Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!

[Pistons]

What the pee pee brothers don't get is the big picture. They're clearly too blinded by range and desire to one-up and denigrate to have any meaningful discussion or hammer out the facts. Their personal flaws and insecurities clearly shine through as they seem obsessed to make irrelevant points as to who did what first, bought this at what price, blah blah blah, while the point from the beginning, the actual point that matters, is that there is a charlatan masquerading as an investing expert while making cringey boastful posts about investment prowess while never ever indicating any losses. Complete red flag of a fraud.

1. Buying too early is the same as loosing money.

2. The only stocks I've written about here are stocks where I first wrote when I bought them. Thus the rest of your post is flawed.

3. You are too dumb of a guy to waste bandwidth on.

[Pistons]

CCP Dumbfuck. "A point no one was making"? Who is the shitworm that claimed "I bought Intel even before you did" as if being earlier gives you some primacy. You are a retard, alright!

Mad lib. Trump. Coming from this Asian shitBing midget. My advice: Stick to your shithole country's politics.

He doesn't even get my initial point that buying early equates to loosing. And he still believes in 10 posts later. Retard is a soft word with him.

[Pistons]

I agree with what you're saying. What I reacted to in the previous post was a lottery winner, if we are to believe him, who pretended to be an expert.

Not sure if you refer to me as a lottery winner. However, I do stand by my definition of the stock market just being a casino. But like with poker, there is always a layer of skill. Not everyone has it.

[Pistons]

If someone follows something like the Motley Fool, they advise someone to own 20 stocks to achieve diversification. 20 can do the job of diversification. As far as poor people gambling and why they do it look no further than the popular example of poor people buying lottery tickets. Rich people do not buy lottery tickets. There is also a popular book called the Psychology of Money that has entered the Zeitgeist which is probably a German word, ha, ha.

I hate Motley Fool! Why does it always pop up in my Google searches while I cannot even bash their half assed mediocre flawed analysis full of holes in them? I think there is an opportunity for a competitor to them. But what they do excel in is Google optimization.

[Pistons]

To be fair, it was probably Charlie Munger who is being loosely quoted. Also, if Charlie Munger or Warren Buffet were investing with smaller sums of capital they would invest in fewer companies. They have spoken to the issues of investing large sums of money in the market. One issue is that it moves the market. They would be totally different investors if they were investing less money. Not everyone is a stock analyst like they are, but that is a different point.

Could have been Charlie as the interview had both in them, but I do think it was Warren.

Still, their definition of the amount of money needed to go beyond the 5/6 stocks is probably more than most of us have. And probably in the tens of millions. Unless we have it as a full time job.

[Pistons]

You're talking about investing to someone who doesn't have significant capital. He has no significant assets to protect nor does he have the ability to use large capital to produce significant gains. It's the mentality of someone looking from the bottom up so the only tools he has are those of desperation. I was guilty myself when I was in my early thirties playing catch up to my peers. Even in 2022 when most tech heavy investors took big hits, at least my defensive positions held and I was able to absorb the huge losses so that the 2023 rebound wiped them out. Things change when you acquire more capital, when you have families to support, or when you approach retirement and risk tolerance changes. Without any of those things, I have a feeling he took huge losses in 2022 but didn't have the ability to wait out the storm so now he still seems desperate to find ways to recover.

I didn't hold any stocks in 2022.

Restarted in 2023 with Adobe.

I did trade a lot between 2009 and 2013 before I sold off and bought my apartment. Big wins and big losses, and high stakes. Even derivatives in raw materials and 5, 10,15 x trades. I run more safe now, thus 100% win rate so far. But as mentioned, not many trades yet.

[Pistons]

Dude,

Berkshire Hathaway owns much more than 5 stocks.

Or saves your worst picks. It's for a reason that global index funds are the safe choice.

Buffet still said that in an interview once. 5 or 6.

