Stupid shit in Medellin

[Huacho]

It was a great session, then finished in room she wanted a propina. This caught me off guard first guy didn't mention that part. All I had was a 50 k note. Sure it didn't break my bank but did catch me off guard, not sure if it's mandatory or she marked me as a gringo.

Of course it's not mandatory and of course she marked you as a gringo. Grow a pair and 'just say no. '.

[CenTexCrash]

Went to Luna Lunera with a few ISGers. First guy took a girl in, asked him after he said it was 250 k and what included. Was itching for my turn but with different girl, no we weren't tunnel buddies albeit the option was very well there.

Paid the house staff for the session and took her upstairs.

It was a great session, then finished in room she wanted a propina. This caught me off guard first guy didn't mention that part. All I had was a 50 k note. Sure it didn't break my bank but did catch me off guard, not sure if it's mandatory or she marked me as a gringo.

(For those keeping score, two other ISGers did their civic duty instead of taking her upstairs at club rates got her personal WhatsApp to meet her outside of club hours / rates).

[Igor54]

Not sure what you meant by saying I treat 5 and 10 the same. I only apply 1 to 10 scale to the looks, not performance, and I would not even touch a girl that doesn't meet my minimum standards (7/10) looks wise. I have never used 1-10 performance scale, and never seen it used, because it varies a lot. The exact same girl may be great in bed one day, and a total disaster the other day for various reasons (sick, grandma just passed, etc). She may be great in bed with me, but suck with you, or vice versa, depending on chemistry. So it makes no sense to use 1-10 scale to assess performance, unless you do it only for yourself. Wine and dine, yes, I like it, but it also helps building rapport which leads to a better performance after. Who doesn't like to eat good food, drink and have fun?

And speaking of performance again, my personal assessment would be as follows. Will I repeat with her? If not, I will move on. If yes, was the sex good or amazing? Obviously, an ideal scenario is a hot girl, 8+ that provides an amazing sex, but I will take a solid 7-7. 5 that does the same any day rather than a hotter girl that is average or just above average in bed. I won't repeat with any girl whose performance sucks, no matter how hot she is. Amazing sex with 7 and good sex with 8 or 9 would probably be a tie, but in this case I will definitely be focusing on a hotter girl, building a better rapport with her, so that the sex upgrades from good to amazing.

My young friends, everything depends on the tension. What is today 5/10 tomorrow could be 9/10 if you need it badly. Everything is subjective. Read something on psychology or wikipedia.

[MarquisdeSade1]

https://dailystormer.in/georgia-man-...-people-cheer/

[Elvis 2008]

Where is the evidence? It would be easy to prove you actually did what you said?? No. It is just all made up. Everyone knows you are, well, undereducated. You try your hardest to post rehashed articles that you read or saw to try to impress people. You did the same thing consistently during the CoVid pandemic. Now you are doing the same thing with investing. You're just a windbag.

Probably the worst of the Covid thing was when JJBee called me a narcissist on the subject. I could see why. I thought and still think I was as smart as Fauci when it came to decision making. Of course, that is a misnomer. He did not know what to do and neither did I. The difference in our approaches would have been I would have taken a do no harm approach first as opposed to doing something just to show I cared.

A better way to have put it was that I was just as dumb as Fauci and so were you and everyone else here, and that is not narcissistic; that is fact.

The problem with Democratic douches like yourself is that you pay off and deify someone with the title of "scientist", and we are supposed to follow everything that person says and damn the data or in this case, pretend there was data.

What played out is that Trump listened to Xi in China said "he is my friend" and believed him when Xi said Covid was contained. Josh Rogin of the Washington Post said this on Joe Rogan's show and Joe Rogan groaned and so did I. I had little doubt that this happened as it sounded just like something Trump would do.

And your being a Democratic douche, V, I expect you to believe that too. What you will not believe is that Fauci pretty much did the same thing. He sent one guy to China and crafted policy based on what China was doing and what they told his guy.

You douches seem to recall my saying the virus would kill 80,000. What you forget was that was based on the curve of the initial variant. When that trend was broken, I concluded way before anyone else that the virus had changed. Back then, your douche paper of record the NYT was breathlessly pointing out all the countries which handled Covid better than the USA. I said of those countries "just you wait, they will get hit too", and they were. In fact, China's policy of lockdowns is blowing up in their face just as it did in Colombia.

Even now even with the evidence that the only thing severe lockdowns do is create riots you Democratic douches all would have us go into lockdowns if Covid surged again. Hell, with you douches, lockdowns were not the greatest health policy debacle ever. No, they would have worked if Republicans (and Colombians) had been more compliant.

