Stupid shit in Medellin

[JjBee62]

No thanks I don't swing that way unlike you, I'm sure you got plenty of admins' balls in your mouth to spare but I'm good. Don't pretend you don't like that all your posts goes to some homo erotic fantasy in your head. And you really need to look up the meaning of Ewe before you put up your fecal matter on paper.

No thanks to what? There's no offer of anything to you in my post. Are you having trouble understanding basic English?

How do all my posts go to homo erotic fantasies? There's nothing even close in any of my posts which you've responded (incoherently) to, yet in each response you go straight to some male on male reference. You appear to be projecting.

Last time I checked, none of the forum is stored on paper. It wouldn't be very efficient if the admins had to print everything out, file everything and then reenter every single post each time someone views the board. Has nobody explained to you how modern day data processing, transmission and retrieval works?

I had no need to look up ewe, but I did it anyway.

Ewe. Noun - A female sheep.

However, let's get back to the subject at hand. I asked before and I'm asking again.

What exactly do you mean by "there's no admin looking out for their favorite power bottom in the real world?

If you're trying to say something, come out and say it. There's no need to hide.

[Ewe52]

What does that even mean? Spell it out for me.

Are you saying "Sure", because you have to ask daddy's permission first? Are you saying "Sure", because you need to borrow a pair of testicles? Next time, try borrowing an adult pair, because the ones you're using don't seem to measure up.

I'm curious why you would advertise your sexual preoccupation with sheep here? Or did nobody explain the meaning of "ewe" to you?

No thanks I don't swing that way unlike you, I'm sure you got plenty of admins' balls in your mouth to spare but I'm good. Don't pretend you don't like that all your posts goes to some homo erotic fantasy in your head. And you really need to look up the meaning of Ewe before you put up your fecal matter on paper.

[JjBee62]

Sure. But you should know there's no admin looking out for their favorite power bottom in the real world.

What does that even mean? Spell it out for me.

Are you saying "Sure", because you have to ask daddy's permission first? Are you saying "Sure", because you need to borrow a pair of testicles? Next time, try borrowing an adult pair, because the ones you're using don't seem to measure up.

I'm curious why you would advertise your sexual preoccupation with sheep here? Or did nobody explain the meaning of "ewe" to you?

[JjBee62]

You're obviously crazy, that explains your delusional rants. Why would I hide from a moron like you that I verbally knocked on his ass? You didn't even dare to reply to me.

I want to thank you anyways, I laughed so hard when I saw that you write erotic novels to prepagos in Medellin. I'm sure that they are extremely appreciative. LMFAO!

I didn't dare reply to you? You have yet to respond to anything I've written in an intelligible manner. You just do the one thing you know how to do, rant like the tiny pathetic little ***** you are.

I did something this morning, which I should have done before. I looked at your contributions to ISG. Except there aren't any. Not one single post which contains anything of value. Nothing to even suggest you've ever ventured farther than 60 cm from your mother's vagina. Did they forget to cut the umbilical cord, or do you just stay that close so she can protect you from all those bad men with the big mean words?

While I am more than happy to sling mud back at anyone who wishes to start slinging, I'll save my energy for those who have some purpose, other than some boy pretending he's not terrified to leave his mama's skirts.

To sum it up, the total number of useful and helpful posts you've contributed to ISG is exactly equal to the number of useable vaginas found on a cactus. Your only achievement so far is to answer the age old question: if garden slugs could talk, what would they say?

[Elvis 2008]

There are 2 glaring flaws in the logic.

Any of the "she only sees me" stuff is at best wishful thinking, especially if you're talking about some girl who obviously loves sex.

I just want to make something clear here. I can usually tell when a woman has been without sex for a while versus one who has been out fucking other guys. I really do not care so much that she is faithful. I like it when I am like an oasis for a woman who has been in the desert a year without sex. Whether she has been or is acting that she has been is not a concern of mine.

Sorry, but no. Unless she's desperate to find anyone willing to fuck her, that money does 1 of 2 things. It either frees her up to fuck the broke ass local boy she would rather be with, or it teaches her how to make extra money from horny or lovestruck gringos. Even if she's not double or triple dipping, her eyes are open to the reality that there's always someone else who will spend more money for the same thing.

There's either hooking, or not-hooking, although some say the only difference is whether or not the woman accepts cash. If you're giving her money, it's not even debatable. If you're paying her rent, as long as you're also staying at the same place when you're in town, then you can call her a house sitter with benefits. Otherwise, it's homes for hookers.

That is usually true with most women, but there is this notion that the money I am giving them causes dependence. Actually, with me, it is so the woman can be independent. That is why I have paid for school, health expenses ETC. Most of the women then are going to look around at other men or opportunities once they are independent. I know that. I think the difference is you are being cynical and saying ALL women are like that, and I would say most women are.

A woman is only going to fuck you if she sees a profit in it. Whether that's money, security, upward mobility, or she just likes the way you fuck, very few of them are fucking anyone, just because they want to fuck.

Somebody said on here that rich people get their money by ripping people off. That is something I have not seen to be true. Most rich people I know have gotten that way by working their ass off. The biggest difference between rich and poor people in my opinion is stamina. When you are busting your ass for nothing and other people you know are out paryting or when you have a ton of studying to do and it is not going well, there is a huge temptation to quit. The biggest difference between rich and poor people then is the support system, rich people have cheerleaders saying all that hard work is going to pay off and encourage you to stick to with it because it is a long road, and poor people do not.

When you say that the women are only interested in money, you are missing the huge payout, the difference in salaries between Colombia and the USA, and that can be millions of dollars over a career. Now how many women are realistically capable of achieving that reality? Very few. You have to get that degree. You have to want to work and you have to be willing to give up your family to get it, and a woman has to trust you through the entire visa process depending on which visa route you choose, and that is a hard road very few will embark on.

Now that is not going to be some barrio girl whose best long term relationship is her drug dealer right? I think I have talked about the heartbreaks too much and not about how many women I have let go or reject saying that they are incapable of making that journey. Or how when women do become dependent, I have gotten rid of them.

Thing is Mr. E's post did make me think. Why did I give that woman I had sex with money before she left? To me, it was custom. In the USA, that money was like protection to me against a woman scorned for being led on which is something I do not need to worry about in Colombia. So he is right. I should not have given her any money. This woman was great but I knew she was not capable of making the journey I talked about. She is a fun companion not a serious one.

I think you guys also miss the payoff in other ways. I was with a girl from club Fiebre. I see her, and she did something out of the blue that I have not had a woman do. After we were done, she texted me and said that she had a really great time. I joked with her that when I was in Bogota, she would be my novia. I think that had an effect on her. She asked to see me again and we did meet.

We have a good time, and she is into the sex, and she was good, but she was better this time. It is over, and we start talking about how the virus hard been hard for her, and she says that she really needs a bed. I ask her how much it is, and she says $200.

I told her that I would give her the money, and I did. Every guy on her is like God you are a sucker or you are ruining the market. She starts crying, and she then fucks me again and insists that I see the bed and we break it in and she wants to cook for me. Now I think there is nothing to this girl. She is a stripper right? She smokes pot, drinks ETC, tatted up. She then tells me that back in Venezuela she was a criminal lawyer, and she has modeled internationally.

[ShooBree]

I understand you're an idiot. You've demonstrated it many times. Then after enough people are laughing at you, you go crawl away and hide for 4-6 months. We've all seen it. I'm sure we'll soon see it again.

Now, since you are such a clueless fuckstick, I'll spell it out for you.

The result of an abortion and the result of a miscarriage is exactly the same fucking thing, you brainless twat discharge. The pregnancy is terminated. It's over. It's finished. There will be no fucking diaper changes required. Does that finally register in one of your 9 functioning brain cells?

Nobody said that an abortion and a miscarriage is the same action. Only someone as ridiculously stupid as you would even assume such a thing. I've clearly stated, for anyone with an IQ over 30, that the significant difference is intent. One is intentional, the other may not be intentional.

Therefore, you infected lesion on the soul of humanity, defining human life as beginning at conception is a slippery slope. There are fucking gerbils who have a better chance of understanding such a simple concept, than you.

You're obviously crazy, that explains your delusional rants. Why would I hide from a moron like you that I verbally knocked on his ass? You didn't even dare to reply to me.

I want to thank you anyways, I laughed so hard when I saw that you write erotic novels to prepagos in Medellin. I'm sure that they are extremely appreciative. LMFAO!

[Ewe52]

If someone will let you borrow a pair of testicles, go right ahead and flex your mental muscle. Or do you need to ask daddy's permission first?

Sure. But you should know there's no admin looking out for their favorite power bottom in the real world.

[JjBee62]

Yes admin please stop protecting him.

