Thread: Stupid Shit in Kyiv
+
Add Report
Results 406 to 420 of 2548
-
05-19-23 03:21 #2143
Posts: 748Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
-
05-19-23 01:46 #2142
Posts: 2802Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
Ukraine had a chance for a bright future, but they screwed it up, mostly because of corruption and greed.
You should always negotiate.
-
05-19-23 00:29 #2141
Posts: 2802Originally Posted by VinDici [View Original Post]
Ukraine is being wiped out both directly and indirectly. Yes, Pres. Z. Is a total piece of shit. He is being played by the Euors / Biden. His population is fleeing the country never to return or being killed. The infrastructure / economy is in ruins or being destroyed. I guess this is winning in your crazy Ass liberal world.
Yes, Putin is a terrible person, but he is winning, big time. Sanctions are not working, many parts of the world are in recession now and gas prices are high. Not to mention he is now in partnership with many of our enemies. Great job!
-
05-18-23 23:12 #2140
Posts: 516Have you seen Ukraine's latest circus trick?
Originally Posted by Questner [View Original Post]
Hear that flushing sound? That's the sound of future Russian weapons contracts going down the toilet.
Can't wait for the NEXT act!
-
05-18-23 23:06 #2139
Posts: 516Cure for corruption: Scrubbing every last vestige of Russian influence from Ukraine
Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
When one looks at the countries that have successfully escaped that legacy, it's clear that the most successful have adopted European systems and left Russia (far behind) in the rear-view mirror. The Baltic nations are probably the clearest examples. And that's precisely the path Ukraine wants to pursue. Candidate status for EU membership means that anti-corruption efforts are not only required, but will be under close watch every step of the way. Going forward, Ukraine has every opportunity to evolve for the better, especially with respect to their governance.
Ukraine has a bright future ahead as part of the EU, and also of NATO. In stark contrast, Russia is choking on the vomit of their inbred corruption. They can't escape it because it's part of the fabric of their very existence. Russia operates under the Law of the Jungle, wherein the powerful prey upon the weak. Now that they've been thoroughly isolated they're reduced to eating their own, like a cage full of rabid dogs. And, IMO, Putin will not be able to escape the harvest he has sown.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/one-of...ng-up-with-him
Bottom-Line: Ukraine = hope. Russia = despair.
P.S. It's hard to negotiate with someone who wants to kill you and erase your nationhood. Especially if their position is something like "If you surrender, I'll only cut off your arm for now, but I'll still kill you later. " What's the point of negotiating with that? Better to resist with all your might and do your best to kill or cripple the rabid dog.
P. P.S. You keep making the same intellectually dishonest mistake as others (or perhaps it's intentional) by creating a false equivalence between aggressor and victim. The war should never have happened? Right, so why don't you tell that to Putin? He gave the order, no one else. And he can end the war anytime he wants.
-
05-18-23 12:02 #2138
Posts: 324Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
This war should not have happened, I think we all agree. The bloodthirsty, rapist, child kidnapping RuZZians cunts, should have stayed home.
Stop pretending to care about corruption, you are a disingenuous piece of Z filth. If you actually gave a fuck about corruption, you'd start with that shithole kleptocracy that is the State of Muscovy, when you've cleaned that up, we can have the discussion about Ukraine.
All you do is watch RT, take your head out of your ass and understand that your beloved country will not survive this war.
-
05-18-23 11:31 #2137
Posts: 324Originally Posted by Questner [View Original Post]
-
05-18-23 03:15 #2136
Posts: 1325Laurent Gerra: LE cirque Zelensky, bientôt proche de chez vous!
https://youtu.be/p-ZyUJAJb9U
From French:
"he can be seen everywhere. Yesterday he visited the Elysée Palace. President Zelensky is touring with a circus. And now, an advertisement in support of Ukraine.
- Gilles Margaritis presents the "Zelensky Circus", which tours all over Europe with its menagerie! In Zelensky's circus you can see a very annoying beardless woman Ursula von der Leyen, Joe Biden an American equilibrist on magic walkers, the Macrons juggling pots, and the highlight of the program, a human cannonball from NATO's procurement. "Zelensky Circus" - yesterday in the Elysée Palace, tomorrow. In your city. ".
-
05-18-23 01:27 #2135
Posts: 2802Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
Now with the latest attack in Moscow, what did they think would happen.
By the way I was in MTY over the weekend, banging hot girls. I will be back in 8 days, with actual girls, join me. This is real world, not this fantasy world you live in. I do feel sorry for the Ukraine people, but I have zero compassion for there government. You conveniently forgot to talk about the corruption going on by he Ukraine government. , even the liberal media report this, but why bother bringing the corruption up.
All you do is complain and watch liberal news. Get a life.
-
05-17-23 06:42 #2134
Posts: 1969Originally Posted by WyattEarp [View Original Post]
-
05-16-23 20:19 #2133
Posts: 516Interesting theory re a possible cause for the recent destruction of Russian aircraft
Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...815934014.html
The thread is in German, but Google translate worked well for me.
