Thread: Seeking Arrangements
+
Add Report
Results 4,501 to 4,515 of 5748
-
12-08-20 08:55 #1248
Posts: 159Bayarea
I am new to SA and I have checked SA after a while. I am seeing lot more girls on SA compared to last year. I am looking into getting into this SA game.
Any suggestions / pointers on bay area SA? What is the rge typical PPM range in bay area? Is there any one area is better than other area in terms of price / attitude etc. Is ir better to look for girls more than 50 miles away from home?
Also why would a girl get premium membership? Does it mean she is pro?
Thanks.
Sam.
-
12-08-20 08:09 #1247
Posts: 1202Originally Posted by Steve9696 [View Original Post]
Then, we barebacked and I nutted inside of her hard. Her period is coming any day now, so I told her that I would be busy at work this week. Next week, when her period is over, I will coincidentally not be busy, and will bust another nut into her. In the meantime, we text, and she sometimes gives me shit about something, but I just ignore it. In person, she's great, which is all that matters for now. She's pretty cool, and very funny. So, I'm having fun, which matters too in these kinds of relationships.
Oh, and I paid her monthly installment, per our arrangement. But it was 3 weeks overdue. But I am going to keep to this new payment schedule. I am not giving her anything for the time that I was blocked obviously.
By the way, if your gal is young and the weight gain is recent, then isn't her body still firm? I remember the heavy girls back in college. Their bodies were amazing, as far as I was concerned. But fat doesn't age well usually.
-
12-08-20 02:13 #1246
Posts: 2732So Right!
Originally Posted by Midwestern [View Original Post]
Ps what’s the latest on ur blocked girl. It back on?
-
12-08-20 01:53 #1245
Posts: 1202Why bother?
Originally Posted by Steve9696 [View Original Post]
-
12-08-20 01:38 #1244
Posts: 2732Yeah No and Advice
Guys. Please take the STDs and condoms talk elsewhere. Let's stick to SBs in here. Speaking of SBs. Sarah has been absolutely fabulous in the sack. I mean so passionate And wet and just a whirlwind fuckfest. Couldn't ask for more. In fact totally ignoring her weight since the sex is so fab.
But she is overweight and I was chalking it up to that making her try harder. But today I found out it's all Covid weight gain. She is a ton heavier than her preCovid weight and in fact would be solid but not overweight if she dropped those pounds.
Anyone ever have this delicate conversation with a girl? She's a sweet girl and I don't want to hurt her feelings. But damn she's be so much better 30 lbs lighter. Advice on the convo to have?
-
12-07-20 20:31 #1243
Posts: 596Elvis,
I was not invited into this discussion, I have no horse in the race, and I have no desire to make people dislike me. But your long note reads as a caricature of what's wrong with a lot of Western society, especially American. Placing "science" in scare quotes. Spouting half-truths, like the statement that antibiotics are a better countermeasure to gonorrhea than condoms (though there are others in your note). I have no judgment whatsoever about people doing what they want to do with a consenting adult. But the science is long settled that condoms greatly reduce the transmission of herpes, which is lifelong; HIV, which is treatable but not curable; HPV, which is beyond ubiquitous and is also treatable but not curable once gotten; syphilis which often doesn't present with symptoms till damage is done.
Your arguments against condoms are like many Americans who insist that wearing a mask to limit covid transmission is pointless on the basis of half-truths (it's just a bad flu; 99 pct of people don't die so how bad can it be; we are no longer a free country if I have to wear a mask). It's really saddening to see this. And I know you vehemently disagree and think me an idiot, or a sheep, for it. But you can't imagine what I think of your points if they're not totally obvious to you.
-
12-07-20 20:29 #1242
Posts: 1972Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
The article I quoted tells the same story you did. Only you did it with omissions, while the article puts it into context.
Like I said, I don't judge your life choices, unless you choose to back your choices with bogus claims.
HIV, gonorrhea and all other shit out there are not political. They don't give a fuck who you vote for.
But I'm glad you agree that condoms help with HIV prevention. Let's stop right there because that's already a compelling enough argument to use them.
