Stupid shit in Medellin

[JjBee62]

Elvis,

I do not know why you waste your time on these losers. They spread there lies about MDE. Your girl and some of my girls these guys can only dream about them, plus they are too stupid or cheap to use SA.

Care to elaborate on that? How is everyone who doesn't use SA too stupid or too stupid?

SA serves a relatively small segment of the P4P community, including many who fail to understand that they're engaging in P4P. For those who use it, they might think it's the greatest, and it is, for them, until they find something else which becomes the new greatest. For everyone else, at best, SA is no big deal.

I prefer finding women through online social sources. I prefer it for many reasons, including many success stories over the last 30 years. For me, SA is a waste of money. For me. It's a waste of money because it adds no value. If I'm looking for a simple, casual encounter, Facebook has more options than I need, without a monthly subscription fee.

However, when I'm looking for something deeper, an actual connection, leading to a relationship, then SA restricts my search pool.

[Elvis 2008]

You should be paying me for lessons in civility and how to reason.

Lesson #1: You don't win points in an argument by calling the other person (or side) childish names. All it does is suggests that you are losing the argument and are frustrated. Intelligent adults learn to make their points and support them. Pulling your "facts" out of thin air or with "non substantial support" and then calling the other side names if they don't agree is so high-school.

Oh really?

Lesson #4: Don't introduce Sri Lanka into the middle of any argument. Guaranteed no one thinks that makes a compelling point.

"No one thinks" Can you read everyone's mind? This is why I call you names. Who do you think you are to speak for everyone? You are not making a good point but are just imagining everyone agrees with you.

No one in their right mind would put everything they own into something that by definition is super risky.

Once again, you are speaking for everyone. And show me how going short when the fed is raising rates and the yield curve is inverted is risky.

Since I trust absolutely nothing you say. I ran the numbers: SQQQ is up 25.8% from 4-28 to today, SPXU is up 30.2% from 4-28 to today and SDOW is up 26.6% from 4-28 to today.

I'm sure your new story is that you bought them at exactly the lowest point a few weeks before and that is how you got to 40%.

Again, this warrants name calling. You insult someone's honesty, make a false accusation, and then when they prove your accusation is wrong, you make up another false one. That is a douche move.

2 1/2 month results are meaningless for comparative purposes. Investment performance is measured over years sometimes decades but not weeks.

Again, you are imagining you have this group who agrees with you. Who says they are meaningless? I could close my position and hold it for 5 years and STILL be ahead of you. What would that prove?

But do you want to compare your record with his over the last 20 years? I bet my 20 year record is a lot better than yours. But mine sure isn't as good as Buffett's.

https://www.barrons.com/articles/war...ce-51651885365

Over the past 20 years, Berkshire is just a percentage point ahead of the S&P 500, with a 10.3% annualized return against 9. 2% for the index.

You just admitted that someone is better off buying an index fund than listening to you. LOL. Congratulations, you just stabbed yourself in the dick.

On top of that, you do another Democratic douche move by blowing an expert without any regards to the expert's performance. How many times have you douches done that? "Fauci was not wrong about masks. He was lying for our benefit. " Yeesh.

And betting that my returns are worse than Buffett's and yours? Why? Because you want them to be?

Of course, my returns are better than Buffett. It is not that hard. I know bond funds now yielding more than 10%. Hell, I could sell now, hold cash, and probably beat him for 5 years too.

Remember the theme of the discussion?? Petro's win in the election caused the peso to devalue against the dollar. Other causes weren't a factor.

No, that is your theme of discussion. Mine is that currencies typically revert to a mean so if the currency is going down every day, that means there is emotional and likely irrational selling. I said my GF told me that people were afraid of Gustavo and guessed that is what is causing the panic selling. You wanted to give a 10 page dissertation on why currencies move when this was irrational selling.

Now, as to the pictures you posted. I think she's fu**ing stunning. Send her my way jajajajaja.

You made a concession. Miracles do happen. Look, V, I posted about seeking not to brag but hope others used it. Guys like Dramafree and Don Carlos who have used seeking rave about it. We have talked amongst ourselves and upped our game that much more.

Truth is one of those women was in Medellin when the travel ban was on and you could have had her before me. I guarantee you that DF and DC would have had jumped on her if they had the chance.

As to why I have argued with so much, did it ever occur to you that the reason I told people what I was buying was so others would make money?

Yeah, I did not think so.

If you want to know my investing history, how about asking about it as opposed to being a douche and lying about it? You might actually learn something.

[Mtndew704]

Though you are at least a bootlicker, and surely challenged in the matter of IQ if you find those childish, unoriginal rants funny. No comedy clubs would give them a second look.

You flirting with me Paulie?

[Mr Enternational]

Elvis,

I do not know why you waste your time on these losers. They spread there lies about MDE. Your girl and some of my girls these guys can only dream about them, plus they are too stupid or cheap to use SA.

Amen to that brother. If I am going to pay a hooker then I am going to fuck her and pay her right after. I am not trying to keep any hookers on retainer for $500+ per month. I am too stupid and cheap for shit like perpetually paying someone's rent. Just going to keep doing the dumb thing and pay as I go.

[DramaFree11]

It is not at all. I am sure you and Viliany think you fuck women from El Centro who are just as attractive as these two for less than $10 all the time.

Elvis,

I do not know why you waste your time on these losers. They spread there lies about MDE. Your girl and some of my girls these guys can only dream about them, plus they are too stupid or cheap to use SA.

[Villainy]

Then why don't you get your nose out of your laptop screen and go out and get a life? You are here all day, every day posting. It's a big world out there, so go get um tiger! Wink.

Tiger. Tiger??. You think the TK in JustTK stands for tiger? I thought it stood for TinKer Bell..

[Elvis 2008]

Yeah chicks that work downtown pretty much get paid what chicks working downtown get paid. How is that to be disputed?

It is not at all. I am sure you and Viliany think you fuck women from El Centro who are just as attractive as these two for less than $10 all the time.

[JustTK]

Then why are you mad? It isn't even about you.

Bcos people who are rude to me and insult me, especially without merit, get under my skin. I treat people w respect (unless they are being AR $eholes), and I expect others to do the same to me.

Why do they get under my skin? Bcos I am me and you are you, and we have had this part of the discussion before. .

[Paulie97]

People can just be arrogant AR $3 holes and think they can get away w it.

Then why don't you get your nose out of your laptop screen and go out and get a life? You are here all day, every day posting. It's a big world out there, so go get um tiger! Wink.

[Nounce]

...People can just be arrogant AR $3 holes and think they can get away w it.

Then why are you mad? It isn't even about you.

[Villainy]

You already have. You and your dumbshit Democratic douches called these two women average looking.

This is when I made fun of you all and made my 10 rules of the Medellin forum. Among the rules, there is no objective criteria for beauty and if you pay more than 30 k, you are overpaying. Nounce got mad at my rules. He actually made non-specific compliments about my women, but he was the only one in your crew who even ventured out a little bit and called these women anything more than average.

And after you jealous, pathetic dumb shit douches called these women average, I had like a dozen guys PM me for their numbers. That is why I considered putting up a photo of someone else and calling her my gal just to see you douches call her average and unattractive.

You should be paying me for lessons in civility and how to reason.

Lesson #1: You don't win points in an argument by calling the other person (or side) childish names. All it does is suggests that you are losing the argument and are frustrated. Intelligent adults learn to make their points and support them. Pulling your "facts" out of thin air or with "non substantial support" and then calling the other side names if they don't agree is so high-school.

And V, anyone who looks at your history can see probably half your posts are negative comments towards me. You are not capable of being objective with anything with me, and you are a liar.

You started this bonfire. Remember? I told someone that the drop in the peso relative to the dollar is a culmination of many things NOT just a result of the recent election.

Naturally you wanted to start a fight about it but you've been unable to acquit yourself creditably (because you were wrong) and you've tried to pivot to everything else under the sun.

Understandable. But remember. You started this.

You want a lie? Here you go.

You're claiming you are up 40% in your portfolio?

A lie?

Lesson #2: A question by definition can't be a lie. It may be deceptive, it may be inappropriate it may be a lot of things. But it can't be a lie.

http://<a href="http://www.internati...p=2719562</a>..

The exact percent return on these funds as of today is 39.87%, and you admitted you are down by 10%. In these very short ten weeks, you are down 50% to me. It would take you five years just with average returns to catch up with me.

And besides accusing me of lying, you say this.

You are down 50%, do not understand why, but the kicker is I can lose everything, and you cannot. Why is that V? Why can't you lose everything?

Since I trust absolutely nothing you say. I ran the numbers: SQQQ is up 25.8% from 4-28 to today, SPXU is up 30.2% from 4-28 to today and SDOW is up 26.6% from 4-28 to today.

I'm sure your new story is that you bought them at exactly the lowest point a few weeks before and that is how you got to 40%.

Why would I have doubts??

1. If you are such a partisan (and we all know you are) then you would have bought them at the beginning of Biden's presidency. On inauguration day. But NO. You waited a year and 3 months to exactly the time when the market started falling. Not a chance you're Monday morning quarterbacking is there? Hmmm??

2. I don't know the size of your portfolio but for your entire portfolio to be up 40% you would have had to put everything into those inverse ETFs. Those ETFs use options to create enormous leverage. Leverage cuts both ways. You can make big gains and you can lose big also. No one in their right mind would put everything they own into something that by definition is super risky. Unless your "portfolio" is so small that big percentage losses wouldn't mean anything to you.

3. Posting something whereby you claim you made the purchases after the fact isn't exactly compelling evidence. Send me your brokerage statements for the last 3 months with your name and address and account number redacted and then I might actually believe you. But I have a feeling you can't (not won't but can't).

This was Lesson #3 BTW. Saying something in a forum on the internet doesn't make it true. Show me or blow me.

Didn't you see what happened in Sri Lanka?

There is a really simple way the USA gets to be Sri Lanka. Some dumbshit Dem douches like you and your crew looks at our power, water, and food supply being down 50% and says, "I went to college. My analysis is great. I know what I am doing. The numbers being down were just bad luck. It will turn around. ".

Remember the theme of the discussion?? Petro's win in the election caused the peso to devalue against the dollar. Other causes weren't a factor. Wasn't that your argument?

Now Sri Lanka has relevance? BTW It was called Ceylon when I was a teenager collecting stamps. I didn't care about Ceylon then either.

That was Lesson #4: Don't introduce Sri Lanka into the middle of any argument. Guaranteed no one thinks that makes a compelling point.

Dramafree asked why can't you guys learn from me. I know why. You dumbshit Democratic douches have swallowed the Kool Aid so badly that anyone right leaning is stupid and not worth listening to.

How much were you drinking when you posted this response?

And as far as having skill with investing, that is not possible either. It has to be luck. Anytime a Republican does anything well it is luck. It has to be because of how fucking stupid we all are.

So was it a mistake not selling all your stock and buying everything I did?

I already know the answer is no. You would rather be down 50% and have the illusion of thinking you are right than being up 50%, and that makes YOU a narcissist.

NO Elvis, I don't think you understand anything about investing. First, even if your claim is true, that doesn't make you a good (much less great) investor. You took a speculative position (that is if you did it at all, which is still only supported by your word) and had some short-term gains. How long are you going to ride those gains? For a full year? Because if you close the position in less than a year, you will have short term capital gains which are treated as ordinary income which will take a big bite out of your "so called gains".

Second of all, investing doesn't mean you don't ever have losses. It means over time your portfolio grows consistently.

Third, you want to compare a 2 1/2 month result. Do you think you're a better investor than Warren Buffett? I bet your claimed 40% gain is a lot better than he did over the last 2 1/2 months.

But do you want to compare your record with his over the last 20 years? I will give you a break. I bet my 20 year record is a lot better than yours. But mine sure isn't as good as Buffett's.

That was Lesson #5. 2 1/2 month results are meaningless for comparative purposes. Investment performance is measured over years sometimes decades but not weeks.

Now, as to the pictures you posted. Are those your girl friend? Or someone you saw? I don't find her attractive at all. I think she's fu**ing stunning. Send her my way jajajajaja.

[JustTK]

Do you ever get mad at someone that you never met on internet?

Do you mean:
"Do you ever get mad at someone on the internet that you have never met?

If so, yes!! Here, Facebook, Whatsapp groups. Hell, it's the bane of social media, isn't it? People can just be arrogant AR $3 holes and think they can get away w it.

[Nounce]

Nounce doesn't do mad. He is the uncle that every member of the family loves.

Do you ever get mad at someone that you never met on internet?

[JustTK]

Just to clarify, I am not mad at you, not ever. I think you are generous too.

Nounce doesn't do mad. He is the uncle that every member of the family loves.

[Mr Enternational]

I called the one who modeled all over the world my supermodel, and Mr. E chimed in I was being dishonest because words mean things, and she was not a supermodel.

Did she fit this description? "Supermodels generally work for high-end brands and on the runway. Catalogue, parts, glamour and fitness models are not considered supermodels because they are not generally well-known or rich enough. Most supermodels were 'scouted' by a modelling agency; this means they were spotted by a modelling agency employer. " "Is a highly paid fashion model who usually has a worldwide reputation and often a background in haute couture and commercial modeling."

Oh and per him, if either one worked Centro, they would be getting 30 k like everyone else. Mr. E said that all women are in demand, and no one disputed it.

Yeah chicks that work downtown pretty much get paid what chicks working downtown get paid. How is that to be disputed?