|
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 2246
Maybe I am the wrong person -- definitely, I am the wrong person to say this, but.
IMHO, MaddTraveler has shared some super helpful information on the board, especially about blue house and paris and recreio.
We have to take the good with bad as to the information we get on this board and through interacting with board members.
That said, mr e is our most prolific poster for a reason, he's almost always right.
Just trying to see and value from both mr e and madd traveler.
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by MrEnternational;29107e20
How am I being defensive when there is nothing for me to defend against? Seems you are the one being defensive since you have to call people names and stuff. It is you that is coming to the conclusion as to why certain women will not date an older age group is due to something psychological deep inside of them instead of admitting that maybe it is just not their thing and they maybe just do not like old ass men. I tend to not worry about the people that do not want to date me and what could possibly be their reasons, and focus on the ones that do. Everything is not for everybody. So what is your reason for not dating old ass women? I am sure it is nothing derogatory or offensive.
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 15925
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by MaddTraveler
[View Original Post]
Are you a Colombian with a vagina? Why get so defensive? Arrogance doesn't have to be a derogatory term or offensive.
How am I being defensive when there is nothing for me to defend against? Seems you are the one being defensive since you have to call people names and stuff. It is you that is coming to the conclusion as to why certain women will not date an older age group is due to something psychological deep inside of them instead of admitting that maybe it is just not their thing and they maybe just do not like old ass men. I tend to not worry about the people that do not want to date me and what could possibly be their reasons, and focus on the ones that do. Everything is not for everybody. So what is your reason for not dating old ass women? I am sure it is nothing derogatory or offensive.
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 2246
I concur Mr E.
Maybe they don't like old ass men, to which I would add.
Men who don't speak brazilian carioca portoguese, which has lots of pronunciation nuance.
I mean, I do speak portoguese but every day, I slam into the language barrier.
I teach at a you, but my seniors tell me I need better formal porto.
To which I say, fine, I work on it with fine ass college girl tutors smoking weed at the liberal fraternity sorority, and manage my money and then catch a bus to centro and fuk hoars for 30 usd, two pops one hour 75 r cost per fuck, making most weekdays, a nice combination of being a dirty old man professor like clint eastwood in eiger sanction and the main character from the great novel.
Marquez, memories of my meloncholy hoars.
Had to use the hoar spellling to avoid getting whacked by the change machine.
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by MrEnternational
[View Original Post]
Or maybe they just do not like old ass men. It does not mean they have arrogance and pride when they reject something they do not like or want. Or is it that arrogance and pride are what is holding you back from living with an 80 year old woman?
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor2.png) Posts: 268
Wtf
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by MrEnternational
[View Original Post]
Or maybe they just do not like old ass men. It does not mean they have arrogance and pride when they reject something they do not like or want. Or is it that arrogance and pride are what is holding you back from living with an 80 year old woman?
Are you a Colombian with a vagina? Why get so defensive? Arrogance doesn't have to be a derogatory term or offensive. I just spent 8 mos in Col and when I brought it up to women there they admit that it is true. Personally I prefer to date those women which are all my exes. Sassy attitude and all. Cause that's strength and pride and they're usually loyal and don't fall for games. Instead of having an input about the main point of my post, which was pointing out that older gents can find more humble wives in certain places you just picked one line to argue. This is something sensitive and emotionally damaged women do. LOL. They'll take one word from a subject to cry about another topic. If you read some prior posts I've defended women countless of times here. This is just the truth and again wasn't stated as an attack. Chill and calm your tits my dude.
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 15925
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by MaddTraveler
[View Original Post]
DR and Thailand are the best places for 60+ mongers since those women don't have an issue to have a real relationship with you, like living together. Much harder to find that in Col or Bra since they're more sophisticated with arrogance and pride.
Or maybe they just do not like old ass men. It does not mean they have arrogance and pride when they reject something they do not like or want. Or is it that arrogance and pride are what is holding you back from living with an 80 year old woman?
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 1117
Godzilla X Kong vs. Rio de Janeiro?
Yikes!
It seems, the latest Godzilla x King Kong movie, has Rio de Janeiro being destroyed. Should be an interesting watch!
Can't wait to see, which iconic landmarks are destroyed. Hopefully, gonna be FUN to watch!!
Godzilla X Kong: The New Empire Trailer (2024)
https://youtu.be/5wyqrlkF1Cs
Rio destrudo em cena de novo filme com King Kong e Godzilla; veja vdeo
https://diariodorio.com/rio-e-destru...la-veja-video/
Viva Rio?
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 15925
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Sperto
[View Original Post]
I didn't really understand your question but you got your facts mixed up a bit. First Taquara is a part of the Jacarepagu region. In the Jacarepagu region there are several favelas, like the famous one Cidade de Deus.
I was about to say the same damn thing Nevertheless, I still did not understand what he is asking.
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 4053
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by FlappyGilmore0
[View Original Post]
What separates a family who lives in a favela vs one that lives in say Jacarapaga or Taquara or Maracana areas from an economic and educational standpoint? Educational meaning that in a perfect scenerio, young Bruno goes to college for accounting, later becomes an accountant, and uses his salary to rent in a decent apt before moving to the suburbs and starting a family.
I didn't really understand your question but you got your facts mixed up a bit. First Taquara is a part of the Jacarepaguá region. In the Jacarepaguá region there are several favelas, like the famous one Cidade de Deus. It's a bit strange to compare a favela to Jacarepaguá region. The Jacarepaguá region is more violent and problematic than many favelas, E. G Praça Seca have shootings regularly between milicia and bandits or police.
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor1.png) Posts: 44
Favela vs "Normal Neighborhood"
What separates a family who lives in a favela vs one that lives in say Jacarapaga or Taquara or Maracana areas from an economic and educational standpoint? Educational meaning that in a perfect scenerio, young Bruno goes to college for accounting, later becomes an accountant, and uses his salary to rent in a decent apt before moving to the suburbs and starting a family.
I don't like broaching this topic with Brazilian work colleagues because it's not really appropriate plus they are so touchy when it comes these things.
Hoping one of the long time locals here can just inform with no BS spin.
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 2246
I tend to agree Senor Axel.
As Sperto has said, I ignore members like Spidy who do not improve my ISG experience.
That said, there is a political economic topic of use to Brazil and we mongers, namely BRICS+ trends as they impact currency, Foreign Exchange (FX), and legal (immigration) visa etc.
One observation is that since Lul at, the president of Brazil is talking the USD down, and is more hostile to tourists, especially from "the west " (more tourists from Chile, Argentina, etc); and especially about the requirement to submit bank statements for a visa, which my best travel buddies from ' the west ' are citing as a reason not to travel to Brazil this year.
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by AxelHeyst
[View Original Post]
Let's see. I checked your recent posts on ISG. It took me around 30 seconds and guess what? Only 2 out your last 60 posts on the International Sex forum have anything to do with girls or travel. And those 2 posts were not original reports containing any useful information to be passed on to fellow members but were merely thanks for posting types to the original BM's. In other words, less than 3% of your output in the last 3 months have anything to do with mongering and 97% of your posts are political diatribes and personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with you. And so, true to your nature, you attack me for what? Posting an honest film review? Go fxxx yourself little man.
By the way, to put it in context, my mentioning of "White Lotus" came about thanks to an ongoing conversation I was having with another BM who had recommended several books by a famous Brazilian author that happened to have working girls in the story lines. I brought up the work of Federico Fellini, one of the greatest film directors of all time, who had prostitute characters in 4 of his master works including "Nights of Cabiria" (1957) which feature a prostitute with a heart of gold as the main character.
Then to bring conversation back up to the present time, I mentioned and gave a favorable review to White Lotus 2nd season which had 2 delightful Sicilian prostitute characters featured in that story line. But not to mislead anyone, I mentioned that the 1st season of "White Lotus" sucked ie it was not so good due to its "wokeness" because I didn't want to mislead anyone into seeing the 1st season based on my positive review of the 2nd season. Got it? So, instead of attacking me, you should be thanking me for turning you on to "White Lotus" 1st season. The story line is right up your alley. You are welcome, A-hole.
Lastly, do I have to remind you that the name of this forum is the "International Sex Forum" and that its main reason for its existence and popularity is that it provides a space where heterosexual men (mongers) can exchange stories, reviews, trip reports, girly information, insights, and travel info related to OUR favorite sport. The key defining words: sex between heterosexual men (XY) and natural born girls (XX). Hence this website is anti-woke by its very nature. In fact, one of the rules of the ISG is no posts are allowed relating to ladyboys or Trannys, no reports on tranny sex, tranny brothels, massage parlors, escorts or their procurement of any kind. Did you miss the memo?
Obviously, you support the tenants of Wokism since you attack anyone who opposes the Woke doctrine or even mentions Wokism in a passing, negative light. This is very interesting because one of the fundamental tenants of Wokism is that there is no difference between a man and woman. That any man (XY) or boy (XY) can be a woman (XX) or girl (XX) whenever he or she feels like it. Nature has nothing to say on the subject. Nature is irrelevant. KKK. Thus, a man can compete in woman's sports, shower in girl's high school bathrooms, and 3rd parties are encouraged to indoctrinate minors in grade school with this insane ideology and even give minors sex changing hormones at a very early age all without parental approval. It is truly shameful! P.S. The Wokes insist on changing the English vocabulary to eliminate what they consider offensive pronouns like "he" or "she". Did I miss anything?
