Stupid shit in Medellin

[Paulie97]

People can just be arrogant AR $3 holes and think they can get away w it.

Then why don't you get your nose out of your laptop screen and go out and get a life? You are here all day, every day posting. It's a big world out there, so go get um tiger! Wink.

[Nounce]

...People can just be arrogant AR $3 holes and think they can get away w it.

Then why are you mad? It isn't even about you.

[Villainy]

You already have. You and your dumbshit Democratic douches called these two women average looking.

This is when I made fun of you all and made my 10 rules of the Medellin forum. Among the rules, there is no objective criteria for beauty and if you pay more than 30 k, you are overpaying. Nounce got mad at my rules. He actually made non-specific compliments about my women, but he was the only one in your crew who even ventured out a little bit and called these women anything more than average.

And after you jealous, pathetic dumb shit douches called these women average, I had like a dozen guys PM me for their numbers. That is why I considered putting up a photo of someone else and calling her my gal just to see you douches call her average and unattractive.

You should be paying me for lessons in civility and how to reason.

Lesson #1: You don't win points in an argument by calling the other person (or side) childish names. All it does is suggests that you are losing the argument and are frustrated. Intelligent adults learn to make their points and support them. Pulling your "facts" out of thin air or with "non substantial support" and then calling the other side names if they don't agree is so high-school.

And V, anyone who looks at your history can see probably half your posts are negative comments towards me. You are not capable of being objective with anything with me, and you are a liar.

You started this bonfire. Remember? I told someone that the drop in the peso relative to the dollar is a culmination of many things NOT just a result of the recent election.

Naturally you wanted to start a fight about it but you've been unable to acquit yourself creditably (because you were wrong) and you've tried to pivot to everything else under the sun.

Understandable. But remember. You started this.

You want a lie? Here you go.

You're claiming you are up 40% in your portfolio?

A lie?

Lesson #2: A question by definition can't be a lie. It may be deceptive, it may be inappropriate it may be a lot of things. But it can't be a lie.

http://<a href="http://www.internati...p=2719562</a>..

The exact percent return on these funds as of today is 39.87%, and you admitted you are down by 10%. In these very short ten weeks, you are down 50% to me. It would take you five years just with average returns to catch up with me.

And besides accusing me of lying, you say this.

You are down 50%, do not understand why, but the kicker is I can lose everything, and you cannot. Why is that V? Why can't you lose everything?

Since I trust absolutely nothing you say. I ran the numbers: SQQQ is up 25.8% from 4-28 to today, SPXU is up 30.2% from 4-28 to today and SDOW is up 26.6% from 4-28 to today.

I'm sure your new story is that you bought them at exactly the lowest point a few weeks before and that is how you got to 40%.

Why would I have doubts??

1. If you are such a partisan (and we all know you are) then you would have bought them at the beginning of Biden's presidency. On inauguration day. But NO. You waited a year and 3 months to exactly the time when the market started falling. Not a chance you're Monday morning quarterbacking is there? Hmmm??

2. I don't know the size of your portfolio but for your entire portfolio to be up 40% you would have had to put everything into those inverse ETFs. Those ETFs use options to create enormous leverage. Leverage cuts both ways. You can make big gains and you can lose big also. No one in their right mind would put everything they own into something that by definition is super risky. Unless your "portfolio" is so small that big percentage losses wouldn't mean anything to you.

3. Posting something whereby you claim you made the purchases after the fact isn't exactly compelling evidence. Send me your brokerage statements for the last 3 months with your name and address and account number redacted and then I might actually believe you. But I have a feeling you can't (not won't but can't).

This was Lesson #3 BTW. Saying something in a forum on the internet doesn't make it true. Show me or blow me.

Didn't you see what happened in Sri Lanka?

There is a really simple way the USA gets to be Sri Lanka. Some dumbshit Dem douches like you and your crew looks at our power, water, and food supply being down 50% and says, "I went to college. My analysis is great. I know what I am doing. The numbers being down were just bad luck. It will turn around. ".

Remember the theme of the discussion?? Petro's win in the election caused the peso to devalue against the dollar. Other causes weren't a factor. Wasn't that your argument?

Now Sri Lanka has relevance? BTW It was called Ceylon when I was a teenager collecting stamps. I didn't care about Ceylon then either.

That was Lesson #4: Don't introduce Sri Lanka into the middle of any argument. Guaranteed no one thinks that makes a compelling point.

Dramafree asked why can't you guys learn from me. I know why. You dumbshit Democratic douches have swallowed the Kool Aid so badly that anyone right leaning is stupid and not worth listening to.

How much were you drinking when you posted this response?

And as far as having skill with investing, that is not possible either. It has to be luck. Anytime a Republican does anything well it is luck. It has to be because of how fucking stupid we all are.

So was it a mistake not selling all your stock and buying everything I did?

I already know the answer is no. You would rather be down 50% and have the illusion of thinking you are right than being up 50%, and that makes YOU a narcissist.

NO Elvis, I don't think you understand anything about investing. First, even if your claim is true, that doesn't make you a good (much less great) investor. You took a speculative position (that is if you did it at all, which is still only supported by your word) and had some short-term gains. How long are you going to ride those gains? For a full year? Because if you close the position in less than a year, you will have short term capital gains which are treated as ordinary income which will take a big bite out of your "so called gains".

Second of all, investing doesn't mean you don't ever have losses. It means over time your portfolio grows consistently.

Third, you want to compare a 2 1/2 month result. Do you think you're a better investor than Warren Buffett? I bet your claimed 40% gain is a lot better than he did over the last 2 1/2 months.

But do you want to compare your record with his over the last 20 years? I will give you a break. I bet my 20 year record is a lot better than yours. But mine sure isn't as good as Buffett's.

That was Lesson #5. 2 1/2 month results are meaningless for comparative purposes. Investment performance is measured over years sometimes decades but not weeks.

Now, as to the pictures you posted. Are those your girl friend? Or someone you saw? I don't find her attractive at all. I think she's fu**ing stunning. Send her my way jajajajaja.

[JustTK]

Do you ever get mad at someone that you never met on internet?

Do you mean:
"Do you ever get mad at someone on the internet that you have never met?

If so, yes!! Here, Facebook, Whatsapp groups. Hell, it's the bane of social media, isn't it? People can just be arrogant AR $3 holes and think they can get away w it.

[Nounce]

Nounce doesn't do mad. He is the uncle that every member of the family loves.

Do you ever get mad at someone that you never met on internet?

[JustTK]

Just to clarify, I am not mad at you, not ever. I think you are generous too.

Nounce doesn't do mad. He is the uncle that every member of the family loves.

[Mr Enternational]

I called the one who modeled all over the world my supermodel, and Mr. E chimed in I was being dishonest because words mean things, and she was not a supermodel.

Did she fit this description? "Supermodels generally work for high-end brands and on the runway. Catalogue, parts, glamour and fitness models are not considered supermodels because they are not generally well-known or rich enough. Most supermodels were 'scouted' by a modelling agency; this means they were spotted by a modelling agency employer. " "Is a highly paid fashion model who usually has a worldwide reputation and often a background in haute couture and commercial modeling."

Oh and per him, if either one worked Centro, they would be getting 30 k like everyone else. Mr. E said that all women are in demand, and no one disputed it.

Yeah chicks that work downtown pretty much get paid what chicks working downtown get paid. How is that to be disputed?

[Nounce]

.. Nounce got mad at my rules. ..

Just to clarify, I am not mad at you, not ever. I think you are generous too.

[Elvis 2008]

So you say. But you never posted any pictures of her, have you? Why is that? OH maybe she isn't the 10 you claim and you're afraid to let people see her picture because everyone will laugh at your standard of beauty.

You already have. You and your dumbshit Democratic douches called these two women average looking. I paid one $100 and Paulie said I overpaid and he could get her for half. I called the one who modeled all over the world my supermodel, and Mr. E chimed in I was being dishonest because words mean things, and she was not a supermodel. Oh and per him, if either one worked Centro, they would be getting 30 k like everyone else. Mr. E said that all women are in demand, and no one disputed it.

This is when I made fun of you all and made my 10 rules of the Medellin forum. Among the rules, there is no objective criteria for beauty and if you pay more than 30 k, you are overpaying. Nounce got mad at my rules. He actually made non-specific compliments about my women, but he was the only one in your crew who even ventured out a little bit and called these women anything more than average.

And after you jealous, pathetic dumb shit douches called these women average, I had like a dozen guys PM me for their numbers.

That is why I considered putting up a photo of someone else and calling her my gal just to see you douches call her average and unattractive.

And V, anyone who looks at your history can see probably half your posts are negative comments towards me. You are not capable of being objective with anything with me, and you are a liar. You want a lie? Here you go.

You're claiming you are up 40% in your portfolio?.

This was posted April 28.

http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/...eply&p=2719562

I have put my money where my mouth is and bought inverse ETFs which have done well lately: SPXU, SDOW, and my favorite SQQQ. As the market falls, these funds go up in value.

The exact percent return on these funds as of today is 39.87%, and you admitted you are down by 10%. In these very short ten weeks, you are down 50% to me. It would take you five years just with average returns to catch up with me.

And besides accusing me of lying, you say this.

Your play is kind of analogous to playing no-limit poker. You know that if you are wrong, or if something dramatic happens you are in a security (a speculative vessel) that could cost you most of your principal in just a few days? You can go all-in on a hunch and you will probably gather in a few pots until the time you try it and run into the nuts.

Fortunately I don't need to take those kinds of obtuse risks. I've invested my whole adult life and I have a very nice retirement. If social security disappears, I'm still extremely comfortable here or in any other country I might choose to live.

You are down 50%, do not understand why, but the kicker is I can lose everything, and you cannot. Why is that V? Why can't you lose everything? Didn't you see what happened in Sri Lanka?

There is a really simple way the USA gets to be Sri Lanka. Some dumbshit Dem douches like you and your crew looks at our power, water, and food supply being down 50% and says, "I went to college. My analysis is great. I know what I am doing. The numbers being down were just bad luck. It will turn around. ".

Dramafree asked why can't you guys learn from me. I know why. You dumbshit Democratic douches have swallowed the Kool Aid so badly that anyone right leaning is stupid and not worth listening to.

The reason these women are average looking is they are not on the arm of a Democrat.

And as far as having skill with investing, that is not possible either. It has to be luck. Anytime a Republican does anything well it is luck. It has to be because of how fucking stupid we all are.

So was it a mistake not selling all your stock and buying everything I did?

I already know the answer is no. You would rather be down 50% and have the illusion of thinking you are right than being up 50%, and that makes YOU a narcissist.

[JjBee62]

Obviously JjBirdbrain has no self control if he does something he doesn't want to do.

That's your expert analysis? Still at it aren't you? Still trying to best me in a battle of wits and you've been shooting blanks for years.

Every day, everyone does things they don't want to do. You probably don't want to put on that adult diaper every day, but you do it anyway because you know what happens when you forget.

As always, you ignore the content and merely pounce on something your feeble, failing mind sees as a weak point and embarrass yourself (although not as badly as on "no diaper day."

If you think about it, although that requires a skill you've long neglected, doing something you don't want to do often illustrates self control, not the lack thereof. Most people don't want to work, they would rather do other things. According to your understanding anyone who chooses to get drunk instead of going to work is exercising self control.

Shall I go on? If so, put on a fresh diaper, because you're certain to shit yourself again.

[Villainy]

You tried to show me that you were my equal by putting up a bunch of the escorts you had been banging and then covered their faces so other guys would not recognize them. LOL. My woman is major league and you had worn out AA types at best.

So you say. But you never posted any pictures of her, have you? Why is that? OH maybe she isn't the 10 you claim and you're afraid to let people see her picture because everyone will laugh at your standard of beauty. But I believe there is a different reason you don't post a picture of her. You're terrified that someone on here will say, "I know her, I spent two nights with her in Cartagena two years ago. She was good in bed but too many stretch marks" or something of that ilk.

Sentiment is emotions, fear and greed typically. My gal was afraid of Gustavo, and you are not. She was right, and you are wrong.

I guess the question was a little too advanced for you. So let me restate it in really simple terms. Let's use fear and greed as synonyms for 'sentiment'.

Which sentiment (fear) is moving the Dollar / Peso market? Is it fear of Colombian inflation? Is it fear of an economic slowdown because the Colombian Central Bank has raised rates? Is it fear of what Petro might do despite constitutional protections? Is it fear the Peso will fall further so moving into US Dollar denominated government securities is safer?

Are you getting the concept? Currency markets are moved by a whole host of factors, very rarely only 1. You want it to be all about Petro's presidency because you wanted to argue. You can't change the way the world works because you want to foment a squabble.

Uh, let's see. You are down 10% in your portfolio on the year, and I am up 40%. I did an analysis of S&P earnings and said they were coming down a month ago. Every day now, analysts are lowering projected earnings and downgrading stocks.

You're claiming you are up 40% in your portfolio? So you put everything you had into a inverse ETF betting on a down market? You know that if you are wrong, or if something dramatic happens you are in a security (a speculative vessel) that could cost you most of your principal in just a few days? You're either lying (most likely) or you have so little money in your market account that losing it won't matter. Your play is kind of analogous to playing no-limit poker. You can go all-in on a hunch and you will probably gather in a few pots until the time you try it and run into the nuts. Then you're watching sports reruns on ESPN the rest of the day.

Fortunately I don't need to take those kinds of obtuse risks. I've invested my whole adult life and I have a very nice retirement. If social security disappears, I'm still extremely comfortable here or in any other country I might choose to live.

And then there is this.

Looks like it's 4,388 for tomorrow.

And COP closed at 4624 today. Maybe you should ask your college for a refund.

I guess you don't understand the difference between the current currency exchange transactions (XE mid-market rate) and the rate that is assigned by Visa a day later which is what you can get using your debit card in an ATM (cajero). The 4,624 rate which was the closing currency exchange transaction on Tuesday will be available at ATMs on Thursday.

So tell me where you went to College? Clearly you didn't take finance / banking or statistics courses. You also seem especially lacking in analytical skills. What was your field of study? Or did you even go to college?

Before I get into the explanation of why you are wrong, I predict you will do the same as before, not admit you are wrong and slither away to come back another day with another shot.

You are right in that is the way currencies are set with USD-Euro and USD-Yen. The exchange rate is set mostly by traders, but when I went to Brazil, I looked to buy puts and they were so expensive and thinly traded they were not worth even buying. I assumed the COP was the same and verified the COP-USD market was not heavily traded. It was just set up in 2021, and I cannot find anything on futures prices or even one contract trading, but there was more to it than that.

Much of technical analysis is looking at charts and their patterns. I am not a big TA guy but there is going to be a different pattern when something like the USD-COP ratio goes higher and it has little to no futures contracts as compared to currencies where there are huge hedges. The pattern without hedges is like what we are seeing with the COP, a line straight to the sky. When there are futures involved, the spike up will be jagged as those who are short a currency have to buy the currency when they get out of their position..

So your master point is that the Dollar / Col Peso market isn't sufficiently large that there isn't an active market in futures? I'm impressed. I think my puppy could have told me that.

The real question is why are you trying to diffuse the argument? You claimed that the Colombian Peso was going through an unparalleled devaluation because of Petro's election win. I confronted you the YTD statistics on several South American and other countries currencies as well. The big reveal was that a large number of currencies have suffered similar declines relative to the Dollar YTD. As usual when another of your bombastic blunders gets exposed as the absurdity that it is. You try to pivot to a different argument.

[Osteoknot]

The relatively few people who are either celebrating, or lamenting the Colombian election can no more move the market than a guy with a bucket can empty a lake.

No direct offense to anyone in particular, but it is one of the easiest things in the world to assign reasons for movement of a market like this after the fact. Show me someone who can predict it accurately and consistently in the future, well, then you have yourself a multi-billionaire. There are too many moving parts for any one to know what is truly happening. Of as the saying goes, shit happens, jeje.

Any single reasonably intelligent person can make his analysis fit the situation with superficial plausibility, after the fact. There are as many different versions of that as there are analysts. Hate to break it to ya' gently but this is just another form of mental masturbation.

[Elvis 2008]

I don't want to intrude, but there's one factor to consider.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/16/eu-r...x-rigging.html

This isn't the first time.

https://www.reuters.com/article/bank...0O50MG20150521

Or the second time.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forex_scandal

The relatively few people who are either celebrating, or lamenting the Colombian election can no more move the market than a guy with a bucket can empty a lake. The forex market is a $5 trillion per day market.

Just for perspective, from June 2008 to May 2009 COP went from about 1700 to 2450. By October 2009 it was back near 1800. From February to June 2006 it went from about 2250 to 2550. More recently, it went from 3204 on January 10,2020 to 4118 on March 20,2020. The current trend isn't unprecedented.

It may continue, it may reset.

Yeah, it could. Things is the COP is not traded much on Forex, and the party that can change the falling COP is the Colombian central bank.

If you look at Colombia and Peru, you can see the two management styles used with currencies. The Peruvian Central Bank keeps a tight control on the currency market and the Colombian Central bank keeps its hands off and lets the COP move freely. Which style is best is an endless argument between economists.

However, I do not think there is much debate that a central bank should step in when there are huge moves down in a currency like we have seen with the COP if they can. This exchange rate creates an even more horrific inflation rate for Colombia.

Point is this is a fire. The Central Bank has the hose and they are letting the fire burn. Why?

[Elvis 2008]

You swear she wasn't a cheap street-walker in El Centro. OK I'll take your word for this one thing (everything else you say requires verification) but the difference between a street-walker and an escort is really only volume.

Well, you would know the centro slums and escort market better than I would. You tried to show me that you were my equal by putting up a bunch of the escorts you had been banging and then covered their faces so other guys would not recognize them. LOL. My woman is major league and you had worn out AA types at best.

I know, I know, you think you've found your own "pretty woman" but from what I hear you're no Richard Gere. More like Chris Farley.

That is close, but I think my gal is a little prettier than Julia Roberts, and Chris Farley picking her up is more impressive than Richard Gere doing so.

Trading is often based on sentiment.

As to whose sentiment has been right so far? What are you talking about?

Sentiment is emotions, fear and greed typically. My gal was afraid of Gustavo, and you are not. She was right, and you are wrong.

I live here.

Yeah, and maybe you should talk to people who are not WGs. You might learn something.

You are so bad at analysis. Did you ever go to college? Ever take statistics or any kind of analytical courses?

Uh, let's see. You are down 10% in your portfolio on the year, and I am up 40%. I did an analysis of S&P earnings and said they were coming down a month ago. Every day now, analysts are lowering projected earnings and downgrading stocks. And then there is this.

Looks like it's 4,388 for tomorrow.

And COP closed at 4624 today. Maybe you should ask your college for a refund.

My point is that there are a bunch of factors involved and only a simpleton thinks that it is all about Petro's election. I know this will come as a shock. But currency trading doesn't mean someone is selling assets and converting them into dollars. Sure there may be some of that. But what drives this rate is traders are buying dollars and selling pesos. I would bet a fair amount of those traders haven't even been to Colombia. Like I've said before. There are a lot of factors involved.

Before I get into the explanation of why you are wrong, I predict you will do the same as before, not admit you are wrong and slither away to come back another day with another shot.

You are right in that is the way currencies are set with USD-Euro and USD-Yen. The exchange rate is set mostly by traders, but when I went to Brazil, I looked to buy puts and they were so expensive and thinly traded they were not worth even buying. I assumed the COP was the same and verified the COP-USD market was not heavily traded. It was just set up in 2021, and I cannot find anything on futures prices or even one contract trading, but there was more to it than that.

Much of technical analysis is looking at charts and their patterns. I am not a big TA guy but there is going to be a different pattern when something like the USD-COP ratio goes higher and it has little to no futures contracts as compared to currencies where there are huge hedges. The pattern without hedges is like what we are seeing with the COP, a line straight to the sky. When there are futures involved, the spike up will be jagged as those who are short a currency have to buy the currency when they get out of their position.

So the real question is why did you make this up crap about traders? Is it you did not know? Maybe, but I think part of is that you are such a Democratic dumb shit douche that you did not want to believe your guy was such a fucking disaster before he stepped foot into office. So this is not USA interest rates are all the other bullshit, it is almost all people who hold real Colombian assets converting them into USD. THAT is what causes the COP to move lower.

Oh, and one last thing, I was wrong about when Q2 earnings come out. It is not July 21. Did you sell your positions and move into the things I told you to? Nah. You are too stupid to do that. All you are going to do is get stressed out from what I post and try to burn me on some stupid petty bullshit like this. Calling my woman a WG is not going to help your portfolio douche.

Ok, you can slither away again. Better luck next time.

[JustTK]

I wondered if it is a new STD or tusi variant.

Humping putas disease. Haha.