La Vie en Rose
"Germany
Escort News
escort directory
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #2300
    Quote Originally Posted by Gino02  [View Original Post]
    You are probably right about the leisure / touristy travels or even the business travels for sales (some competitive situations), but I doubt all those non-sales / conference-attendee type business travels will come back anytime soon, even after most people get vaccinated. Mongers who were using such non-sales / conference-attendee type business travels as a cover (from their families) to enjoy FKKs, will probably have to find other excuses to travel to Germany or any mongering destinations.
    I will never understand why married guys or having a GF have to fuck prostitutes, if they are not happy in their relation better to divorce or to find a new GF, fucking prostitutes is bringing 0 solution except emptying the balls and spending money.

  2. #2299
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirioja  [View Original Post]
    About these rushing vaccines for big business to come for pharma and countries which invested billions: Pfizer and Moderna even a French boss, or Astra, when they want to rush to vaccine first old weak people and at health risk, meaning also weak health people, without really knowing about effects, I really wish they won t kill too many from vaccine. I never take medicine, my only medicine is my way of life, I won t rush for rushing vaccine, I think I would prefer to fight virus with my little soldiers inside my body, when for sure my lungs are as clean as a baby. I wanted to go to clean them more for Christmas, making intense violent efforts in high altitude, but no ski allowed for Christmas, when at the moment, no snow yet, and Merkel I often agree with except about Erdogan and now when she says ski resorts to stay close whole Winter, can t have second Winter with no ski, would be too dangerous for future.
    What good is all of that cardio when you can't even do 1 pull up.

  3. #2298

    The Coronavirus

    2020........year of the pandemic.

    2021........year of recovery.

    2022. ......year of getting back to normal.

    2023........normal.

  4. #2297
    Quote Originally Posted by Mursenary  [View Original Post]
    Question. Why is it that the antivaxxers never cite the overwhelming number of vaccination success stories.

    Smallpox, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, yellow fever, HPV, etc.

    Why is that?
    About these rushing vaccines for big business to come for pharma and countries which invested billions: Pfizer and Moderna even a French boss, or Astra, when they want to rush to vaccine first old weak people and at health risk, meaning also weak health people, without really knowing about effects, I really wish they won t kill too many from vaccine. I never take medicine, my only medicine is my way of life, I won t rush for rushing vaccine, I think I would prefer to fight virus with my little soldiers inside my body, when for sure my lungs are as clean as a baby. I wanted to go to clean them more for Christmas, making intense violent efforts in high altitude, but no ski allowed for Christmas, when at the moment, no snow yet, and Merkel I often agree with except about Erdogan and now when she says ski resorts to stay close whole Winter, can t have second Winter with no ski, would be too dangerous for future.

  5. #2296
    Quote Originally Posted by MaxSquatter  [View Original Post]
    Neither is that concerning to me. I am just trying to counter the catastrophic argument that this lockdown will never end by saying it seems likely the western world will be put in a new paradigm of registry and tracking with annual vaccines. And with that in place we'll be allowed to go about mongering and traveling etc like we used to. That scenario seems most likely to me.
    You are probably right about the leisure / touristy travels or even the business travels for sales (some competitive situations), but I doubt all those non-sales / conference-attendee type business travels will come back anytime soon, even after most people get vaccinated. Mongers who were using such non-sales / conference-attendee type business travels as a cover (from their families) to enjoy FKKs, will probably have to find other excuses to travel to Germany or any mongering destinations.

  6. #2295
    Quote Originally Posted by MaxSquatter  [View Original Post]
    Neither is that concerning to me. I am just trying to counter the catastrophic argument that this lockdown will never end by saying it seems likely the western world will be put in a new paradigm of registry and tracking with annual vaccines. And with that in place we'll be allowed to go about mongering and traveling etc like we used to. That scenario seems most likely to me.
    How would mandatory CV19 vaccines introduce anything new from a registration and tracking perspective? Since Sept 11, you need to scan some form of government issue identification card for both domestic and international flights. If you drive across an international border, you need to undergo this same scanning process. The proof of CV19 vaccine certificate would then just become an additional form of identification (or entry requirement), right? Depending on your home country or destination country, you need to fill out additional visa forms. And seems most African countries already require inbound travellers to provide proof of yellow fever and or malaria vaccination.

  7. #2294
    Quote Originally Posted by MaxSquatter  [View Original Post]
    Neither is that concerning to me. I am just trying to counter the catastrophic argument that this lockdown will never end by saying it seems likely the western world will be put in a new paradigm of registry and tracking with annual vaccines. And with that in place we'll be allowed to go about mongering and traveling etc like we used to. That scenario seems most likely to me.
    Definitely a very real possibility regarding the future of travel. If it turns out that vaccination efficacy declines over the years, this scenario would likely be the new normal. If another microbial pandemic pops up in the next decade, I believe that it would be guaranteed that mandatory immunization records be as commonplace as passports and identification cards.

    Increase profits by the pharmaceutical companies will definitely be a hot topic issue. I guess that loosely translates to some sort of power grab? But besides benefiting from profits from a steady flow of mandatory vaccines across the globe, I don't really see where they will gain "vast new levels of power."

