Stupid shit in Medellin

[Mr Enternational]

It's not about performance. In the case of sexuality, if Brazilian is 10, Colombian maybe 7 on average. These are just relative number I use for explanation, it's not exact. Skill will be more about performance but I will still look at the whole package.

Glad I don't have to put all that pressure on myself worrying that I can not go with a chick because she is only a 6 1/2 instead of a minimum 7 that I must have. I am just out to have a good time.

[Mr Enternational]

I only apply 1 to 10 scale to the looks, not performance, and I would not even touch a girl that doesn't meet my minimum standards (7/10) looks wise. I have never used 1-10 performance scale, and never seen it used, because it varies a lot.

But that same thing goes for looks! She could be a 4 looks wise one day and a 7 another day!

[Nounce]

Not sure what you meant by saying I treat 5 and 10 the same. I only apply 1 to 10 scale to the looks, not performance, and I would not even touch a girl that doesn't meet my minimum standards (7/10) looks wise. I have never used 1-10 performance scale, and never seen it used, because it varies a lot. The exact same girl may be great in bed one day, and a total disaster the other day for various reasons (sick, grandma just passed, etc). She may be great in bed with me, but suck with you, or vice versa, depending on chemistry. So it makes no sense to use 1-10 scale to assess performance, unless you do it only for yourself. Wine and dine, yes, I like it, but it also helps building rapport which leads to a better performance after. Who doesn't like to eat good food, drink and have fun?

And speaking of performance again, my personal assessment would be as follows. Will I repeat with her? If not, I will move on. If yes, was the sex good or amazing? Obviously, an ideal scenario is a hot girl, 8+ that provides an amazing sex, but I will take a solid 7-7. 5 that does the same any day. I won't repeat with any girl whose performance sucks, no matter how hot she is. Amazing sex with 7 and good sex with 8 or 9 would probably be a tie, but in this case I will definitely be focusing on a hotter girl, building a better rapport with her, so that the sex upgrades from good to amazing.

It's not about performance. In the case of sexuality, if Brazilian is 10, Colombian maybe 7 on average. These are just relative number I use for explanation, it's not exact. Skill will be more about performance but I will still look at the whole package.

Using your example, there are girls that can easily have chemistry with more men, there are girls that takes work, some take a lot of work. You can make a scale out of that.

I am not trying to invalidate your view, instead I am giving a reason why we think differently.

[MiamiBoy1]

I don't know we have a dispute. LOL.

I have a dynamic view. For example, some people rank women from 1 to 10. I think there is a range of sexuality from 1 to 10 too. 1 has no interest in sex so the sex likely won't be good and chemistry won't help. 10 requires very little chemistry to have good sex with. Using MiamiBoy as an example, from the sound of it, he may treat 5 and 10 the same while I may just look for the 9 or 10 in sexuality that does not require me to wine and dine them. MiamiBoy said that is how he likes it. My understanding from that is that he will do it for himself, even if the girl does not need it. I agree chemistry helps but you don't necessary need it when you meet a 10 in sexuality. There is also skill that can go from 1 to 10 too. For me, in order to claim to have the best sex, you probably need to get 9 or 10 in most areas. That is why I say it is a rare combination. I don't disagree about your assessment of what is the best for you but I don't think that is the best for me. A lot of stuff happen in our head and my head too.

See how this girl evolves, the one that I did not know like woman. she now trying to arrange 3 some about once a week.

Not sure what you meant by saying I treat 5 and 10 the same. I only apply 1 to 10 scale to the looks, not performance, and I would not even touch a girl that doesn't meet my minimum standards (7/10) looks wise. I have never used 1-10 performance scale, and never seen it used, because it varies a lot. The exact same girl may be great in bed one day, and a total disaster the other day for various reasons (sick, grandma just passed, etc). She may be great in bed with me, but suck with you, or vice versa, depending on chemistry. So it makes no sense to use 1-10 scale to assess performance, unless you do it only for yourself. Wine and dine, yes, I like it, but it also helps building rapport which leads to a better performance after. Who doesn't like to eat good food, drink and have fun?

And speaking of performance again, my personal assessment would be as follows. Will I repeat with her? If not, I will move on. If yes, was the sex good or amazing? Obviously, an ideal scenario is a hot girl, 8+ that provides an amazing sex, but I will take a solid 7-7. 5 that does the same any day rather than a hotter girl that is average or just above average in bed. I won't repeat with any girl whose performance sucks, no matter how hot she is. Amazing sex with 7 and good sex with 8 or 9 would probably be a tie, but in this case I will definitely be focusing on a hotter girl, building a better rapport with her, so that the sex upgrades from good to amazing.

[Villainy]

I don't know we have a dispute. LOL.

I have a dynamic view. For example, some people rank women from 1 to 10. I think there is a range of sexuality from 1 to 10 too. 1 has no interest in sex so the sex likely won't be good and chemistry won't help. 10 requires very little chemistry to have good sex with. Using MiamiBoy as an example, from the sound of it, he may treat 5 and 10 the same while I may just look for the 9 or 10 in sexuality that does not require me to wine and dine them. MiamiBoy said that is how he likes it. My understanding from that is that he will do it for himself, even if the girl does not need it. I agree chemistry helps but you don't necessary need it when you meet a 10 in sexuality. There is also skill that can go from 1 to 10 too. For me, in order to claim to have the best sex, you probably need to get 9 or 10 in most areas. That is why I say it is a rare combination. I don't disagree about your assessment of what is the best for you but I don't think that is the best for me. A lot of stuff happen in our head and my head too.

See how this girl evolves, the one that I did not know like woman. she now trying to arrange 3 some about once a week.

Nounce,

I can't presume to comment on what works best for you as opposed to anyone else. But as I read through the WA exchange with the girl. She agreed to go along with your preferences after stating that she didn't want to do some of those things. You reasonably, thanked her and were preparing to move-on. Then she said "OK I'll do kissing"etc.

My question for you is. Did you see her? How was the session? I've generally followed a similar strategy of describing what I most enjoy in a session (cita) and sometimes the girl says yes I like those things too or no, I don't like this or that. When they say they don't like something but then turn around and say they will do them, I get the sense of desperation and at least for me. Generally those sessions turned out poorly. Sometimes they back away from what they said they would do, or the performance is less than enthusiastic. So, I've generally not booked a session if there is an initial dispute about certain preferences or if there is a dispute about compensation.

I'm curious about your experiences in that regard.

[Villainy]

And here we go again. You said you were long a REIT, real estate investment trust. Now I have to listen to your cocky idiotic douche ass explain how this is different than real estate all over again when your dumb ass does not understand the case against REITs and real estate is the exact same.

Clearly you don't understand Real Estate and why (or how) a REIT (real estate investment trust) is different. You might be the only person I have every encountered from Texas that doesn't understand Real Estate. I could try to explain it to you but you can't read so it would be a waste of time.

Right so when I play the game it does not count but when you do it does?

You don't know anything about investing, Elvis. Listening to Cramer on CNBC doesn't make you knowledgeable about investing. Have you ever taken a Finance course? At least that might be a place to start.

Hey, douche, what you are trying to push is the oldest trick in the book. You have some portfolio where you jettisoned all the times you lost your ass and held onto all your gains and are trying to show the world how smart you are. What you offer as proof then is anything but.

If I was MMQB, I would say you were an idiot for not selling at the absolute peak instead of just going back a few months when the discussion began. 2021 was as close to ideal conditions for big tech as there were.

There you are. I never owned big tech stocks. You still haven't learned to read. Why is that Elvis? If I were a Monday morning Quarterback like you, I would have claimed to have bought all those tech stocks after the tech bubble burst in 2001 and I would claim to have made millions. I wish I had done that. But I didn't. Practice your reading skills, Elvis. I'm sure there is a remedial high-school somewhere near you.

I could ask then what your exit strategy is but it is pretty clear, you do not have one and therefore are making the same mistake today as you did then.

Hahahaha my exit strategy? Pretty clear what my exit strategy is, and it is well documented too. It is called a will. Naturally since I was a CPA I read all the financial statements and if things look like they are changing for one of my investments then I modify my holdings.

The reason you buy and hold is because you think everything has nowhere to go but up. What is so stupid with you is you think what worked the last 20 years ago is going to work again. But douche, we are back in the conditions of the 1970's.

No, Elvis. I saved and invested all my working years. Something I learned from my parents. Luckily I did very well. Not hard to fathom. Just keep investing in quality companies or S&P index funds from 1970-2019 and you will have a pretty sizeable fortune for retirement. It wasn't rocket science. So what do you do when you reach retirement? Continue to invest in equities and take chances? Or plug everything into bonds? Neither was appropriate. I changed my portfolio to slowly move monies into solid dividend paying companies. Several of these are REITs. I have the advantange of a very nice income from dividends with very good appreciation. This is one way to derisk a portfolio. I could see that interest rates were not going to be low for eternity so bonds were not a reasonable option.

And what I know about you is you are so egotistical, judgmental, and pigheaded, you just cannot adapt to the market, you cannot adapt that way in real life. Your cockiness is just a mask your fear, and you should be afraid because you do not know what the fuck you are doing.

You don't know me at all. I am far more reasonable than you and I don't have to call you names. Only undereducated children have that compulsion.

I enjoy debating people with positions opposite mine who know what they are taking about. You are not one of those people V. You have no made case for your positions outside of how great you are.

Hardly. You are extremely insecure. You make up your investment trades after the fact and you even throw in that you have a 2500% investment winner. Tell me all about that one Elvis. I'm still wating to hear about it. Why do you do these things?? Because of your insecurity. You need people to think you are something more than an overweight, undereducated slob. Sadly you haven't changed many hearts or minds.

[JustTK]

I could really care less what any of you do.

Hey Ram. How are you? So why do you care what some of us do?

[RamDavidson84]

Ah yes. DramaQueen has returned. And his grasp of reality remains as tenuous as ever.

Top 50 cities in the world by murder rate. 13 of the top 25 cities by murder rate are in Mexico. 21 of the top 60 are in Mexico, and only 2 in Colombia. After 60 it's basically all US cities. Violent crime rate by country, Mexico is 4th in the world, Colombia is 7th.

Of course the footnote in both countries is that tourists are less likely to be victims than natives.

I've never had to deal with the violence or the drugs. I've almost never encountered girls with bad attitudes. Although I've probably eaten nearly 1,000 meals in Colombia and probably less than 50 in Mexico, guess which country's culinary offerings put me on the toilet for 7 days.

Nobody has gotten pissed off because those 2 don't agree with their lifestyles. In fact I'll wager that my lifestyle in Colombia is much better than Miamiboy's. What annoys people is when they come along insulting everyone who doesn't follow their style.

So if CDMX is so incredibly good to you, what brings your sorry ass here? I just checked on the fabulous, can't be beat CDMX forum and there have been 2 posts this month. Seems to me, if it's so fucking incredible, someone would occasionally post something talking about how great it was. Shit. Battle Creek, Michigan, population 52,000 has more activity on their forum than CDMX.

Is that the problem? You need to beg people to come to CDMX so maybe 1 person might agree with your opinion? Good luck. While I enjoyed playing tourist in CDMX, I didn't see anything to convince me it was worth choosing as a mongering destination.

Most of the guys who monger in CDMX probably do not have the time to post a bunch of be. S. On a sex mongering forum. Before visiting CDMX I had the same concerns as you, "how could such a huge Latin American city have so few posts on its' threads? Then I visited it and quickly realized it's not a budget destination and most of the guys mongering there most likely live quite busy lives. I don't think you get the digital nomad sex monger type in CDMX, more like the successful married American / European businessman type who is there for the weekend on business or escaping the wife for a few days. To those types of guys, time is much more important than money. They are not wasting there time posting because they are too occupied with their professional and personal life.

I could really care less what any of you do, but for those looking for a different type of experience and may want to try CDMX one day, for the right type of monger it is certainly worth a visit.

[Nounce]

...As for my dispute with Nounce and saying this is the best sex there is, it has to be. If my harem was made up of some of the best P4 P women there are, and if I am giving up my harem for one girl, then she had better be sexually better than the harem. IMO it is very rare to find such a woman....

I don't know we have a dispute. LOL.

I have a dynamic view. For example, some people rank women from 1 to 10. I think there is a range of sexuality from 1 to 10 too. 1 has no interest in sex so the sex likely won't be good and chemistry won't help. 10 requires very little chemistry to have good sex with. Using MiamiBoy as an example, from the sound of it, he may treat 5 and 10 the same while I may just look for the 9 or 10 in sexuality that does not require me to wine and dine them. MiamiBoy said that is how he likes it. My understanding from that is that he will do it for himself, even if the girl does not need it. I agree chemistry helps but you don't necessary need it when you meet a 10 in sexuality. There is also skill that can go from 1 to 10 too. For me, in order to claim to have the best sex, you probably need to get 9 or 10 in most areas. That is why I say it is a rare combination. I don't disagree about your assessment of what is the best for you but I don't think that is the best for me. A lot of stuff happen in our head and my head too.

See how this girl evolves, the one that I did not know like woman. she now trying to arrange 3 some about once a week.

[Mr Enternational]

If you are a top G and by Top G I mean- you speak Spanish- have class- sufficient funds- want a beautiful woman to engage with outside of sex- have solid online game- do not want to deal with desperate beggars and thieves- CDMX / Mexico is your city all day every day and there is no debate.

If you want physically beautiful girls for the best price and ease of access and you don't mind dealing with low end hookers, shady drug dealers, crooked cab drivers, and everything in between- Colombia is your paradise.

Seems you have compared 2 tourist places in one country with the capital of another. If you compared Bogota to CDMX or Acapulco to Cartagena would make more sense. That way we get more apples to apples.

[RamDavidson84]

I have spent quite a bit of time in both countries. In fact I have been in jail in both countries and I think they are both pretty dangerous. Cops are even more corrupt in Mexico and hassle you even more. Colombia I find the average person to be a little more fake and untrustworthy. In Mexico you just have more gang infiltration of the police and military and they seem to be targeting tourists towns now, which were previously somewhat off limits. I find Colombia to be going slightly forward in terms of safety and Mexico going backwards. Obviously both are big countries and it depends on what city in Mexico you are comparing to what city in Colombia. Pussy is cheaper in Colombia in most exchange rate environments. Mexican pussy can be really, really great, or a complete waste of time. Colombian pussy tends to be more mean reverting. These are my experiences in the two countries. And yeah Mexican food is better but yeah you are also more likely to get the shits there.

Good point about the cops in Mexico, I was shaken down once by them. Not a fun time. The Mexico I was referring to, was Mexico minus Tijuana. I have actually never been to Tijuana, but from what I understand Tijuana is more similar to Medellin in monger style compared to other Mexican cities.

[Elvis 2008]

Well, at your suggestion I just read it. Other than for entertainment purposes I'm not sure it was worth the effort. However, I'm kind of stuck waiting around for other people to do their jobs, so I not only read it, but I'll address it. This will also take some time to read. Worth it? Probably not.

Well, you have to actually try to learn something.

If you'll recall, not many months ago the same person was talking about how important it was to commit yourself to 1 girl in order to have the best sex. Now it's 3 or 4.

This is so you, JJBee. You pick something random out and try to burn me instead of trying to learn what I was saying. It is too fucking funny. I was not arguing but explaining the journey.

II'm confident the girl in question is exclusive to me. There haven't been any demands on my time. Quite the opposite.

Meets the definition of a GF? Confident she is exclusive? No demands on my time? Oh brother.

And yet here I thought every time an American guy used Western Union to send money to a Colombian woman, it had to be that she picked up the money with her BF. Now that you are sending money to her the reason she is not picking up with her BF is that you are not using Western Union? That is the best you can do?

