, or her friends Melodie and Sonia, on social media. On the other hand I've seen her sometime duo partner Lea Abrams about 10 times and never for less than 3 hours.

    You didn't ask about Effy. Read her review thread and see if she is your type. She is a21 year old Part Chinese college girl. Her service is off the chart PSE.

    Lots of DFK with all kinds of kinky stuff.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
escort directory


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape