Stupid shit in Medellin

**Paulie97** · 10-19-21 05:30

Originally Posted by Ptrbrgr [View Original Post]

Point being: when you want to communicate something about effectiveness, there is always a ton of context. It doesn't help at all to just knock out a number and amplify stuff you read somewhere without understanding the meaning of it. Be better. And dare to think for yourself.

Your whole post was excellent, but this concluding advice may be the best we have ever seen here on this subject. For example Tucker Carlson, a fuckface who refuses to reveal his vaccination status, seized the day to use the death of Colin Powell to cast doubt on vaccines. Yet he left out of his monologue the fact that Powell had cancer which greatly hinders an immune response, in spite of vaccination, all while being 84 years old. So Carlson is dishonest by omission, and his Joe six pack, angry white male fanboys allow him to do their thinking for them. This while 90% of Fox employees are vaccinated.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/18/media...dia/index.html

P.S. CNN, though left leaning is at least a legit news source that has raked Biden and other Democrats over the coals on many occasions. Fox though is tabloid, and guys like Carlson have plenty of blood on the hands.

**MarquisdeSade1** · 10-19-21 03:48

Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]

Seriously dude you need to get a grip on reality. Who are the ISGers who can confirm your presence in Colombia? Or anywhere else for that matter? I've never seen your name mentioned in someone elses post as someone they met with or hung out with. How can that me with your extensive world travelling and mongering experience? .

Go back to doing your homework and maybe after you get out of high school, you can get a job and save some money (or maybe mommy will give you a graduation present) and then instead of writing fantasy posts you can actually go someplace and get laid for the first time.

So, I'll wait for your brilliant retort about ass-licking. It seems to be your go to move. Jajajajaja.

I will bother to respond to you, since I haven't kicked your teeth in lately, you really want to run with the childish tactic of accusing someone of something no one believes is true because you are so weak, lame and desperate you have nothing else, OMG you even used bolder italics OMG (what ISG wouldn't let you use RED)? Jajajaaaaaaaaa.

Only a fool tells someone like you who they are, I gave a monger a business card in Mexico once and he was sending me emails on an acct I didn't give him and stalking my Linkedin page, never again.

We can place a large wager, ok pussy? Lets do it, how much can you afford? I'm guessing not much, hanging around with that scumbag pedophile in Laureles, did you know you can tell a lot about someone by the company they choose to keep jajajajaa scumbags are attracted to scumbags, you're such a classless monger, the bottom of the barrel variety!

You sound like a low rent govt worker of some type? Not sure what, but I'm guessing bus driver or garbage collector.

I have met mongers from all over the world, I respect their anonymity and they respect mine. This is, an anonymous website and I do have a real life (I'm guessing unlike your lame ass).

We can place a large wager that I can back up what I say and prove it, maybe you can steal some money from your grandmother?

I don't have to prove anything (but I will take your money if you want) to a worthless asslicking scumbag like you, evidenced by your choice of BMs you meet up with ala scumbag JJquasimodo spreading the Chinese virus all over MDE, and the latest scumbag pedophile to appear on ISG, that tells us everything we need to know about dirtbag V.

I suggest we find a way to place the money for a large wager in an escrow account, if not move along and get back to licking Xis and the rest of the CCPs diarrhea drenched assholes.

You worthless China loving POS.

Post-script, for starters.

The admin has access to all IP addresses when posts are made.

I can provide that as prima facie evidence of where I post from you low IQ scumbag.

Don't be a pussy your whole life, put up or STFU and stick with what you love most.

**Villainy** · 10-18-21 22:39

Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]

Jajajaaaaa are you referencing me?? Yes I've been there a couple times since then, and I'm pretty sure it was you that pmed me to meet up, do you seriously think I would ever meet up with a complete whackjob like you? I have met up with ISGers all over the world, but not.

Ones like you, you must be one of the goofiest members on all of ISG along with that made in China defective POS veryscaryselfharmingthoughts which I'm guessing is about 12-13 yo by the content of her posts.

If anyone reads your posts and agrees to meet up with you they belong in a damn psych ward also!!

Seriously dude you need to get a grip on reality. Who are the ISGers who can confirm your presence in Colombia? Or anywhere else for that matter? I've never seen your name mentioned in someone elses post as someone they met with or hung out with. How can that me with your extensive world travelling and mongering experience? .

Go back to doing your homework and maybe after you get out of high school, you can get a job and save some money (or maybe mommy will give you a graduation present) and then instead of writing fantasy posts you can actually go someplace and get laid for the first time.

So, I'll wait for your brilliant retort about ass-licking. It seems to be your go to move. Jajajajaja.

**Ptrbrgr** · 10-18-21 21:01

Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]

Yeah your probably right. Couldn't possibly be this websites autocorrect function during posting. Must just be me who is stupid.

Try this one. www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02183-8/fulltext

I look fwd to your non stupid comments.