So once again, I ask, what the fuck is a Woke ideologue believer like yourself doing on the International Sex Forum posting nothing but radical left wing talking points and attacking anyone who disagrees with you? And simultaneously never posting personal trip report or reviews that have anything related to heterosexual mongering? It is a fair question and before you launch another one of your personal attacks at me, I will add that you know nada about me. For all you know, I may have scores of ladyboy sexual romps in my more than 30-year experience in Thailand. 555/ KKK. You know nada. So, I will end this, my final communique to you, with one more fact: when a monger asks a BKK Sukhumvit ladyboy street walker if she is a girl, 99% of the time the ladyboy will say no, she is not a girl. Ha Ha! Ladyboys apparently have a firmer grip on reality than American Wokes.
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 1117
Crickets...
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Axel Heyst
[View Original Post]
By the way, to put it in context, my mentioning of "White Lotus" came about thanks to an ongoing conversation I was having with another BM who had recommended several books by a famous Brazilian author that happened to have working girls in the story lines. I brought up the work of Federico Fellini, one of the greatest film directors of all time, who had prostitute characters in 4 of his master works including "Nights of Cabiria" (1957) which feature a prostitute with a heart of gold as the main character.
Then to bring conversation back up to the present time, I mentioned and gave a favorable review to White Lotus 2nd season which had 2 delightful Sicilian prostitute characters featured in that story line. But not to mislead anyone, I mentioned that the 1st season of "White Lotus" sucked ie it was not so good due to its "wokeness" because I didn't want to mislead anyone into seeing the 1st season based on my positive review of the 2nd season. Got it? So, instead of attacking me, you should be thanking me for turning you on to "White Lotus" 1st season. The story line is right up your alley. You are welcome, A-hole.
Fair enough! However, that ongoing convo w/r to books art and TV-shows..etc, could have, just as easily been placed in the "appropriate" thread, such as General Info. But of course that's my opinion, just like you, exercised your opinion, when you asked of me, to move my "political shit".
Who knows, perhaps next time, I'll interject and politely ask, to move the "artsy" convo, over to a more appropriate forum? Naturally, without categorizing another ISGer/BMs convo/politics or points of view on the subject matter as "shit".
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Axel Heyst
[View Original Post]
Lastly, do I have to remind you that the name of this forum is the "International Sex Forum" and that its main reason for its existence and popularity is that it provides a space where heterosexual men (mongers) can exchange stories, reviews, trip reports, girly information, insights, and travel info related to OUR favorite sport. The key defining words: sex between heterosexual men (XY) and natural born girls (XX). Hence this website is anti-woke by its very nature. In fact, one of the rules of the ISG is no posts are allowed relating to ladyboys or Trannys, no reports on tranny sex, tranny brothels, massage parlors, escorts or their procurement of any kind. Did you miss the memo?
Obviously, you support the tenants of Wokism since you attack anyone who opposes the Woke doctrine or even mentions Wokism in a passing, negative light. This is very interesting because one of the fundamental tenants of Wokism is that there is no difference between a man and woman. That any man (XY) or boy (XY) can be a woman (XX) or girl (XX) whenever he or she feels like it. Nature has nothing to say on the subject. Nature is irrelevant. KKK. Thus, a man can compete in woman's sports, shower in girl's high school bathrooms, and 3rd parties are encouraged to indoctrinate minors in grade school with this insane ideology and even give minors sex changing hormones at a very early age all without parental approval. It is truly shameful! P.S. The Wokes insist on changing the English vocabulary to eliminate what they consider offensive pronouns like "he" or "she". Did I miss anything?
If just so funny these days, how some people love to classify everything they dislike, are ignorant of, homophobic to, disagree with or don't understand, as "woke". Let's conveniently place everything we can't comprehend or don't care to understand, along with all the "undesirable" people we're intolerant of, into the proverbial "woke box" (or whatever the latest political term is currently being kicked around).
FYI, those on the right, "woke" or is it "anti-work (who can tell?), that are "burning" and banning books and even banning dictionaries (for heavens sake!), I doubt very much, they'd even be able to look-up the word "woke" to know what it means, in all it's forms, definitions and contextual history. Or even look-up the word "sex" or what any "sexual" related words mean, for that matter.
But hey, you seem to have a "lock" on what is "woke" and "anti-work", as it suits your narrative. So good for you, for being so secure in your "wokeness" or lack thereof? I can't decide, which it is YET!
