Stupid shit in Medellin

[Villainy]

My attitude in terms of what I am willing to pay has in no way shape or form anything to do with how I treat the girls. I am always kind, never rude or violent.

But at the end of the day it is a service that you consume. You really do not have to pretend it is more than that. And prices matter. Not everyone makes $150 k+ a year.

You can dress it up however you want. But let's look at what you said.

Tough luck. I'm not there to support hookers. I am here to use them. No moral issues with that at all. If any of those girls were in the US they would not even look at you.

Sounds harsh but what I am saying is if roles were reversed you can bet your ass that they would not give a flying FK about you either.

I am not saying you need to pay a girl close to what would be required in the US or in Europe but you might try to show just a modicum of humanity. 5 or 10 dollars (converted to COP) as a tip would mean nothing to you (at least I hope not) but for her it is food for the family for a few days.

[Elvis 2008]

When I speak of 'science', I generally mean 'the science community in general'. As you agree it is often (but not always) wrong. As a species we seem to be very good at developing technology (scientific breakthroughs) but lag way behind in understanding its impact. The issue w the COVID discussion here, I think, is that you are willing to accept what one section of the scientific community is saying, the section that is corrupted by capitalism, and dismiss the skeptics. It seems your general leaning is on the wrong side of the fence on this one.

As far as the new hypothesis goes WRT polio polio refers to a paralysis caused by inflammation at the base of the spine. The polio virus causes this, but so do various other things the virus is far from unique in causing that. So when 'scientists' claim that they recorded polio in the 18th century they mean that people were observed with this paralysis at that time. No doubt there were sufferers of paralysis at the time, but that does not mean that the virus caused it. And indeed, no scientist had the know-how to identify a virus at that time. So the new hypothesis is that the polio VIRUS arrived in the USA at the end of the 19th century along with the new and widespread use of DDT, thus causing the epidemic.

Note a polio epidemic is not the same as polio. Just as COVID can exist without there being a COVID epidemic.

TK, almost all causes of neurodegeneration are the same, excessive amounts of the neurotransmitter glutamate destroy nervous cells. In polio, apparently only 1% of cases go that far. When I was looking at the numbers, I was shocked at how few cases of polio resulted in nervous system damage.

One of the issues I had with vaccines causing autism is if you talk about mercury, lead, aluminum is if you talk about direct toxicity to the brain, the brain shrinks. However, if these elements interfere with the ability to lower glutamate, the brain actually swells as there is more glutamate to detoxify and one of the by products of glutamate detoxification is excessive water production, and that IMO is why autistics have bigger heads. So IMO mercury's role with autism had to be indirect.

And while dopamine is the attention part of ADHD, glutamate is they hyperactive part. So you take an ADHD person, and they are more likely to be physical attractive because they are high energy people and to be normal and lower their glutamate, they exercise like crazy. Bipolars and borderlines are similar to ADHD, and these types of people typify the multiorgasmic, good in bed, easily slighted types. There is truth to the phrase the crazy ones are the best in bed and why negging can work. And alcohol and Xanax lower glutamate as well, so these people are likely to seek drugs like this out. Thing is my gal is ADHD and of the three types, they are the least crazy.

So with all these neurodegenerative diseases like ALS, MS, Alzheimer's, and poliomyelitis, the cause is the same, excessive glutamate but because there is such variance in glutamate levels between people, double blind studies, AKA "science" are not going to pick out. And when you have someone like myself who can spot a bipolar, borderline, or ADHD person a mile away, I can stick them in the control group and the low glutamate people, the chilled out hippie types, into the group getting vaccines or DDT or whatever, and rig a study. And you really cannot measure glutamate levels but like I can said, I can observe people or ask them questions and figure it out in a minute. In fact, my seemingly innocuous questions like, "When you study for school, do you need absolute quiet?" clue me into what their levels are. Low glutamate people can study in a rock concert.

The same goes with dopamine. I will ask "do you lose your keys and phone a lot?" That is another simple question. If you are low in dopamine, you will say yes. That also tells me the person has above average physical stamina as that is well known with low dopamine people. Thing is you cannot accurately measure dopamine levels either.

The problem with DDT, aluminum, mercury, and lead is that blood levels are only good for recent exposures. If you go a few months out, you have to chelate and then measure urine levels. Only then can you see how much those poisons are affecting people. RFK Jr. Caught one of these vaccinologists lying about the mercury put in vaccines. There was a version of mercury, the "safe kind", that was put in vaccines. People would get the vaccines and no one knew where the mercury went. It took a series of autopsies to show that the "safe kind" of mercury went right into the brain. RFK Jr. Asked the vaccinologist if he was aware of those biopsy results, and the vaccinologist hung up the phone on him.

For now, those who say vaccines do not cause autism have to explain why doctors cannot find an unvaccinated kid with autism and why the Amish, who mostly do not get vaccinated, have close to no autism in their communities. As I said before, I could easily rig a study to show why vaccines do not cause autism based on my observations.

So with DDT like mercury and lead, the mechanism is the same. In numerical terms, if you have to get to 100 to have poliomyelitis, maybe DDT adds 20 points. If you focus on the people who are likely to be 80 or less, you can design a study showing DDT is safe.

The other simple measure with things is blood type. I am O positive the most common type. I always do well with vaccines. Everyone told me the same thing. You have pain at the site the next day, and that is what I had. The second vax left my whole arm tender to the touch for three days. People misunderstood what I meant when I said that. That was my body reacting to the vaccine.

So if this happens to me, can you imagine how other people like AB negative types would react? I talked to one Mexican lady who had trouble walking around for a year. And this lady lived in a hilly neighborhood in Mexico, and she would fly around town once recovered. She got maimed after the first booster and her friends, family, and coworkers wanted to get more boosters. Can you imagine this shit?

And so when I see doctors, I do not want the ones with mastery of the studies. I can read the studies. I want doctors that are familiar with diagnosis and treatments. So when I talk to a an autism doctor I know and respect and ask him how many times he has seen vaccines lead to autism, and he rolls his eyes and says "thousands", that means a helluva lot more to me than some Fauci funded study. The whole concept of anecdotal as worthless completely depends on something else you cannot measure, the character of the observer. And in this case, it was not some doctor with an agenda but a doctor frustrated beyond belief at how many children have been hurt.

[Zeos1]

This is both wild and interesting Can you give us the source of this information about its use in the Ukraine war? I can't find it. Thanks

.

That is hilarious stuff. Someone in a basement somewhere is laughing their ass off at how it's spreading.

[Argo1990]

With that attitude you are probably right. No girl would give a flying FK about you.

My attitude in terms of what I am willing to pay has in no way shape or form anything to do with how I treat the girls. I am always kind, never rude or violent.

But at the end of the day it is a service that you consume. You really do not have to pretend it is more than that. And prices matter. Not everyone makes $150 k+ a year.

[AmorPorFavor]

This is both wild and interesting Can you give us the source of this information about its use in the Ukraine war? I can't find it. Thanks

.

You can't find it because it is just more internet bullshit that people believe.

[IamLookin]

This is both wild and interesting Can you give us the source of this information about its use in the Ukraine war? I can't find it. Thanks

Electric vehicles are very dangerous, especially the ones made in China. They are prone to explode and set fires.

I came across this report recently.

"Russia is preparing to file a complaint against the Ukraine, accusing them of war crimes. The Ukraine, facing a shortage of bombs and artillery ammunition due to the US Congress' allowing a lapse in foreign aid, has made up for the shortfall by dropping Chinese electric vehicles from bombers and launching electric vehicle batteries from artillery and long range rockets. Ukrainian saboteurs have also parked Chinese electric vehicles near Russian ammunition depots, defense plants, and aerodromes and allowed them to catch fire spontaneously, starting fires that take fire fighters days to extinguish and releasing toxic fumes that force the evacuation of nearby workers and residents. According to Moscow, this is an illegal circumvention of Geneva Convention rules against the use of Napalm and chemical weapons. ".

.

[Iguana Six]

They understand. I think they just use more of a cross that bridge when we come to it approach. When cars came out they knew the engine exhaust gave off pollution. But at least we will not have to deal with all this horseshit everywhere anymore. When electric cars came out they knew how mining lithium for the batteries fucks up the environment and the miners. But at least we will not have to deal with this smog anymore.

Electric vehicles are very dangerous, especially the ones made in China. They are prone to explode and set fires.

I came across this report recently.

"Russia is preparing to file a complaint against the Ukraine, accusing them of war crimes. The Ukraine, facing a shortage of bombs and artillery ammunition due to the US Congress' allowing a lapse in foreign aid, has made up for the shortfall by dropping Chinese electric vehicles from bombers and launching electric vehicle batteries from artillery and long range rockets. Ukrainian saboteurs have also parked Chinese electric vehicles near Russian ammunition depots, defense plants, and aerodromes and allowed them to catch fire spontaneously, starting fires that take fire fighters days to extinguish and releasing toxic fumes that force the evacuation of nearby workers and residents. According to Moscow, this is an illegal circumvention of Geneva Convention rules against the use of Napalm and chemical weapons. ".

[Orgasmico]

Woke up to crazy rain this morning. Yesterday I got in my Uber just before a torrential downpour. Electricity was spotty and wifi was out for a few hours. If you're coming to Medellin soon, check the weather and bring your umbrella.

[Mr Enternational]

When I speak of 'science', I generally mean 'the science community in general'. As you agree it is often (but not always) wrong. As a species we seem to be very good at developing technology (scientific breakthroughs) but lag way behind in understanding its impact.

They understand. I think they just use more of a cross that bridge when we come to it approach. When cars came out they knew the engine exhaust gave off pollution. But at least we will not have to deal with all this horseshit everywhere anymore. When electric cars came out they knew how mining lithium for the batteries fucks up the environment and the miners. But at least we will not have to deal with this smog anymore.

[JustTK]

No ridicule. Just pointing out the obvious. Work on your phrasing. "DDT caused the polio epidemic. " If the virus already existed and was already causing polio, the most DDT could have done was facilitate the epidemic.

Next is Science itself, the methodology used by everyone to find solutions.

Which brings us to the third player, Capitalism. Scientists are both brilliant and ignorant. They often look only at potential benefits for humanity and overlook environmental risks, or opportunities for financial gain. Fortunately, Capitalism is there to save the day. Capitalism weighs the human cost against profits for shareholders. It's a brutal, but effective scale.

When I speak of 'science', I generally mean 'the science community in general'. As you agree it is often (but not always) wrong. As a species we seem to be very good at developing technology (scientific breakthroughs) but lag way behind in understanding its impact. The issue w the COVID discussion here, I think, is that you are willing to accept what one section of the scientific community is saying, the section that is corrupted by capitalism, and dismiss the skeptics. It seems your general leaning is on the wrong side of the fence on this one.

As far as the new hypothesis goes WRT polio – polio refers to a paralysis caused by inflammation at the base of the spine. The polio virus causes this, but so do various other things – the virus is far from unique in causing that. So when 'scientists' claim that they recorded polio in the 18th century – they mean that people were observed with this paralysis at that time. No doubt there were sufferers of paralysis at the time, but that does not mean that the virus caused it. And indeed, no scientist had the know-how to identify a virus at that time. So the new hypothesis is that the polio VIRUS arrived in the USA at the end of the 19th century along with the new and widespread use of DDT, thus causing the epidemic.

Note – a polio epidemic is not the same as polio. Just as COVID can exist without there being a COVID epidemic.

[JjBee62]

Your response just illustrates my point JB. You assume you know the argument and it is too simple and then you ridicule it, but it is not that way at all. I can link the video if your interested. It is not an argument akin to that the COVID vax contains track and spy technology.

You also skip the significant point that science pointed to DDT being safe.

No ridicule. Just pointing out the obvious. Work on your phrasing. "DDT caused the polio epidemic. " If the virus already existed and was already causing polio, the most DDT could have done was facilitate the epidemic.

I'm not interested in watching a video. If you link the peer-reviewed study demonstrating the link between the epidemic and DDT, I'll look it over. As I've stated several times, there are no requirements for posted videos. Anyone can post anything. With comment filtering and blocking they can even control the responses. It's the educational equivalent of a dictatorship.

On the other hand, a study, submitted to publication and opened up to examination and criticism by members of the field of study, requires the scientist to be able to defend their research. It's how Andrew Wakefield was discredited. He falsified data for financial gain.

More problems with your phrasing on the last paragraph. Science didn't point to DDT being safe. A scientist first synthesized the compound. Later another scientist discovered it was an effective insecticide and it was widely and successfully used to combat malaria by killing mosquitoes. Scientists and health organizations determined, based upon the data available at that time, that the benefit of battling malaria outweighed the risks against humans.

