Thread: Smooci Advertiser Thread
+
Add Report
Results 811 to 825 of 1196
-
09-05-17 16:49 #386
Posts: 1222Originally Posted by GrandaddyPerp [View Original Post]
-
09-05-17 16:11 #385
Posts: 217Originally Posted by Crocodilexp [View Original Post]
Premium members are able to see the review comments which also show the scores, so in that respect you can view some of the most recent scores and comments first, in the context of the overall rating. But what you are suggesting is a good idea, and something we will make note of for when we get to review the rating code again. Thanks.
-
09-05-17 10:45 #384
Posts: 1232Originally Posted by SmoociApp [View Original Post]
I think that would be a good idea to both reflect degradation in service (girls do get lazy over time), as well as reward improvement (rare, but happens). If a girl has 10 ratings it may not matter (and could even arguably be unrepresentative by letting one sessions skew the result), but if she has 100, I sure care more about the recent ones than ones several months ago.
-
09-05-17 05:06 #383
Posts: 115Originally Posted by Paolo99 [View Original Post]
I think the access to user profiles and comment history can really be beneficial because there exists two very divisive groups within the sex monger scene. There are a good number of guys who see sex workers as underprivileged people and see themselves as white knights and any experience they have is amazing regardless of the level of service because they don't want to hurt the woman's business. They will skew the numbers higher than reality.
On the other hand, there are guys who are extremely cynical and see the women as things and can become quite bitter and have a superiority complex. They tend to have unrealistic expectations, can often be abusive, so they could then skew the numbers in a totally different direction and their comments can often be quite damaging, more so than the first group.
Being able to see these histories can help weed out the people who may not be giving accurate reviews.
-
09-05-17 03:21 #382
Posts: 183Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
-
09-05-17 01:12 #381
Posts: 5452Originally Posted by Dan7373 [View Original Post]
Of course, since neither of us was the punter who wrote the original report and neither of us is the girl and neither of us was sitting in that room to observe first hand, we don't know the truth or what her reasons were for balking at and refusing to provide "half" the services she listed on her profile and balking at enduring as much as 7 minutes of FS. But my experience in Thailand's P4P environment tells me when I hear that kind of report it was merely a typical scammer encounter and it no longer strikes me as so unusual as to lead me to assume anything else. Such as when a cowboy hears hoof beats outside his barn door he thinks of horses and has very little reason to stretch his imagination into thinking that might be a herd of zebras outside instead.
And there is more to consider here that leads me to my conclusion. A 20 y.o. girl that looks (in her pics at least) as perfectly acceptably attractive as the one in question who is only pulling a 4.1 Star rating is very likely NOT also honestly delivering the goods listed on her profile or her rating would be over 4.5, imo. It can't be that middling a rating just because she has been booked by a string of brutish, inconsiderate customers who expect too much of her.
-
09-04-17 21:59 #380
Posts: 926Originally Posted by SmoociApp [View Original Post]
It's true that the girls I've met did not appear on smooci from the beginning. They were there at most 2 or 3 months before I booked them, and at least one of them had very few bookings at the time I met her, so your explanation is pretty accurate in my opinion.
-
09-04-17 18:20 #379
Posts: 926Originally Posted by Dan7373 [View Original Post]
By the way, she is not kind with you when she has sex with you. She does it in exchange of a considerable amount of money. If she was kind she would do it for free for some guys, or would accept that some guys give her less money for any given reason. By reading reviews about her it appears that she had that attitude with many customers, so she is exactly the opposite of a kind girl, I would say that she looks very close to a scammer, at least her customers should know before booking her that she expects every guys to be very quick to finish.
-
09-04-17 15:22 #378
Posts: 1089Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
You don't know the truth, until you hear both sides. And the lady obviously isn't here to tell her side of the story.
I used to put on two condoms to make myself last longer with the lady. And I really pounded the chick with my dick. It was an enjoyable experience for me. And the lady let me do it too. Because I was giving her more money than most guys, and I was staying with her for my whole vacation. But later I found out that she was getting rubber burns and abrasions in her pussy and going to see the doctor once in a while, when she was with me.
