Thread: Stupid shit in Medellin
+
Add Report
Results 5,116 to 5,130 of 7075
-
10-29-21 20:50 #1960
Posts: 3223Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
The irony in a courtroom is that Fauci's folly, that HIV is commonly transmitted heterosexually, is widely believed, and a doctor would have to adjust to that non-scientific belief. If you get HIV and deny drug use and homosexual activity, I know you are full of shit, but I bet a jury would not. From a liability stand point, the worst thing a doctor can tell a patient is "you can fuck BBFS all you want". It is not that fucking with condoms is safer but they are believed to be safer, and we have Lord Fauci and his fucking AIDS scare to thank for that.
-
10-29-21 18:49 #1959
Posts: 5462This was just funny to me
For more than 2 days the only posts here are from 1 person. I have no idea what they say, as you'll see from the screenshot, but it looks pretty desperate. Kinda like a child repeatedly screaming for attention.
-
10-29-21 18:15 #1958
Posts: 749Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
-
10-29-21 15:51 #1957
Posts: 2579Post script jajajajaja
Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
I'm sure he was Faucis public health PR acte ouvert!
The Chinese virus being his piece de resistance.
-
10-29-21 03:07 #1956
Posts: 2579Touche'
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
And asked about the HIV risk of my cock in a puta vagina, I will never forget the look on his face, it was like he thought I was asking him as some kind of immature joke, I asked if he could quantify the risk factor.
And I believe he said if was "statistically insignificant" he prescribes Truvada for me, and I can't get him to say I don't need it, maybe for liability reasons? But I asked for it because I told him.
I periodically like to pound some fresh from the market puta buttholes BBFS, and he seemed kind of neutral on the idea, I'm not sure how many Colombian putas have HIV? I'm guessing not many.
Yes the CDC wasn't getting the funding they wanted from Reagan so they came up with a lie to get the public scared and pushing to give the CDC funding.
Instead of just telling the truth that HIV is a gay men's issue along with IV drug users, they lied and it worked.
The Chinese virus is the sequel to that, 40 yrs later with Fauci still center stage!
-
10-28-21 18:16 #1955
Posts: 2579Beware of the door to door grifter
Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
Your credit cards and bank accts.
-
10-28-21 17:13 #1954
Posts: 2579An alt for anti vaxers?
-
10-28-21 03:24 #1953
Posts: 25792 funny LMAO
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
-
10-28-21 01:50 #1952
Posts: 2579Well jajajajaja
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Full disclosure.
I've been vaxed 4 x in 12 months LOL.
I'm guessing somewhere between 90 and 150 days Ill take another hit off the needle LOL.
"in for a penny in for a pound" LMAO.
-
10-27-21 20:47 #1951
Posts: 2579Forgot a few what?
Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
Didn't they have books in the Florida prison system for you to read?
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/26/b...gtype=Homepage
-
10-26-21 01:58 #1950
Posts: 3223Originally Posted by JjBee62 [View Original Post]
The reason it is ridiculous is the assumption that everyone is the same. If you are a fat 80 year old diabetic with a lung problem, you are probably 100 X more likely to die if you do not get the vaccine, but a healthy 12 year old boy is going to get no death benefit from the vaccine but he is extremely likely to have a horrific and potentially long lasting side effect from the vaccine relatively speaking.
And so you have the vaxxers on one side and the antivaxxers on the other. The problem is where is my group, the people who actually use their fucking brains, believe in freedom, and say "I am pro or anti vax based on who is actually getting the shot." We do not have a voice.
If you take those two extreme patient examples, most everyone else is in the middle, and it is the height of arrogance for anybody to say I know what is best for everyone, but because people are so in love with power, they do it anyway. Fauci does not know if we should be vaccinating people with natural immunity but professor shit for brains here does. Jesus.
The thing is you have these government bureaucrats and they are in power for life and they have legal immunity from lawsuits and the like, and I would actually be in favor of these people if they truly acted in the public good, but I just do not see it. I see people more interested in looking good than doing good.
One of the first thing these fuckers did was to cover their ass. This virus was created in a lab in China paid for by USA bureaucrats who skirted the will of elected officials. Instead of being honest about this, these assholes published in one of their "peer reviewed" articles that anyone who said this virus did not originate in nature was pushing conspiracy theories, and anyone who criticized China was racist.
The other thing I see is the bureaucrats mingling with the pols to cut the best deals they can get for their own selfish asses. The bureaucrats should be out hawking the "it depends" idea but instead they are incessantly promoting the vaccine. Well, it turns out that some of these bureaucratic agencies get a piece of the pie with every shot given. The CDC's own internal documents show it promoted the notion of heterosexual HIV for its own selfish purposes (I. E. To get funding) and people to this day still do not believe it is true. And it smells like the CDC, NIH ETC are out cutting deals with the pols right and left now at this moment. You almost have to ask: do these bureaucrats really want the Covid crisis to end?
So what should the bureaucrats have done? They should have admitted publicly that there is no cure for a cold virus, and that the natural course of events is that cold viruses mutate into more contagious but less deadly forms. Our goal therefore is to actually expose those with the strongest immune systems (I. E. Young people) to create these less deadly viral mutations while protecting the most vulnerable (the obese, the diabetic, the elderly) from getting sick at all. Just like with the flu vaccine, the emphasis should be placed on those most at risk.
They should have been emphasizing endlessly to do no harm. Instead they jumped on the "doing something" band wagon. Wear your mask! Wash your hands! Social distance! The problem with "doing something" is you are more likely to be doing nothing or doing something harmful than actually doing good. That is why do no harm is the first rule in all medical interventions. "Do no harm" is right. "Do something" is popular.
What we saw time and again was fucking bureaucrats holding the ball like Lucy telling the gullible Charlie Brown public "just run and kick the ball Charlie Brown and all will go back to normal. " The bureaucrats pull the ball, the public falls on its ass, and these bureaucrats laugh at us and give some new excuse about why the ball was not kicked, and how everything was our fault. The classic example of this was Fauci with herd immunity. First, it was 75% have to be vaccinated then 85 and now it is 97% for the Covid crisis to end. Of course, Fauci owns Moderna stock, and the fucked up part is that he does not even have to disclose how many shares he owns.
When you see a guy like Fauci incessantly on TV, he is no longer the tireless bureaucrat making the tough calls behind the scenes. No, he is a fucking pol, and I want to know why I feel like I am the only one who sees it. I just see this fucker profiting endlessly off the red-blue divide. Early on, both sides seem to care more about getting Fauci on their team rather than holding him accountable for doing the right thing.
Pols are motivated by popularity, and that is fine, but bureaucrats should not be. It is not popular to say there is practically nothing we can do about a cold virus. It is not popular to say that yes 15 year old Johnnie should get Covid for the benefit of society as a whole, but that is what was needed to be done and was not because everyone is focused on being popular over being right.
All the past and present bureaucratic stupidity is ignored. Remember the Lucy about telling us we had to flatten the curve back in March 2020? I do not know why it is that I seem to be the only one who remembers all the dumb shit and the times the bureaucrats were dead wrong.
And the reason the bureaucrats get away with it is because they always put out a new conflict for people to chew on, miraculously coming up with the latest red-blue debate, and the provax-antivax debate may be the dumbest one yet.
-
10-26-21 00:24 #1949
Posts: 2579Touche'
Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
-
10-25-21 23:52 #1948
Posts: 1680Some hilarious stuff
-
10-25-21 21:41 #1947
Posts: 749Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]
-
10-25-21 21:38 #1946
Posts: 749Originally Posted by MarquisdeSade1 [View Original Post]