Of course, the data says otherwise, and my articles were data reliant. It is no wonder you were intimidated by them. You had no answer for them but arrogance.

And your douchery shows its ways with investing as well. It is Democratic douches like yourself who make the claim, "everyone knows you are undereducated. " That is as delusional a statement as one can make. First, do you have any data showing education levels equals better market performance? Of course not. Peter Lynch said that investing is more about the stomach than the brain, and I agree with that.

And despite the fact that I have said why I made 2500% in one stock is irrelevant to our current discussion, you dismiss it out of hand. Why? You have no data to say otherwise. You just do not want to believe it.

And finally, the people on ISG who have met me would very much dispute the education level comment not that it means anything outside of showing you are a douche who think your education level somehow means you are more likely to be correct about something. It is irrelevant to investing as all that matters with investing once again is data.

Speaking of irrational, a friend showed me his newsletter and was disappointed when I suggest he throw it in the trash. All the 2022 picks were in the red, and he gave an overly rosy S&P 500 prediction. My friend knows logistics and was certain companies he bought in the field were going up. After the market went sky high after the Fed press conference, a total nothingburger IMO, he called me up and said I told you so.

Maybe you have learned something V because you did not take the occasion to beat your chest. I agree with your prediction on interest rates and more importantly so do those who buy and sell Fed fund futures, however, you did what you always do and ignored the huge elephant or in this case bear in the room, the inverted yield curve. The traders and investors on CNBC's Fast Money are not as blind as you. They had on an economist who pointed out how the yield curve inversion and a few other markers always point to recession. There was then a healthy debate on which to listen to the sunny stock market or gloomy bond market and of some market tailwinds but no one dismissed the bond market and the overwhelming response for those invested dare I say consensus was to take profits in stocks, keep your powder dry, and listen to the bond market. In fact, all the Fast Money traders heard the same old nothing new message from the Fed as I did.

And I suspect you already know what my response would have been had you beaten your chest. Yes, I bought SQQQ at $45 and am looking to add more at $40. If we have another market decline I will unload some and look to buy more on the cheap. And when we hit the inevitable recession, I will unload it for good. That is my market strategy. And when the recession hits and the market hits its inevitable decline, then I will look at fixed income vehicle like REITs. It is not the right time for REITs. Stocks hit their bottom when the Fed finishes raising rates.

So you are not totally wrong V. You are just early and just as I saw all the investments the newsletter picked out in 2022, I know your investments went down too. If you were not short and had more than one stock like Dollar General, you were down. Still, if you had a brain, you would look at this Fed induced rally to take some profits on your REITs and look to get back into them at a later time. Maybe even (Gasp) go short for a change.

And enough with this quality shit. Microsoft is a quality company and they pulled out of real estate and selling items in Microsoft stores. The whole notion than that you REITs have quality companies paying rents is ludicrous then. The real issue is not the company's quality but how dependent they are on having a physical location. The pandemic changed that metric for many businesses.

And no doubt if you applied your quality model to airlines, you would have put your nose up at Spirit. It is at $21.25 a share and has a shareholder accepted offer of $33.50 per share from Jet Blue. If the deal is blocked for antitrust reasons, JetBlue will pay Spirit a $70 million reverse breakup fee and will pay Spirit's shareholders $400 million. So the airline that is the worst quality wise has the greatest room to advance in the near term. Stocks are either over, fairly, or undervalued and the market may give a higher multiple for "quality" but that is all that it means.

[Mr Enternational]

Yes, a silent partner hidden deep under her skirt. One does not simply walk into Mordor.

In this hypothetical scenario she would already need to be plugged in and knowing all the right people and proper amounts that don't set anyone accidentally on fire or make one slip and fall on a knife several times.

In that case seems she would just go into business for herself. What would she need you for?

[Mr Enternational]

You don't want to be the last nation to convert its economy to run off electricity when the price of oil shoots up due to limited supply.

And where does the electricity come from? From the same shit they are telling us we need to stop using. Most of it is not solar, wind, hydro, or nuclear (and even the waste from those create a mess when it needs to be disposed of). People are being sold a bunch of rainbows and unicorns and bullshit. Most politicians are dumb asses anyway. Hello. Vote for me. I want to make rules on something I do not know shit about.

[PigSavinBoy]

That thought has crossed my mind from time to time too. I wonder how much under the table you'd need to fork out though. You'd have to choose a good front woman with wide hips for you to hide behind.

Yes, a silent partner hidden deep under her skirt. One does not simply walk into Mordor.

In this hypothetical scenario she would already need to be plugged in and knowing all the right people and proper amounts that don't set anyone accidentally on fire or make one slip and fall on a knife several times.

[RamDavidson84]

But that is due to taxes. Oil is a commodity that you can look up the price of everyday. You think once they coax everyone into electric vehicles they are not going to find some way to tax them to maintain or increase that tax revenue? Like they are just going to lose out on that gasoline tax money. Stop concentrating on the trees and back up and look at the forest.

I think a lot of it is also supply and demand. There is only a few decades of affordable oil left, whether we use it for gas, diesel, plastic, etc. It all comes from crude oil. You don't want to be the last nation to convert its economy to run off electricity when the price of oil shoots up due to limited supply. I am not saying saying electric cars are perfect for the environment, but as of now it seems to be the future.

I could never or want to imagine an America where the predominant form of personal travel is public transportation. The convenience of the personal automobile is something I don't mind working a extra few hours for, I think most Americans would agree as well.

[JustTK]

Planning to open a bordello and considering the potential profitability LOL.

That thought has crossed my mind from time to time too. I wonder how much under the table you'd need to fork out though. You'd have to choose a good front woman with wide hips for you to hide behind.

[JjBee62]

But that is due to taxes. Oil is a commodity that you can look up the price of everyday. You think once they coax everyone into electric vehicles they are not going to find some way to tax them to maintain or increase that tax revenue? Like they are just going to lose out on that gasoline tax money. Stop concentrating on the trees and back up and look at the forest.

They already are. Look at your home electric bill.

Forget about the price of gasoline. Gasoline is mainly for entertainment. The country runs on diesel. I drive more than most and I'll probably buy about 400 gallons of gasoline this year. I've already bought over 20,000 gallons of diesel. That's just 1 truck.

[JjBee62]

"Progress" also depends on who pays politicians the most. Here in Thailand weed was just legalized in June. Now they are talking about making it illegal again. They are spouting how bad it is for you with no mention of how bad cigarettes and alcohol are. Why shouldn't those products be made illegal too? Every Joe and their brother are out selling weed on each corner unlike cigarettes which are sold in stores where the tax money is easily tracked.

In the States once upon a time street cars were the thing. They were very economical and environmentally friendly. But I think it was the rubber companies that were not having that. They wanted to sell more tires so they made those street cars disappear. Progress is not always progress. A lot of times it is just corporations trying to increase profits.

Everything is corporations trying to increase profits. If they could make an 80% net profit on them Hobby Lobby would be selling DIY Home Abortion Kits. The greenest company would be barbecuing bald eagles if it increased profits.

Had me confused for a second until I realized you were talking about streetcars. With only a few exceptions, public transportation in the US sucks. But that's one of those evil socialism things. Using tax money to provide low cost transportation, even if eventually it will pay for itself, isn't popular with many.

[PigSavinBoy]

What difference does it make?

I am curious to know why you think it's important. If you want a virgin, you can go to church, or go to the Phils and pick a cherry girl. If you want a girl tat knows what she is doing, surely you want one with a lot of experience? A few years under her anus, and plenty of rimming.

Planning to open a bordello and considering the potential profitability LOL.

Seriously though makes no difference to me and I don't consider it important when choosing a girl (unless she's a cherry of course), nor do I ask them about it; just killing some time at work and for some reason started to wonder how much do the girls actually make per month, and whether it's a good salary (locally). So to get an idea of that I figure it could be approximated from the average numbers of monthly fucks.

And I do agree, I'd rather get in with a girl with some experience under her belt, same as I'd rather hire an experienced electrician not someone fresh out of school.

[JustTK]

So, how often do the Medellin working women actually work, aka fuck?

My fucks per month guestimates:

I am curious to know why you think it's important. If you want a virgin, you can go to church, or go to the Phils and pick a cherry girl. If you want a girl tat knows what she is doing, surely you want one with a lot of experience? A few years under her anus, and plenty of rimming.

[Mr Enternational]

Progress finds a better way, without considering there's always a downside to change.

"Progress" also depends on who pays politicians the most. Here in Thailand weed was just legalized in June. Now they are talking about making it illegal again. They are spouting how bad it is for you with no mention of how bad cigarettes and alcohol are. Why shouldn't those products be made illegal too? Every Joe and their brother are out selling weed on each corner unlike cigarettes which are sold in stores where the tax money is easily tracked.

In the States once upon a time street cars were the thing. They were very economical and environmentally friendly. But I think it was the rubber companies that were not having that. They wanted to sell more tires so they made those street cars disappear. Progress is not always progress. A lot of times it is just corporations trying to increase profits.