La Vie en Rose
"Germany
 Sex Vacation
Escort News

Thread: Stupid shit in Medellin

+ Add Report
Page 62 of 472 FirstFirst ... 12 52 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 72 112 162 ... LastLast
Results 916 to 930 of 7075
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #6160

    The red herring logical fallacy

    Quote Originally Posted by MrEnternational  [View Original Post]
    So you say Henry Ford was the first to make a car. I say no he wasn't.
    I didn't say that.

    Quote Originally Posted by MrEnternational  [View Original Post]
    I show you proof of him actually giving credit to this other guy for making a car before him.
    Since I didn't say that I don't need your proof.

    No facts were ever presented that countered the original point that I made that an individual here quoted Kevin Samuels and did not give credit. What you said is that Kevin Samuels did not give credit to someone else. But you never proved nor provided any facts that the particular quote I put up or the one that the other poster used was said by another person.

    Your original post was a red herring logical fallacy. Address the fact that original poster quoted something and did give credit to WHOMEVER wrote it.

    Quote Originally Posted by MrEnternational  [View Original Post]
    Definitely belongs in the stupid shit thread.
    Damn straight is does!

  2. #6159
    Quote Originally Posted by RamDavidson84  [View Original Post]

    To despise anything is a contradiction to your statement. What should we refer to people who are born with everything and every advantage and they piss it all away on gambling, working girls, and drugs? Is it wrong to call those people losers? What do we refer to the person who is born with nothing and no advantages at all, yet they over come every obstacle and achieve all of their goals? Is it wrong to call those people winners?

    I learned all of this in a very intriguing documentary. I think it was call The Highlander. You should check it out TK.
    Mmm, not sure why you think it is a contradiction to despise an attitude. Most times the people that call others losers have no idea of the issues that the 'loser' has faced. Whilst there are a very small number of people that manage to uplift themselves in fnancial status, and an equally small number of those that lose their financial status, the vast majority of people suffer what they must. And can we really credit a person for doing well, when all the cards fell in that person's favour? And the person who fell from grace. The cards ran against them? You are assuming free will. And you are also dictating the terms of the label for what is a 'winner' and a 'loser'.

    Stan Bowles. I spent most of my vast earnings on wine, women and song; the rest of it I just watsed. Is he a loser, is he a winner?

    Hunter Biden. Born in to astionishing opportunity. Is known as a drug addict. Is he a loser? Most people would cut their right hand off to be in his shoes.

    Donald Trump. Likewise, some claim is has lost vast fortunes and therefore is a loser. Really?

    A guy that foregoes family and friends to rise from the slums - is he a winner?

    And so it goes on. I don't think your analysis passes muster Ram.

    Although a few people have recommend Highlander to me over the years. So thanks for the reminder to watch it!

  3. #6158
    Quote Originally Posted by Elvis2008  [View Original Post]
    LOL. You mean like I am doing now?
    If you want to make it about you. But I am unsure how you could be a single mother or a mother in a relationship.

  4. #6157
    Quote Originally Posted by SubCmdr  [View Original Post]
    Contrary to popular belief this is not a forum about prostitution.
    You missed the part where Mr. E was corrected on this same stupid statement just last week? Pay attention to all the escort ads to the left, right, top, and bottom. The site states "sex" not "relationship" or "GF", etc. Read the tag line. I will start it for you: "Money is the world's." Please show links to posts where guys have found their wives here. OK I will accept just one.

  5. #6156
    Quote Originally Posted by JustTK  [View Original Post]
    I actually despise this attitude of calling people losers (and winners). All it demonstrates is a lack of compassion and empathy, and the egocentric thinking of oneself.
    So I think its the sign of an ignorant egoist to label people as losers. Much better to show some understanding and consideration.
    There are winners and losers. Fact of life. There simply has to be. If not all the carnivores on the planet could not exist. They have to hunt the losers (young, old, weak, dumb). Using "Losers" is not always the best term, just faster and easier. Some winners get there by hard work and some by luck. Some losers never had a chance or were simply unlucky. The last few years the USA Has been showing compassion and all the empathy crap and the country is turning to shit because of it. Everyone gets a trophy mentality is making everyone losers with the exception of the super rich who preach it but never practice it.

    Most countries consider prostitutes societal losers yet here you are using them for your carnal pleasure. Try saving them instead of preaching to us. Where is your compassion and empathy you loser?

  6. #6155
    Quote Originally Posted by SubCmdr  [View Original Post]
    The ironic thing about your post is that Tommy Sotomayor in 2016 a video by Sotomayor on Twitter that declared African Americans are responsible for most violent crime in the United States. In the video, Sotomayor claimed that black Americans are a more serious threat than guns.

    Now tell me MrEnternational why you riding the dick of an individual like that?

    How you like me now?
    So you say Henry Ford was the first to make a car. I say no he wasn't. I show you proof of him actually giving credit to this other guy for making a car before him. Your reply is why am I dick riding the guy that ACTUALLY DID make the first car, while not disagreeing with the fact that was presented.

    So you are saying your criteria for giving credit is contingent upon whether you agree with everything someone says and they do not say anything that you do not like. Definitely belongs in the stupid shit thread.

  7. #6154

    Kevin Samuels was the reason the stuff from Tommy Sotomayor got heard

    Quote Originally Posted by MrEnternational  [View Original Post]
    The ironic thing about your post is that Kevin Samuels got all of his stuff from Tommy Sotomayor, but did not give him the credit.
    The ironic thing about your post is that Tommy Sotomayor in 2016 a video by Sotomayor on Twitter that declared African Americans are responsible for most violent crime in the United States. In the video, Sotomayor claimed that black Americans are a more serious threat than guns.

    Now tell me MrEnternational why you riding the dick of an individual like that?

    How you like me now?

  8. #6153

    I am currently in the Dominican Republic living the best life I can live!

    Quote Originally Posted by Elvis2008  [View Original Post]
    Only thing that is incorrect is you're not knowing what an ad homimem is.
    Actually I do know what one is. I taught you the meaning of the expression. And when you continued to attack me by your own admission I decided to throw a few back at ya brother. I don't know what your problem is. If you are fucking beauty queens that should give you a lot of pleasure and you shouldn't wake up on the wrong side of the bed every morning and log onto ISG to take out your life frustrations on random people you don't even know.

    Quote Originally Posted by Elvis2008  [View Original Post]
    Actually, you got the first statement correct. And what are you here for outside of blowing your horn and bullshitting everyone?
    This is the "Stupid Shit in Medellin" forum. And you are a frequent poster here. So, look in the mirror and ask yourself the same question. You are reflecting. If you don't want to read my posts, learn how to use the tools given to use in the Forum and put me on ignore.

    Quote Originally Posted by Elvis2008  [View Original Post]
    Wow, you are really stuck on the beauty queen thing. If you would have banged a few of them we would have never heard the end of your yapping about it. Truth is what I have seen is beauty queens work hard on their beauty and have been trained and expect to be compensated for that beauty. In that sense, they are even greedier than strippers and not satisfying to be with. Still, any guy who says they don't want to bang one for $40 like you are doing is full of shit but what else is new?
    Actually if you had better reading comprehension skills you would understand that I do not care who you bang. I have never paid a prostitute for sex in Colombia as of this date. Have you?

    Pussy is Pussy

    How you like me now?

  9. #6152

    Don't be so closed minded in your logic.

    Quote Originally Posted by JustTK  [View Original Post]
    I actually despise this attitude of calling people losers (and winners). All it demonstrates is a lack of compassion and empathy, and the egocentric thinking of oneself.

    Just think about your life. You had no control of where you were born, your education, the passport you hold, your parents, your pre-adult education, your diet, your daily routine, in fact, so much of what forms your likely success in the business world (as if this is even a valid measure of personal success). And all this is before we even consider the issue of whether free will actually exists.

    And don't forget for you to be a winner, there needs to be losers. So I think its the sign of an ignorant egoist to label people as losers. Much better to show some understanding and consideration.
    You should always try to put yourself in someone else's shoes.

    To despise anything is a contradiction to your statement. What should we refer to people who are born with everything and every advantage and they piss it all away on gambling, working girls, and drugs? Is it wrong to call those people losers? What do we refer to the person who is born with nothing and no advantages at all, yet they over come every obstacle and achieve all of their goals? Is it wrong to call those people winners?

    Better yet, if someone is going to design the social structure of a society, should those who make immense contributions to society receive any praise or incentive for doing so? Should those who are negligent and devious have to answer for their crimes or lack of contribution? Hmmm I wonder how long a society like that is sustainable?

    From a biological perspective, humans are social animals and the instinct for a social hierarchy has always and will always exist. It is this instinct which leads us to the labels of winners and losers. It's not healthy to lose touch with the realities of the human condition.

    Now trying to solve the problem of poverty and opportunity does not mean one has to deny those who have sacrificed and fought for their worth their place in society nor should it condone the sins of a selfish criminal.

    I learned all of this in a very intriguing documentary. I think it was call The Highlander. I believe it starred Sean Connery if I am not mistaken. You should check it out TK.

  10. #6151
    Quote Originally Posted by SubCmdr  [View Original Post]
    "Throughout history losers and quitters have always found a way to justify losing" - Kevin Samuels.
    I actually despise this attitude of calling people losers (and winners). All it demonstrates is a lack of compassion and empathy, and the egocentric thinking of oneself.

    Just think about your life. You had no control of where you were born, your education, the passport you hold, your parents, your pre-adult education, your diet, your daily routine, in fact, so much of what forms your likely success in the business world (as if this is even a valid measure of personal success). And all this is before we even consider the issue of whether free will actually exists.

