Thread: Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!
+
Add Report
Results 11,731 to 11,745 of 12052
-
04-28-20 19:02 #322
Posts: 537Very interesting!
Originally Posted by Downandup [View Original Post]
Rock.
-
04-28-20 18:30 #321
Posts: 1385Originally Posted by DeltaIndigo [View Original Post]
Vietnam, another country in the vicinity, has had less than 300 cases and zero deaths. Vietnam has 95 million people, only 31 M less than Japan population. Our friend has a habit of dismissing countries he does not like as showing unreliable data, not believable etc, but I think it is clear that Vietnam and Taiwan have controlled it better. Some reasons are obvious. Their populations are more docile and do not question or flout government rules, lockdowns actually work as intended, infected people were forcibly detained in government facilities in Vietnam when they had the virus, their healthcare facilities were on high alert from the beginning of the outbreak and so on. Yes, the US got caught with its pants down this time but if a vaccine or cure comes, it will be American or German / English or some other Western European. I expect France to also cope well with any future virus breaks, and Italy and Spain to do much better than this one. But if corona deaths are the sole indicators of a country's healthcare system, does anyone think Vietnam has a better one than Italy? Next time you become sick, where would you rather be? Italy or Vietnam?
As for the overall tone about Japan, I pointed out once before that GDP per capita in Japan is $39.2 K, only $5 K more than Italy's and $8,000 less than German per capita GDP and $23 K less than US per capita $62.5 K (World bank -- easily seen o Google search). Our friend countered with China having large GDP only due to large population and missed the point that these are *per capita*; Yes, Japan is an important ally, and is an important country in Asia with some Western democratic values and a good counter to have against rising China. But from American pov, it is China and its strength which is a huge concern to our president, our businesses and our population these days.
-
04-28-20 17:12 #320
Posts: 3497Originally Posted by Dreams [View Original Post]
I had someone tell me the other day that a 20 year old girl died from coronavirus, so the coronavirus is dangerous for young people as well. I asked "did she have any health problems prior to that"? They replied no, no health problems, she was completely healthy.
Later I found out the girl had bad asthma all her life.
My guess is this smoker "study" is also not giving all the details.
-
04-28-20 16:54 #319
Posts: 1812Originally Posted by Downandup [View Original Post]
-
04-28-20 16:51 #318
Posts: 1812Originally Posted by Arnold15 [View Original Post]
-
04-28-20 16:48 #317
Posts: 1812Originally Posted by Pistons [View Original Post]
It will be your human right to refuse the vaccine. But it will other's right to stop you travelling if you are not vaccinated. I, for sure would refuse to deal with people like you, and I believe I will be part of a huge majority. And last, of course, as an ICU doctor, I would refuse to treat you, should you come to my unit with respiratory distress.
-
04-28-20 16:00 #316
Posts: 1812Originally Posted by MrHo [View Original Post]
Vietnam war? 50000.
Holocaust? 6.000.000.
First WW: 10 Millions.
Japanese invasion of China? (200000 Chinese casualties just in Shanghai).
-
04-28-20 15:58 #315
Posts: 1812Originally Posted by MrHo [View Original Post]
Still waiting for the scientific links proving efficacy of Avigan, in which patients (young, old, mild, severe).
-
04-28-20 15:54 #314
Posts: 1812Originally Posted by ShooBree [View Original Post]
But if you had been in Bergamo end of March you may have changed your mind.
Anyway, I have worked in Sweden many years, and know well the Swedish mentality, very friendly, I liked my time there, but terribly arrogant, they always know better. I was there when Olof Palme was assassinated. They always thought that this kind of things could never happen in their wonderful free society. And could only happen in the uncivilized parts of the world I. E south of Malmoe. Same about them teaching us, those guys living near the Mediterranean, how we should treat better our North Africans immigrants. Now look at the mess they are in with their own, Malmoe is a no-go area.
-
04-28-20 15:47 #313
Posts: 1812Originally Posted by Sirioja [View Original Post]
But what is 100% sure is that once a smoker gets it, his risks of having severe pneumonia and death are much higher. Based on hose facts, everyone can choose and decide what to do or not to do.
-
04-28-20 15:31 #312
Posts: 936Singapore University of Technology and Design has a set of predictions on when coronavirus might end worldwide and for many counties.
https://ddi.sutd.edu.sg/when-will-covid-19-end
-
04-28-20 15:05 #311
Posts: 5648Originally Posted by ShooBree [View Original Post]
I think the difference between back then and now is firstly, there are many more people in the world today and international travel is greater now so that disease spread is easier and more rapid. Furthermore the world is much more politicized now and leaders retaining their position in government is highly dependent on containing the virus within their respective countries. Sweden's approach is worth study and reminiscent of 1968-70; what is interesting is that its death rate via covid 19 is less than most other European countries with severe lockdowns.
-
04-28-20 14:26 #310
Posts: 737True but
Originally Posted by Downandup [View Original Post]
This pandemic has taught us a lot, for example, the German health care system is far more effective than that of France, Italy, Spain and the UK. I am now comparing large countries, the mortality rate figures do not use the exact same methodology, but the numbers are so far apart it is very hard to deny that the Germans have handled this very well.
I like comparing like for like and not completely different countries for the reasons you quoted. In this way it is interesting to note why Belgium's figures were so high and you are right, it is not indicative of policy or its health care system. I was also interesting to compare Switzerland and Austria, Austria has handled this quite a bit better than Switzerland, which has a private health care system, you can draw your own conclusions but I have long thought that the public system in German and Austria is a lot better than the private on in Switzerland. However the private system in Switzerland seems to be a hell of a lot better than the public one in the UK.
About the different lock down regimes, Switzerland has a relatively lax one and Czechia has a very strict one and the statistics will show glaring differences. When you compare countries you do have to be careful and I have had a keen interest in Statistics for over 30 years and I try to be careful.
I am surprised by the slow progression of the disease in Japan given the population density it has, but even though I do not find our infamous Japanese's mongers explanation convincing, it does sound like a nationalist diatribe, however I think he has a point that social distancing is a cultural norm anyhow in Japan and that is what is keeping the numbers down. For sure their statistics might not be comparable, but the discrepancies are too large.
But if you do not compare countries, then how could you ever infer the difference in outcomes from different policies?
-
04-28-20 13:51 #309
Posts: 936It's a mistake to compare counties
It's important to know that each country is counting Coronavirus deaths using their own different methodology and at varying pace.
Look at Belgium which has the highest death rate around the world - 631 per million. But they are also being very aggressive in counting anyone who could possibly have died from Coronavirus and count everyone who died everywhere.
Compare that to the UK where it's 317 deaths per million but that only counts those who have died in hospital. It does not count those who have died of coronavirus in rest homes or in the community. Also the Office of National Statistics latest report is up to April 17 as it takes time for death certificates to be recorded. It reports that deaths are double the five year average. So not all deaths that could be related to coronavirus are being counted. The real death toll in the UK could be 45,000 and still be climbing.
Then there are counties where pneumonia deaths are unusually high but there's been few deaths from coronavirus.
I'm using this link for the reporting: https://www.statista.com/statistics/...n-inhabitants/.
-
04-28-20 13:31 #308
Posts: 264Originally Posted by Dreams [View Original Post]
I am much more exposed than personnel (this means All persoennel at hospital), since I travel with Metro, go in shops, and walk among people etc, without any protection at all.