In the paper you cite the authors conclude (p1413) "Our results reiterate in a real-world US setting that vaccination with BNT162 b2 remains an essential tool for preventing COVID-19", which sounds a bit different than your conclusion (rubber gloves and such). What gives? Judging from your comments and how you interpret those numbers, I think you do not fully understand what effectiveness is (same goes for your buddy Elvis and his 39%) and how it informs policy. Not trying to ridicule you, but since you asked for comments, here are a few.

A vaccine with 0% effectiveness against infections (and imagine the headlines, the outrage, Fauci to the gallows!) could hypothetically still be one of the best vaccines ever. For example, if it kept you out of the hospital and completely prevented transmission (incl variants) from you to other people. Ethical concerns aside, Darwinism could then run its course among those who choose to remain unvaccinated, and that would be that. The point is that a) there is a ton more that informs policy than a vaccine's effectiveness against infections, and b) you can't use effectiveness alone to push against vaccine recommendations, that would indeed be a fallacious argument.

Also, effectiveness per se is not super helpful in policy decisions, since it is a relative risk (in the paper you cite, the calculations are based on hazard ratios). What you ideally want to have are absolute risks, which are much harder to come by because they depend on many things such as the time frame we are talking about, what variants we are looking at and how transmittable they are, your environment, the prevalence of the virus, etc. So the effectiveness doesn't tell you how likely or unlikely you are to get infected, it tells you how much less likely you are to get infected relative to some comparison group over the course of the study (and that can also get dicey, more on that below). You also need some sense of absolute risk to estimate the basic reproduction number R0, which is what you really want to know for public health recommendations (if R0 is less than 1, the virus is not finding enough hosts to infect, and the incidence goes down).

I think it is reasonable to conclude from Figure 2 a in the paper you cite that it appears to get progressively harder to protect the upper respiratory tract, due to waning of antibodies (and this is where the booster shots come in). But you also have to be extremely careful with soft endpoints such as viral infections, especially when you use electronic health records. A fairly sizeable fraction of infected people are completely asymptomatic and might enter the records as never infected. That can especially change the composition of you comparison group over time, and lead to a decrease in the estimates of effectiveness (just like in Figure 2 a) even if there was no waning of antibodies and your protection didn't change. This is not trivial stuff.

Point being: when you want to communicate something about effectiveness, there is always a ton of context. It doesn't help at all to just knock out a number and amplify stuff you read somewhere without understanding the meaning of it. Be better. And dare to think for yourself.

**MarquisdeSade1** · 10-18-21 18:04

Originally Posted by LoveItHere69 [View Original Post]

Another guy PM'ed me was coming in October of last year and still not here. In fact, he has never been to Colombia and posts all the time. We all know who that is..

Jajajaaaaa are you referencing me?? Yes I've been there a couple times since then, and I'm pretty sure it was you that pmed me to meet up, do you seriously think I would ever meet up with a complete whackjob like you? I have met up with ISGers all over the world, but not.

Ones like you, you must be one of the goofiest members on all of ISG along with that made in China defective POS veryscaryselfharmingthoughts which I'm guessing is about 12-13 yo by the content of her posts.

If anyone reads your posts and agrees to meet up with you they belong in a damn psych ward also!!

**BlackThought** · 10-18-21 11:53

Originally Posted by LoveItHere69 [View Original Post]

Another guy PM'ed me was coming in October of last year and still not here. In fact, he has never been to Colombia and posts all the time. We all know who that is.

Oh you didn't know? He was busy spending 180 nights in the Philippines jajajaj.

**JustTK** · 10-17-21 16:25

Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]

This is from the above article: A July report from the Israel Ministry of Health found that Pfizer / BioNTech's Covid-19 vaccine is just 39% effective in Israel, where the
39% LOL. Better get busy and mandate that!
All this economic destructiveness that went on because we had to do something, and the USA is still #1 in Covid. All the money that was spent, all the hand wringing, all the preaching, all the lecturing, and it is estimated that 100 million Americans have had Covid by now.
Have you all noticed that since Colombia ended the lockdown cases in Colombia went from 30,000 a day to less than 2000? Amazing huh?

Hehe. In the link I posted, if you managed to figure out the url that ISG keeps altering, Pfizer themselves funded a study that shows their own vaccine is 47% effective after 5 months. Really? Is that a vaccine or a pair of rubber gloves? Vegan diet does 73% better on COVID outcomes. That's a better long term result than Pfizer. Maybe that's why India has such low deaths (other than understating their deaths).

Yes, I agree on Colombia. Amazing that COVID is last year's news here now. Its not even mentioned anymore. They have obviously reached a level of natural immunity where the virus no longer poses a national emergency. Plus they don't have an obesity rate of 42.4%, and all the other confounding factors of a generally low health country.

But anyway, on with the insults and ad hominems.

**JustTK** · 10-17-21 16:15