    And don't forget for you to be a winner, there needs to be losers. So I think its the sign of an ignorant egoist to label people as losers. Much better to show some understanding and consideration.

  11. #6150
    Quote Originally Posted by SubCmdr  [View Original Post]
    Here is one for you: "Throughout history losers and quitters have always found a way to justify losing" - Kevin Samuels.

    I didn't say it and claim it for myself. I looked it up and gave credit where credit is due like real man handles his business. Here is the reference:

    https://theojellis.com/best-kevin-samuels-quotes/

    Winners gonna win; Haters gonna hate; Which one are you?
    The ironic thing about your post is that Kevin Samuels got all of his stuff from Tommy Sotomayor, but did not give him the credit.

    https://fb.watch/lCRH_tHQj6/?mibextid=Nif5oz

  12. #6149
    Quote Originally Posted by MiamiBoy1  [View Original Post]
    I think I had already answered your question. I don't care how you pulled it off, and I'm not interested in reading your novels. The story of your life doesn't belong here, this is a mongering / P4P forum.
    MB, I had to read what the dispute between you and JJBee was it. It was in one of his novels, and I passed it by.

    FWIW, I actually think it belongs here but not because of the reason he said. I don't remember if you recall this, but the beauty queen fucked me and then engaged in some immature behavior.

    Do you know how you said a 20 year old wants this age and a 40 year old wants this kind of a guy this age or something like that? Thing is I know now the 22 year old BQ may have been 42 when it came to so many other things but she was 12 when it came to relationships. She was in the Disney phase of white knights, unicorns, and rainbow farts. Thing is when you are dealing with a girl who expects a white knight and happily ever after, you have to coax them into letting go of those dreams, and that is hard, and I really do not like doing that. I want a woman who sees me and the help I can give her realistically instead of expecting me to behave like some white knight out of a Disney movie.

    So in this case with regards to maturity, there are two kinds of women: those with the image of a male Disney hero in their mind and those realistic about men. The former can be any age even into their 40's and above, and the latter can be very young. I actually was surprised to see that the most realistic young women in the USA come from the drug culture. I guess you lose your idealism quickly in that world.

    Thing is what do you know about JJBee really? This guy spends a year in Colombia getting drunk in dive bars every night, is not only penniless but gets himself into deeper and deeper debt, hangs out with people for the purpose of hitting them up for money, was led on by a cam girl, and what does he say about it? It was the greatest year of his life. Even when JJBee was in Colombia spreading Covid, he and his buddy V were spinning it in a positive way.

    So JJBee can put a positive spin on anything. And he has someone 19 or whatever versus my 34 not that he is competing? Cough, cough. But you know where she is at on the Disney scale. She is in the front row of the church of rainbow farts, unicorns, and white knights, and JJBee, Mr. Positive (I repeat cough, cough) has convinced this young thing that he is her white knight and for now, it is clear that she believes it.

    So you should care but not for the reasons he gives. The fun part is what happens next. Will the white knight stroke out or his knees give out to worsening arthritis, will our fair maiden wake up to reality, or will they live happily ever after? And that is where I disagree with you MB. I think we both know the ending but watching what almost certainly will be a train wreck is IMO must see tv.

  13. #6148
    Quote Originally Posted by SubCmdr  [View Original Post]
    Incorrect.
    Only thing that is incorrect is your not knowing what an ad homimem is.

    Quote Originally Posted by SubCmdr  [View Original Post]
    Individuals such as yourself need to be right! Please write a book telling me that I am wrong again.
    Actually, you got the first statement correct. And what are you here for outside of blowing your horn and bullshitting everyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by SubCmdr  [View Original Post]
    You will find a way to make yourself feel better because you are paying for sex with beauty queens. If you need a beauty queen to stroke your ego no problem. I'm very comfortable that you think I am a loser. You are actually the one that has no idea what I am about.
    Wow, you are really stuck on the beauty queen thing. If you would have banged a few of them we would have never heard the end of your yapping about it. Truth is what I have seen is beauty queens work hard on their beauty and have been trained and expect to be compensated for that beauty. In that sense, they are even greedier than strippers and not satisfying to be with. Still, any guy who says they don't want to bang one for $40 like you are doing is full of shit but what else is new?

  14. #6147
    Quote Originally Posted by MrEnternational  [View Original Post]
    So what do you call having a front row seat to watching 84% of people do something that turned out unfavorable, then decide to do the same thing yourself? A smart move?
    My gal's daughter was an unfavorable outcome? Wow, you just keep digging yourself deeper and deeper.

    She has the talent, intelligence, and skill to be a doctor, and one day when you get older, she could very well save your life. Or then again, with you, maybe she won't.

  15. #6146
    Quote Originally Posted by JustTK  [View Original Post]
    Having a child outside of wedlock and being a single mother are 2 different things. One can be a mother and have a child outside of wedlock but not be single. For example, one can have a partner.
    LOL. You mean like I am doing now?

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
escort directory


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape