Thread: Stupid shit in Medellin
+
Add Report
Results 2,491 to 2,505 of 7075
-
07-16-22 15:47 #4585
Posts: 5466Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
SA serves a relatively small segment of the P4P community, including many who fail to understand that they're engaging in P4P. For those who use it, they might think it's the greatest, and it is, for them, until they find something else which becomes the new greatest. For everyone else, at best, SA is no big deal.
I prefer finding women through online social sources. I prefer it for many reasons, including many success stories over the last 30 years. For me, SA is a waste of money. For me. It's a waste of money because it adds no value. If I'm looking for a simple, casual encounter, Facebook has more options than I need, without a monthly subscription fee.
However, when I'm looking for something deeper, an actual connection, leading to a relationship, then SA restricts my search pool.
-
07-16-22 03:01 #4584
Posts: 3234Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Over the past 20 years, Berkshire is just a percentage point ahead of the S&P 500, with a 10.3% annualized return against 9. 2% for the index.
You just admitted that someone is better off buying an index fund than listening to you. LOL. Congratulations, you just stabbed yourself in the dick.
On top of that, you do another Democratic douche move by blowing an expert without any regards to the expert's performance. How many times have you douches done that? "Fauci was not wrong about masks. He was lying for our benefit. " Yeesh.
And betting that my returns are worse than Buffett's and yours? Why? Because you want them to be?
Of course, my returns are better than Buffett. It is not that hard. I know bond funds now yielding more than 10%. Hell, I could sell now, hold cash, and probably beat him for 5 years too.
Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Truth is one of those women was in Medellin when the travel ban was on and you could have had her before me. I guarantee you that DF and DC would have had jumped on her if they had the chance.
As to why I have argued with so much, did it ever occur to you that the reason I told people what I was buying was so others would make money?
Yeah, I did not think so.
If you want to know my investing history, how about asking about it as opposed to being a douche and lying about it? You might actually learn something.
-
07-15-22 19:15 #4583
Posts: 307Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
-
07-15-22 17:52 #4582
Posts: 15925Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
-
07-15-22 03:14 #4581
Posts: 2794Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
I do not know why you waste your time on these losers. They spread there lies about MDE. Your girl and some of my girls these guys can only dream about them, plus they are too stupid or cheap to use SA.
-
07-15-22 01:40 #4580
Posts: 651Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
-
07-15-22 01:01 #4579
Posts: 3234Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
-
07-15-22 00:21 #4578
Posts: 1782Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
Why do they get under my skin? Bcos I am me and you are you, and we have had this part of the discussion before. .
-
07-14-22 23:58 #4577
Posts: 1680Well
Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 23:40 #4576
Posts: 2933Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 23:28 #4575
Posts: 651Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Lesson #1: You don't win points in an argument by calling the other person (or side) childish names. All it does is suggests that you are losing the argument and are frustrated. Intelligent adults learn to make their points and support them. Pulling your "facts" out of thin air or with "non substantial support" and then calling the other side names if they don't agree is so high-school.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Naturally you wanted to start a fight about it but you've been unable to acquit yourself creditably (because you were wrong) and you've tried to pivot to everything else under the sun.
Understandable. But remember. You started this.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
Lesson #2: A question by definition can't be a lie. It may be deceptive, it may be inappropriate it may be a lot of things. But it can't be a lie.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
I'm sure your new story is that you bought them at exactly the lowest point a few weeks before and that is how you got to 40%.
Why would I have doubts??
1. If you are such a partisan (and we all know you are) then you would have bought them at the beginning of Biden's presidency. On inauguration day. But NO. You waited a year and 3 months to exactly the time when the market started falling. Not a chance you're Monday morning quarterbacking is there? Hmmm??
2. I don't know the size of your portfolio but for your entire portfolio to be up 40% you would have had to put everything into those inverse ETFs. Those ETFs use options to create enormous leverage. Leverage cuts both ways. You can make big gains and you can lose big also. No one in their right mind would put everything they own into something that by definition is super risky. Unless your "portfolio" is so small that big percentage losses wouldn't mean anything to you.
3. Posting something whereby you claim you made the purchases after the fact isn't exactly compelling evidence. Send me your brokerage statements for the last 3 months with your name and address and account number redacted and then I might actually believe you. But I have a feeling you can't (not won't but can't).
This was Lesson #3 BTW. Saying something in a forum on the internet doesn't make it true. Show me or blow me.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Now Sri Lanka has relevance? BTW It was called Ceylon when I was a teenager collecting stamps. I didn't care about Ceylon then either.
That was Lesson #4: Don't introduce Sri Lanka into the middle of any argument. Guaranteed no one thinks that makes a compelling point.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Second of all, investing doesn't mean you don't ever have losses. It means over time your portfolio grows consistently.
Third, you want to compare a 2 1/2 month result. Do you think you're a better investor than Warren Buffett? I bet your claimed 40% gain is a lot better than he did over the last 2 1/2 months.
But do you want to compare your record with his over the last 20 years? I will give you a break. I bet my 20 year record is a lot better than yours. But mine sure isn't as good as Buffett's.
That was Lesson #5. 2 1/2 month results are meaningless for comparative purposes. Investment performance is measured over years sometimes decades but not weeks.
Now, as to the pictures you posted. Are those your girl friend? Or someone you saw? I don't find her attractive at all. I think she's fu**ing stunning. Send her my way jajajajaja.
-
07-14-22 23:18 #4574
Posts: 1782Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
"Do you ever get mad at someone on the internet that you have never met?
If so, yes!! Here, Facebook, Whatsapp groups. Hell, it's the bane of social media, isn't it? People can just be arrogant AR $3 holes and think they can get away w it.
-
07-14-22 20:26 #4573
Posts: 2933Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 17:54 #4572
Posts: 1782Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
-
07-14-22 17:23 #4571
Posts: 15925Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]