Thread: Stupid shit in Medellin
+
Add Report
Results 5,026 to 5,040 of 7004
-
11-01-21 17:21 #1979
Posts: 5430Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
Maybe it's luck, maybe it's skill, or maybe they just like me, but I've never encountered a scammer. I believe they exist, they are just outside of my experience.
I have run into a bunch of online scammers, the women who hit you up, then start asking for money. I've gotten to the point where I can recognize them within seconds.
However, it sounds like you followed my advice. Instead of turning it into a screaming match and having her call the police, you brought in the hotel, which is tentatively going to be on your side. You got her to a position where you were able to cut your losses and everyone went away happy.
The reason most men in the west, or at least the US, don't deal with hookers is because it's illegal and carries a heavy social stigma.
-
11-01-21 16:34 #1978
Posts: 648More Advice?
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
-
10-31-21 20:07 #1977
Posts: 3160Originally Posted by JjBee62 [View Original Post]
How hard is it to put a photo with an underage chica on your phone? How about photo shopping one with you and her on it? Wouldn't Customs just need your phone number? If not that, there is wi fi, blu tooth ETC.
The counter to the argument "why not let the police search your premises if you have nothing to hide" is that the police may plant something. That is why our forefathers stated a neutral magistrate sign a search warrant and limit warrants. That you think the writers of the Constitution did not know what they are doing does not surprise me.
The correct answer when dealing with LE is almost always, "I am not saying or doing anything until I talk to a / my lawyer. " That is a position the American Embassy can be an advocate for.
I was completely compliant with a Mexican policeman who caught me speeding. I was in the wrong, and he could have done anything including taking me to jail. On the flip side, I had two Mexican cops search my wallet when I was using a Coke machine. I told them that if they took a penny, I would post on line about how corrupt the police in Cancun are and also inform my hotel management what they had done. They were actually afraid when I said that and took nothing.
The position you are advocating, to always suck government dick, is pretty stupid when dealing with countries as corrupt as Colombia. There are other paths than just being compliant or refusing.
-
10-31-21 19:59 #1976
Posts: 1680Well
Originally Posted by JjBee62 [View Original Post]
Your typical girl who shows up acting unreasonable will leave for 50 mil or the taxis, assuming no sex has started. A few years ago I had one in Costa Rica come to the room after agreeing to payment after, then demand that I place the whole fee, 50 mil colones (about $85) on the night stand. Your typical Costa Rican independent has at least passable English, so communication was no problem. I explained to her that putting the cash out where she could grab it any time was the same thing as sticking it in her pocket, and that this was not going to happen. She would be paid after as agreed. She then demanded the full fee of 50 mil colones for her "time," and without any sex, under threat of calling the police. I then called hotel security, which was a ruse, as I knew they wouldn't do anything, but it got her at the door, door wide open talking to the wuss security guy. And she hadn't disrobed yet so was fully clothed, her purse under her arm. Well that close to the door, ready to go, and an offer of $20 US and she decided to make her exit. She wasn't getting the whole $80 unless she did a sit in and the police told me to pay it or else.
There a reason why most men, at least in the West, don't deal with hookers. This is one of the reasons along with the fact that most put in little effort and are just laying there waiting for you to get off. But hey, this is a hooker forum, so we are about trying to make the best of these situations. Wink.
-
10-31-21 19:13 #1975
Posts: 5430Some Useless Trivia
For most of the 20th century, International Harvester was a major manufacturer of trucks and farm equipment. Now the only remnant are Navistar International trucks.
They formerly built trucks in Fort Wayne, Indiana. In their old factory there used to be a swinger's club. I don't know if it's still there, it's been 16 years since my last visit there, which was for a Halloween party.
Halloween is the best time to go to a swinger's club. You get a lot of people who don't normally swing, but want to really **** it up for Halloween. Add in alcohol and I think the term is "off the hook."
Back to International Harvester. One of the pieces of farm equipment they built was a device for spreading organic fertilizer, manure, cow shit. Because of that bit of trivia, International trucks have the nickname "13 letter shit spreader."
ATFQ and RTFQ:
In the Navy nuke program we often wrote these acronyms on the student's tests (Yes, I did a tour as an instructor). Occasionally, the student would write the correct answer, but for the wrong question. That would earn them a RTFQ, read the fucking question.
More common were the students who had no clue what the correct answer was. Our tests required detailed answers, often with some rather intense formulas and math. Rather than leave a question blank, they would try the "baffle them with bullshit" approach. You write small, sloppy and ramble on all around the answer, but never get to the answer. That's when ATFQ came into play.
Here's the useful part of this post. If someone asks a question, answer the question. If you don't know the answer, don't answer. Don't spread 400 words of bullshit that have nothing to do with the question, just let someone who knows answer handle it.
And if you don't like the answers you get, register a complaint with the real world.
-
10-31-21 07:13 #1974
Posts: 5430Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
I'm all for discretion and I've said so in several scenarios. Just one example, when some hooker starts demanding more than you feel she deserves. My advice has always been to deescalate the situation, rather than blowing it up and getting the police involved. While the police might take your side, they might not and in most cases the potential savings are less than the potential risks. That doesn't mean you give any amount she asks for. It means you keep things friendly and cut your losses.
As for Cuba Dave, he was the first person charged under the law, which he didn't violate. Sure he was an obvious target, but what does it take to get targeted? I've heard about a guy on ISG who had his Global Entry revoked for no apparent reason, even though he keeps a low profile. That sounds suspiciously like someone got singled even though he's "a regular Joe in the crowd."
I'm still waiting for you to ATFQ (which is nuke for answer the fucking question). Are you recommending people comply with the police, for a lawful request, or not?