Enjoy life and stay safe!
-
12-07-20 20:10 #1241
Posts: 1972Originally Posted by TheCane [View Original Post]
So the second time I ordered it from an Ebay seller. Took about 3 weeks to receive, which should be normal from that part of the world, but like I said, I had some doubts about their authenticity.
If you do decide to get Ocamato, get a large size. They didn't use to have it before, and yes, it was a pain to put it on. But worth it, LOL.
-
12-07-20 15:21 #1240
Posts: 3266The problem with you Xpartan is you read an article in the Washington Post and you are like, "Oh, that is all exactly on point". I refer to a Christian group not because I care about them but just because they had the data I wanted to refer to, and you go off on this Christian angle.
It is amazing how the political BS takes over everything and can get even smart people to turn their mind off.
So you take this guy Spieler and because the Washington Post calls him an expert, you totally buy into it Xpartan.
Valtrex reduces HSV transmission rate by 75% so why he is even talking about condoms and HSV when Valtrex have been proven ineffective?
Active gonorrhea is successfully treated 100% of the time with antibiotics in both sexes so why is he even talking about condom use to prevent that disease? For prophylaxis, antibiotics beat condoms and it is not even close.
The vaccine Gardasil has significant risk reduction against HPV but condoms do not.
Then you have the risk of allergy to latex. That runs up around 5 to 10% with rare sudden death being reported with latex exposure.
With that data now look at this quote again "As somebody who is completely devoted to improving public health, I know that any message that minimizes the role and importance of correct and consistent condom use can have an extremely negative effect on preventing HIV and other STDs. ".
Uh sorry. I do not see someone dedicated to health. I see a "scientist" likely paid off by the condom industry. In fact, I question the purpose of the entire study, which is not A study but a compilation of a 100+ studies, because to me it looks like an attempted blowjob to the condom industry.
As for religious groups, I look at their economic interests instead of their moral virtuosity. They want to have as many members as they can and any form of birth control gets in the way of that. Bashing condom use for them in my mind is the same reason they really have for bashing abortion.
So here you are putting in this right-left debate when a guy really just wanted to know how to get to bareback. That is it, just information.
Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
Because you have to ask what kind of sex right? You are just assuming it is for vaginal sex right? Well, is it? How often does HIV transmission occur with vaginal sex? And with anal sex? And how often do anaphylaxis and latex allergies occur with condom use?
Honestly, Xpartan, have you done these calculations or are you just listening to a "scientist" and assuming he does not have an agenda?
Science is making a hypothesis and collecting data and seeing whether or not the hypothesis is true. Science is not making a hypothesis, collecting data, and rejecting the data and keeping the hypothesis. That is what this guy Spieler did, and the Washington Post is rushing to give this a guy a platform? Why?
Here is my take on the data: Condoms have definite benefit with HIV prevention with anal sex and with pregnancy prevention. Outside of those two things, the potential benefits of condom use are either non existent or so small that they do not overcome the risk of latex allergies.
If you have other data, Xpartan, I would like to see it but quit using this Democrat bullshit tactic of wanting people to bow down to some hack who the media certifies as an expert. Real scientists do not ignore data.
-
12-07-20 12:47 #1239
Posts: 6441Okamoto
Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
https://www.okamotoglobal.com/
-
12-07-20 11:43 #1238
Posts: 2953Originally Posted by Xpartan [View Original Post]
-
12-07-20 05:22 #1237
Posts: 1972Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
I've tried Okamoto 001, and it's a real deal. They sell in regular or large size, so buy wisely. BUT! I bought 2 packages from 2 different sellers and felt something was off the second time. Don't know if I got a knock off or if I was just imagining things.
-
12-07-20 05:03 #1236
Posts: 2953Originally Posted by Luminous [View Original Post]
-
12-07-20 04:11 #1235
Posts: 1163Originally Posted by Oneminuteboy [View Original Post]
-
12-07-20 02:11 #1234
Posts: 2805Originally Posted by Midwestern [View Original Post]