Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!

[HammerTime96]

Japanese youth don't even have sex anymore and for God's sake, their porn is even pixelated!

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...041.html%3Famp

What do you think it the whole point of those silly face diapers and "social distancing?" To stop people from reproducing.

What long term psychological effect do you think this has on the current teenagers? It's all part of the George Soros "Open Societies" plan to socially engineer the world. This website is probably on his pay roll, hahaha!

[Sirioja]

Some do. Some don't. But in general, a colder climate makes people more introvert in the Nordics. And I do believe a colder climate may be the reason for less sex than say in Spain or Brazil. A colder climate has all sorts of problems with it. Ranging from higher levels of depression and lack of vitamin the, to people getting sleepier during the winter. Leading to less sex. Once the spring and the sun arrives again, people get instantly horny.

But there are many factors in this, and I do think the entire schooling system in Europe and America is based on religion. And population control. Thus leading to less sex. But that is just part of the picture.

They should rub to warm up.

[Pistons]

I admittingly incorrectly applied the term sexually repressed in regards to Sweden as Nordic countries are pretty sexually liberal in practice, their cultures just don't exude sexuality. But even though they are liberal minded to it, do they actually have much sex?

Some do. Some don't. But in general, a colder climate makes people more introvert in the Nordics. And I do believe a colder climate may be the reason for less sex than say in Spain or Brazil. A colder climate has all sorts of problems with it. Ranging from higher levels of depression and lack of vitamin the, to people getting sleepier during the winter. Leading to less sex. Once the spring and the sun arrives again, people get instantly horny.

But there are many factors in this, and I do think the entire schooling system in Europe and America is based on religion. And population control. Thus leading to less sex. But that is just part of the picture.

[Mursenary]

Sexual repression in a country is where sex is frowned upon and regarded as a sin which means that Japan, Sweden and Singapore are not sexually repressed countries hence their peaceful outlook. Brazil, Colombia, Honduras, El Salvador, etc. are highly religious societies with pervasive teachings about sexual abstinence. Do not confuse the existence of prostitution in a country with open sex attitudes. Prostitution is hugely frowned upon in Roman Catholic societies which Latin American countries are.

LOL at Roman Catholic trope. Have you ever been to a Latin American Carnival? A Latin American night club? Or ever met an Italian man? "Pervasive teachings about sexual abstinence", yeah okay.

I admittingly incorrectly applied the term sexually repressed in regards to Sweden as Nordic countries are pretty sexually liberal in practice, their cultures just don't exude sexuality. But even though they are liberal minded to it, do they actually have much sex?

But Singapore? Japan?

Lack of Sex in Singapore.

http://factsanddetails.com/southeast...ntry-3745.html

In 2005, condom-maker Durex ranked Singapore for three straight years near the bottom of its list of sexually active nations. among 34 nations in the frequency Peter Edidin wrote in the New York Times, Singaporeans do not appear especially, or even adequately, eager to have sex. In an annual global sex survey conducted by Durex, a condom manufacturer, Singapore ranked last, for the second year in a row, among 34 nations in the frequency with which men and women reported having sex. (Hungary is No. 1.) According to another study, of 1000 Singaporeans younger than 40, conducted by professor Victor Goh of the National University of Singapore, only 25 percent of men and 10 percent of women wanted sex more than six times a month.

Japanese youth don't even have sex anymore and for God's sake, their porn is even pixelated!

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...041.html%3Famp

Nearly a third of Japanese people are entering their 30s without any sexual experience, according to research.

The country is facing a steep population decline as a growing number of youngsters abstain from sex and avoid romantic relationships.

[Sebastiane]

We all love Romanian girls and many of them tell us they are Bucharest or Constanza (but we know not all of them will be from these two places!

So I'd like us to list all the places girls have told you they come from in Romania.

[The Cane]

Sexual repression in a country is where sex is frowned upon and regarded as a sin which means that Japan, Sweden and Singapore are not sexually repressed countries hence their peaceful outlook. Brazil, Colombia, Honduras, El Salvador, etc. are highly religious societies with pervasive teachings about sexual abstinence. Do not confuse the existence of prostitution in a country with open sex attitudes. Prostitution is hugely frowned upon in Roman Catholic societies which Latin American countries are.

And yet it's all over the fucking place in Latin America LOL! That's where I learned how to be a monger.

[Paulie97]

Sexual repression in a country is where sex is frowned upon and regarded as a sin which means that Japan, Sweden and Singapore are not sexually repressed countries hence their peaceful outlook. Brazil, Colombia, Honduras, El Salvador, etc. are highly religious societies with pervasive teachings about sexual abstinence. Do not confuse the existence of prostitution in a country with open sex attitudes. Prostitution is hugely frowned upon in Roman Catholic societies which Latin American countries are.

