Masion Close
OK Escorts Barcelona
escort directory

Thread: Stupid Shit in Kyiv

+ Add Report
Page 117 of 168 FirstFirst ... 17 67 107 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 127 167 ... LastLast
Results 1,741 to 1,755 of 2513
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #773
    Quote Originally Posted by Jmsuttr  [View Original Post]
    I'm not defending either pre-invasion Ukraine, or the CIA. I'm simply stating a plain and unassailable fact.

    The Russian army, acting solely on Putin's orders, marched into Ukraine on Feb 24th and proceeded to devastate entire cities, with no regard for civilian casualties.

    If you want to characterize Zelensky and the CIA as demons, go right ahead. But Putin has demonstrated that he's Satan incarnate, and that he needs to be defeated, and hopefully destroyed.

    Every time I see a post that tries to deny, or sidestep, Putin's exclusive agency and responsibility for the war, I will point out the factual error. Every time.
    I have never said Putin is not to blame. He started it, but there also many others that do not want the war to end. We should be demanding a ceasefire and negotiations. Cut off some of the money and weapons, you will see a settlement quickly.

  2. #772

    No one trying to stop war?

    Time to you to step up and stop this war yourself by volunteering at the local Ukrainian embassy for a free ticket to a Ukrainian training camp where you will become Rambo and single handedly end this war by stopping the Russian Army! LOL.

    BTW, if a country bombarded Jews (or ethnic Russians in the Donbass) for 8 years and refused to sign a peace treaty like the Minsk Accords, as Zelensky refused to do, would Israel (or Russia) be an aggressor if it invaded the country that had been bombarding Jews for 8 years? The difference between children and many Americans is that children grow up and accept reality. Many Americans don't. Pissing off the Russians was a bad idea and now Ukraine is paying for Zelensky's stupidity.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike963  [View Original Post]
    Who wants war, and we can safely say Russia started, true.

    But no one is trying to stop it.

  3. #771

    Wrong Again

    Quote Originally Posted by Jmsuttr  [View Original Post]
    P. S. There are two things in the world that are universally hated. There are probably more, but for sure at least two. Mosquitoes are the first. Everybody hates them. p.
    Mosquitoes are not universally hated. West Africans have songs praising them because they killed the white colonialists, people like you. But then Africans are not even people to things like you.

    Meanwhile, the great Russian Army roll on and American continues to fight to the last Ukrainian.

  4. #770

    Putin ordered the invasion, no one else.

    Quote Originally Posted by DramaFree11  [View Original Post]
    Exactly, it makes no sense. We have created a monster in the Ukraine President. The CIA is promising him the world, mean while, economies are tanking. Great job Biden!!
    I'm not defending either pre-invasion Ukraine, or the CIA. I'm simply stating a plain and unassailable fact.

    The Russian army, acting solely on Putin's orders, marched into Ukraine on Feb 24th and proceeded to devastate entire cities, with no regard for civilian casualties.

    If you want to characterize Zelensky and the CIA as demons, go right ahead. But Putin has demonstrated that he's Satan incarnate, and that he needs to be defeated, and hopefully destroyed.

    Every time I see a post that tries to deny, or sidestep, Putin's exclusive agency and responsibility for the war, I will point out the factual error. Every time.

  5. #769

    Right now, the only way to stop the war would be to destroy Russia.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike963  [View Original Post]
    Who wants war, and we can safely say Russia started, true.

    But no one is trying to stop it.
    And, in response, Russia would destroy half the world, and NATO would proceed to destroy the other half.

    There, no more war, we've solved it, right?

    You sound like a child whining at their parents to make the thunder and lightning stop. It's understandable that a child doesn't know the difference between what's possible and what's not, because they think their parents can do anything.

    So, what's your excuse? Please tell us who has the power to make the thunder and lightning stop?

    Or, if you prefer, we could simply push the button that ends up decimating the world. Not to worry, if you live anywhere near a population center, you shouldn't feel much. Just a bright flash and it'll all be over. And, as a bonus, your silhouette will be emblazoned on the nearest wall.

    But hey, the war will stop. In fact, ALL wars will be stopped. Happy days, right?

    P. S. There are two things in the world that are universally hated. There are probably more, but for sure at least two. Mosquitoes are the first. Everybody hates them. The second are people who constantly whine and complain about things, but offer nothing constructive. In school, in the workplace, among acquaintances (and even family), those people are universally hated. So far, your posts in this forum have placed you firmly in that latter group.

  6. #768
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike963  [View Original Post]
    Who wants war, and we can safely say Russia started, true.

    But no one is trying to stop it.
    Exactly, it makes no sense. We have created a monster in the Ukraine President. The CIA is promising him the world, mean while, economies are tanking. Great job Biden!!

  7. #767

    What shoud I say

    Who wants war, and we can safely say Russia started, true.

    But no one is trying to stop it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Xpartan  [View Original Post]
    I wonder what can possibly possess a grown-up to say something so monumentally stupid.

  8. #766

    Exactly.

    If you read my first post, probably you would have got the point.

    I am not bothered about who started the war or who is fighting.

    War is bad for sure, and its extremely worse for the common people.

    Now it comes to the question of NATO, Why didn't NATO support Ukraine directly, and we could have hoped optimisticaly, that would have stopped the war? Or by now reached a negotiation?

    Then we might say, Ukraine is not a NATO member? Kuwait, Vietnam, S Korea to name a few none of them where. In reality if NATO wants to help, they can!

    That is the point, there is business in war, more than saving people and ending war.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jmsuttr  [View Original Post]
    http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/...=1#post2703784

    If Russia doesn't want to stop fighting the war, the only way the US could make them stop would require the use of force by the US military, or NATO, or both.