[Sirioja]

After 2 world wars, from 1972 til 1990 , Germany used to almost always win at the end, defeating magic Oranje on 1974 and French dream team best ever on 1982. But now, they already lost their number 13 magic Bomber and yesterday their leader Kaizer, when guys with spirit like Karl Heinz Forster finished since long time. When one of my model to learn to play modern football was Rainer Bonhof, when now square feet Rudiger, or no spirit like Leroy Sane or Gnabry and Germany don t win anymore. Another time. Nevertheless, I remember Oranje romantism on 1974, versus Berti Vogt who should have been kicked out after 1 mn for his intentional fault on magic Johan Cruijff, but it was in RFA, West Germany when was the wall. To listen to Pink Floyd for the wall.

[Escape Artist]

What the pee pee brothers don't get is the big picture. They're clearly too blinded by range and desire to one-up and denigrate to have any meaningful discussion or hammer out the facts. Their personal flaws and insecurities clearly shine through as they seem obsessed to make irrelevant points as to who did what first, bought this at what price, blah blah blah, while the point from the beginning, the actual point that matters, is that there is a charlatan masquerading as an investing expert while making cringey boastful posts about investment prowess while never ever indicating any losses. Complete red flag of a fraud.

[Escape Artist]

CCP Dumbfuck. "A point no one was making"? Who is the shitworm that claimed "I bought Intel even before you did" as if being earlier gives you some primacy. You are a retard, alright!

Mad lib. Trump. Coming from this Asian shitBing midget. My advice: Stick to your shithole country's politics.

Yes Mad Lib and Trumpian.

Surely you realize that the contents and pattern of your post indicates some form of Tourette's or being mental unhinged. Your obsession with me indicate an even deeper mental illness. My advice: 1. Deal with the fact that I'm a better American than you. 2. Get help bro.

[Pessimist]

LOL, this guy. So obsessed and triggered by me, some random dude on the internet, for over 3 years while arguing some random point because he's such a spaz and argues a point no one was making. The rest, same same rambling, mad lib blah blah.

Gives repressed liberal who really votes for Trump in secret vibes.

CCP Dumbfuck. "A point no one was making"? Who is the shitworm that claimed "I bought Intel even before you did" as if being earlier gives you some primacy. You are a retard, alright!

Mad lib. Trump. Coming from this Asian shitBing midget. My advice: Stick to your shithole country's politics.

[Ararat]

If someone follows something like the Motley Fool, they advise someone to own 20 stocks to achieve diversification. 20 can do the job of diversification. As far as poor people gambling and why they do it look no further than the popular example of poor people buying lottery tickets. Rich people do not buy lottery tickets. There is also a popular book called the Psychology of Money that has entered the Zeitgeist which is probably a German word, ha, ha.

I agree with what you're saying. What I reacted to in the previous post was a lottery winner, if we are to believe him, who pretended to be an expert.

[BobNSuzy]

Dude,

Berkshire Hathaway owns much more than 5 stocks.

Or saves your worst picks. It's for a reason that global index funds are the safe choice.

If someone follows something like the Motley Fool, they advise someone to own 20 stocks to achieve diversification. 20 can do the job of diversification. As far as poor people gambling and why they do it look no further than the popular example of poor people buying lottery tickets. Rich people do not buy lottery tickets. There is also a popular book called the Psychology of Money that has entered the Zeitgeist which is probably a German word, ha, ha.

[BobNSuzy]

Dude,

Berkshire Hathaway owns much more than 5 stocks.

Or saves your worst picks. It's for a reason that global index funds are the safe choice.

To be fair, it was probably Charlie Munger who is being loosely quoted. Also, if Charlie Munger or Warren Buffet were investing with smaller sums of capital they would invest in fewer companies. They have spoken to the issues of investing large sums of money in the market. One issue is that it moves the market. They would be totally different investors if they were investing less money. Not everyone is a stock analyst like they are, but that is a different point.

[Sirioja]

Whatever you say, dumb CCP shit. Pushing mid 40's, broke, shame to his immigrant community, spending his last buck on a few cheap tutes and sleeping in rental cars. What a miserable life!

I sleep really good in white leather in my V8 S5 and when I push button to hear sound of thunder, I get hard. Funny in Germany, when I arrive behind, no need to make lightning, they go to the right when they hear V8 thunder and no Akrapovic I don't want, just more open to make engine breathing deeper and now also with admission like for race, rather than Audi shit plastic valves. Same shit than Haldex which want to kill You when You want to go over grip. I much prefer good old mechanic quattro, the real one.