Thread: Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!
+
Add Report
Results 8,251 to 8,265 of 12059
-
03-14-21 05:33 #3809
Posts: 2367Originally Posted by HammerTime96 [View Original Post]
-
03-14-21 05:30 #3808
Posts: 2367Originally Posted by Pistons [View Original Post]
-
03-14-21 05:27 #3807
Posts: 6686Do you know Peter Daszak? The guy who lead the international investigation into the Wuhan lab on behalf of WHO?
Well, aside from the fact that he first let China get 12 months to prepare, clean and hide all traces, here is a fine interview by him 9 months ago where he splurged how easy it is to tweak the spikes on the corona viruses:
https://youtu.be/IdYDL_RK--w
He also knew the Wuhan lab personell who were studying bats gathered from Yunnan.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02473-4
So now go figure why this is also being covered up in the west.
But later on after the investigation was done, this same fraud of a guy suddenly turns 180, contradicts himself and say this very idea is impossible that the virus would come from the lab who were studying this transmission. Something he 8 months earlier in the interview I linked easily stated how easy it was.
Not to mention Li-Meng Yan's claim on top of this and how she said she knew the people who did the tweaks, and had talked to many of them about it several times.
-
03-14-21 05:26 #3806
Posts: 2367Originally Posted by Sirioja [View Original Post]
-
03-14-21 04:57 #3805
Posts: 6686Originally Posted by BigBuddy69 [View Original Post]
Anyway, you cannot be very good with Google if you were unable to find it.
https://www.businesstoday.in/current...ry/428119.html
I also read the original statement. And that statement was tweaked after 3 days. As I said, due to crisis management.
And no, I am not sharing my sources. You really think I would jeopardize my job? How dumb can someone be?
Also, by looking at the number of shots having been made here prior to the news, and taking lag into account, I came up with 10 000 only. And this was after only 1 out of 2 jabs by the way.
-
03-14-21 03:37 #3804
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by RockyV [View Original Post]
However, I differ on one point. I don't believe the metaphor in the end paints the best portrait of reality. "Crocodile-infested river" is a little inaccurate. His camp does have something right. The super majority of people without chronic disease who are middle age or younger will likely only suffer from mild to moderate symptoms and rebound without much ill effects, at least not while they remain young and healthy. Briefly however, post covid sequelae including exertion intolerance and neurological symptoms from headaches to epilepsy remain a point of concern and investigation.
The point I prefer to make, which I still have yet to hear a rebuttal, is the scenario of an alternative responses to COVID19.
Should we have done nothing and let the disease run its course? In that scenario, Are we okay with NYC, Wuhan, and Lombardy situations all over the world? Do we let every hospital system in every major city in the world break down as they did in those first hard-hit areas?
Or should we have isolated only the elderly and at-risk population while letting everyone else resume normal activity? As seen with the Winter Holiday surge, even *with* restrictions, people still exposed their at-risk loved ones. So what would be the end game to release the at-risk from their banishment as they still continue to helplessly die off? Would it be, *gasp*, vaccines?
Other solutions?
-
03-14-21 02:08 #3803
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by Canary [View Original Post]
-
03-14-21 00:31 #3802
Posts: 180They are still using AstraZeneca in France, which is their and. 1 and because well. They are French!
(but there is a rumor that they might stop it, and that would be not before 6 months and only after huge medias pressure).
Originally Posted by HammerTime96 [View Original Post]
-
03-13-21 23:04 #3801
Posts: 6686Originally Posted by BigBuddy69 [View Original Post]
I'm just a simple guy that way.
-
03-13-21 22:51 #3800
Posts: 66863 more health workers under the age of 50 now hospitalized due to brain bleeding caused by blood clots related to the AZ vaccine. So far only health workers have been given the AZ vaccine here, and not too many have even received them. Maybe just 3-5000.
Also, I wouldn't even want a blood clot anywhere on my body. Lifethreatening or not.
-
03-13-21 22:47 #3799
Posts: 717Originally Posted by Clodius1 [View Original Post]
This 'virus' is so deadly that you need to be tested to see if you even have it, and this 'vaccine' is so good and reliable that you need to be forced to take it. Go figure.
On the WHO website: https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_....20.265892.pdf.
Page 7:
The median infection fatality rate across all 51 locations was 0.27% (corrected 0.23%).For people < 70 years old, the infection fatality rate of COVId-19 across 40 locations with
available data ranged from 0.00% to 0.31% (median 0.05%); the corrected values were similar.
History has plenty of examples of vaccines that were rushed to market in order to satisfy the commercial (read: money) lust of the pharmaceutical companies. Here are some;.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-d...-of-wild-virus
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1383764/
The Thalidomide scandal has shown that pharmaceutical companies don't give a fuck about humans, they only care about a quick buck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide_scandal
n the late 1950s and early 1960s, the use of thalidomide in pregnant women in 46 countries resulted in the "biggest man‐made medical disaster ever,"
-
03-13-21 22:16 #3798
Posts: 22248Originally Posted by Adindas [View Original Post]
-
03-13-21 21:37 #3797
Posts: 22248Originally Posted by PaulInZurich [View Original Post]
-
03-13-21 20:46 #3796
Posts: 22248Originally Posted by Turgid [View Original Post]
-
03-13-21 19:11 #3795
Posts: 537Once and for all
Originally Posted by HammerTime96 [View Original Post]
When a drug is introduced into the market it is subject to continued monitoring. This is because having tested it on a few thousand people will not give you the absolute certainty that it is going to work in other people with different comorbidities. Under normal circumstances, the few cases of serious adverse events that have been observed for AZ vaccines would not be worthy of notice because they occur at a very low frequency if you take into account the number of AZ vaccines that have been administered. However, because you would need to vaccinate billions of people, there is an even attention on the reported adverse events. The more serious ones, seem to occur at a handful of cases per million. Now would you across a bridge that has 1 in a million chances of collapsing or would you prefer to swim across an crocodile-infested river where you have significantly more chances to even die?