You avoided his point about Muslim states. And, as always, the best points are the ones that are ignored. Also Latin America is widely seen as "the left wing" of the Catholic Church. In Medellin vendors often sell sex toys in Parque Bolivar in front of Catedral Basílica Metropolitana. Sex in the minds of the average person is of the minor sins that might warrant a few extra seconds in purgatory, if it's viewed as a sin at all.

[Turgid]

............. Upon inspecting that, societies like Japan, Sweden, Singapore, etc are pretty sexually repressed but also very peaceful. Most muslim states have low incidence of violent crime but are obviously very sexually repressed.

https://www.nationmaster.com/country...ountries/Crime

As previously stated, numerous countries with open sex attitudes have pretty high violent crime rates, Brazil, Colombia, basically nearly all south and central American countries.

Sexual repression in a country is where sex is frowned upon and regarded as a sin which means that Japan, Sweden and Singapore are not sexually repressed countries hence their peaceful outlook. Brazil, Colombia, Honduras, El Salvador, etc. are highly religious societies with pervasive teachings about sexual abstinence. Do not confuse the existence of prostitution in a country with open sex attitudes. Prostitution is hugely frowned upon in Roman Catholic societies which Latin American countries are.

[Rocky V]

The Assyrians, Persians, Greeks, Vikings and Romans were very warlike. Early in their civilizations they were very constrained and rigid towards sex; however, with growing wealth from their military conquests they then became very liberal towards sex with orgies, etc. thus becoming more peaceful resulting in vulnerability to outside attack ending in declining empires.

Romans in Pompei invented the first brothels with five types of sex for sale: intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio, active anal sex, and passive anal sex. Then the volcano erupted! https://theconversation.com/the-grim...-pompeii-88853 and http://www.pompeii.org.uk/s.php/pomp...-en-214-s1.htm.

[Sirioja]

Here is what the WHO has to say about face masks: (download the. Pdf file on the lefthand side).

https://www.who.int/publications/i/i...l-coronavirus-(2019-ncov) -outbreak.

Quote from page 6: "Results from cluster randomized controlled trials on the use of masks among young adults living in university residences in the United States of America indicate that face masks may reduce the rate of influenza-like illness, but showed no impact on risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza. (62,63) At present, there is no direct evidence (from studies on COVID- 19 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19. ".

So with "no direct evidence" on 'the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people," the politicians and media continue to act like dictators and keep in insisting everybody wears a face diaper with all possible negative side effects, which include self-contamination!

Quote from page 8:

"Potential harms / disadvantages.

The likely disadvantages of the use of mask by healthy people in the general public include:

potential increased risk of self-contamination due to the manipulation of a face mask and subsequently touching eyes with contaminated hands;(48,49).

potential self-contamination that can occur if non- medical masks are not changed when wet or soiled. This can create favourable conditions for microorganism to amplify;..

So clever and good example and image Trump experience about his crazy talks. I wish Slovenian Ivana will feel good.

[Mursenary]

Notwithstanding the Nordic model and some of their pc stuff, the Swedes are far from repressed when it comes to sex. I've spent enough time with Swedish students to know that.

Yeah, somehow in conversation, social rigidness turned into sexual repression, didn't mean that. I just meant that the culture and customs as a whole doesn't breed an environment of sexual expression.

[Samplerr]

Upon inspecting that, societies like Japan, Sweden, Singapore, etc are pretty sexually repressed but also very peaceful. Most muslim states have low incidence of violent crime but are obviously very sexually repressed.

Notwithstanding the Nordic model and some of their pc stuff, the Swedes are far from repressed when it comes to sex. I've spent enough time with Swedish students to know that.

[Pessimist]

I feel somewhat uneasy reading posts about such low level statistics of people having sex per year. I need sex every day. Except maybe bad days when I am under the weather or someone is sick in the family. I would self describe as a workaholic, yet regardless if I work 12 or 14 hours or more, I want sex. Do it before bedtime, in the morning, before or after lunch, doesn't matter, I want it once a day. Like eating, breathing, exercising, laughing, sleeping, whatever you do as a living organism. And I am not trivializing sex, I view it as a soulful, healthy, and always respectful connection between me and my delightful girl du jour. If I can afford to pay her, isn't it wonderful for both of us? Do I need to report statistics how many times I sleep or eat per year? I just don't get it why it's so popular to alienate sex from a common daily experience.

Yes, porn helps, but it cannot substitute a warm, hot body of a beautiful girl, the smell of her hair, perfume, her hand on my balls, do I need to go on? Occasionally watching porn is fine, but not as adequate replacement of a normal intercourse. I think it's a dangerous misconception which, regrettably, has already made itself firmly into mainstream of today's life. Watching porn together with a partner is, of course, a completely different story.

I am w / you on the porn substitution. A real woman and her touch and smell simply cannot be substituted by masturbation coupled w / porn. That does not mean I have not used masturbation or porn, but it is a poor, poor substitution and highly unsatisfactory.

As for frequency of sexual activity, I would also wish healthy, frequent sexual activity for everyone but I doubt that reality matches that wish.

1. For a large number of people, sex is simply not that important. First, I think for women it is clearly a lot less important than for men. Everything else being equal (age / health / worries about making money etc), a man would want good sex but also frequent sex and may want to keep having it many times but a woman is likely to be satisfied with quality sex that is less frequent. Perhaps women place a lot more importance on quality while men want both and are willing to compromise on quality to make up in quantity. Many rich men become playboys but there are very few stories of rich women being playgirls and fucking dozens of new young studs weekly.

If there was a FKK catering to women where women can go and fuck naked men parading around in the club as we do w / girls, it is very doubtful that there are sufficient # of women in the world to support dozens of such clubs as currently exist. Assume for a minute there is no social taboo, women are free and have enough money, etc. Even with all those, the chance that women would fly from around the world, drive from France every weekend as our friend does, to fuck 5 guys a day for 6 days in a row is close to zero. And in fact, money permitting, it is easy for women to do it. We men can't finish so many times a day but women have no such issues. But my firm belief is that there will be no demand for such clubs from women.

2. There is a mismatch between people needing / wanting sex and those able to have sex. For example, there may be many horny men who can physically have sex, willing to compromise on looks and other things, and would have sex twice a day 365 days a year, but don't have a willing partner, but the guy does not have skills and game / partner / money / other things to make that sex happen. On the other hand, there will be many people who have money and have the means, have a sexual partner / relationship but don't have sexual drive to have sex frequently. If one partner is interested in sex then that partner would be sexually frustrated, and if the partner is also equally disinterested then it will be a sexless marriage / relationship.

3. With age / health / job stress / other reasons / sexual desire simply dies / wanes for many people.

People, especially mongers here, compute mental averages with the thinking they are in the middle. That is a huge mistake when it comes to sex and ISG members. We take weeks off, fly across the world, spend several grand a year, just for sex. We are probably 0. 00001% of world's men in that regard. To us sex is very important. To think our situation is representative of an average adult in the world on the topic of sex is the biggest mistake we can make, just as Bill Gates thinking everyone in the world is as secure about money as he is.

[Mursenary]

Sex gives peace of mind while lack of sex makes men irritable, edgy and aggressive. Men who have regular sex want peace. Men with high testosterone and full balls who do not enjoy coitus initiate wars. Very religious countries where intimate physical interaction between men and women is disapproved of are the most warlike countries.

Kings and the oligarchy class have the power to start wars, not the masses, and those powerful people are hardly ever the sexually repressed. Kings, emperors, sultans, senators, etc have their balls drained on a regular basis so built up sexual tension is ever hardly their reasoning for starting wars.

If anything sexual (although it is more likely to due to poverty and education), a better measuring stick for your thesis is internal violence within societies as that reflects the mental state of the masses. Upon inspecting that, societies like Japan, Sweden, Singapore, etc are pretty sexually repressed but also very peaceful. Most muslim states have low incidence of violent crime but are obviously very sexually repressed.

https://www.nationmaster.com/country...ountries/Crime

As previously stated, numerous countries with open sex attitudes have pretty high violent crime rates, Brazil, Colombia, basically nearly all south and central American countries.

[Mursenary]

The Assyrians, Persians, Greeks, Vikings and Romans were very warlike. Early in their civilizations they were very constrained and rigid towards sex; however, with growing wealth from their military conquests they then became very liberal towards sex with orgies, etc. thus becoming more peaceful resulting in vulnerability to outside attack ending in declining empires.

While it fits your narrative, there is nothing in historic literature that backs your claims that those societies were sexually constrained and rigid early in their histories. Feel free to provide source so I can educate myself.

Middle ages England and Europe e. g. Spain during the inquisition were very strict religious societies with much sexual repression resulting in numerous military conquests that led to world domination. With the decline of religion in those countries and sexual liberation England and Europe's place in the world has declined significantly. The US was once a very religious and sexually repressed country and rose to dominate the world militarily. The powers that be in the US are seeking to continue sexual repression in order to have a military edge over its enemies.

Decline and rise more easily explained by events of War War 2. Besides, the American attitude towards sex has always been and still is relatively repressed and the loosening of that attitude from the 20's through the 90's only correlated to a rise to power, not a decline. From Puritan America to the Great Depression, America was not a superpower and was even more sexually repressed. European collapse due to tens of millions of lost lives, infrastructure destruction, and political musical chairs better explained Europe's decline rather than, "sexual liberation equals less war. "