Smooci Advertiser Thread

[Breadman]

Have to say I love the new proximity addition to your website. Its nice to know which girls might take longer to reach you with traffic if you just want a quicky. I see that its free for everyone to see those girls who show their location although some girls aren't shown with a distance. I did check the Manila section and most of the girls there seemed to be showing how far away they are. It does add that little extra help in planning if you know how far away the girl is you want to see and understand the traffic backups at certain times. If you have premium membership do all the girls show up with distances to your hotel?

[Franciscass]

Stating whether or not she is shaved or hairy will also help the hairy girls get booked by those rare men who actually prefer such a thing. May they both live happily ever after together.

I feel we can agree Smooci is a great platform for ease of booking but there is room for improvement when it comes to listing escorts profiles and exactly what services they are offering. Agree excluding FS can be confusing. Added to shaven or not could be breast enhanced or not in most instances a personal dislike of mine.

[EihTooms]

With respect I feel it's a given that a session with an escort includes as standard covered vaginal sex. Other reasonably expected services need to be explained such as is the BJ covered, where / how you can ejaculate, is DFK and receiving and giving oral included. More specific services such as anal cannot be assumed.

Applaud Smooci on planning to roll out age verification. May I suggest they include in their escort profiles weight and whether shaved or not, a personal predilection of mine.

It might be a given in the minds of many, but I see that some version of FS, Full Service, Vaginal Sex, Safe Sex (covered), etc. is still clearly stated as an individual service offered by each girl in their profiles on most of the escort services' original websites. So it apparently isn't confusing to the customers booking through those sites instead of through Smooci or to the girls. I also see what appears to be a resurgence of the term "GFE", even "Ultimate GFE" on a few Bangkok escort services' websites, occasionally instead of terms like FS, Full Service, Vaginal Sex, etc. Not sure I see that as a good thing since those terms only mean whatever the girl thinks they mean and not one lick, suck or poke more, covered or uncovered.

BTW, I fully support your suggestion about including Shaved or Not. I know some men like and prefer a thick jungle down there. But that number and percentage must be dwarfed by those who much prefer shaved or at least very, very closely trimmed. I rarely meet a punter who doesn't make an icky face and shake off the heebie-jeebies when relating a story about encountering a hairy bush girl. It is one of the reasons knowing precisely whether or not a girl does indeed perform a genuine BBBJ+CIM is so important to me. If a girl drops her drawers and she's got a hairy bush, I am no longer the least bit interested in fighting through that mess to engage in DATY or even FS. So the BBBJ+CIM option is the only thing left to save the day for me.

Stating whether or not she is shaved or hairy will also help the hairy girls get booked by those rare men who actually prefer such a thing. May they both live happily ever after together.

[EihTooms]

We were receiving a lot of contacts from clients who didn't understand what full service meant, due to the fact that many girls were not selecting it. To save confusion for now we have removed it for now.

Yes, there were always several girls who never listed Full Service (FS) as an offered service. Now that FS is not mentioned at all, does that mean the 1,000-1,500 baht Cancellation Fee On Arrival is waved if the girl shows up and says, sorry I don't do that and did not say I would?

[Franciscass]

We want to create more verified informmation but also understand the trends of creative license with information in the escort industry. We aren't purposely protecting any use of misinformation but we don't want to be too heavy handed and are looking to ease in long term solutions.

Not sure what you mean by "understand the trends of creative license". I get it most escort"s profiles on booking sites particularly on age and pics are misleading, that's why we look to Smooci to be the leader in transparency. You transformed the booking process why not the accuracy of what to expect when you open the door. Not easy I know but doable.

[Franciscass]

Has anyone else noticed that Full Service (FS) is no longer included among the services offered by the girls on Smooci? Unless there is some very weird thing happening with my computer or the terminology has changed without my noticing, it appears no girl on Smooci offers FS anymore and you cannot filter for FS.

With respect I feel it's a given that a session with an escort includes as standard covered vaginal sex. Other reasonably expected services need to be explained such as is the BJ covered, where / how you can ejaculate, is DFK and receiving and giving oral included. More specific services such as anal cannot be assumed.

Applaud Smooci on planning to roll out age verification. May I suggest they include in their escort profiles weight and whether shaved or not, a personal predilection of mine.

[SmoociApp]

My sense is Smooci are dragging their heels on age verification because they know it's a problem for the escorts. I would hazard a guess and say listed age profiles are almost uniformly inaccurate so asking them to provide proof of age is a nonstarter. In fairness this is not particular to Smooci, it applies to all escorts sites worldwide but come on people be the leader and give it a shot. Perhaps enhance the attraction and include it only for premium.

Not at all. Our motivation is to create the best possible platform for genuine escorts and clients. We want to create more verified informmation but also understand the trends of creative license with information in the escort industry. We aren't purposely protecting any use of misinformation but we don't want to be too heavy handed and are looking to ease in long term solutions.

We are actually testing the age verification today and expect to have it implemented and live by the end of the week, or early next week.

Smooci really took off much quicker than expected and in terms of tech development we have a small but skilled team and many ideas and improvements we are working on. We understand we can be a bit slow on some promised updates, but I can guarantee you we are working hard and moving in the right direction.

[SmoociApp]

Hello Smooci,

I was wondering if you put in a tentative date for Pattaya or have started gathering the contacts yet.

Any info on this would be really appreciated.

We understand the high demand for the Pattaya launch and we are hoping to launch it in Oct / Nov. Our goal has alway been to get established in at least 3-4 more countries before expanding locally in Thailand, and we are due for our current tech developments to be complete around mid October. After this we will have scheduled launches for several European locations too.

[SmoociApp]

Has anyone else noticed that Full Service (FS) is no longer included among the services offered by the girls on Smooci? Unless there is some very weird thing happening with my computer or the terminology has changed without my noticing, it appears no girl on Smooci offers FS anymore and you cannot filter for FS.

For 2 hour Short Times in Bangkok, there a 27 year old girl right now (ketty) with a 4.9 Star Rating who only offers BBBJ, COB, DATY, DFK, Guide and Massage for 4,000 baht, not even CIM. Another girl (Plang, 20) is rated at 4.7 Stars and only offers two things, COB and DFK, for 3,750 baht. Another one (sea, 25 years old, no Star Rating yet) only offers BBBJ, COB, DFK, Guide and Massage for 8,000 baht!

26 year old Veranika only provides BBBJ, DFK and Massage for 5,500 baht. And for that she has earned a 5.0 Star Rating.

On the upside, I think they are all praised for always responding within 10 minutes. LOL. I would imagine so.

We were receiving a lot of contacts from clients who didn't understand what full service meant, due to the fact that many girls were not selecting it. To save confusion for now we have removed it for now.

We would prefer to not comment on individual girls on this thread, but we can guarantee you that no ratings or comments are fake or edited. A companion may change their details, phots, services, or rates at any time but the comments and ratings will remain visible.

[GCNovice]

Has anyone else noticed that Full Service (FS) is no longer included among the services offered by the girls on Smooci? Unless there is some very weird thing happening with my computer or the terminology has changed without my noticing, it appears no girl on Smooci offers FS anymore and you cannot filter for FS.

For 2 hour Short Times in Bangkok, there a 27 year old girl right now (ketty) with a 4.9 Star Rating who only offers BBBJ, COB, DATY, DFK, Guide and Massage for 4,000 baht, not even CIM. Another girl (Plang, 20) is rated at 4.7 Stars and only offers two things, COB and DFK, for 3,750 baht. Another one (sea, 25 years old, no Star Rating yet) only offers BBBJ, COB, DFK, Guide and Massage for 8,000 baht!

26 year old Veranika only provides BBBJ, DFK and Massage for 5,500 baht. And for that she has earned a 5.0 Star Rating.

On the upside, I think they are all praised for always responding within 10 minutes. LOL. I would imagine so.

FS is still offered, just harder to know if it's actually on the table or not. Maybe they did it for legal purposes or whatever, hard to tell due to lack of notification besides the twitter thing. Another update they did was asking for hotel info before you can search. Time wasted step when I just want to search real quick if a WG is active or not.

[EihTooms]

Has anyone else noticed that Full Service (FS) is no longer included among the services offered by the girls on Smooci? Unless there is some very weird thing happening with my computer or the terminology has changed without my noticing, it appears no girl on Smooci offers FS anymore and you cannot filter for FS.

For 2 hour Short Times in Bangkok, there a 27 year old girl right now (ketty) with a 4.9 Star Rating who only offers BBBJ, COB, DATY, DFK, Guide and Massage for 4,000 baht, not even CIM. Another girl (Plang, 20) is rated at 4.7 Stars and only offers two things, COB and DFK, for 3,750 baht. Another one (sea, 25 years old, no Star Rating yet) only offers BBBJ, COB, DFK, Guide and Massage for 8,000 baht!

26 year old Veranika only provides BBBJ, DFK and Massage for 5,500 baht. And for that she has earned a 5.0 Star Rating.

On the upside, I think they are all praised for always responding within 10 minutes. LOL. I would imagine so.

[AdvancedPerson]

Hello Smooci,

I was wondering if you put in a tentative date for Pattaya or have started gathering the contacts yet.

Any info on this would be really appreciated.

[SmoociApp]

Didn't say it was your website but it is a girl on your website that obviously isn't the age that she is listed.

We are hoping the optional age verification will help tackle things like that. While we won't force girls to lock in their date of birth we will highlight those who do.

[Franciscass]

We have only been launched just over 18 months and independents only 6 months so we don't have many girls who have worked more than a year. But it is correct that the first version of the girls app asks for age and not date of birth. That will be corrected as soon as we launch the age verification option.

My sense is Smooci are dragging their heels on age verification because they know it's a problem for the escorts. I would hazard a guess and say listed age profiles are almost uniformly inaccurate so asking them to provide proof of age is a nonstarter. In fairness this is not particular to Smooci, it applies to all escorts sites worldwide but come on people be the leader and give it a shot. Perhaps enhance the attraction and include it only for premium.

[Breadman]

That's not the Smooci. We only launched at the end of 2017.

Didn't say it was your website but it is a girl on your website that obviously isn't the age that she is listed.