Science, on the other hand kept collecting data. Science determined that the environmental impact of widespread DDT use outweighed the benefits and most usage has been banned for 50 years. Science has continued to examine human health effects to determine in what other ways DDT may be harmful.

It's crucial to understand the 3 elements involved. First there are scientists, people who are passionate about unraveling questions and finding answers. They generally are highly focused upon the path their research takes.

Next is Science itself, the methodology used by everyone to find solutions. You use Science finding girls. You've developed your methods, tested them and determined which ways work best for you. Your fellow scientists in the field of mongerology might disagree with your methodology or findings. Some might use the same methods but ignore the human risks, and seek out underaged, trafficked, abused or addicted women. The science isn't evil, but it's subject to abuse.

Which brings us to the third player, Capitalism. Scientists are both brilliant and ignorant. They often look only at potential benefits for humanity and overlook environmental risks, or opportunities for financial gain. Fortunately, Capitalism is there to save the day. Capitalism weighs the human cost against profits for shareholders. It's a brutal, but effective scale.

As an example, look at asbestos, incredibly useful and highly profitable. Capitalism jumped in and exploited all the benefits of asbestos and money was made. Fortunately, for them, asbestos related health issues generally take decades to manifest, plus decades more to isolate the cause. Meanwhile, Capitalism used scientists to find more profit from asbestos. Eventually, science catches up, asbestos use is regulated and the grandchildren of the earlier Capitalists lose part of their trust funds.

Part of survival is the ability to make decisions. Often a bad decision is better than no decision. When it comes to any of the subjects currently being discussed here, decisions were made, based upon available data. And yes, part of the data is always focused on profit. Looking at Covid, drastic measures were taken. Some were ineffective. Years from now, more will be known about the effectiveness of each. Long after we're both dead science might decide that nothing should have been done about Covid, or it might determine failure to react would have been disastrous.

Meanwhile this is just a frivolous debate for a few people, and an excuse to babble incoherently for others.

[JustTK]

DDT was invented in 1874. First suspected case of polio was in 1773.

I'm not suggesting DDT is safe to put on your corn flakes, but it doesn't take much to argue against something that didn't yet exist causing something else.

Your response just illustrates my point JB. You assume you know the argument and it is too simple and then you ridicule it, but it is not that way at all. I can link the video if your interested. It is not an argument akin to that the COVID vax contains track and spy technology.

You also skip the significant point that science pointed to DDT being safe.

[Casa No Va]

DDT was invented in 1874. First suspected case of polio was in 1773.

I'm not suggesting DDT is safe to put on your corn flakes, but it doesn't take much to argue against something that didn't yet exist causing something else.

Aristotle.

"The sign of an intelligent mind is some who can entertain and idea without having to accept it".

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...s-ddt-science/

[JjBee62]

Not at all. You do not think many beliefs of yesteryear were based on the science of that day? So people just threw leaches on each other because they believed it would do something? No. The science of that day was enough to prove it would do what they were saying. The same as some science of today is enough to prove some things that will be discredited in years to come. One day Pluto is a planet and the next day it is not. Pluto has not changed in billions of years, but science has.

You have the cart before the horse. The science comes after the beliefs, either as an attempt to prove or contest the beliefs. At times, and we're in one of those times now, beliefs overthrow reason. We're just entering into a new dark age.

You do realize that leeches are still used in medicine and have several applications? Now there was a period when leeching was overprescribed for almost everything, but if you were in the Navy you surely remember when Ibuprofen was given out like Halloween candy (and not long before that it was Tylenol 3 with Codeine).

Perhaps a basic explanation of what science is could simplify the conversation.

Science is the use of observation and experimentation to determine the best possible answer using available data. Technically, science is always wrong, at least in hindsight, because we're always learning more and improving data collection.

[JjBee62]

Bayer / Monsanto are paying out millions and millions to settle medical claims against Roundup bcos it causes cancer, although their version of science and the one that the establishment scientists accepted as correct at the time, showed that it was safe.

I watched a very compelling discussion today about how the Polio epidemic was caused by DDT. Another pesticide. Scientists still deny this, although they prefer to burn up a strawman rather than confront the real claim (just as they do with COVID). It seems that a huge proportion of the worst illenesses facing mankind have been caused by man following the 'science'.

DDT was invented in 1874. First suspected case of polio was in 1773.

I'm not suggesting DDT is safe to put on your corn flakes, but it doesn't take much to argue against something that didn't yet exist causing something else.