Thread: Seeking Arrangements
+
Add Report
Results 1,951 to 1,965 of 5689
-
08-08-22 10:11 #3739
Posts: 129Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
In Seeking, girls are offered money for meetings. Or, they are provided allowance. Or gifts. Or catered with dinners and certain kind of 'luxury experiences'. And of course there are the occasional Sugar Daddies and Sugar Girls who consider sex out of the question, enjoying the platonic side of the relationship. But basically the concept is, as I understood it was in your case too, that you had agreed to pay for the girl certain amount of money for a meeting, which included sex? This is the typical way. It's also a very convenient way for a woman, who is seeking a man with money, since the girl will get paid either way: she can take the money for the meeting, or if she finds a suitable man, she might try to establish a relationship with him. But if the girl is interested in marriage and the man is not, then I feel sorry for the man, for he is only playing with the girl if this is not made clear. (By the way, I hope that if your lawyer girl is looking for a marriage, you two will have a great future as a husband and wife! That is, of course, if you are interested in such a relationship as well.).
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
By the way, there is no mention of "Sugar Girl" or "Sugar Daddy" in the profile making process on Seeking, instead there is the option to choose if one is looking someone who has the money, or the looks. I would consider an adult woman who does not see through this as someone who is probably better on Tinder than on Seeking.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
I do hope that any woman wouldn't have to be in the situation where she is looking for a man for serious relationship and possibly a marriage, but the man in question is just having his fun with the woman without having the discussion of his hopes for the future, if these hopes doesn't involve getting married or having a serious relationship. This would be using of another person as his instrument of enjoyment, in the case of the man.
But when both person are on the same page and it's clear for both of them, then it's a honest relationship which can be based on money as well as mutual interest and love.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
I disagree with your statement. The correct form is that the two people can set up their rules in the way they like, when they are doing it together. When they are playing only for themselves, they are using the other person as an instrument. It's how some. If not many. People act in regards to the other sex (men to women and women to men), but this does not mean it's the way to go when one grows up above the age of teenage and being young adult. Morality and proper way of acting towards other people is not a given thing, it is something each person either does or does not develop in himself or herself.
(I used the "you" form intentionally do make the point that it's not about you, Elvis 2008, but you and the girl. Even as you might have meant the two of you.).
-
08-08-22 08:58 #3738
Posts: 6Originally Posted by FastMdSter [View Original Post]
-
08-08-22 02:02 #3737
Posts: 2698Bare is the new Bush
Originally Posted by AmericanPi [View Original Post]
-
08-07-22 22:57 #3736
Posts: 585Beaver indications
Kind of an odd question and observation here.
I like seeking for the amateurs. The ones who really are just uni students trying to make rent. But who aren't pros.
Sometimes I being a girl home, like yesterday, and she's young and beautiful. 19 years old and cute.
And then we get to the bedroom, pants come down, and she's shaved bare.
And I like me a bare cooter. Love it really. But it always makes me suspicious. A bare cooter? Is she really all that innocent? I mean, to get to the point you shave bare you've had some life experience, you know? Maybe a lot of miles on the odometer. Like I prefer a shaved snatch but ID rather see some fuzz in these situations just to announce she's not a prostitute doing seeking on the side.
Am I overthinking this?
-
08-05-22 20:41 #3735
Posts: 77Seattle trip report and Vancouver Part 2
So just returned from a week in Seattle and unexpected trip to Vancouver.
The normal SA leg work had started before the trip. Had a lot of responses from who I thought were attractive going on pics.
I target 8+ under 35, white women. After having multiple conversations and then video calls I was getting worried. They just didn't seem that attractive to me from what I have been used to lately.
The pros there are plentiful and also on SA. BBFS is out in the open in Seattle. After all the work set up 2 dates, one was decent 25 yr she was really into it, but for me no fire. 400. She wanted to stay the night, had dinner etc before but I told her I had an early call with NYC.
2nd, was just too enamored with my fit and accessories, was getting stalker vibes but pounded anyway. She is blowing up my phone still. She was 500. Both were my normal PSE experience, but not enough for me to continue further.
I just don't think the women are that attractive, now I'm a little different. I need their outfit, appearance, style, banter etc to match what I'm used too. I'm willing to upgrade the right one if they polish up, but even in the bars etc only saw a handful.
Bar pickups would be pretty easy there, from 2 experiences out during the night. Had two women who were dtf, but was with some business colleagues and didn't want to go full throttle.
Anyway, 2 of my previous hookups from Vancouver have been asking me return. The Finance mgr and realtor. Plus I have been texting with a real 9. 5 23 yr old law student (reminds of young Gal Gadot, with implants). So took the quick flight to Vancouver to hit the 3 of them. That was the best part of this business trip.
As was walking through the city with 23 yr old, she was telling me about her new apartment and dog. So bought her an espresso machine and stuff for her puppy. Totaled to about $550. After a full night of bed breaking sex and morning repeat I offered another 5, she said the presents were enough this trip. So $550.
Will be back in Seattle in 2 weeks, and MTL so report any updates.
Also, heading to Amsterdam at the end of the month and thinking of taking one of them. The sex is that good as is the connection in general.
Be well and good luck.
-
08-05-22 17:22 #3734
Posts: 2698Kissing Seeking Girl vs Pro
I guess I knew this but was very struck recently kissing Shayla how different it is from kissing a pro even one who provides good DFK. With a Seeking girl (at least the ones I adore who I would not even class semi-pro) like Shayla, Alexa, and Sylvia (of late) it's a completely different passion and "set of moves".
What I mean by that is it's not just tongue tangling. There is playful licking and lip biting. Tongue sucking both directions. Just no rules. Wherever that animal passion takes you you go there. It's so amazing and such a joint "dance" if you will.
And because it's real, it's part of the sex. Shayla is definitely more connected mouth to pussy than most girls. But no pro is getting wet from DFK. She's probably even getting out the lube after you eat her pussy. LOL. Cuz there is nothing going on downstairs when u kiss. With a real connection that animal kissing is getting her wet just like it gets you hard. Amazing stuff and one of my favorite parts. And I guess I don’t mind the ego boost either — knowing that kissing me make Shayla’s juice drip down her thighs is def satisfying to the self esteem!
-
08-02-22 15:01 #3733
Posts: 585Diamond access
Anyone know if the Diamond upgrade in seeking is good for anything?
Far as I can tell it only serves to signal that you paid more for the same thing. But maybe I'm missing something.
-
08-02-22 02:43 #3732
Posts: 2793Originally Posted by TierdTraveler [View Original Post]
-
08-02-22 00:45 #3731
Posts: 3215Originally Posted by Desin [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Desin [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Desin [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Desin [View Original Post]
Well, I had my fun. Desin, quit with all the pseudointellectual bullshit and moral dilemmas and get on the site and go on a few dates. You have strangled yourself with all these moral issues to compensate for your fear. The women are not as innocent as you think and the men are not as crude as you think. The truth is when you are on a date it is two people and you can set whatever rules you want to.
-
08-01-22 18:39 #3730
Posts: 241Not pre-covid
Dramafree.
This is what I paid in June 2022. The one that refuses to take money. We first met Aug 2021. The other two. One I met in Jan and the other in Mar 2022.
I continue meeting them. Juggle them around. A bit boring to fuck the same but they are all super nice persons first and great fucks, second. So, just keeping them. But always looking for the fourth pussy.
Originally Posted by DramaFree11 [View Original Post]
-
08-01-22 18:15 #3729
Posts: 129Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Yes, there are women who really do wish to fulfill their childhood / teenage dream of marrying a rich guy. And people who are all about money and material. If these individuals find each other and get married, it's all great. As long as the girl doesn't have to sign a prenuptial agreement.
Yet, I do feel sorry for the women who are attached to the idea of money as the answer, and the men who are their counterparts in these relationships. It's really a sad thing.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
When a girl falls for a guy in paid relationship environmenet, and the guy is willing to use this situation to his own advantage by, for example, not telling to the girl that "sorry, but I'm not going to marry you and we'll be together only for the time I feel happy to hang out with you and have sex with you", I do feel sorry for the girl. Some guys are able to perceive their own thoughts, feelings and motives, and some are not. Same goes for the women. But a person who is able to see the situation and decides to not act honestly toward the other person, is putting the other person in position which I feel sorry about. Be it in paid environment, or non-paid.
Rookie women are also less likely to be accustomed to these situations which have money and / or power dynamic inside them, and which consist for the young woman with being with an older man, who is possibly near his father's age. This has psychological meanings to the girl, who might not be familiar with them if she hasn't had enough of these relationships previously to get accustomed to her own feelings, reactions and ways of acting in these relationship. To find out that she "always falls for this type". The man is then in the position of taking advantage of the girl. Like you wrote (was it you? That you think it's necessary to anticipate the woman's feelings before she knows them herself, and to master your own. This sounds to me as calculative, manipulative way of acting towards other people, if it isn't guided by a moral principle based on openness, honesty and the good of the other person.
And lastly, by being fake I pointed out that men act in these situations differently than how they would act when they are on an "even level" with the woman they are interacting with. Money and the dynamics of the arrangement makes it more easy to act in a way that charms the girl. A young woman might very likely be unable to recognize this subtle things, maybe not until they are more than 30 years old or until they've met enough Sugar Daddies to take notice how these men really are, compared to the act they present. It's all good when used with the payment the girl gets. But if there is no payment, then it's an elaborate con act. Anyone finds out about another person after couple of years of being with him or her. And our normal relationships are based hugely on this, that we act on our best and mostly ignore the signals that reveal from the other person something that they are trying to cover up in their good act. It's fair when it goes both ways. But when there is money involved, the money should stay involved. If it's dropped out and the motive is still the same, to fuck a young pretty girl as long as it's fun, it turns into a con act.
But anyway, good luck to you. Maybe you'll get married or stay together for years. It's always nice when two people find each other, be it whatever the route.
Originally Posted by Steve9696 [View Original Post]
Outside of paid arrangements, I was hugely amused when a 12 years younger girl literally dropped her jaw when she heard my answer to her question of how old am I, and very soon was hitting me so god damn erotically (at my work place, when we were alone) that I felt I have never felt such a heat in my life. 15 year younger student made it clear that if I would be willing to consider starting a family with her in the future, we could resume to have sexual encounters. And I ain't a guy many girls notice for looks.
I can believe this is the thing that makes the difference between having good, fulfilling relationships in older age with younger (paid or non-paid) girls:
Originally Posted by Steve9696 [View Original Post]
-
08-01-22 13:17 #3728
Posts: 282Agree 100%
Originally Posted by Steve9696 [View Original Post]
-
07-31-22 22:39 #3727
Posts: 3215Originally Posted by Desin [View Original Post]
And you have not used seeking but feel sorry for the women based on all men being fake and all the women being too stupid to know it? That is a very sexist POV IMO.
From what I have seen, the men get fleeced way more often than the women but the damage is much less harsh.
-
07-31-22 22:19 #3726
Posts: 3215Originally Posted by Edk750 [View Original Post]
-
07-31-22 18:57 #3725
Posts: 6416Wasting Time
Originally Posted by SethiatSpace [View Original Post]