    That would a) Play into Putin's hands by allowing him to frame the conflict as existential, with Russia's nationhood at stake, and; b) Exponentially raise the risk that nuclear weapons could be used.

    Also, you're mistaken as to a fundamental fact. Putin made the decision to invade Ukraine, not the US and not American arms manufacturers. It was Putin, and he alone, who started the war. And, since he started it, the war will continue until Putin, or his successor, gives the order to stop.

    Any questions?

  9. #765

    Try again!! True

    US fought more wars than any other country after WWII, I guess that is a fact.

    The fact is I am not worried about who is at war, but the common people is who will suffer in the end.

    Lot of us will debate on the ideologies.

    Quote Originally Posted by Paulie97  [View Original Post]
    All you've done is ignore all of Jmsuttr's points and concerns while repeating the same assertions all over again, but this time tacking on double exclamation marks at the end of each sentence. And you earn a demerit by adding the ludicrous claim that the US has been the only country involved in war since WW II. We should expect better, even in a hooker forum. Why don't you go back and try again? Wink.

  10. #764

    Why not mentioned Russia?

    I didn't mention Russia, as its mentioned all over here.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jmsuttr  [View Original Post]
    I'm sure there are plenty of ways to look at the situation, including views from 10,000 feet that focus on which players (countries and companies) might benefit from, or be taking advantage of, the conflict.

    But it's hard for me to concern myself with such issues while Ukrainians are being killed, captured, tortured, and their cities reduced to uninhabitable rubble.

    When confronted with that in-your-face reality, there are only a very few questions at the top level of priority:

    Q: Who bears primary responsibility for the conflict?

    A: Russia.

    Q: Who is the only party with the ability to unilaterally bring an end to the conflict?

    A: Russia.

    Q: How can the conflict be stopped?

    A: By Russia deciding to stop, either by their own independent decision, or as a response to external and (or) internal pressures.

    While other questions and issues may be valid and worth exploring, they must necessarily take a back seat to the primary issues listed above. I'm certainly open to debating which countries might secretly, or not so secretly, be hoping for Ukraine to fail (Serbia, Hungary, Germany, etc.), or which countries are giving Ukraine their full support (Poland, Baltics, etc.), or which countries (USA, France, Italy, etc.) might be slow-walking assistance because they see upsides to a protracted conflict.

    I have no illusions about the fact that there are plenty of bad actors who could, and should, be named and shamed. But Job #1 is ending the war, full stop. And that will only happen if Russia has a change of mind (unlikely), or if a combination of battlefield defeats, attrition, and pressures from within and without, cause them to have that change of mind.

  11. #763

    An under-the-hood look at economic developments in Russia

    You'll appreciate the pun when you watch the short video included in the thread:

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...657124352.html

  12. #762
    Quote Originally Posted by Xpartan  [View Original Post]
    ...2. 1994: Budapest Memorandum...
    Just to refresh people's memory, prior to 1994 Ukraine held over 1700 nuclear warheads on multiple missles, bombers, etc. They had the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world. They gave up these weapons in exchange for international treaty assurances, including (and principally) Russia, that guaranteed the integrity of Ukrainian borders. Russia is clearly the treaty breaker here; however, the US and the UK do bear some responsibility for not coming to their defense in 2014.

  13. #761
    Quote Originally Posted by VinDici  [View Original Post]
    Turkey or Israel could mediate.

    However, there is little reason to believe in any good faith from the Russian side since there is not one agreement standing they have respected with Ukraine. I think only a resounding defeat of Russia will be the end of this war, otherwise Russia will simply regroup and do the same again whilst lying in the faces of the International community.

    Only way to curtail it's power to wean away the reliance on Russian resources, and ensure that long term, technologies like microchips are not exported to Russia.
    Yep.

    Russia has recognized Ukraine's borders AT LEAST 4 times in the last 30 years.

    1. 1991: Russia recognizes Ukrainian independence.

    2. 1994: Budapest Memorandum.

    3. 1997: Russian–Ukrainian Friendship Treaty.

    4. 2010: Kharkiv Pact.

    What else do they want to realize that Russia can't be trusted. Sign anything with them, and they'll use the break to regroup and start again. They don't give a shit about Donbass, they came to Ukraine FOR Ukraine.

  14. #760
    Turkey or Israel could mediate.

    However, there is little reason to believe in any good faith from the Russian side since there is not one agreement standing they have respected with Ukraine. I think only a resounding defeat of Russia will be the end of this war, otherwise Russia will simply regroup and do the same again whilst lying in the faces of the International community.

    Only way to curtail it's power to wean away the reliance on Russian resources, and ensure that long term, technologies like microchips are not exported to Russia.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jmsuttr  [View Original Post]
    Bad on me, I should been more clear about the disqualifications coming from both sides, as in France and Germany would be nixed by Ukraine and the UK nixed by Russia.

    Does Switzerland's neutrality allow it to serve in a mediator role? Other than the Swiss, it's hard to think of another country in Europe that hasn't formally or informally chosen a side.

  15. #759

    UKR OK with UK, but RU not OK with UK.

    Quote Originally Posted by Xpartan  [View Original Post]
    Not necessarily. UK and Boris Johnson in particular are very popular in Ukraine (unlike Germany, France and Italy).
    Bad on me, I should been more clear about the disqualifications coming from both sides, as in France and Germany would be nixed by Ukraine and the UK nixed by Russia.

    Does Switzerland's neutrality allow it to serve in a mediator role? Other than the Swiss, it's hard to think of another country in Europe that hasn't formally or informally chosen a side.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Escort News
 Sex Vacation


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape