Thread: Stupid Shit in Tijuana
+
Add Report
Results 496 to 510 of 2011
-
09-22-21 06:49 #1516
Posts: 444First off let me say I got the vaccine. The data that supports its effectiveness is really good. I knew months before we had vaccines they would not prevent transmission so breakthrough cases do not bother me but I know some people tripping on this.
Funny how you think the different parts of the world are lying but you willing to trust the people who will make big bucks on Ivermectin not being used.
No one gets paid if Ivermectin is the answer.
Lots of people get paid if the company can develop a new drug that does the same thing.
Big red flag should be they calling it a horse / vet drug instead the of human drug it is. My doctor prescribed me ivermectin for Covid19 and my insurance covered it. For some reason there is an large amount of people focused on the vet uses and multiple of these reports like the Rolling Stones article have been shown to be complete fake news.
Another red flag is how different the search results are from google and other search engines. Google = nothing but vet drug talk. Other search engines = actual ivermectin news.
Another red flag is a youtube channel can not even say ivermectin without losing 25%+ of their revenue. Have seen a channel just discuss the topic after directly supporting vaccines and they lose revenue money.
And finally the biggest red flag is just weeks after the data was submitted to the NIH / FDC after a Senate hearing the Federal Government gave the company who came up with Ivermectin 300+ million dollars to make the next Ivermectin which will essentially do the same thing. In June a 1+ billion agreement was made for when the next Ivermectin clears all medical trials. The FDA gets paid when the new drug is submitted for approval because that is how they get a large chunk of their revenue the last 10+ years. They get zero money from saying Ivermectin works. The establishment health system gets paid. Big Pharma gets paid. There will be a lot of money paid all around to grease the wheels.
No one gets paid if Ivermectin is the answer.
Lots of people get paid if the company can develop a new drug that does the same thing. There is close to 2 billion already on the table and the new drug is still clearing the hurdles that gets the establishment health system paid.
This is how health care for profit works in 2021.
Oh and since animals are getting covid they will probably turn that into a vet drug and get more money.
Then when it is beyond patent protection and needed again they news will forget how it was used for humans and just talk about the vet uses so they can make a new one and start the profit machine rolling again.
Originally Posted by MacNCheeze [View Original Post]
-
09-22-21 04:20 #1515
Posts: 536Originally Posted by Dcrist0527 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Dcrist0527 [View Original Post]
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/heal...9-vaccine-safe
-
09-22-21 04:11 #1514
Posts: 536Originally Posted by Dcrist0527 [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 20:18 #1513
Posts: 6493Wow. John Clayton is probably a healthcare professional or researcher.
Johnson & Johnson's vaccine uses a different technique, injecting the viral vector of a different Corona virus to stimulate the production of Covid-19's spike proteins and the body immunity.
I don't want another virus in my sexy body. Have to keep it in good shape for the benefits of Tijuana's chicas hehe.
-
09-21-21 20:01 #1512
Posts: 1283Originally Posted by JohnClayton [View Original Post]
MRNA absolutely made it possible to develop this vaccine so rapidly. But to say it is safer or more effective is obviously premature at best.
https://www.mskcc.org/coronavirus/wh...cines-covid-19
-
09-21-21 19:55 #1511
Posts: 1283Originally Posted by Jackie888 [View Original Post]
#1-dismissing something as fake news is foolish. Argue the merits, but not the source.
#2-More to the point, 1 in 10,000 is not a wild prediction. And his larger point, about global distribution, is warranted.
#3-Big picture: I'll credit Gates for bringing up side effects and long term testing. We dove head first into these vaccines without any testing. Even the efficacy testing has proven to be bullshit.
-
09-21-21 19:51 #1510
Posts: 744Originally Posted by CaptainSolo [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 19:35 #1509
Posts: 1283Originally Posted by CaptainSolo [View Original Post]
Just as important, the vast majority of these vaccines (Moderna and Pfizer) are mRNA vaccines. We don't have a history of mRNA vaccines in humans.
I'm not trying to be disagreeable. But you've highlighted my main point. We don't question vaccines. In fact we point fingers at people who don't get it. When there is absolutely NO long term testing. The vaccine hasn't even existed for a year.
Yet we laugh off evidence for Ivermectin. Why? Because, in your own words, we have no long term testing.
I'm no doctor. I can barely even spell prescription right. But even my low IQ self can identify the hypocrisy coming from our "experts". They lie and mislead us. But we trust the vaccine is ok because they say so? And we label Ivermectin as a horse drug when it's been consumed by humans for many years? Why? Because our "experts" call it a horse drug.
We are absolutely foolish if we don't study every possibility. Because as it stands now, we're no closer to an end than we were two years ago.
-
09-21-21 17:31 #1508
Posts: 2420Originally Posted by Travv [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 15:40 #1507
Posts: 8Originally Posted by PokerLover11 [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 11:38 #1506
Posts: 6493Vaccines side effects
Cause and effects of vaccines have been understood for at least 300 years.
Vaccines have saved millions people from deaths of smallpox, polio, yellow fever, diphtheria, measles.
It's stupid to suspect 300 years of professional wisdom, believe crack pots with their stupid conspiracy theories, and take horse medicines.
-
09-21-21 06:19 #1505
Posts: 657Vaccine Test? Look in the Mirror!
I'm waiting on all the lab rats oops, I meant you, to finish doing the longterm testing of new Covid Vaccines!
Quote: Bill Gates Admits: 700,000 People Will Be Harmed Or Killed By Coronavirus Vaccines.
In his rush to develop one, two, or even seven different vaccines for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), billionaire software tycoon Bill Gates openly admitted that upwards of 700,000 people could become injured or die from these jabs.
The Microsoft co-founder and prominent eugenicist has been more outspoken in recent days than perhaps ever before about his desire to vaccinate the entire world, in this case as soon as possible for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). And the reality is that many more will die from the vaccine than from the virus itself.
Speaking during a recent segment on CNBC, Gates admitted that in order to make vaccines "work" for the most vulnerable groups, they have to be super-charged, in a sense.
And this super-charging means that some people are going to be injured or killed as a result. . . . Unquote.
https://humansarefree.com/2020/05/bi...-vaccines.html
Originally Posted by Dcrist0527 [View Original Post]
-
09-21-21 03:18 #1504
Posts: 1283Originally Posted by CaptainSolo [View Original Post]
Yet, we line up to take the jab. Two, three, now four times.
-
09-21-21 03:15 #1503
Posts: 1283Originally Posted by WombatEd2 [View Original Post]
Not all of us like to feed at the trough. But to each their own.
-
09-21-21 00:41 #1502
Posts: 6493Horse worm medicine
Why would anyone be stupid enough to trust rumors, anecdotal evidences and half-assed test results by unknown people from unreliable sources over science-based recommendations by responsible, distinguished, world renown public health officials?
Any medicine strong enough to kill worms in horses will also be strong enough to kill off lots of cells, beneficial organisms and destroy organs in humans. Patients may survive Invermectin but could develop holes or cancer in their digestive tracts and shorten their lifespan.
Who has done any test on long-term side effects of this drug on humans?