Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!

[Pistons]

I considered it but didn't. It seemed kinda stupid for me to do it just because a random guy on the internet suggested it. I have been following it thinking maybe you know what you are talking about. I did watch some video showing the automatic fill. I have gotten burned a couple of times by going all in on one stock. It is a bad feeling to be loosing my shirt and owning more stock than the CEO of a company. I was really thinking about it just because it sounded like a good idea but I have done no due diligence. I am certainly intrigued.

Oh, I was the craziest trader in my country online about 10-12 years ago. And a nightmare to all the trader forums. Learnt alot of things. The most important thing I learnt from it was to never second guess my initial first instinct and analysis on a stock. Kind of how a 20-something guy always want the world to run faster than it does. Patience. And then alot of technical analysis stuff and ways to trick robots in day trading. As well as how criminal insiders operate before they push for more equity (read communication). But the bad side of the day trading stuff is the fomo effect. So it is better to have 6-18 months time frames on every trade you make. I would have been up in among the super rich if I had had patience and didn't think like a 20-something year old back then also.

My take on it is self learnt. Never had an economics degree even if I got top grades in economy at high school and always been told to take one. Rather studied communication. Most we see in finance is only really communication anyway, so that's a big LOL!

In the case of Adobe I've followed what the big trading houses have said regarding how to make money from AI. They are all silent regarding Adobe even thought it is a prime candidate. One big reason is that they haven't fully loaded up themselves (again: communication). One amateur house even sold their stake during the last two months now. Bad analysis by them, and they don't know what they are doing. Another reason Adobe is being kept silent about is the potential purchase of Figma for 20 be. If it goes through, they need to take up some loan, but not much. They have about 6 be in pure cash right now. And they will increase their earnings after expenses, since Figma is already net positive. If the trading commission stops it, then worst thing that can happen is that they repurchase shares for the same amount. And that's a big potential kicker to the share price too. Meaning the more quiet we keep about Adobe before that potential purchase, the more shares they are able to buy back. There are less shares out now than back in 2021 at Adobe's peak. To think the price per share won't reach a new maximum is silly itself. It will at the very least continue its technical analysis peak trajectory. Add in alot of AI hype in the comming years and you have a perfect no brainer buy in candidate.

[BobNSuzy]

Just wondering, how many here listened to me and bought in? Cause if you didn't, you'd already lost a 25%+ gain in a short time, and that's just the beginning. Since noone has realized that Adobe can use the data collection in order to add generative fill to improved pictures, and even video and 3 d. No other company is better situated globally to that right now. Generative fill to videos will be 10 x bigger than anything we've seen so far with pictures.

I considered it but didn't. It seemed kinda stupid for me to do it just because a random guy on the internet suggested it. I have been following it thinking maybe you know what you are talking about. I did watch some video showing the automatic fill. I have gotten burned a couple of times by going all in on one stock. It is a bad feeling to be loosing my shirt and owning more stock than the CEO of a company. I was really thinking about it just because it sounded like a good idea but I have done no due diligence. I am certainly intrigued.

[Pistons]

Just wondering, how many here listened to me and bought in? Cause if you didn't, you'd already lost a 25%+ gain in a short time, and that's just the beginning. Since noone has realized that Adobe can use the data collection in order to add generative fill to improved pictures, and even video and 3 d. No other company is better situated globally to that right now. Generative fill to videos will be 10 x bigger than anything we've seen so far with pictures.

[Pistons]

Noted, can I finance my FKK hobby by going long on Adobe?

Exactly!

15 months horizon is my bet.

[Ararat]

Noted, can I finance my FKK hobby by going long on Adobe?

Once every year or two I find a stock that is a complete no brainer to buy.

Two years ago it was ASML. It went up 40% before I coined the day it started falling again. And I coined the transfer over to buying energy stocks.

Now we have reached the end of energy stocks growing on behalf of the IT downselling. And it is time to return to the IT sector for the best gains.

Nvidia has been the greatest player so far the past 9 months. But in percentage growth the train might have left.

However, the no brainer company to buy right now is kinda on the backs of Nvidia, and is still down 50% from its heights almost 2 years ago.

It is Adobe Systems!

Mark my words when I say it will have a target value of 100 $ per share in the next 15 months! That is up about 120% from their current value!

[Pistons]

Mark my words when I say it will have a target value of 100 $ per share in the next 15 months! That is up about 120% from their current value!

1000 $ and up 145%.

[Escape Artist]

You are so dumb, the majority of your post is pure ramblings. Never have I said degrees make anyone into anything. I have actually stated the exact opposite here several times. And I turn it into a joke time after time.

Your degree still makes you useless. That must hurt like hell!

Clear example pf a man who can't even see his own inconsistencies.

This guy who repetitively makes posts on subjects which no one cares as evident by no one ever actually responding. You think someone who claims to be some communications expert would actually have people skills, or at the very least read one's audience. Dunce.

[Pistons]

Once every year or two I find a stock that is a complete no brainer to buy.

Two years ago it was ASML. It went up 40% before I coined the day it started falling again. And I coined the transfer over to buying energy stocks.

Now we have reached the end of energy stocks growing on behalf of the IT downselling. And it is time to return to the IT sector for the best gains.

Nvidia has been the greatest player so far the past 9 months. But in percentage growth the train might have left.

However, the no brainer company to buy right now is kinda on the backs of Nvidia, and is still down 50% from its heights almost 2 years ago.

It is Adobe Systems!

Mark my words when I say it will have a target value of 100 $ per share in the next 15 months! That is up about 120% from their current value!

[Pistons]

Umm, no, it doesn't at all. This claim doesn't even make logical sense. Facepalm emoji.

Your IQ is lower than a worm. Must be tough.

[Pistons]

Careful, your revisionist tendency keeps cementing your future of becoming your cycling, race car driving father here.

Kinda ironic to reference degrees as a measure usefulness coming from someone who seems to take a cliche position on institutional education. Even more absurd coming from someone who studied "communications" over half a decade. Even more ironic when individual is so terrible at communicating.

Most people I knew in college who studied "communications" were not the most book smart but were actually generally sociable and attractive people who were probably able to salvage a useless field with their natural attributes. Must be terrible to be the oddball who has neither of the latter attributes.

Sorry that I used so many 3 syllable words. You can get through it, just have an adult help you read it.

You are so dumb, the majority of your post is pure ramblings. Never have I said degrees make anyone into anything. I have actually stated the exact opposite here several times. And I turn it into a joke time after time.

It is a communication trick to make people fooled into thinking their education defines them. A brainwashing technique in order to label people by which brainwashing books dealing with which agenda the communication masters can put the sheeps into.

You don't even know that people at the 1990 WEF meeting discussed adding toxins into most 'medicines' supplied to the entire world. In order to kill people, or at least cripple them. Especially infant vaccination programs. And you seem to think you are helping people. Fool!

[Escape Artist]

It is tough to know if you are really as retarded as you consistently appear in this forum or intentionally dumb your comments down for some weird purpose. You have no fucking clue what a cartel even means and hence copy pasting dictionary which you don't understand followed by a bunch of typical MurseShit. Have it your way. You do have to get paid for your troll farm posts, so I guess that makes sense in some universe.

According to your recent assessments, I'm a drug dealer who doesn't know what a cartel is. Appreciate the irony dumb dumb.

[Escape Artist]

Not really. But this shows how unscientific it is.

Umm, no, it doesn't at all. This claim doesn't even make logical sense. Facepalm emoji.

[Escape Artist]

- I had to lecture you on Crispr.

- I had to lecture you on covid-vaccine issues.

- I had to lecture you on side effects.

Your degree still makes you useless. That must hurt like hell!

Careful, your revisionist tendency keeps cementing your future of becoming your cycling, race car driving father here.

Kinda ironic to reference degrees as a measure usefulness coming from someone who seems to take a cliche position on institutional education. Even more absurd coming from someone who studied "communications" over half a decade. Even more ironic when individual is so terrible at communicating.

Most people I knew in college who studied "communications" were not the most book smart but were actually generally sociable and attractive people who were probably able to salvage a useless field with their natural attributes. Must be terrible to be the oddball who has neither of the latter attributes.

Sorry that I used so many 3 syllable words. You can get through it, just have an adult help you read it.

[Pistons]

Not to mention that he inserted his own personal belief in the end while mischievously attributing it as a statement made by the author. You can easily forgive ignorant people because, by definition, they just don't know any better. The worst people however are the ones who knowingly, or perhaps even pathologically, create false realities and push it onto others. Numerous people fitting the latter category on this forum.

- I had to lecture you on Crispr.

- I had to lecture you on covid-vaccine issues.

- I had to lecture you on side effects.

Your degree still makes you useless. That must hurt like hell!

[Pistons]

That's not how science works.

You can't just choose the findings you like and claim others are fake.

I don't think about Dunning-Kruger a lot but maybe this has been a thorn in your side? You've been told about it a lot, haven't you?

Not really. But this shows how unscientific it is.