Also, one possible way to evaluate if this author is onto something will be to observe the behavior of Russian aircraft, going forward. Accident or malfunction shouldn't cause a general change in behavior, and neither should friendly fire (assuming the cause is found and corrected). But a new Ukrainian air-to-air attack capability would likely have an effect on when and where Russia decides to use its aircraft.
-
05-16-23 19:29 #2132
Posts: 516A moral thought experiment
Morality, in its simplest sense, concerns itself with questions and judgments about right and wrong. While there are many moral issues about which there can be vigorous debate (ex: legalization of prostitution), there are many about which there is universal, or near-universal, agreement. I would submit that an example of the latter category is the calculated murder of an innocent child. I know of no country, society, or system of laws, in which that is not viewed as morally wrong (to put it mildly). So that fact provides a suitable foundation for this thought experiment:
1. On the other side of the world, an innocent child is murdered by a shot to the head. The murderer publicly admits committing the act and further states that he acted on orders from superiors. You don't personally know any of the individuals involved.
Q: What feelings, if any, does the above scenario generate within you?
2. On the other side of your country, an innocent child is murdered by a shot to the head. The murderer publicly admits committing the act and further states that he acted on orders from superiors. You don't personally know any of the individuals involved.
Q: Same as for #1.
3. On the other side of your city or town an innocent child is murdered by a shot to the head. The murderer publicly admits committing the act and further states that he acted on orders from superiors. You don't personally know any of the individuals involved, but you're familiar with the neighborhood.
Q: Same as for #1.
4. On the other side of your street, an innocent child is murdered by a shot to the head. The murderer publicly admits committing the act and further states that he acted on orders from superiors. You've personally seen the child playing in the neighborhood and you've exchanged pleasantries with the child's parents.
Q: Same as for #1.
5. In your own home, directly in front of you, an innocent child is murdered by a shot to the head. The murderer publicly admits committing the act and further states that he acted on orders from superiors. In this scenario, the child is your daughter or son, or perhaps a grandchild or other beloved family member.
Q: Same as #1.
Discussion: Every morally relevant element is the same in each scenario. The only variables are the proximity of the event and the level of personal knowledge of the area and victim. And, since the event is one that's generally acknowledged to be morally wrong (if not heinous, reprehensible, etc.), then one's reactions arguably provide a sort of barometer of moral sensitivity.
If scenarios 1 and 2 generate feelings like outrage, feelings of anger and hate against the perpetrator, desire for justice (or even revenge), then it's fair to say you tend to fall within the highly sensitive segment of the moral spectrum.
If you start to have similar feelings when events unfold as in scenario 3, I would argue that's the part of the spectrum in which a sizeable percentage (majority?) of people fall. After all, people live busy lives and understandably don't necessarily think much about (relatively) distant happenings.
Scenario 4 is where the rubber, morally speaking, really meets the road (or street). If you're not feeling outrage at this point, I'd suggest you'd be well advised (IMO) to examine the foundations and underpinnings of your personal moral sense.
Scenario 5, it's fair to say, is where 99.999% of people will absolutely have feelings of anger, outrage, grief, etc. However, if that's the ONLY scenario that moves you, and if every other scenario gets a "shit happens" (or similar) response from you, that's a hugely sad commentary on your moral sense, IMO.
BTW, in NONE of the above scenarios do I pretend to have the right to tell anyone how they SHOULD feel. An individual's feelings are entirely up to them. However, what the experiment illustrates is that there is a spectrum in the moral dimension, and also that there are ways in which you can assess, for yourself, approximately where you fall on that spectrum.
Also, while everyone is entitled to their own feelings, and entitled to NOT be lectured about how they SHOULD feel, it's perfectly fair to make assessments based on what people have said for themselves. As one example, for the PutinFanBoyz who exult and applaud events like the one described above, I would argue that the moral labels "evil" and "reprehensible" are appropriate. For those who feel nothing until scenario 4, I would argue that the moral labels "obtuse," or perhaps "blind," could be used. Finally, for someone who can't be bothered to have feelings until the events of scenario 5 splatter blood on their own shoes, I would argue that the moral label "cripple" applies.
Everyone can judge and evaluate for themselves. And, if anyone thinks the experiment is flawed, in either its premises or design, I'm happy to debate the topic.
-
05-16-23 17:38 #2131
Posts: 516Definition of a delusional clown
Originally Posted by Questner [View Original Post]
Perfect example of delusion vs reality from last night's missile attack on Kyiv. Six supposedly "unstoppable" Kinzhal hypersonic missiles were successfully intercepted. Another nail in the coffin of the reputation of Russia's military hardware. And a huge nail in the coffin for the future of Russia's military export industry.
-
05-16-23 11:50 #2130
Posts: 324Originally Posted by Questner [View Original Post]
-
05-16-23 04:10 #2129
Posts: 1325After being rebuffed the Pope gives a celestial advice to a delusional clown, 'You have to hide'.