Thread: Smooci Advertiser Thread
+
Add Report
Results 301 to 315 of 1196
-
09-28-18 10:10 #896
Posts: 12856Originally Posted by Crocodilexp [View Original Post]
Influx would mean a larger selection but mostly less appealing. Most girls in the influx would not be able to make enough money. Demand is only so large.
Sure if ALL the girls were making big money hand over fist, you could expect a big influx. I suspect many girls try and fail to make it or are not patient enough to build a reputation or clientele.
We could all wish to be movie stars because movie stars make big money but we could turn up to Hollywood and find no one is interested.
Change is generally Gradual! Sudden huge change usually fails. How fast did the internet take off?
-
09-27-18 11:58 #895
Posts: 217Berlin launch
We are pleased to announce that Smooci will be launching in Berlin, Germany on 9th October http://blog.smooci.com/post/berlin-launch.
This will be our first European launch and we will be looking to follow it up with further European launches in the coming months https://smooci.com/europe.
-
09-17-18 12:52 #894
Posts: 1136Excellent!
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
09-17-18 10:55 #893
Posts: 1232Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
Smooci is ostensibly not an agency, but an online marketplace, albeit one that cornered a very specific niche of overpriced escorts for less-than-demanding Farang customers. Somehow, girls there manage to charge 2 x to 3 x the price of local competitors like FinFanFan. Admittedly, the website and ordering experience is superior, but girl quality, quantity or selection are certainly not.
Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
When Smooci started out, I had high hopes that they would become a big mass-market platform (like ThaiFriendly, but for paid sex) and that influx of freelance providers would push prices down to reasonable levels (and make the selection more appealing as well). Thailand definitely has a need for such a platform, both on the demand and supply side.
Unfortunately, that has not happened. At this point, it seems that Smooci is simply not interested in targeting the mass market outside their niche. Not sure why, maybe if they became big enough, they'd get busted by the authorities, or make less profit. Disappointing, but can't blame them, they're a business.
-
09-17-18 07:54 #892
Posts: 5454Originally Posted by Syzygies [View Original Post]
lol. When was the last time anyone other than ME argued for any of the review mechanisms to finally be related directly to whether or not the girl actually fully and completely performed the services listed or as conscientiously as might be expected for the money? And then be blasted with flame throwers by the supposed escort service regulars for daring to suggest such a horrible thing?
-
09-17-18 06:43 #891
Posts: 12856Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
To me many escorts are plain looking in the face in particular, I don't like the over blown tits, nose jobs, etc. So I am very wary, since I like to see exactly what I am getting and preferably know the character as well.
Is the girl performance, consistently above the norm? I presume that is what motivates most guys to keep booking escorts, plus they presumably love the surgeries look.
In the end it is just a competition. The girl just has to believe she can beat other girls already working as Escorts.
75% of bar girls and 95% of Oily MP girls are probably just to ordinary (or ugly) to make it in the Escort world. Am I wrong? Presumably the escorts have to have a fairly good body, no disaster areas, and have fairly good skills, and have a face that appeals at least to someone. They can't be too average.
-
09-17-18 03:15 #890
Posts: 5454Originally Posted by SmoociApp [View Original Post]
On that count, an agency like Smooci provides an extremely sweet deal for the girl. In fact, I might go so far as to say it has "pre-negotiated" a deal between the girl and her customer that is so sweet for the girl most experienced punters would reject it in a nanosecond if it were proposed by a girl in a go-go bar, a beer bar, Thermae, Beer Garden Soi 7, on the street or in an online dating site and strongly encourage others to reject it as well for fear of "ruining the market", so to speak, if you believe in things like that.
Just for starters, the customer will be committed to a non-refundable 1,000-2,000 baht cancellation fee on arrival and at first sight of the girl in the flesh. That ought to go a long way to keeping him committed to proceeding with the next step of expenditure no matter what he sees or encounters when that hotel room door swings open. Next, he'll have ten minutes to refine any negotiation loose ends that were not tapped down at the point of booking. Of course, she can say anything she wants during that ten minute final negotiation since he has also been told he must Pay Upfront at the ten minute mark and before anything else happens. After which, if she pulls the kind of things many Pay Upfront FLs would do after pocketing the money beforehand, her only concern might be getting a low Star Rating. But soon enough she might already feel fairly safe in the knowledge that maintaining a pleasant demeanor through whatever does or doesn't occur of a sexual nature in the room will likely assure her a decent if not better than decent Star Rating anyway.
And, should the customer display any negative vibe, displeasure in her behavior or ask for something that in any way offends or bothers her, even issues having to do with the Pay Upfront deal, she can always go back and give him a secret 1 Star Rating that he will never know about but all the other girls he tries to book will. That will also help to weed out the "complainer" or "problem" customers and naturally select for very low demand, easy, go with the flow and accept what you get with a smile at any cost customers over time. Along with the accompanying higher Star Ratings for the girls one would expect from fellows like that.
I don't think it's a mystery at all why a girl would sign up with someone or an agency who has already "pre-negotiated" that kind of deal for her. The mystery is why a much larger percentage of girls in the FL pool as well as every other P4P option pool who can at least produce a fairly fetching small photo album hasn't signed up with them already. Maybe many girls just don't know about them. Yet.
-
09-16-18 19:40 #889
Posts: 217Originally Posted by Crocodilexp [View Original Post]
The only payments we receieve from anyone are premium client payments and premium escort payments. We do not recieve any other payments on or off the record.
We actually restrict the number of agencies and agency girls on the platform and chat to the agencies (and do some basic research) before accepting any. We are happy to work with good agencies who have built a strong reputation as it not only gives Smooci credibility it also helps set standards, but we look for agencies with experience and quality, and we don't get any kickbacks, commissions, or any other payments other than the premium memberships (agency's get a free private dashabord but are required to cover all the premium fees for their escorts).
We don't require or encourage girls to join agencies. When an independent contacts us she is sent the app and can create an independent account. We already have a lot of independents on Smooci.
I cannot answer you why some girls chose to work for agencies, I would say there are a variety of reasons. This is not a new situation, escort directories advertising both agencies and independents have been around for a long time, and not so long ago backpage and craiglist were booming for independents, but some girls still preferred to work for agencies.
-
09-15-18 00:59 #888
Posts: 183Originally Posted by Crocodilexp [View Original Post]
-
09-14-18 23:00 #887
Posts: 1232Thank you, those answers are interesting, but don't sound particularly convincing.
Originally Posted by GCNovice [View Original Post]
Maybe there's a bit of one-time overhead with taking photos and posting a profile, but 90% of the Thais I know use Facebook and have no problem doing such stuff.
Originally Posted by GCNovice [View Original Post]
Even if they do get plenty of regular business from agencies, why use them agencies for Smooci, if they have an option of signing up independently and keeping all the money?
Originally Posted by GCNovice [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by GCNovice [View Original Post]
-
09-14-18 13:09 #886
Posts: 60Originally Posted by Crocodilexp [View Original Post]
1. Too lazy, basically they don't want to manage the bookings themselves, it's a lot of management and work.
2. Agency provides "stable" work, girls become loyal to them.
3. Agency provides safety, if somethings go wrong, run like the wind or you'll have someone at your door.
Again, I do not work for smooci, just a broken person after going to BKK.
I wonder how many people here actually use the service. Or talk to WG without the "can you do this." questions.
-
09-14-18 05:21 #885
Posts: 1222Originally Posted by Crocodilexp [View Original Post]
I imagine as the app gains popularity with increasing views advertising will play a part in the revenue mix.
-
09-14-18 02:34 #884
Posts: 1232Originally Posted by SmoociApp [View Original Post]
-
09-12-18 23:13 #883
Posts: 217Originally Posted by Bkkdog [View Original Post]
'Smooci does absolutely no age verification'.
We have now launched the age verification feature so escorts have the option to verify their age. This is done by checking their date of birth against an accepted ID. It is then locked to their date of birth and highlighted on the site to premium members as VERIFIED. You can also use the filter feature to only see verified ages.
This is optional for the companions and at the moment only a few have verified but we hope to see this become more natoable in the coming days / weeks. We launched this a few days ago andhad an error with our notification system which is now fixed, so tomorrow we will begin to notify the companions and hope that it will encourage more girls to verify their age.
'they pay 450 Baht to Smooci'.
This is not true. We receive '0' commission from the escorts, and they have the option to use the app totally for free. Free accounts have some restrictions which limit them to 1 booking every 3 days and they can pay for a premium account which is $50 for a month. But we don't receive any part of the booking fee from any companions. Agencies usually take a fee per booking from the girl and this is different for each agency, but they are also responsible for paying the app fees of their girls.
If a girl is claiming she is paying a commission to Smooci and she seems genuine, please let us know as we would like to look into who she is paying this too. We did actually have one incident where some guy downloaded the app for 2 independent girls in Bangkok and charged them a fee or commission, but this was last year and was stopped and dealt with.
'some bookings add a taxi fare depending on where the lady is located but it does not mention that'.
Previously this was done zonally. So if you were staying outside of the central areas of Bangkok (10 km radius from ASOK), the system would add a 500 Baht travel fee, which would be show to the client before the booking is confirmed. We are now starting to change this so that the system can calculate travel times and travel distances based on the distance between the client and the companion. We don't allow companions or agencies to set their own travel fees, these will only be added when the distance is significant and calculated by us and what we deem as a fair amount.
'it shows the customer booking history, the commission the ladies must pay, and the reviews of the customer. These reviews for free members will show your name, email address and phone number. The girls can see all this'.
This is absolutely not true. When a companion receives a booking she will see 3 icons at the top:
1. An icon to show if the client is a premium member or free user.
2. An icon to show if the client is a new users or regular user (has had bookings before).
3. The clients average rating out of 5.
Other than the 3 simple icons absolutely no other booking history is shown anywhere to the companion or on the site. A while back we experimented with the idea of allowing the companions to write reviews of clients but this was scrapped, and now we use a simple anonmyous rating.
Again, any commission she is requested to pay is to her agency and added by them, companions pay 0 commission to Smooci.
I can only assume you are mistaken and have looked at a companions app to see her clients detail. I. e. When she accepts a booking she recieves the clients name, location, and contact details, which are all needed in order for her to attend the booking. There is absolutely no way a companion can see who a client has met previously, and any other details. Even one the companions comments on their profile pages we try to keep it completely anonmyous, only showing the month, year, rating and comment, with no details of the client, and delaying the posting so that it is less obvious which of their clients left the comments.
-
09-12-18 11:34 #882
Posts: 60Well, now.
Originally Posted by Bkkdog [View Original Post]
WG able to see John's real name is F'and BS, if true. IDK, I don't read the service agreement, but if it states in their agreement, that's on me for not reading. If not.