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Axel Heyst
[View Original Post]
So once again, I ask, what the fuck is a Woke ideologue believer like yourself doing on the International Sex Forum posting nothing but radical left wing talking points and attacking anyone who disagrees with you? And simultaneously never posting personal trip report or reviews that have anything related to heterosexual mongering? It is a fair question and before you launch another one of your personal attacks at me, I will add that you know nada about me. For all you know, I may have scores of ladyboy sexual romps in my more than 30-year experience in Thailand. 555/ KKK. You know nada. So, I will end this, my final communique to you, with one more fact: when a monger asks a BKK Sukhumvit ladyboy street walker if she is a girl, 99% of the time the ladyboy will say no, she is not a girl. Ha Ha! Ladyboys apparently have a firmer grip on reality than American Wokes.
Okay, but not really sure where you're going with this line of thinking? Everything from "Woke Ideologue" to something about posting/not posting according to the world of "Axel Heyst", to personal attacks, and then something about "Ladyboys"? Sorry I didn't grasp the gist of the overall theme of what you were trying to convey, here.
Anywho, I'll attempt an answer: - First, it's seldom personal for me. Sure certain ISGers get under my skin, at very rare times, but for the most part, it's like water of a duck's back. You'll be hard pressed to find me calling other ISGers/BMs names or throwing profanity at them. Although it has happened on the very odd occasion. But I typically don't make a habit of it.
- Second, you've been here at ISG, long enough to know, what an actual personal attack looks like vs. a disagreement w/r to where conversational content should be "appropriately" placed. So when you use the word "attack" about a half-dozen times, is this you claiming "victimhood"? If so...have at it!
But let me remind you, this is the second (2nd) time you've called me out for "inappropriately" posting to the wrong thread. The first (1st) time, rightly so, since I was trying to make a point, about the inconsistencies of posting "correctly". I knew then somebody was eventually, going to call me out. Coincidentally, it just so happen to be you. The second (2nd) time, I did post in the "appropriate" forum. But again it was YOU, calling me out for said infraction. So was that just a coincident? Or something more at play here?
Don't forget, I did commend you on the first (1st) time.. So hardly the "attacker", you imagine or make me out to be. If I am this big, bad "attacker", you claim, please identify the multitude of times (prior), in posts where I've "attacked" you, in a response to a post of yours? Let alone posted a response to anything of yours, you're posted!
So back to that initial point I was trying to make. It's funny how when ISGers/BMs post pages and pages of off-topic "where-to-find-pussy/sex" stuff like "financial stock/bonds/Forex trades" (even when they do dress it up to sound like sex/pussy talk) or "Real Estate talk" or "Arts-n-craft talk", in the RJ/SP thread, its suddenly okay. However, as soon as a few posts w/r to "political talk" or anything on "views about on race, cultural, or ethnic talk" crops up, it's suddenly, "inappropriate" for the forum/thread.
Again, when we call out other ISGers, it sure would be nice for a change, to have a little consistency. Hence why I called you out for said hypocrisy. And to be clear General Info has always had political content in it, as an appropriate forum/thread. Just check its history!
- Third, the rest of this paragraph on Thailand and "Ladyboys sex romps", interwoven with "American wokes" (whatever that is?), I just wasn't sure what to think. As guess better minds than I, will figure it out?
But it does sound like those are some "happy times" in Thailand...I hope that what I was reading. Thanks for sharing! I'm sure someone will make use of the info.
Finally, by now you should realize, that when you post on an open discussion/debate forum, your written posts/reports/ideas, are going be praised, applauded, congratulated and thanked. And we all love the praise and attention, if and when, it comes our way. But...
At other times NOT so much! As things get contentious, wildly debated, judged, scrutinized and criticized to the nth degree. That is the Nature of the ISG beast, get used to it! If ISGers that want to refute my posts, that's okay with me and I don't get too emotional or take it personally. But to each his own!
Having explained and addressed, that I posted appropriately in the General Info forum and why IMHO, I rightly criticized your post for being hypocritical, would this be a good time to open up a discussion and start totally separate posts here, and REALLY debate the topic of "woke"?
Or should we "appropriately" take it over the the "American Politics" forum, since "woke" is after all an American "political football" and NOT a Brazilian one? But more importantly since we all know, YOU are a very big policing advocate for posting "appropriately" in the "correct" forums/threads, which shall it be?
So to "communique" or NOT to "communique", that is the question?
Okay, the deafening silence of crickets it is then!!! ...Which now put this to bed!!!
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 3228
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by ShooBree
[View Original Post]
Haha, it is funny to see how you go crazy when someone suggests that you keep to the subject of this forum. You're pathetic.
You really seem to have some serious mental issues.
Why don't you just get a life?
This is ISG, not some political forum for libtards.
And oh, never forget that RJ&SP is Bolsonaro Land!
Yeah, I do not get Spidy. He seems to be here to get pats on the head from his fellow liberals and to virtue signal. Governor Abbott, the Republican governor of Texas, made prostitution a felony. It was a dick move for a victimless crime, and I think part of the reason for this is he is in a wheelchair and cannot get laid. On the flip side, you have Lula who just reinstated visa fees so he is a dick too, but he is a liberal dick, so you had guys like Spidy stick up for them. He will go off on Abbott all day long but Lula is great.
But the biggest road blocks to getting laid IMO have been put down by that fucker Anthony Fauci. First, he blew up heterosexual AIDS, and the two big numbers were one million Americans had AIDS and 6% of that AIDS was heterosexually transmitted. The number one million stayed in place for years. It was only when AIDS research started getting more $ than cancer research, and people were like WTF are we doing that the gravy train was over, and the number of people with AIDS in the USA miraculously was cut in half.
The 6% number was not at all scientific. It was doctors asking patients and the assumption was that people would tell the truth about whether they engaged in gay sex or shooting up drugs. The thought process, and I am not kidding, is why would they lie with death so near.
The WSJ did a expose on this conflict in the CDC between groups. One group said tell the truth about who really has AIDS or the other group, which Fauci led, wanted to lie and scare the shit out of straight people to get more money, and the latter group won. Even today though we stil have people scared shitless on here about getting AIDS with straight sex. It amazes me. I am like do you know anyone who has gotten AIDS and died from straight sex. The answer is always no, and I am like, then what are you worried about?
But then we had the fucker Fauci who did it again and to a much higher degree and with Covid. The Democrats elevated Fauci "the scientist" to deity like status to bash Trump and when he was caught lying about masks, guys like Spidy mouthed off he was lying for our benefit.
But the one organization had its shit together with Covid was the NFL. Early on in 2020, they did their draft remotely, but they played in the fall of 2020 and tested everyone. They required vaccination when the vaccine worked and did not require it when it stopped working. They did not miss any game time due to Covid. Call me crazy but I think the government with all its money should have performed better than the NFL with Covid, but it was no contest.
The enduring image I have of Covid is Anthony Fauci sitting in the completely empty bleachers of the baseball stadium in Washington DC between two of his "friends" maskless. I could see him saying to his "friends", "you see what I can do? Do you see the power I have? Of course, we know he was caught without a mask and instead of telling the truth and saying his friends were not sick and outdoor transmission is close to nonexistent, he said his mask was off to drink a few sips of water.
But there were those of us who were like the NFL and let Covid minimally affect us. Axel Heyst just mentioned going to Brazil and kicking ass. I did not have the time to go there, but God I wish I had. Still, I had used seeking twice before Covid in Mexico City and it was like meh. The best I got was a 7 or 8. Post covid, I landed four women in the 9-10 class.
And yeah, I miss the empty roads, half full flights, and paying $100 a night while staying in resorts that are now charging a $1000 a night. Colombia was shut down for 7 months and I had been sending women there money and I had the time of my life when the travel ban ended. I met my gal who my friends call a 10 and was so into me, I did not even believe it. It is a few years later now and I am still blown away she is more into me than vice versa. Thing is she was focused on being a mom, working out, and having a job. It was only when Covid hit that she looked at her life and became lonely sitting at home all day and wanted a partner.
But Spidy still loves Fauci. If I ask him, who handled Covid better, me or you? He is a fucking name calling baby. He is never going to admit he was wrong. For even asking the question, you are a dumb, Qanon, right winger Trump loving scumbag. What makes these guys feel better is being dumb in a group. I call them Democratic douches when they band together and claim to be so smart while they were so dumb about things like Covid.
I think the irony is now you look at Covid, and we are having a huge surge. You go to worldometers and see that there are still a substantial number of Covid deaths. So I love to needle them. You guys still wearing your masks? I know they are not because almost no one wears them now.
They also want us to pretend we forgot when these dumb asses used the term antivaxxer to slam people. And then I ask them what booster you guys are on now? Anyone who used the term antivaxxer like Spidy should apologize for being such a fucking dupe.
We have all had to fight the government to get laid to some extent. That is why so many of us have gone abroad to find countries where getting laid is not so expensive or such a hassle. So we can admit that the parts of government fighting on this issue are not our friends, the cops and DOJ and FBI organizing stings, but are our enemies. I get liking parts of government if you are getting a check from the agencies like the defense department or SS or HHS for health care, but guys need to understand that there are elements within government that hate you and want you in jail.
It just blows me away though that the elements of LE who want to jail mongers and guys like Fauci who have done everything in their power to fuck with mongers have the support of some mongers. It should be 100% against, and that is when I wonder how many guys on here are narcissists who believe if LE caught them committing a crime they would be let go versus anyone else. Or that Fauci was lying for THEIR benefit.
Lula is charging visa fees for mongers for political purposes. In my eyes, that makes him a dick just like Governor Abbott. What else is there to say about them on a forum like this?
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 1117
Pissing contest done? But is it "appropriately" posted or just "woke"? (Part 2 of 2)
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Axel Heyst
[View Original Post]
By the way, to put it in context, my mentioning of "White Lotus" came about thanks to an ongoing conversation I was having with another BM who had recommended several books by a famous Brazilian author that happened to have working girls in the story lines. I brought up the work of Federico Fellini, one of the greatest film directors of all time, who had prostitute characters in 4 of his master works including "Nights of Cabiria" (1957) which feature a prostitute with a heart of gold as the main character.
Then to bring conversation back up to the present time, I mentioned and gave a favorable review to White Lotus 2nd season which had 2 delightful Sicilian prostitute characters featured in that story line. But not to mislead anyone, I mentioned that the 1st season of "White Lotus" sucked ie it was not so good due to its "wokeness" because I didn't want to mislead anyone into seeing the 1st season based on my positive review of the 2nd season. Got it? So, instead of attacking me, you should be thanking me for turning you on to "White Lotus" 1st season. The story line is right up your alley. You are welcome, A-hole.
Fair enough! However, that ongoing convo w/r to books art and TV-shows..etc, could have, just as easily been placed in the "appropriate" thread, such as General Info. But of course that's my opinion, just like you, exercised your opinion, when you asked of me, to move my "political shit".
Who knows, perhaps next time, I'll interject and politely ask, to move the "artsy" convo, over to a more appropriate forum? Naturally, without categorizing another ISGer/BMs convo/politics or points of view on the subject matter as "shit".
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Axel Heyst
[View Original Post]
Lastly, do I have to remind you that the name of this forum is the "International Sex Forum" and that its main reason for its existence and popularity is that it provides a space where heterosexual men (mongers) can exchange stories, reviews, trip reports, girly information, insights, and travel info related to OUR favorite sport. The key defining words: sex between heterosexual men (XY) and natural born girls (XX). Hence this website is anti-woke by its very nature. In fact, one of the rules of the ISG is no posts are allowed relating to ladyboys or Trannys, no reports on tranny sex, tranny brothels, massage parlors, escorts or their procurement of any kind. Did you miss the memo?
Obviously, you support the tenants of Wokism since you attack anyone who opposes the Woke doctrine or even mentions Wokism in a passing, negative light. This is very interesting because one of the fundamental tenants of Wokism is that there is no difference between a man and woman. That any man (XY) or boy (XY) can be a woman (XX) or girl (XX) whenever he or she feels like it. Nature has nothing to say on the subject. Nature is irrelevant. KKK. Thus, a man can compete in woman's sports, shower in girl's high school bathrooms, and 3rd parties are encouraged to indoctrinate minors in grade school with this insane ideology and even give minors sex changing hormones at a very early age all without parental approval. It is truly shameful! P.S. The Wokes insist on changing the English vocabulary to eliminate what they consider offensive pronouns like "he" or "she". Did I miss anything?
If just so funny these days, how some people love to classify everything they dislike, are ignorant of, homophobic to, disagree with or don't understand, as "woke". Let's conveniently place everything we can't comprehend or don't care to understand, along with all the "undesirable" people we're intolerant of, into the proverbial "woke box" (or whatever the latest political term is currently being kicked around).
FYI, those on the right, "woke" or is it "anti-work (who can tell?), that are "burning" and banning books and even banning dictionaries (for heavens sake!), I doubt very much, they'd even be able to look-up the word "woke" to know what it means, in all it's forms, definitions and contextual history. Or even look-up the word "sex" or what any "sexual" related words mean, for that matter.
But hey, you seem to have a "lock" on what is "woke" and "anti-work", as it suits your narrative. So good for you, for being so secure in your "wokeness" or lack thereof? I can't decide, which it is YET!
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Axel Heyst
[View Original Post]
So once again, I ask, what the fuck is a Woke ideologue believer like yourself doing on the International Sex Forum posting nothing but radical left wing talking points and attacking anyone who disagrees with you? And simultaneously never posting personal trip report or reviews that have anything related to heterosexual mongering? It is a fair question and before you launch another one of your personal attacks at me, I will add that you know nada about me. For all you know, I may have scores of ladyboy sexual romps in my more than 30-year experience in Thailand. 555/ KKK. You know nada. So, I will end this, my final communique to you, with one more fact: when a monger asks a BKK Sukhumvit ladyboy street walker if she is a girl, 99% of the time the ladyboy will say no, she is not a girl. Ha Ha! Ladyboys apparently have a firmer grip on reality than American Wokes.
