Thread: Stupid Shit in Kyiv
+
Add Report
Results 556 to 570 of 2532
-
04-24-23 17:56 #1977
Posts: 1680Tucker Carlson out at Fox News
From the Wapo comments section:
"BREAKING NEWS! On today's Fox News announcement, Vladimir Putin has ordered all Russian flags to be lowered at half mast. " logcabin 1836.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/media...aves-fox-news/
-
04-24-23 15:24 #1976
Posts: 3240Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
Seymour Hersh beaks the story on the Nordstream pipeline bombing. It goes into meticulous detail. If even one fact of the report is wrong, they can toss the whole thing, so is that what the government does? No, they do exactly what you would expect if all the facts are correct. They assert he has one source, they bring up times he was wrong in the past, and they make him and not the facts the issue upon which people judge.
And let's get real. You did not read Hersh's story. You just read the bullshit "fact checkers" story.
The next thing to do is the classic Democratic douche move and slam me as a Tucker Carlson listening, closed minded right winger. Only issue with that is Hersh is anything but a right winger. He is as liberal as they come. Still, anyone telling truth to the progressive narrative is a right winger these days.
Then there is this kid Jack Teixeira leaking documents about the Ukraine war. He is arrested and of course, those in the military industrial complex call the information he was releasing disinformation and misinformation but once again they do not give any specifics as to what he released was wrong. So if someone states facts harmful to the government narrative, and the government does not state they are untrue specifically, they probably are true.
Quite frankly, I found the whole story to be so outrageous that I believed it to be true. Dramfrree said this guy was a CIA plant, but I did not see any of the information Teixeira released to be helpful to the CIA. I put that at low odds around 10%.
Well, now it turns out Teixeira was leaking information about the war since it began, and his information was vey accurate. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...nvaded-ukraine.
When you call Russians orcs, JM, you are advertising your cognitive bias. You swallowed whole that absolutely idiotic notion that because Russian ships were near Nordstream, the Russians blew up said pipeline. I would say that is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, but that got topped.
"In what sounds like it might just be a comically absurd attempt to portray Teixeira as a Russian asset, prosecutors this filed new information with the court, noting that he once shot a vintage Soviet pistol. " At this point, I may as well be a Russian agent because I once had a shot of Stolichnaya vodka.
So now that we or rather I know that what Teixeira released was 99+% true it begs the question what is the USA doing in Ukraine. This fight for Democracy crap always was nonsense. The second part was to weaken Russia but for what? They do not seem all that strong to begin with. The DOD inflating Russian military strength to get money has been going for 50+ years.
Well, we already know that Biden has lined his family's pockets with American aid packages before, but this war is on a scale 100 X larger than Hunter and Burisma. It also shows me the dumb Dems still believe in Russiagate and think weakening Putin will help them in 2024.
-
04-24-23 12:55 #1975
Posts: 1680?
Originally Posted by HessenStud [View Original Post]
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/...s/Non-Sequitur
Monger forums truly win the day for the volume of stupid remarks found. Sports forums are a close second.
-
04-24-23 08:58 #1974
Posts: 18Bullshit!
Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
-
04-24-23 04:54 #1973
Posts: 516Anyone who won't post sources shouldn't expect to be taken seriously
Originally Posted by Questner [View Original Post]
But throwing out supposed "data" and "information," while refusing to reveal your sources, is intellectually dishonest. Nobody is going to take your word for anything, eapecially since you've firmly cemented your reputation as a Putin butt-boy. So it's the height of hilarity to watch you try to pretend that you actually care about objective fact and truth.
Let's take your tank production "figures," as just one example. Here's a source that provides information that pretty much blows your narrative out of the water:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidax...st-in-ukraine/
The article starts by talking about the effect of sanctions on things like optical systems for tanks, then it moves on to the more mundane (yet essential) topic of ball bearings.
"But optics aren't the only thing in short supply in the Russian armored vehicle industry. The Russians also are desperately short of ball-bearings, which they used to get from the United States and Europe before the United States and Europe tightened their sanctions on Russian industry.
A new study from the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC confirmed what independent analysts have been saying for months. Tanks and other modern armored vehicles need a lot of ball-bearings. And Russia doesn't have enough bearings to maintain steady production of new vehicles".
"The ball-bearing problem might be even harder for Moscow to solve. Even after trading Sosna-Us for 1 PN96 MT-02's, Uralvagonzavod and Omsktransmash still were at an impasse. Workers were building or restoring most of a tank, then running out of parts.
It's for that reason that Russia has struggled to make good the 2,000 or more tanks it has lost in 14 months of hard fighting in Ukraine. Russian forces need at least 150 new or restored tanks a month just to maintain their front-line strength".
"Careful analysis of activity at Uralvagonzavod and Omsktransmash strongly hints the factories every month are shipping out just a few dozen modern-ish tanks: either new-build T-72 BM3's or T-90 Ms or reconditioned T-72's, T-80's and T-90's that technicians have pulled out of long-term storage.
Which is why the Russians are traveling back in time, technologically speaking, and reactivating 1960's-vintage T-62's and 1950's-vintage T-55's that have been moldering in storage since the 1980's".
So there you have it. A source that explains why the Russians have no balls (bearings, that is), and explains what it means for ACTUAL tank production, which is different from the propaganda coming out of the pro-Russia outlets.
So here's a direct challenge: Do you have the balls to post the actual sources of your alleged facts? Or are you as much of a eunuch as the Russian tank industry?
-
04-24-23 03:52 #1972
Posts: 690Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
-
04-24-23 02:14 #1971
Posts: 1324Originally Posted by GDreams [View Original Post]
-
04-23-23 20:06 #1970
Posts: 324Originally Posted by Questner [View Original Post]
-
04-23-23 19:55 #1969
Posts: 1968Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
-
04-23-23 19:00 #1968
Posts: 516That's what many so-called experts said over a year ago
Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
BTW, whenever I see or hear any of those so-called experts who made wrong predictions, and they haven't acknowledged their mistakes, I automatically flag them as unserious posers. No one is infallible, but anyone who cares about the truth should have the intellectual integrity to admit past mistakes.
An honest pundit or expert would detail the reasoning behind the wrong prediction and then move forward to explain how their analysis has evolved. Shameless narrative-mongers and self-promoters will never do that.
-
04-23-23 18:34 #1967
Posts: 324Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
-
04-23-23 17:00 #1966
Posts: 516Problem: Which are ubermenschen and which are untermenschen?
Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
And, no matter the country in which the parents decided to settle, any children would be "half-breeds," with all the negatives that inevitably accompany that status. The problem with ubermenschen is that they place a high value on the purity of the bloodline, which doesn't make for a hospitable attitude toward mutts.
Which means, if the parents (or parent) moves to a third country (assuming they can), then they won't be doing anything to help either Russia's or China's demographic problem. Same thing if the child leaves when they're older and on their own. I guess it's an occupational hazard for any "Master Race" that they either eliminate or alienate any who don't meet their purity standards.
-
04-23-23 16:56 #1965
Posts: 2798Originally Posted by GDreams [View Original Post]
-
04-23-23 08:04 #1964
Posts: 690Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
-
04-23-23 05:53 #1963
Posts: 516Q: Why won't the cowardly clown engage in direct debate?
Originally Posted by Questner [View Original Post]
I responded directly to your bogus assertions with clear evidence that debunks any so-called claim of Russia over Crimea. The full post isn't very far down the page, so it's obvious that you chose to ignore, rather than address it. That's a clear mark of cowardice AND a tacit admission that you're unable to refute the facts presented. As to those facts, here's a short excerpt:
Russia OFFICIALLY recognized Ukrainian independence in August 1991.If Russia had any territorial claims to make, or any objection to the referendum being held in Crimea, or the Donbas, that was the time to raise the issue. All the events of 1991 detailed above are conclusive evidence that Crimea, Donbas, and ALL the territory of the Ukraine SSR, were considered part of the newly independent Ukraine. And that fact was officially recognized by Russia, Ukraine itself, and the world at large.In 1997 two treaties were signed between Ukraine and Russia. One was the "Partition Treaty on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet," and the other was the "Russian-Ukrainian Friendship Treaty" In neither of those treaties did Russia seek to exert a claim on Crimea or any other area.Two additional points re 1997:
1. As part of the Friendship Treaty, BOTH nations recognized the inviolability of EXISTING borders. And those borders included Crimea + Donbas as part of Ukraine (see 1991).
2. As part of the Black Sea Fleet Status Treaty, by agreeing to pay Ukraine for the lease of the naval base at Sevastopol, Russia explicitly recognized it as sovereign Ukrainian territory. They, Russia, were leasing from the owner, Ukraine.
I could go on, but there's no need.
Here's an interesting question I'm sure the forum would find fascinating: Are you the kind of coward who, when confronted, pisses himself in public? Or are you the kind of coward who slinks off to his hole and pisses himself in private?
I'm guessing you're the second kind. Maybe we should start a forum poll, eh? Or maybe it doesn't even matter, 'cause either way you're still a cowardly self-pisser.