  8. #2293
    2400 deaths yesterday, more than 260.000 deaths, Trump is a real winner, he is number 1 for covid in the world, when we don't know truth about figures in China, but now party with no mask in Wuhan. Improving decreasing covid figures in France, but 149 women were killed by husband, ex husband, or BF in 2019 , after 120 in 2018 , and so many women are beaten at home. Just a shame for men, at least for French men, with some women saying: I was only a mother, but not a woman.

  9. #2292
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBuddy69  [View Original Post]
    Says the guy who has been constantly insulting all the guys who dare to contradict him, describing the people of Southern Europe as a burden and parasites http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/...=1#post2447226 (yet he goes to Madrid to get his cock sucked) , praising Trump and Bolsonaro and using the same words as the orange golfer (shithole country for instance). He even qualified "LE Monde" as a fake news media while he's playing with his willy watching Fox News. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Le-Monde.

    Source: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionari...glish/lockdown.

    I bet there is only one public museum in Stockholm with a maximum capacity of 3 people according to you no? Because closing the museums sounds like trying to control the movement of people to me!

    You should really try harder!
    You should take a look at yourself and your childish insults.

    OK, you're saying that it's a lockdown because the museums are closed. It doesn't matter that the restaurants, gyms, massage joints, shops and malls are open. Good for you.

    Spain is a great country if you're a fan of irresponsible politicians and their unbalanced budgets (200 billion euros in deficit over the past five years), corruption, political prisoners, Erdogan and Turkey.

    We are paying big money to the EU while Spain and the other shithole countries in the south receive money to be members. Yet they come running to the EU begging for more money, how are they not a burden?!

    Don't get me started on France, their colonial past and current maniac for president. Anyways, what's up with the ridiculous move from Brussels to Strasbourg every year?! Maybe if France paid as much as Sweden per capita you would've had a different view of things. More over the EU is a scam with their agricultural support which undoubtedly benefits France greatly. Close to 25% of the agricultural budget goes to French farmers. It's disgraceful how France sneak away from taking their share of the responsibility. Sweden contributes with twice as much as France per capita.

  10. #2291
    Quote Originally Posted by HammerTime96  [View Original Post]
    For all the "vaccine" fanboys expecting a summer 2021 FKK fun in Germany, here's what the mainstream media is not telling you;.
    Question. Why is it that the antivaxxers never cite the overwhelming number of vaccination success stories.

    Smallpox, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, yellow fever, HPV, etc.

    Why is that?

  11. #2290
    Quote Originally Posted by HammerTime96  [View Original Post]
    For all the "vaccine" fanboys expecting a summer 2021 FKK fun in Germany, here's what the mainstream media is not telling you;.

    https://www.rt.com/news/507829-astra...ine-questions/

    "What AstraZeneca did, though, was to secure full indemnity from all damages in most countries that struck vaccine-supply deals with the company. Such agreements were reached in July, well before the somewhat puzzling test data arrived. "

    This is most disturbing, because there is absolutely zero incentive for these vaccination companies to "get it right. " If they fuck up with the vaccine and you develop serious side effects in a few years time, then there are zero consequences for Big Pharma companies. Because they will be immune for getting sued. This leaves the door wide open for fraudulently manipulating "trials" in order to push the share price, allowing a few people to get rich quick, because if they get caught then they will be immune from any criminal prosecution, thanks to Trump's Operation Warp Speed.
    You had to resort to finding an article in Russia Today to support your delusional thoughts about vaccines? Have you heard of the stock markets and shares going up and down based on companies performance? What do you think the investors would do if AstraZeneca fails, buying more shares? I'm sure you know that RT is trying to praise the Russia's vaccine over the others, right? Of course you do and you have written this post just to see if we spotted it!

    Quote Originally Posted by HammerTime96  [View Original Post]
    It's like paying a hooker E1000 in advance for a E50 session, and hoping that you get E950 back after 30 minutes. While being surrounded by 10 muscular "boyfriends" of this hooker. You'll have zero chance! Crazy sex addicts here are so scared into wanting a highly controversial and highly experimental mRNA vaccine for a simple flu with a infection mortality rate of 0,05% so they can fuck some hookers in the short term, that they are completely ignoring the possibility that perhaps in a few years time they might develops serious auto-immune problems.
    Long-term efficacy and safety of any product can only be evaluated over time and I hope you understand this concept! The evaluation and approval processes of new products is much more stringent now, but you are welcome to go into crowds and shag every escort you come across. After all is only a flu and if you are still not doing so, you are the usual coward Trumpian wanker willing to put his own habits over other people's safety.

    Quote Originally Posted by HammerTime96  [View Original Post]
    https://mises.org/wire/what-covid-va...-fails-mention

    "Cases" were defined by positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. There was no information about the cycle number for the PCR tests. "
    Even by your standards, this is the most idiotic quote to report here. PCR amplification is done by standard protocols!

    Quote Originally Posted by HammerTime96  [View Original Post]
    "There is no evidence, yet, that the vaccine prevented any hospitalizations or any deaths. The Moderna announcement claimed that eleven cases in the control group were "severe" disease, but "severe" was not defined. "
    The data has not been published in peer-reviewed medical journals and therefore it must be considered unchecked at this moment in time. So far we only have the results that the manufacturers have communicated because they still have to submit the data to a medical journal, where it will be checked in detail.

    Quote Originally Posted by HammerTime96  [View Original Post]
    "There is no information about how long any protective benefit from the vaccine would persist."
    To confirm how long it will last you need something called time and this is true for any new product coming into the market.

    Quote Originally Posted by HammerTime96  [View Original Post]
    "There is no information about safety. None."
    There is actually, as that is the whole point of conducting clinical trials around the world, but it's not been published yet.

    Quote Originally Posted by HammerTime96  [View Original Post]
    "My colleagues include resident physicians and faculty physicians who work with covid patients on a daily basis. I have asked a number of my colleagues whether they will be first in line for the new vaccine. I have yet to hear any of my colleagues respond affirmatively."
    Speculative and inconclusive I can say the same thing of the opposite with my hospital colleagues.

    Quote Originally Posted by HammerTime96  [View Original Post]
    "The reasons for hesitancy are that the uncertainties about safety exceed what they perceive to be a small benefit. In other words, my colleagues would prefer to take their chances with covid rather than beta test the vaccine."
    That is the principle of natural selection, only the well equipped (mentally and physically) will survive and transmit genes to the next generations and I won't be sorry to lose some anti-vaxxers from this world over the next few weeks. I would actually celebrate it!

  12. #2289
    Everyone knows that Russia today is a very reliable media. Do you have the opinion of the dudes from Qanon? I trust them with my life.

  13. #2288

    Another perspective about vaccinations.

    For all the "vaccine" fanboys expecting a summer 2021 FKK fun in Germany, here's what the mainstream media is not telling you;.

    https://www.rt.com/news/507829-astra...ine-questions/

    "What AstraZeneca did, though, was to secure full indemnity from all damages in most countries that struck vaccine-supply deals with the company. Such agreements were reached in July, well before the somewhat puzzling test data arrived. "

    This is most disturbing, because there is absolutely zero incentive for these vaccination companies to "get it right. " If they fuck up with the vaccine and you develop serious side effects in a few years time, then there are zero consequences for Big Pharma companies. Because they will be immune for getting sued. This leaves the door wide open for fraudulently manipulating "trials" in order to push the share price, allowing a few people to get rich quick, because if they get caught then they will be immune from any criminal prosecution, thanks to Trump's Operation Warp Speed.

    It's like paying a hooker E1000 in advance for a E50 session, and hoping that you get E950 back after 30 minutes. While being surrounded by 10 muscular "boyfriends" of this hooker. You'll have zero chance! Crazy sex addicts here are so scared into wanting a highly controversial and highly experimental mRNA vaccine for a simple flu with a infection mortality rate of 0,05% so they can fuck some hookers in the short term, that they are completely ignoring the possibility that perhaps in a few years time they might develops serious auto-immune problems.

    https://mises.org/wire/what-covid-va...-fails-mention

    "Cases" were defined by positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. There was no information about the cycle number for the PCR tests. "

    "There is no evidence, yet, that the vaccine prevented any hospitalizations or any deaths. The Moderna announcement claimed that eleven cases in the control group were "severe" disease, but "severe" was not defined. "

    "There is no information about how long any protective benefit from the vaccine would persist."

    "There is no information about safety. None."

    "My colleagues include resident physicians and faculty physicians who work with covid patients on a daily basis. I have asked a number of my colleagues whether they will be first in line for the new vaccine. I have yet to hear any of my colleagues respond affirmatively."

    "The reasons for hesitancy are that the uncertainties about safety exceed what they perceive to be a small benefit. In other words, my colleagues would prefer to take their chances with covid rather than beta test the vaccine."

  14. #2287

    Neither particularly

    Neither is that concerning to me. I am just trying to counter the catastrophic argument that this lockdown will never end by saying it seems likely the western world will be put in a new paradigm of registry and tracking with annual vaccines. And with that in place we'll be allowed to go about mongering and traveling etc like we used to. That scenario seems most likely to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mursenary  [View Original Post]
    So it sounds that the threat of concern is specifically mandatory coronavirus vaccination for travel? Is this headed the way of a "slippery slope" debate? Or is it the coronavirus vaccine that specifically concerns you?

  15. #2286
    Quote Originally Posted by MaxSquatter  [View Original Post]
    The newness of it would be that this would be a registry for everyone in the western world who wants to do "public" things like travel, go to concerts, bars, hotels. You would have to stay up to date on corona vaccines, boosters, etc and that would be a very new thing. That would also seem to be something that would make their trouble of destroying economies around the world worth it to them. Tracking and making huge profits off the hapless public. At that point why would they want to keep the tyranny going?
    So it sounds that the threat of concern is specifically mandatory coronavirus vaccination for travel? Is this headed the way of a "slippery slope" debate? Or is it the coronavirus vaccine that specifically concerns you?

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
 Sex Vacation


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape