Thread: Stupid Shit in Kyiv
+
Add Report
Results 1,591 to 1,605 of 2513
-
06-21-22 04:38 #923
Posts: 516As one of a multi-part series, that article makes more sense.
Originally Posted by WyattEarp [View Original Post]
Think about it in terms of historical wars. How often did the learned pundits and analysts, writing in the early stages of those wars, get it right? In the Civil War, for example, the early advantages were held by the South as Lee was more advance-minded and McLellan was more on the back foot. So, anyone writing before the 2nd Battle of Bull Run, to pick one milestone, would have been justified in being pessimistic about the Union's prospects.
In WW-II, Allied butt was being royally kicked by the Axis for most of the early stages of the war. Of course, most US media coverage was of the patriotic cheerleader variety, but I'm sure serious analysts had deep concerns regarding the course of the war. But did any pundit or analyst accurately predict that Hitler would try something like Operation Barbarossa, and thereby squander his advantage?
Maybe I've missed a war or particular pundit in which accurate predictions took place. I'll happily admit to that, if such an example exists. But it seems to me that the record of wartime analysts is about as good as those who make economic projections, which is to say not very good. Don't get me wrong, they're great at pointing out things to watch out for, and also for explaining things that have already happened. But the sheer number of dynamic variables involved in a wartime scenario makes it a daunting challenge.
As for my optimism, it's simply based on my assessment of how tidal forces are currently flowing. One prime example is that I think there's been a paradigm shift in how the world views Russia, and what that means for geopolitical relationships going forward. Putin-Dora's Box has been opened, with all the hatefulness and evil revealed, and there's no closing it again. Putin could order a stop to the fighting, and withdraw his forces from Ukraine, but that wouldn't return us to the status quo ante. They've crossed the Rubicon and will be (rightly) perceived as a threat, and NOT as a partner, for decades (or generations) to come. And I think that new reality will create even more alliances in Europe and beyond as a necessary protective counterbalance. Of course there will be bumps in the road, but I think things will come together, not because of altruistic motives, but because of legitimate security concerns. It'll be messy but I think the West (NATO, EU, etc.) will figure it out. OTOH, I don't see any realistic scenario by which Russia avoids pariah status and a significantly more isolated existence than before. And that's a tidal force I see that's flowing inexorably in a negative direction for Russia.
-
06-21-22 01:57 #922
Posts: 1680Absolutely
Originally Posted by WyattEarp [View Original Post]
-
06-21-22 01:52 #921
Posts: 1680Well
Originally Posted by WyattEarp [View Original Post]
-
06-20-22 23:47 #920
Posts: 516Kazakhstan-Russia tensions? Haven't seen much analysis about this.
At the recent St. Petersburg Int'l Economic Forum (SPIEF) Kazakhstan President Tokayev raised eyebrows when he said his country would refuse to recognize the separatist republics of Luhansk and Donetsk. Here's the link and quote:
https://en.trend.az/casia/kazakhstan/3610762.html
"It has been calculated that if the right of a nation to self-determination is organized throughout the globe, instead of the 193 states that are now members of the UN, more than 500-600 states will appear on earth. It will be chaos. For this reason, we do not recognize either Taiwan, or Kosovo, or South Ossetia, or Abkhazia. Apparently, this principle will also be applied to quasi-state structures, which, in our opinion, are Lugansk and Donetsk. This is a frank answer to your frank question".
And, in another discordant note, Tokayev refused to accept an award (Order of Alexander Nevsky) from Russia. Putin is reportedly furious at this show of disrespect, especially since the SPIEF was hosted by Russia. And the same reports state that Putin is planning consequences (preparing "gifts") in response.
https://newsfounded.com/ukraineeng/t...-answer-unian/
Two additional reports state that Russia has placed restrictions on flows of Kazakh oil through a pipeline and that Kazakhstan may be responding by blocking railcars full of Russian coal. Take these last two reports with a grain of salt, as they're still awaiting verification by more established news sources. But still, everything taken as a whole seems to suggest that all is not rosy in LilliPutin's own backyard.
https://intellinews.com/face-to-face...ublics-248002/
"Indeed, one of the first developments in relation to Russia and Kazakhstan that occurred on June 17, shortly after Tokayev's words, was an announcement that the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) would be periodically halting oil shipments in order to allow the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry to defuse around 50 WWII era mines it had found on the Black Sea seabed. Kazakhstan relies significantly on the CPC infrastructure for oil exports".
https://thesaxon.org/kazakhstan-bloc...an-coal-media/
"Authorities of Kazakhstan decided to block 1700 wagons with Russian coal on their territory. The Telegram channel "We Can Explain" writes about this with reference to its sources".
Again, some of the above reporting needs additional verification, but that won't be easy since I doubt either Russia or Kazakhstan will want to discuss any problems. But it certainly seems like something to keep an eye on and, though it may not result in any major change to the situation, it's an example of one of those "under the radar" variables that no one's really discussed or analyzed. Or, if they have, I haven't seen it yet.
-
06-20-22 21:42 #919
Posts: 516Not a criticism, just an explanation.
Originally Posted by WyattEarp [View Original Post]
-
06-20-22 21:33 #918
Posts: 2041Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
Since I think Foreign Affairs tries to be somewhat objective, let me give you some further background on the article I posted. It was titled "What If Ukraine Wins?" It was a part of a multi article set. The other titles are "What If Russia Loses?" "What if Russia Wins?" "What If Russia Makes a Deal? And "What If the War in Ukraine Doesn't End?" So Foreign Affairs does try to look at all the possibilities for an outcome. I will have to admit they take a relatively pessimistic tone in all the possibilities.
I think you have laid out above the poor scenarios for Russia nicely. I don't have any disagreement there.
-
06-20-22 17:45 #917
Posts: 2041Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
I think there is a strong possibility that when the fighting ceases the dividing line between Russia and Ukraine will look like the Korean Demilitarized Zone. I suspect Russia and the Ukraine will be in a state of hostility for many years to come.
-
06-20-22 17:38 #916
Posts: 2041Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
Similar to me challenging Golfinho awhile back on his post that Americans take their strong currency to buy cheap, third world pussy, we shouldn't criticize the forum and its members inadvertently or not.
-
06-20-22 17:16 #915
Posts: 3230Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
-
06-20-22 16:14 #914
Posts: 2041Originally Posted by Paulie97 [View Original Post]
The United States and Britain significantly supplying the Russians is an interesting fact that even Stalin and Khrushchev admonished as a major cause for their victory.
I fast forward to today and it would appear Russian military equipment is not a match for Western equipment. Russia's relative isolation and its failure to modernize in a deep sense has always limited the country.
-
06-20-22 09:26 #913
Posts: 1056Hitler's Play book
Originally Posted by ReinerOtto [View Original Post]
-
06-20-22 09:12 #912
Posts: 500Originally Posted by Jmsuttr [View Original Post]
Because the dam is user for water control, and electricity generation, not a valid target for destruction by the UA forces.
-
06-20-22 05:45 #911
Posts: 1680Well
Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
-
06-20-22 05:34 #910
Posts: 1680Ha Ha
Originally Posted by Golfinho [View Original Post]
-
06-20-22 02:47 #909
Posts: 3230Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
You dumb Dems are all lined up combatting each other like you did with Trump over who can give out the best insults. Nothing is off the table.
Why should we care how he feels? Well, another reason is because he can wipe us out with one push of a button, you effing moron.
Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
And seeing how you want war so much, have you volunteered to enlist? Or are you just willing to fight the Russians until the last dead Ukrainian?
How dare you bring up dead bodies while you are cheering on war.