If someone will let you borrow a pair of testicles, go right ahead and flex your mental muscle. Or do you need to ask daddy's permission first?

[JjBee62]

Yawn, the more you argue the crazier you seem to be. You can be in favor of abortions all you want but it's still not the same thing as a miscarriage. But please, go to a grieving woman that lost her baby and tell her that she had an abortion. It's all just a slippery slope after all.

Don't you worry about my linguistic skills, just tell me what's your fourth language? Mine is English.

It would be good if you took your own advice and stopped acting like a full blown example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Arrogant airhead.

I understand you're an idiot. You've demonstrated it many times. Then after enough people are laughing at you, you go crawl away and hide for 4-6 months. We've all seen it. I'm sure we'll soon see it again.

Now, since you are such a clueless fuckstick, I'll spell it out for you.

The result of an abortion and the result of a miscarriage is exactly the same fucking thing, you brainless twat discharge. The pregnancy is terminated. It's over. It's finished. There will be no fucking diaper changes required. Does that finally register in one of your 9 functioning brain cells?

Nobody said that an abortion and a miscarriage is the same action. Only someone as ridiculously stupid as you would even assume such a thing. I've clearly stated, for anyone with an IQ over 30, that the significant difference is intent. One is intentional, the other may not be intentional.

Therefore, you infected lesion on the soul of humanity, defining human life as beginning at conception is a slippery slope. There are fucking gerbils who have a better chance of understanding such a simple concept, than you.

You see, you cum encrusted, dessicated dog turd, if every fertilized over is legally classified as a human being, the host of that fetus, the mother, the pregnant woman, becomes legally responsible for the health of the fetus.

Just curious, did you snort mercury and practice oxygen deprivation therapy as a child? I'm trying to understand whether your obvious brain damage was self-inflicted.

Any loss of human life, unless the cause is obvious, must be investigated to determine if the life was ended wrongfully. The end result is that any woman who miscarries, if human life is classified as beginning at conception, is subject to investigation and prosecution.

Now go back to sniffing paint fumes or whatever it is you do to destroy your minimal ability to think.

[Ewe52]

Admins, please stop protecting me.

I hope this doesn't result in me being struck by a meteor.

Oh shit. I just imagined Admin2 playing poker while wearing a fairy godmother costume.

Did that work? I never realized they were protecting me. As many times as they have stomped on my dick, I was pretty sure that protecting me was somewhere on their list of priorities below "Find a fat, old, ugly woman who gives toothy blowjobs for $200."

Sensitive? Me? Sure, I cry whenever I watch a touchy-feely chick flick with a girl, but that's only because I realize the sex won't be worth having to sit through the movie.

Little? Not even close on that one. You know the grab rail on the Medellin metro? Of course you don't. How silly of me. Anyway, 99 out of 100 trips on the metro, I'm the only one who has to worry about hitting his head on the grab rail.

Pussy? This coming from the guy who keeps telling everyone what he would do in places he won't ever go? It would appear you're not qualified to make that judgement.

Yes admin please stop protecting him.

[ShooBree]

You're back from when you crawled away to lick your wounds last time. How delightful!

I understand English isn't your first language and rational thought isn't something you've ever achieved, but that should read "there is no slippery slope." Which is, keeping your record perfect, wrong.

1. There have already been cases prosecuted successfully in the US, against mothers who miscarried and it was determined their behavior was responsible for the miscarriage.

2. While still Governor of Indiana, current VP Mike Pence signed a law requiring funeral services for all abortions and miscarriages. Under the law every sexually active woman would have been required to have every monthly discharge examined at a lab to determine whether or not the egg had been fertilized, and if so, funeral services were required. Look up "Periods for Pence" for the reaction.

Of course the only difference between a miscarriage and an abortion is intent. The result is the same. Defining human life as beginning at the moment of conception is a slippery slope, because the exact moment of conception can't be determined.

As most men (at least those with functional penises, apparently not a group you belong to) are aware, semen is often emitted prior to ejaculation, and it can contain enough sperm to result in pregnancy. That arguably makes the moment of conception the same as the moment of penetration..

Yawn, the more you argue the crazier you seem to be. You can be in favor of abortions all you want but it's still not the same thing as a miscarriage. But please, go to a grieving woman that lost her baby and tell her that she had an abortion. It's all just a slippery slope after all.

Don't you worry about my linguistic skills, just tell me what's your fourth language? Mine is English.

It would be good if you took your own advice and stopped acting like a full blown example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Arrogant airhead.

[JjBee62]

My belief is that in general money has nothing to do with the quality of the sexual encounter that you have with a woman. Now if we are going down a list saying shit a la carte did she kiss me, did she blow me, etc then I would not even entertain that in the discussion. That is some old Tijuana street chick bullshit and you will nary get what can be described as quality in that kind of situation.

But when talking about hookers from online, or hookers that you picked up in a disco then I would say you have to take into account the chemistry of both partners together. You would also have to take into account your expectations. Were you expecting this chick to put her tongue deep into your ass but she would not do it? Maybe you would not consider that quality. Even beyond that stuff you have to consider if this person is just plain not good at sex. It may not be something they are doing on purpose that is not making it quality and even in a quality session it probably not something the chick is doing consciously or on purpose for it to be considered a great session. It could just be the way she has sex. And in my experience it is just the luck of the draw. You found someone that does perfectly everything that you like. Not that they are trying to impress you or the amount of money got them to do it, but that is just how they do it.

Any time you deal with women it is always a numbers game. The more you talk to, the more you will get. Sometimes I have met chicks that are known hookers, but I am fucking them for free on a regular basis. Can I go out and do this with every hooker I meet? No. Do I even do this on purpose? No. And again, this stands for all women: It just so happens I or you or anyone else was in the right place at the right time saying and doing the right shit. And when the opportunity appeared, was able to take advantage and capitalize. As the old saying goes, the sun even shines on a dog's ass every now and then..

There are 2 glaring flaws in the logic.

1. She has never done this with anyone but me and she's only seeing me.

Unless you've spent every day with a girl since before she became sexually active (in Colombia better start watching her at 12), you haven't the faintest fucking idea whether she's ever fucked for money before, or if she's made it into the Mansion Hall of Fame by fucking 23 guys in 1 night. Unless you're staying with her 24/7 afterwards, you have no way to even guess about who she's fucking when you're not around.

I had a girlfriend's mother tell me her daughter was nearly sick with missing me and couldn't wait to see me again, while the daughter was fucking a married guy her mom had hooked her up with. I happened to be sitting in the parking lot at the time, since I had come to dump her and pick up my stuff.

Any of the "she only sees me" stuff is at best wishful thinking, especially if you're talking about some girl who obviously loves sex.

2. Giving her money to keep her hooked on you.

Sorry, but no. Unless she's desperate to find anyone willing to fuck her, that money does 1 of 2 things. It either frees her up to fuck the broke ass local boy she would rather be with, or it teaches her how to make extra money from horny or lovestruck gringos. Even if she's not double or triple dipping, her eyes are open to the reality that there's always someone else who will spend more money for the same thing.

There's either hooking, or not-hooking, although some say the only difference is whether or not the woman accepts cash. If you're giving her money, it's not even debatable. If you're paying her rent, as long as you're also staying at the same place when you're in town, then you can call her a house sitter with benefits. Otherwise, it's homes for hookers.

There's nothing wrong with all of that. There's just no need for self-delusion. You meet, you fuck, you pay and then you go on your way. Next time you're around you do it again. You can do the "te amo" and "te adoro" crap in between, while you're fucking someone else, but there's no need to take it seriously.

A woman is only going to fuck you if she sees a profit in it. Whether that's money, security, upward mobility, or she just likes the way you fuck, very few of them are fucking anyone, just because they want to fuck.

And that's the fundamental difference between the sexes. Most men will happily grab a girl from a lineup and fuck her without any worry about whether or not she'll respect him in the morning. Does she swallow gets asked a lot more than will she still respect me.

[Mr Enternational]

So let me state what I think are your beliefs. The women on seeking are all working girls and how much you pay has no bearing on your sexual encounter.

My belief is that in general money has nothing to do with the quality of the sexual encounter that you have with a woman. Now if we are going down a list saying shit a la carte did she kiss me, did she blow me, etc then I would not even entertain that in the discussion. That is some old Tijuana street chick bullshit and you will nary get what can be described as quality in that kind of situation.

But when talking about hookers from online, or hookers that you picked up in a disco then I would say you have to take into account the chemistry of both partners together. You would also have to take into account your expectations. Were you expecting this chick to put her tongue deep into your ass but she would not do it? Maybe you would not consider that quality. Even beyond that stuff you have to consider if this person is just plain not good at sex. It may not be something they are doing on purpose that is not making it quality and even in a quality session it probably not something the chick is doing consciously or on purpose for it to be considered a great session. It could just be the way she has sex. And in my experience it is just the luck of the draw. You found someone that does perfectly everything that you like. Not that they are trying to impress you or the amount of money got them to do it, but that is just how they do it.

Okay, so how come this woman is not fucking everyone who walks if it is just about money?

Any time you deal with women it is always a numbers game. The more you talk to, the more you will get. Sometimes I have met chicks that are known hookers, but I am fucking them for free on a regular basis. Can I go out and do this with every hooker I meet? No. Do I even do this on purpose? No. And again, this stands for all women: It just so happens I or you or anyone else was in the right place at the right time saying and doing the right shit. And when the opportunity appeared, was able to take advantage and capitalize. As the old saying goes, the sun even shines on a dog's ass every now and then.

If there are women who take money for sex and respond to incentives, and you tell me that you are not, then I am a fool. But if there are women who are selective about their escorting and do respond to incentives, then you are missing out.

And I think that is what bugs you. You do not want to trust any woman who sell any part of themselves. You are equating the risk of a broken heart.

Actually none of it bugs me. I could literally not even tell you how many non-pros I am fucking right now. I just came from 4 days in Barranquilla where I fucked 4 non-pros and there were more that I talked to everyday, but did not let them know I was in town. Now I am in Bogota and the only reason I am not with one now is because 2 are on covid quarantine until their tests come back, and 2 that are nurses are at work right now. But one will come when her shift is over in the morning. And I leave for Dominican Republic in the afternoon, where I have a countless number as well. I do not even tell most women that I will be in town until I am actually in town. And I do not stay long. So if something is going on when I hit them up and say hey I am in Bogota until tomorrow (as I did the 4 I just mentioned), then my loss. So the trust and broken heart thing really has nothing to do with me. Women come and women go. I do not make any commitments and I enjoy them while we are in each other's lives.

My financial risk was one hour of pay from work. I will tell her in the future that our personalities can connect for fun, but when it comes to a serious business deal, we are not compatible, and she will stay with me until something better comes along.

That is exactly how I run my operation. A chick can kick it with me until something better comes along for her. And there will be no hard feelings. I have had chicks even leave me when a guy came along and you know what, they were right back when it finished or still kept dealing with me when they had that guy. My financial risk is zero, because I simply do not give money to non-pros. That is what hookers are for.

[Ewe52]

Why yes, he actually does. You can address questions directly to me, rather than clinging to someone else's skirt. I will answer them. Ask anyone. I'm not afraid to speak my mind.

Since you're asking, go back and read it again. Tell me what is the fundamental difference between the result of an abortion and the result of a miscarriage. I'll give you a hint, since you don't seem to be too bright. If a person accidentally ingests a lethal dose of poison, or if a person intentionally ingests a lethal dose of the same poison, the result is the same.

Here's another hint. If a person accidentally falls from the top floor of Edificio Coltejer, their body strikes the sidewalk at the same velocity as if they had jumped or been pushed. The result is the same.

Using the last example, if I opened the window and got the victim drunk and then told him his wife was going to leave him and take everything he owned, do I share any liability for his death?

That should be an easy question to answer. Without my intervention the death would not have happened at that place and time.

Yeah. You really need to step off from that ledge my friend. No one defines back alley clothes hanger abortion as miscarriages it's called murder. Seek help.

[Ewe52]

You're back from when you crawled away to lick your wounds last time. How delightful!

I understand English isn't your first language and rational thought isn't something you've ever achieved, but that should read "there is no slippery slope." Which is, keeping your record perfect, wrong.

1. There have already been cases prosecuted successfully in the US, against mothers who miscarried and it was determined their behavior was responsible for the miscarriage.

2. While still Governor of Indiana, current VP Mike Pence signed a law requiring funeral services for all abortions and miscarriages. Under the law every sexually active woman would have been required to have every monthly discharge examined at a lab to determine whether or not the egg had been fertilized, and if so, funeral services were required. Look up "Periods for Pence" for the reaction.

Of course the only difference between a miscarriage and an abortion is intent. The result is the same. Defining human life as beginning at the moment of conception is a slippery slope, because the exact moment of conception can't be determined..

If you honestly think the rights of women to safely choose to abort her pregnancy and causing malicious harm to an unborn resulting in loss is the same thing then you are not playing with a full deck. Do you understand what the term miscarriage even means? Do you think when Scott Peterson killed his wife and unborn child she suffered a miscarriage? Of course not he was charged with double murder.