Okay, but not really sure where you're going with this line of thinking? Everything from "Woke Ideologue" to something about posting/not posting according to the world of "Axel Heyst", to personal attacks, and then something about "Ladyboys"? Sorry I didn't grasp the gist of the overall theme of what you were trying to convey, here.
Anywho, I'll attempt an answer:- First, it's seldom personal for me. Sure certain ISGers get under my skin, at very rare times, but for the most part, it's like water of a duck's back. You'll be hard pressed to find me calling other ISGers/BMs names or throwing profanity at them. Although it has happened on the very odd occasion. But I typically don't make a habit of it.
- Second, you've been here at ISG, long enough to know, what an actual personal attack looks like vs. a disagreement w/r to where conversational content should be "appropriately" placed. So when you use the word "attack" about a half-dozen times, is this you claiming "victimhood"? If so...have at it!
But let me remind you, this is the second (2nd) time you've called me out for "inappropriately" posting to the wrong thread. The first (1st) time, rightly so, since I was trying to make a point, about the inconsistencies of posting "correctly". I knew then somebody was eventually, going to call me out. Coincidentally, it just so happen to be you. The second (2nd) time, I did post in the "appropriate" forum. But again it was YOU, calling me out for said infraction. So was that just a coincident? Or something more at play here?
Don't forget, I did commend you on the first (1st) time.. So hardly the "attacker", you imagine or make me out to be. If I am this big, bad "attacker", you claim, please identify the multitude of times (prior), in posts where I've "attacked" you, in a response to a post of yours? Let alone posted a response to anything of yours, you're posted!
So back to that initial point I was trying to make. It's funny how when ISGers/BMs post pages and pages of off-topic "where-to-find-pussy/sex" stuff like "financial stock/bonds/Forex trades" (even when they do dress it up to sound like sex/pussy talk) or "Real Estate talk" or "Arts-n-craft talk", in the RJ/SP thread, its suddenly okay. However, as soon as a few posts w/r to "political talk" or anything on "views about on race, cultural, or ethnic talk" crops up, it's suddenly, "inappropriate" for the forum/thread.
Again, when we call out other ISGers, it sure would be nice for a change, to have a little consistency. Hence why I called you out for said hypocrisy. And to be clear General Info has always had political content in it, as an appropriate forum/thread. Just check its history!
- Third, the rest of this paragraph on Thailand and "Ladyboys sex romps", interwoven with "American wokes" (whatever that is?), I just wasn't sure what to think. As guess better minds than I, will figure it out?
But it does sound like those are some "happy times" in Thailand...I hope that what I was reading. Thanks for sharing! I'm sure someone will make use of the info.
Finally, by now you should realize, that when you post on an open discussion/debate forum, your written posts/reports/ideas, are going be praised, applauded, congratulated and thanked. And we all love the praise and attention, if and when, it comes our way. But...
At other times NOT so much! As things get contentious, wildly debated, judged, scrutinized and criticized to the nth degree. That is the Nature of the ISG beast, get used to it! If ISGers that want to refute my posts, that's okay with me and I don't get too emotional or take it personally. But to each his own!
Having explained and addressed, that I posted appropriately in the General Info forum and why IMHO, I rightly criticized your post for being hypocritical, would this be a good time to open up a discussion and start totally separate posts here, and REALLY debate the topic of "woke"?
Or should we "appropriately" take it over the the "American Politics" forum, since "woke" is after all an American "political football" and NOT a Brazilian one? But more importantly since we all know, YOU are a very big policing advocate for posting "appropriately" in the "correct" forums/threads, which shall it be?
So to "communique" or NOT to "communique", that is the question?
-
Senior Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 1117
Is posting/contributing to ISG, just a pissing game for some? (Part 1 of 2)
Dude, if this is your last communique to me...arhhh, what a shame! Say it isn't so! That definitely, would be a pity! But I guess we all live with disappointed everyday...kkkk!
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Axel Heyst
[View Original Post]
Go fxxx yourself little man...You are welcome, A-hole.
(...kkkk!) I see what you mean when you said, "It will only lead to pointless arguments and hatred".
So I guess I was correct when I said, "As for the 'pointless arguments' and 'contamination', I will leave that up to you." But who really knew, you'd be the one doing ALL the hating (...kkkk!) Who is really "true to form", now?
BTW you can write/say "FUCK", you're not going to hurt my feelings! (...kkkk!)
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Axel Heyst
[View Original Post]
Let's see. I checked your recent posts on ISG. It took me around 30 seconds and guess what? Only 2 out your last 60 posts on the International Sex forum have anything to do with girls or travel. And those 2 posts were not original reports containing any useful information to be passed on to fellow members but were merely thanks for posting types to the original BM's. In other words, less than 3% of your output in the last 3 months have anything to do with mongering and 97% of your posts are political diatribes and personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with you. And so, true to your nature, you attack me for what? Posting an honest film review? Go fxxx yourself little man.
If posting on ISG is a numbers game for you...than have at it! Personally, if an ISGer/BM has posted, one or one thousand posts, I don't care, as along the posts are informational and/or informative and they have something meaningful to offer w/r to the conversations and/or reports on ISG forums.
But calling out ISGer/BMs, because they don't post "as much" as you, or what you deem "suitable", or perhaps not in the "sexier" forums/threads you think is "benefiting", contrary to your opinions, is ALL still "contributions" to ISG and is IMHO perfectly fine. Granted it may not be as meaningful to you or I, and if I personally don't find it meaningful, I hope someone else does find it useful. Last but certainly not least, is to simply I try IGNORE IT and/or THEM!
So to nit-pick at a BMs contributions and how they choose to contribute is in your own words, "pointless arguments". It has been said before, there are many ways to contribute
to ISG. For example: - The Obvious Contributions: Trip reports/Updates (albeit minor, major, large, small, past, present or future reports), Maps, Photos, Articles/News, Non-competing Web Links/Sites ...etc)
- Not so obvious and often considered "thankless" contributions:
Feedback (for those affirmation of those minor and major reports/updates and boot-on-the-ground info.),
Commentary (to show support for those who take the time to write a report or to encourage, those that don't post that often)
Analysis and Critiques (pos. e neg. if constructive, which hopeful does lead to invoking further insights into uncovering things ISGers thought to do or NOT do)
Open Exchange of Ideas (I'm probably repeating my self here... but more target towards open dialogue and critique, regardless of the # of posts under your moniker)
The "Thank You's" and "Attaboy's" (Simple but effective. Perhaps a relic to some, but in my books, still a thing of beauty)
Yes, the often "thankless" ISG contributions and contributors that are overlooked and often forgotten, in the eyes of some. After all, what is a leader without followers? What is a report/post, if no-one or anyone responds to it? Or it goes unnoticed and doesn't "move the needle" or illicit a response in anyone, enough to take the time to log-in and write a response?
You know, as well as I do, that there are ISGers/BMs that have hundreds/thousands of posts to their names and how much they've "actually contributed" will always be "a bone of contention", for ISGers/BMs who wish to debate such things, or argue about another ISGer's "worth" or "value" of contribution, as if somehow they've been appointed "ISG Jury, Judge and Executioner". Again...have at it!
Some goes for the frequency of contributions to forums. I know I lot guys, are hung up on "how much" or "When much" an ISGer contributes, I'm not one of those guys. Again, I'm more interested in garnering anything, of meaningful "substance", from "as little" or "as much" from their content/contribution being posted, no matter the frequency or period of frequency of posts, no matter the forum/thread. And if I can't find anything of "value"...I MOVE ON!
- Note: My above statements on the topic, applies as a response to similar questions, other ISGers/BMs, that are asking! For those of us that pay attention, already know, this topic has been hashed to death before. Go check either the this thread or the "General Info" thread (I Think?). Don't forget "ISG SEARCH" is your friend!
But hey, I guess if this is a pissing contest for YOU (and that goes for some others too, you know who you are)?...Okay you guys WIN!!!
-
Regular Member
![](/forum/ISGScripts/Images/PostContributor3.png) Posts: 1184
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
Okay so I was asked, to take my Brazilian politics over to the "Stupid Shit in Brazil" thread. So here I am...hooray! But let's not get ahead of ourselves!
If ONLY that is, to highlight the hypocrisy behind said "ask". BTW, FWIW to be clear, my Brazilian eco-social politics, were appropriately posted in the correct thread, IMHO. But yes, this can always be somewhat very subjective.
Anywho, to be honest, "the ask", if it were NOT for the hypocrisy, it would have been a fair ask, for the most part.
But when you "ask" of others to stop doing, when you yourself, have criticize other people's politics as "shit" and/or politicize other works of art/tv shows as "woke dumb", you are being a hypocrite and a political hypocrite at that!
Haha, it is funny to see how you go crazy when someone suggests that you keep to the subject of this forum. You're pathetic.
You really seem to have some serious mental issues.
Why don't you just get a life?
This is ISG, not some political forum for libtards.
And oh, never forget that RJ&SP is Bolsonaro Land!
Posting Limitations
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|