Smooci Advertiser Thread

[Syzygies]

I note many girls don't like a non-stop session and many expect a quick bang at one shot and out the door, but that's not what I do or expect. I have had a number of girls say round 1 was too much fucking and too tired for round 2. I am guessing they the reason I get low ratings?

Ramrodding them for 2 hours straight and usually not tipping? Yeah, that's probably it.

Come now do guys really give Escorts an extra tip? They are pretty expensive from the start. One would surely expect high service levels for the entire 2 hour booking.

Note the official way to quote a previous post's text, so don't need italics. Even if you are not quoting a post, you can still use QUOTE tags in square brackets.

[Franciscass]

This a tough one to call.

I guess it depends on how Smooci handle girl's comments / rating. It would be unfair if after a single booking a girl who was unhappy with not getting a tip gave a biased review and the customer was black balled.

However if the same customer gets continuous bad reviews because of his behavior even if it is short of actual physical violence I don't see a problem in the girls knowing this and deciding whether to take the booking or not. Some girls may be OK with being continuously pounded for 2 hours.

I disagree with the attitude I'm paying so she should shut up and keep quite.

[Growtek]

I note many girls don't like a non-stop session and many expect a quick bang at one shot and out the door, but that's not what I do or expect. I have had a number of girls say round 1 was too much fucking and too tired for round 2. I am guessing they the reason I get low ratings?

Ramrodding them for 2 hours straight and usually not tipping? Yeah, that's probably it.

[Growtek]

<I I note many girls don't like a non-stop session and many expect a quick bang at one shot and out the door, but that's not what I do or expect. I have had a number of girls say round 1 was too much fucking and too tired for round 2. I am guessing they the reason I get low ratings? </ I .

Ramrodding them for 2 hours straight and usually not tipping? Can't imagine why the low rating.

[Goatscrot]

No, that's not fairness. It's not a dating site. Customers are paying for a service. Girls are getting that money and delivering a service.

The whole idea of being rated as a customer is abhorrent and extremely ofputting to me. Of course, there should be a system for the girls to indicate violent customers or those who fail to pay (and those should eventually be banned from the site), but anything other than that should be off limits.

We're NOT on equal standing with the girls. If I want to suck up to girls and do what they want in order to curry approval, I'd rather go charm civilians, not pay a prostitute.

Agreed. The idea of rating the customer is not ok and would definitely keep me away.

[Crocodilexp]

Smooci are good to get his thing running, at least to be fair to both sides and not just one sided.

No, that's not fairness. It's not a dating site. Customers are paying for a service. Girls are getting that money and delivering a service.

The whole idea of being rated as a customer is abhorrent and extremely ofputting to me. Of course, there should be a system for the girls to indicate violent customers or those who fail to pay (and those should eventually be banned from the site), but anything other than that should be off limits.

We're NOT on equal standing with the girls. If I want to suck up to girls and do what they want in order to curry approval, I'd rather go charm civilians, not pay a prostitute.

[Tiandihui]

I am wondering what criteria the girls are asked to rate on for their bookings?

What is a rating less than 3 for a client supposed to represent?

I ask because I made a booking where the lady asked why my rating was 3, said I had no clue and neither did she. Either way she was reluctant to take booking.

So I am wondering what the ratings stand for, does the escort have a set criteria to judge?

I would think the only set criteria should be:

1) Did he pay you correctly.

2) Was he polite.

3) Was he aggressive or violent.

Otherwise, what is the rating supposed to mean and ladies can put any number depending on personal preference or if you didn't tip them more?

I can guess why my rating is 3 or less because I don't tip, unless service is 10/10 (many times its not).

Plus other big reason is I use the full 2 hours for my 2 shots with minimal breaks, I note many girls don't like a non-stop session and many expect a quick bang at one shot and out the door, but that's not what I do or expect. I have had a number of girls say round 1 was too much fucking and too tired for round 2. I am guessing they the reason I get low ratings?

Girls are wondering too how the customer judge her, I had girls complained to me, they did whatever the customer requested, but still they got 1-3 stars only. But when the girls asked the customer if everything alright, they said good and nice, but in the end, hahaha, bomb dropped. Got 1-3 stars. Some even funnier, ask for money first, paid and did the number of shots stated in the duration, customer feel good and dead and exhausted. Must be a happy ending to him I guessed, but later the girl received 2 stars. Just because she asked money first. Hahahaha. To the customer. Girls don't have the rights to feel unfair, but when customer gets low rating, they grumble.

Smooci are good to get his thing running, at least to be fair to both sides and not just one sided. Well, at least I'm having a 4 stars rating and I can't complain much about it. Some girls I do did a bit rough on them, but that's the moment which one can't be bother of anything and just go with the moment and get it off. Apologise to some of the girls. But overall all are good.

Talking about tipping, I believe in this escort industries, tipping is not mandatory but rather a extra bonus to the girls. Some I don't tip I still get 5 stars from them. Gave tip for the girl I did a bit rough on her, she still gave me 3 stars. But overall I'm 4.

[Vrsabien]

I am wondering what criteria the girls are asked to rate on for their bookings?

What is a rating less than 3 for a client supposed to represent?

I ask because I made a booking where the lady asked why my rating was 3, said I had no clue and neither did she. Either way she was reluctant to take booking.

So I am wondering what the ratings stand for, does the escort have a set criteria to judge?

I would think the only set criteria should be:

1) Did he pay you correctly.

2) Was he polite.

3) Was he aggressive or violent.

Otherwise, what is the rating supposed to mean and ladies can put any number depending on personal preference or if you didn't tip them more?

I can guess why my rating is 3 or less because I don't tip, unless service is 10/10 (many times its not).

Plus other big reason is I use the full 2 hours for my 2 shots with minimal breaks, I note many girls don't like a non-stop session and many expect a quick bang at one shot and out the door, but that's not what I do or expect. I have had a number of girls say round 1 was too much fucking and too tired for round 2. I am guessing they the reason I get low ratings?

[Vrsabien]

Messaged Vilisa after reading her reviews. She came to my condo on Soi 13 within one hour of messaging her. She's hot, great attitude. Looks just like her pictures but her fakes are a bit hard. Other than that, it was great. DFK, BBJ, DATY, A-level, COF (all uncovered). Came right in her eye. She took A-level like a champ. She cleaned up and massaged me, then we went for round 2. I let her stay longer, we cuddled for a bit, then Road 3. All in all she stayed 3 hours. Paid 4,500 baht. Happy hunting.

Gave this girl a spin.

Weird boob job, not awful but obvious.

Does it all but not my type. Lucky she got list so tured up 1 hour late so gave me cheaper 1 hour session.

Enjoys sex, likes watching videos (has a porn library on her phone).

Not for me but you rsw doggers might like her.

[SmoociApp]

Why do you want to debate with me on that? Have it occurred to you that I expressed my concern only because I am also a customer.

I just tell what I think is a better approach. What you do is up to you. I did read your private policy which is last updated 2017 which is before GDPR being enforced. It cites "Data Protection Act 1998" which is already replaced by "Data Protection Act 2018". Keep in mind that I don't claim to be an expert on "Data Protection Act", I just google them.

It is great if you confirm that you conform to everything. It will be even better you can explain your policy in layman's term in FAQ. If there is a question pop up here, you can simply explain and point to FAQ that it has been addressed previously. That to me is more effective.

We don't mean to be confrontational on this matter, but we did want to quickly refute the claim that we are not GDPR complaint and that clients card details and hotel / booking details are all on the site and hackable. This is incorrect, misleading and unfair.

In layman's terms we use data to try to determine whether clients and companions are genuine, and whether bookings / reviews were genuine. We try to store the minimum data to define and record this, so once we can mark a client as being genuine his email address and / or phone number are the piece of data we use to flag past and future bookings / reviews as genuine (or as unreliable or spam). For companions it is we store their IDs in order to verify that they are of a legal age, working of their own freewill, and to try stop them creating multiple accounts.

[Nounce]

GDPR is not optional, it's mandatory for businesses with EU clients. Our privacy policy and terms and conditions are detailed on our site.

Rather than trying to deflect, please tell us what it is you feel we are doing wrong. If you have a point we would like to know so we can fix it.

Why do you want to debate with me on that? Have it occurred to you that I expressed my concern only because I am also a customer.

I just tell what I think is a better approach. What you do is up to you. I did read your private policy which is last updated 2017 which is before GDPR being enforced. It cites "Data Protection Act 1998" which is already replaced by "Data Protection Act 2018". Keep in mind that I don't claim to be an expert on "Data Protection Act", I just google them.

It is great if you confirm that you conform to everything. It will be even better you can explain your policy in layman's term in FAQ. If there is a question pop up here, you can simply explain and point to FAQ that it has been addressed previously. That to me is more effective.

[SmoociApp]

You can help yourself and users. Why not just tell users you are GDPR compliant publicly on your web site.

GDPR is not optional, it's mandatory for businesses with EU clients. Our privacy policy and terms and conditions are detailed on our site.

Rather than trying to deflect, please tell us what it is you feel we are doing wrong. If you have a point we would like to know so we can fix it.

[Nounce]

To make a public statement that we are not compliant with the GDPR without saying what the issue / reason is, is not helpful to us or ther other users.

You can help yourself and users. Why not just tell users you are GDPR compliant publicly on your web site.

[SmoociApp]

Many people want to be discrete and not have record kept when paying for sex. That is the main difference. I think Smooci consider it is secure if the communication is secure but they don't mention much about how the data they store is secure. A hacker or government can easily get their data and match up with hotel guest record to get a customer's identity.

Another thing is that they are doing business in Europe but they don't seem to be compliant with European regulation GDPR .

We are very open to having a conversation about data and privacy, but it's not fair to make accusation and claims without any facts. We always welcome suggestions and feedback, Smooci is built on the feedback and needs of the clients and companions.

We do not collect data for any prupose other than to try to judge if a client / companion is genuine, and then whether the review and rating is genuine. Data is never used for marketing and our general policy is that we never make first contact. So if we see a client has made an error on a sign up or there is a need to contact a client due to something we see, we have wait for them to make first contact.

One of the main aims of the platform is to build an environment which limits fake and spam bookings and builds a source of verified / reliable reviews. Once a booking is complete and we have understood how trustworthy the client / companion is and how genuine the booking (and review) is, we can then delete the unecessary data such as hotel / room number, and no longer store that. Reviews and ratings are always kept anonymous (and we removed and personal info given out on them). We wiill try to make the ratings and reviews more dynamic, and we are currently working on a trustworthy score to give each ratings / review, but this will not be attached to anything such as a hotel / room / date.

We keep track of clients via use of phone and emails, names are always editble and removable, and on request we can also delete email and phone records. We try to not keep any unecessary data and limit the data we verify on the client. As mentioned in the last post, we require a lot more info from escorts and agencies in order for them to use Smooci.

We take data and privacy very seriously. Like any European based company who deal with client data we did a lot of work to make sure we are complaint with the GDPR, and we use those some practices and standards for all clients, including non-european clients. If you see something we are doing which is in contradiction to those data protection laws please let us know and we'd look into it immediately and fix it. To make a public statement that we are not compliant with the GDPR without saying what the issue / reason is, is not helpful to us or ther other users.

[SmoociApp]

So booked a smooci girl in Bangkok recently who said she was reluctant to take my booking cause one of my last bookings gave me a zero star rating.

Was surprised I had a rating cause I am not a premium member and didn't think I stored my details on the site or had a history of my bookings stored anywhere.

However, it seems Smooci collects and connects your bookings via name and or email address (probably email address) keeping a log of all your bookings for rating purposes.

I guess its good they keep track of their customers to give their girls proper info of likely customer, but not sure I like my details being stored on their site.

This main reason I don't go premium cause I don't want them also to have my credit card details and even more info about me.

The girls can be anonymous but the customer have to give out registered names at hotel booking, phone, email and credit card info.

Next time will be using burner email and common name, rather not have a profile on smooci with history.

If you buy prmeium you are not giving Smooci your card details. We use a payment gateway service who process that payment, and we are informed if the payment is successful. We only get notified that a payment was successful and the email address the payment was attached to. Once that is done a premium client has the ability to skip the phone verification, so a premium client can make a booking using less info.

We store minimum data and to say that companion can be anonymous but clients cannot, is also very incorrect and misleading. To work on Smooci a companion needs to have a copy of their government ID accepted and they must allow us access to their location settings when using the app. The only piece of information we verify with the clients is a mobile number, no other information is verified or marked as accurate.