-
10-31-21 03:07 #1973
Posts: 5430Originally Posted by VasyaPetya [View Original Post]
1. A couple of people posted they recently witnessed people being pulled aside at the airport for extra inspection. Someone speculated it was for trafficking or porn.
2. You asked what they could do if you refused to unlock your phone.
3. Several people replied you could be detained.
4. You replied they couldn't detain you and that the Embassy was there to help you.
Does that capture the basic essence? Is there anything I missed? If not, it would appear the failure to understand doesn't lie with me.
You keep saying that those things never happen, but even MrE said it's happened to him. What part of that did you fail to understand? MrE did us the favor of bringing up both Cuba Dave and the guy whose name we're not allowed to mention. In both cases they were detained without trial. A quick search will confirm the details I've already posted.
You seem to believe the US Embassy is there for your benefit, and you throw a tantrum when anyone suggests otherwise. Did you throw as big of a fit when you learned Santa Claus wasn't real? Or did I just cause a meltdown for mentioning it?
The US Embassy anywhere in the world doesn't give a fuck about you. If you lose your passport they will help you get home. If you want to marry a hooker and bring her to the US, they'll help you.
However, if you get tossed in jail because you're too stupid to realize you're no longer in the US, you're shit out of luck. I don't even understand how you are planning to call the Embassy when some cop is holding your phone and asking you to unlock it. Even if you could, do you honestly believe someone is going to rush to the Bogota airport, jump on a plane to Medellin and tell them that you're exempt from being searched?
The only time the State Department is getting involved is if there's a big enough outcry in the US to create a public relations problem. Even if they do get involved your release could take months. Remember the retired Marine with PTSD who spent 8 months in a Mexican prison on gun charges?
If misconceptions and ignorance mated you would be the offspring.
-
10-31-21 02:42 #1972
Posts: 15815Originally Posted by JjBee62 [View Original Post]
-
10-30-21 23:53 #1971
Posts: 2462Originally Posted by VasyaPetya [View Original Post]
-
10-30-21 22:09 #1970
Posts: 98Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
-
10-30-21 22:07 #1969
Posts: 98Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
-
10-30-21 22:04 #1968
Posts: 98Originally Posted by JjBee62 [View Original Post]
-
10-30-21 21:21 #1967
Posts: 5430Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
If so, it would seem to establish that someone having their phone searched can happen.
His case also clarifies what everyone else has been saying. They don't need to prove anything to detain you indefinitely. He was acquitted on appeal, which boils down to the court admitting he didn't break the law he was convicted of breaking.
Again, thank you for mentioning him because he's a perfect example of what you insist nobody has to worry about.
He was held for over a year in prison before his trial. He wasn't informed of his trial until the day before his trial. After his conviction was overturned he was held in prison for almost 3 more months while the government tried to overturn the appellate court decision. Nearly 2 years for doing nothing wrong.
Oops. I forgot that reality isn't allowed. Go right ahead with that "tell the cops you're untouchable" mentality.
-
10-30-21 20:50 #1966
Posts: 5430Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
As for the probability of getting pulled aside for an additional search, gee Wally, I don't know. It doesn't matter where the extra search occurs, does it? Are we going to declare that nothing is considered an additional search unless it occurs within 4 meters of an airport security checkpoint? While we're at it let's declare no search is a search unless it happens on Tuesday between noon and 2 pm.
Why don't we keep this in the real world instead of your fantasy land where nothing that hasn't happened to you has ever happened. For example, in your fantasy land nobody has ever been robbed in Santa Fe or El Centro because you've never been robbed there. You've posted that sentiment dozens of times.
In the real world people get pulled aside and searched all the time. You've admitted it's happened to you, it's happened to me and several others have reported it has happened to them. It doesn't matter whether it happens in the airport or in front of the airport, or in Parque Lleras, or in a taxi somewhere on the road.
Has that part penetrated yet? Are you ready to accept that people get searched? If not, there's no point in anyone posting anything, because all activities are limited to your fantasy land.
Searches by people, who have the legal authority to conduct searches, of people who may or may not have committed any crime, happen. I just want to make sure that's clear, because you seem unable to accept it, even after admitting it has happened to you.
Do you have the legal right to refuse the search? That's the question. That's the only question. The probability of the search is irrelevant. Whether they are searching the contents of your luggage, your electronic devices or your colon is irrelevant. Again, I'm trying to be clear because for some reason you insist on saying that something, which has happened to you, will never happen.
My opinion, as I've stated several times, is that complying with the search is in your best interest. Refusing the search, claiming your Embassy will rescue you, or arguing with whoever is trying to perform the search is unlikely to yield the best results.
So, it boils down to a very simple question: Do you recommend people comply with legal requests from law enforcement, or do you recommend people refuse to comply.
As for snake bites in Plaza Botero, perhaps Paulie can explain logical fallacies to you.
Millions of people are bitten by venomous snakes every year, and about 100 k die. Are you trying to say, since it's unlikely to find a venomous snake in Plaza Botero, nobody anywhere in the world needs to worry about snakes? Are you suggesting that snake venom somehow works differently in Plaza Botero? I'm kind of lost here.
Oh. You're suggesting that since you've never been bitten by a snake in Plaza Botero, nobody in Colombia will ever be searched. Got it. I'm glad that's cleared up.
-
10-30-21 19:47 #1965
Posts: 15815Originally Posted by TjBrazil [View Original Post]
How do you make an example of someone by not announcing the example? An example would be Cuba Dave, David 33, the Aussie board member that I met in Philippines who is now in a Philippine prison, or the guy that used to be in this thread that killed himself.
If you are flying under the radar, and not doing anything illegal then there are no examples to be made. If you are yelling from the top of the mountain telling people to check out all the hookers over here, messing with chicks that are not of age, trying to make money off of hookers then you are setting your own self up to be made an example of.