Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!

[Pessimist]

So tell me more about how much it hurts you that I do Americaning better than you? Feed me more of that sweet sweet rage so I know how much my little stalker still thinks about me.

These homeless hobos in San Fran poop on the streets everywhere. You are that street poop on ISG. I don't think about you anymore than pedestrians think about poop when they are walking the streets of that city. They curse the hobo (MacShit), they sidestep the poop (you), and they move on.

[Escape Artist]

An obsessed stalker says what?

[Escape Artist]

I can't even read it since the AI faked pic requires an ISG sub.

Can only tell very diffuse shadows. Looks like the number is single digit thousand dollars. And he claims to have money?

"Have money"? No, just more than a fraud trying to gain credibility from strangers on a hooker forum. Made that point pretty clear multiple times. Considering that the earning difference was already there 6-7 years ago when coming off a fellowship salary, the chasm between a desk jockey working a dead end job and myself has only grown in multiplicity since 2016.

I mean, it's pretty obvious when looking at the "advice" given. No one with actual capital picks one stock or two and hopes for the best. A guy that only looks for homerun balls is someone who doesn't have the ability to safely collect $80-100 K from 8-10% of a $1 million portfolio. Instead, he has has to rely on taking $10 K and hoping to 10 x. Dude is still stuck in the penny stock investment "strategy" of a 2010 26 year old.

You know what's definitely not AI generates? This interaction:

Never said anything about a supermodel, but she was prettier than most supermodels. I can say the same about alot of FKK girls.

I once broke up with a supermodel (she was too tall). And went to school with one miss universe girl, and worked with another. There were several sexier girls I knew at the time. Maybe two of them were 8's. Nothing more.

How about you go AI generate something a little more believable or was this another attempt at "humor."

[Pessimist]

Oh you silly little man. As always, you show you're just some guy who thinks he has it all figured out when forgetting obvious details, maybe because your blind rage for little old me. You keep trying to make points that no one was making.

1. Criticism was regarding how ridiculous it is for the the OP to brag about 1 month Intel gains when an SP500 semiconductor ETF (XSD for example) outpaced it it during the time frame. Seems that you purposely ignore such an obvious criticism when you brag about gains of a stock when it underperforms the blue chip etf within it's own sector. If you can't see why intel is compared to it's own sector, then well, you're more hysterically blinded by rage towards me than even I would have thought. I feel like I'm debating a Trumpy, antivax, flat earther.

2. I have yet to brag about a stock because that's is my original criticism in the first place: bragging on stock picks, how tacky. I did however answer yours and the other pee pee questions when asked..

LOL.

You have a million posts "debating" Pistons and Siri and a couple of others. And you have the shameless temerity to talk about being obsessed. However, debating those two might be the most productive part of your shitty life because the only other thing you do is servicing your cell master Macshit.

We both know you are a worthless piece of shitbing, too broke and too ashamed of it. You were openly talking about living in rental cars because you couldn't afford a hotel room and that was in 2019. Nevertheless, even in the fictional world you built for yourself on ISG, you can't keep up with your lies and numbers. Hence, in one sentence you rag on another poster for his INTC returns and in the next sentence brag about your fictitious and worse returns! I can only assume your retarded brain is the result of malnourishment growing up in your CCP shitland.

[Pessimist]

So tell me more about how much it hurts you that I do Americaning better than you? Feed me more of that sweet sweet rage so I know how much my little stalker still thinks about me.

Americaning? Only if you live forever on ISG. Which in your case is true. Out in the real word, you will always be the CCP shit midget. Ripped off by Romie tutes in the clubs and despised and pitied out on the streets in the country you sneaked into illegally, dingbat.

[Pistons]

I can't even read it since the AI faked pic requires an ISG sub.

Can only tell very diffuse shadows. Looks like the number is single digit thousand dollars. And he claims to have money?

[Escape Artist]

CCP shitbing. You are not and will never be an American. Your pathetic desperation to belong comes through but you will always be a CCP dungworm, taking orders from your cell leader MacShit. Even in your shitland, you must be particularly low on the hierarchy. There are millions of emigrants from China who did well. You OTOH are having to defecate in your rental car and living paycheck to paycheck.

So tell me more about how much it hurts you that I do Americaning better than you? Feed me more of that sweet sweet rage so I know how much my little stalker still thinks about me.

[Escape Artist]

I hate Motley Fool! Why does it always pop up in my Google searches while I cannot even bash their half assed mediocre flawed analysis full of holes in them? I think there is an opportunity for a competitor to them. But what they do excel in is Google optimization.

Sounds like the algorithm recognized a sucker so it's pushing ads that are appropriate for said sucker.

[Escape Artist]

1. Buying too early is the same as loosing money.

2. The only stocks I've written about here are stocks where I first wrote when I bought them. Thus the rest of your post is flawed.

3. You are too dumb of a guy to waste bandwidth on.

Once again, no logic. You seem to think you make sense but it does not. If your claim is that you've only invested in 2 stocks and win big on both then well, perhaps you should just stop while you're ahead.

You make blanket points that use personal claims as facts. Well only a fool would believe you. Will keep citing supermodel claim is it seems to be the most hilarious claim of all. But the denial is even funnier as I can just keep reference, since you know, you keep getting caught up in that lie.

Anyway, it's not believable that a person seems to time the market completely correctly every time, especially over the past 3 years, not taking any losses, getting out at the most perfect time, not holding any stock assets at all for losses in 2022, then just happens to pick 2 stocks with 2 stocks winning positions at just the right time. Yeah, sure. And I'm a championship cyclist winning a Formula 1 race in an old Audi while making hookers orgasm in the front seat with my 12 inch cock.

Oh brother. The mental illness I see here in guys like you. I do appreciate the posters like you though. You all give me the chance to talk trash to trash humans who deserve it.

[Escape Artist]

Retarded piece of CCP shit.

From the end of 2015 to end of 2023, inclusive of reinvested divi, INTc was up 82%, S&P 500 169%, SoX 617%.

From the beginning of 2015 to end of 2023, INTC returned 78% (incl reinvested dividends), S&P 500 173% and SOX 605%.

These are straight from Bloomberg terminal.

This MurseShit Bing just makes up numbers (as he fabricated owning Intel in the first place. This dung worm can't even afford a hotel room when in Germany).

It's funny how he conveniently referenced Semis and AMD as comparisons for Intel in the last month of 2023 but compared to S&P 500 for the period from 2015 to now when he claims to have owned Intel.

Not that it matters. He didn't own anything other than the shit stuck to his face, in 2015 or 2023 or any other time.

If anything, INTC returns would be even worse if not for the $15 upswing since October 2023. In that sense, it's hilarious that this shit fucker trashes INTC returns in the last few months but proudly brags about owning INTC since 2015.

There is a reason this shitface works for MacShitXing as a lowly sidekick.

Oh you silly little man. As always, you show you're just some guy who thinks he has it all figured out when forgetting obvious details, maybe because your blind rage for little old me. You keep trying to make points that no one was making.

1. Criticism was regarding how ridiculous it is for the the OP to brag about 1 month Intel gains when an SP500 semiconductor ETF (XSD for example) outpaced it it during the time frame. Seems that you purposely ignore such an obvious criticism when you brag about gains of a stock when it underperforms the blue chip etf within it's own sector. If you can't see why intel is compared to it's own sector, then well, you're more hysterically blinded by rage towards me than even I would have thought. I feel like I'm debating a Trumpy, antivax, flat earther.

2. I have yet to brag about a stock because that's is my original criticism in the first place: bragging on stock picks, how tacky. I did however answer yours and the other pee pee questions when asked.

I see you went through the trouble of gathering intel versus SP500 8 year rate of return. Too bad no one said investing in intel was better than investing in S&P 500 over the past 8 years. I did however state that my personal rate of return investing in intel was 11%, outpacing the S&P returns over that time. You do realize that increasing and lowering positions is a thing right? A person's actual rate of return differs from the the asset rate of return when they increase and decrease their positions right? You considered that before you went through the trouble of making this post right? Right? Or did you write your entirely long post, supporting your facts, in a field you primarily earn your dollars without factoring all the details? Oopsies.

I will admit that I was a bit off as S&P yields were closer to 12% annual so my personal return was slightly lower. See that? I admitted a mistake. Things well adjusted people do. Not closet Trumpers who are too arrogant to ever admit fallibility.

3. The rest of the post was the same old Tourette's same old. Stop being so obsessed with me dude. It's not healthy. It's a creepy sickness that you can't let it go, you uptight little man.

[Pessimist]

Oh probably something to do with Intel doubling from 2015 to 2020 with an additional 2.5 to 3.5 dividend yield, up to as much as 5% in late quarter of 2022, meanwhile reinvesting dividends and adding more to my my position when buying recent post pandemic crash, all amounting to an 11% annual rate of return the stock crashing 2 years ago and still besting the S&P500. So there's that.

Poor people look to pick hot stocks. People with actual capital have diverse portfolios that absorb down turns and profit during recoveries. You would know that if you understood simple compound interest and weren't an internet fraudster who desperately tries to con people into thinking that he is anything but worthless.

Key Red flags:

1. Only disclosing wins but never losses.

2. Ugly, broke guy who claims to date super models.

Retarded piece of CCP shit.

From the end of 2015 to end of 2023, inclusive of reinvested divi, INTc was up 82%, S&P 500 169%, SoX 617%.

From the beginning of 2015 to end of 2023, INTC returned 78% (incl reinvested dividends), S&P 500 173% and SOX 605%.

These are straight from Bloomberg terminal.

This MurseShit Bing just makes up numbers (as he fabricated owning Intel in the first place. This dung worm can't even afford a hotel room when in Germany).

It's funny how he conveniently referenced Semis and AMD as comparisons for Intel in the last month of 2023 but compared to S&P 500 for the period from 2015 to now when he claims to have owned Intel.

Not that it matters. He didn't own anything other than the shit stuck to his face, in 2015 or 2023 or any other time.

If anything, INTC returns would be even worse if not for the $15 upswing since October 2023. In that sense, it's hilarious that this shit fucker trashes INTC returns in the last few months but proudly brags about owning INTC since 2015.

There is a reason this shitface works for MacShitXing as a lowly sidekick.

[Pessimist]

Yes Mad Lib and Trumpian.

Surely you realize that the contents and pattern of your post indicates some form of Tourette's or being mental unhinged. Your obsession with me indicate an even deeper mental illness. My advice: 1. Deal with the fact that I'm a better American than you. 2. Get help bro.

CCP shitbing. You are not and will never be an American. Your pathetic desperation to belong comes through but you will always be a CCP dungworm, taking orders from your cell leader MacShit. Even in your shitland, you must be particularly low on the hierarchy. There are millions of emigrants from China who did well. You OTOH are having to defecate in your rental car and living paycheck to paycheck.

[Pistons]

What the pee pee brothers don't get is the big picture. They're clearly too blinded by range and desire to one-up and denigrate to have any meaningful discussion or hammer out the facts. Their personal flaws and insecurities clearly shine through as they seem obsessed to make irrelevant points as to who did what first, bought this at what price, blah blah blah, while the point from the beginning, the actual point that matters, is that there is a charlatan masquerading as an investing expert while making cringey boastful posts about investment prowess while never ever indicating any losses. Complete red flag of a fraud.

1. Buying too early is the same as loosing money.

2. The only stocks I've written about here are stocks where I first wrote when I bought them. Thus the rest of your post is flawed.

3. You are too dumb of a guy to waste bandwidth on.

[Pistons]

CCP Dumbfuck. "A point no one was making"? Who is the shitworm that claimed "I bought Intel even before you did" as if being earlier gives you some primacy. You are a retard, alright!

Mad lib. Trump. Coming from this Asian shitBing midget. My advice: Stick to your shithole country's politics.

He doesn't even get my initial point that buying early equates to loosing. And he still believes in 10 posts later. Retard is a soft word with him.

[Pistons]

I agree with what you're saying. What I reacted to in the previous post was a lottery winner, if we are to believe him, who pretended to be an expert.

Not sure if you refer to me as a lottery winner. However, I do stand by my definition of the stock market just being a casino. But like with poker, there is always a layer of skill. Not everyone has it.