You know when I would use a term like "meets the definition of GF"? It is when I had a sugar baby that I liked who I hoped like me as much back. What would snap me out of that funk would be realizing I had to give up all other women for her.

And the discussion of having the best sex of your life is futile? That you think such a discussion is futile tells me you are not having the best sex of your life. That significantly raises the chances you will stray looking for better or she will.

If another poster posted like this two years ago, you would have been up his ass about what a fool he was, and everybody here knows it.

[Elvis 2008]

I never said I was long real estate..

And here we go again. You said you were long a REIT, real estate investment trust. Now I have to listen to your cocky idiotic douche ass explain how this is different than real estate all over again when your dumb ass does not understand the case against REITs and real estate is the exact same.

I told you that I could have Monday Morning Quarterbacked just like you did. You are a liar you never made the trades that you claim and you can't back it up.

Right so when I play the game it does not count but when you do it does?

Hey, douche, what you are trying to push is the oldest trick in the book. You have some portfolio where you jettisoned all the times you lost your ass and held onto all your gains and are trying to show the world how smart you are. What you offer as proof then is anything but.

Hillary Clinton had one of electoral sugar daddies pull this shit in the 90's and she claimed to have made $100,000 trading cattle futures. Amazingly, she never traded like that again because she did not do it the first time. She made money because her sugar daddy took the hit for all the losses in the portfolio and gave her the credit for all the wins.

If I was MMQB, I would say you were an idiot for not selling at the absolute peak instead of just going back a few months when the discussion began. 2021 was as close to ideal conditions for big tech as there were. I could ask then what your exit strategy is but it is pretty clear, you do not have one and therefore are making the same mistake today as you did then.

The reason you buy and hold is because you think everything has nowhere to go but up. What is so stupid with you is you think what worked the last 20 years ago is going to work again. But douche, we are back in the conditions of the 1970's.

And what I know about you is you are so egotistical, judgmental, and pigheaded, you just cannot adapt to the market, you cannot adapt that way in real life. Your cockiness is just a mask your fear, and you should be afraid because you do not know what the fuck you are doing.

Yield curve inversion, multiple contraction, exit strategy, long term demographic trends mean nothing to you douches and instead of admitting you are getting your asses beat, all you can do is come back with cockiness and lies.

Stocks did so badly in the 1970's, there was a cover story on Business Week Magazine in 1980 entitled, "The Death of Equities" and yeah, I know you did not know that. I also know my telling you that will do nothing except get you even more upset and respond with even more vile posts, another bad sign because that means fear is beating rational thought. Been there, done that.

I enjoy debating people with positions opposite mine who know what they are taking about. You are not one of those people V. You have no made case for your positions outside of how great you are.

[Huacho]

How did you end up in jail?

It's too long of a story and too long ago and been told too many times. Short version is, resisted a robbery, fucked a guy up, cops wanted a bribe, I wouldn't pay it and they locked me up all weekend trying to get money out of me. México it was just a big bar fight, which I was attempting to run from, and they just grabbed everybody running out. That was just a night in the drunk tank and they kicked us out the next morning. Some big fat fucker made me clean the toilet though. Colombia was way worse but nothing really happened I didn't get over.

[Mtndew704]

I have spent quite a bit of time in both countries. In fact I have been in jail in both countries and I think they are both pretty dangerous. Cops are even more corrupt in Mxico and hassle you even more. Colombia I find the average person to be a little more fake and untrustworthy. In Mxico you just have more gang infiltration of the police and military and they seem to be targeting tourists towns now, which were previously somewhat off limits. I find Colombia to be going slightly forward in terms of safety and Mxico going backwards. Obviously both are big countries and it depends on what city in Mxico you are comparing to what city in Colombia. Pussy is cheaper in Colombia in most exchange rate environments. Mexican pussy can be really, really great, or a complete waste of time. Colombian pussy tends to be more mean reverting. These are my experiences in the two countries. And yeah Mxican food is better but yeah you are also more likely to get the shits there.

How did you end up in jail?