The lady won't necessarily tell you the reason why she wants you to stop after a 7-minute ride. But chances are that she probably has a good reason for it.
Just because the lady is kind enough to have sex for money with you, doesn't mean that you can do whatever you want with her and treat her like a thing, rather than the human being she is.
-
09-04-17 11:10 #377
Posts: 217Originally Posted by Paolo99 [View Original Post]
Around 40% of users currently give ratings after a booking. But it's also worth to bear in mind that some of the girls have been on the platform for over 9 months and had a large amount of bookings, so a single rating may not make an immediate noticable difference, especially if that rating is close to her average, whereas with a new companion will see her rating change very noticably with each new rating.
We are very pleased with the way the rating system is now working and the large amount of positive feedback we are getting. It's not a perfect science, and some guys still book girls with very low ratings and have a great time, whilst you could also book a girl with a very high rating and find the chemistry isn't quite there, but we feel the rating and comments are still very useful to most users.
-
09-04-17 06:49 #376
Posts: 5452Originally Posted by Tiandihui [View Original Post]
But as far as the Smooci service goes, what would one have to know from personal experience that contradicts what everyone can see is the way they handle and present their rating system that would lead you or anyone else to believe my observations of it aren't valid? In fact, my observation that one would be best to stick with girls rated 4.5 or greater if actual delivery of the services listed on their profiles really matters to you precisely matches that of the owner of Smooci. And I posted that observation weeks before he did. It is just one of those things anyone can easily figure out based on how the site is set up even if you have not actually typed in a booking and given someone your hotel room number.
The "experience" at issue is what one sees and reads on their website, whether or not it can tell you much regarding delivery of services listed, not anything whatsoever to do with what happens when you go through the booking process. I already know the various things likely to happen when a P4P girl shows up at your hotel room and the door shuts behind you. I don't believe my actually booking a girl through them is going to reveal something startlingly different I hadn't considered.
So, tell us, other than discovering exactly how long it takes for the girl to arrive to your room after you've made the online booking, how much back and forth communication between Smooci, your hotel and you is required to get it done, whether she was punctual or not, whether she expected more money than posted or not, what is it about Smooci's service and / or rating system has been misunderstood by those of us who have not actually booked through them? And where on their website might we get the clarification of that you believe you are privy to having booked through them while the rest of us are not?
-
09-04-17 02:33 #375
Posts: 4Guys,
I need some help. Most of the girls on Smooci seem to be bad or reluctant at DFK from my experience. I am a premium member and most reviews don't really tell you if the girl is good or bad at DFK. Can anyone with prior experience with smooci girls point me in the direction of some girls who are good at DFK??
-
09-03-17 16:02 #374
Posts: 926Originally Posted by GrandaddyPerp [View Original Post]
There is also another point to take in consideration. I've used smooci five times and I've given a rate each times. The next day, the girl's rate was different than her rate prior to my booking with each girls. That means that my rating had a real influence on the girl's global rate.
Now I'm regularly looking at smooci and I see a lot of girls with rates that doesn't change at all, some of these girls are the ones that I've met earlier. I see these girls available many times, disappear for some hours then reappear on smooci. I cannot believe that these girls are never chosen by any customer. So my conclusion is that a lot of customer do not even bother giving a rate after their session. As you said the rating helps to separate the providers in two categories: girls below 4.2 only for adventurous guys and girls over 4.2 that seems to be the best ones but we still have no guarantee that they will perform well or that their pic is accurate or not.
-
09-03-17 04:35 #373
Posts: 115Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]
I think that there is some sort of misconceived notion of what smooci is.
All the app is doing is providing customers with a more convenient way to order up escorts and to potentially separate the best from the rest of a fairly limited pool but mostly in regards to accuracy of pics. It doesn't guarantee anything related to the services and looks of the ladies nor does it change the realities of the industry. The ratings are all provided by the users and as we know all too well YMMV.
-
09-03-17 03:33 #372
Posts: 183Originally Posted by EihTooms [View Original Post]