Thread: Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!
+
Add Report
Results 10,561 to 10,575 of 12093
-
10-04-20 16:03 #1533
Posts: 22334Originally Posted by Turgid [View Original Post]
-
10-04-20 14:16 #1532
Posts: 5670Originally Posted by Mursenary [View Original Post]
-
10-04-20 13:26 #1531
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by Pessimist [View Original Post]
-
10-04-20 03:36 #1530
Posts: 410I feel somewhat uneasy reading posts about such low level statistics of people having sex per year. I need sex every day. Except maybe bad days when I am under the weather or someone is sick in the family. I would self describe as a workaholic, yet regardless if I work 12 or 14 hours or more, I want sex. Do it before bedtime, in the morning, before or after lunch, doesn't matter, I want it once a day. Like eating, breathing, exercising, laughing, sleeping, whatever you do as a living organism. And I am not trivializing sex, I view it as a soulful, healthy, and always respectful connection between me and my delightful girl du jour. If I can afford to pay her, isn't it wonderful for both of us? Do I need to report statistics how many times I sleep or eat per year? I just don't get it why it's so popular to alienate sex from a common daily experience.
Yes, porn helps, but it cannot substitute a warm, hot body of a beautiful girl, the smell of her hair, perfume, her hand on my balls, do I need to go on? Occasionally watching porn is fine, but not as adequate replacement of a normal intercourse. I think it's a dangerous misconception which, regrettably, has already made itself firmly into mainstream of today's life. Watching porn together with a partner is, of course, a completely different story. Once I had great time watching Tinto Brass's Paprika with a lovely girl in my hotel room in Bonn, ordering pizza, drinking wine, convincing her to stay overnight and eating her pussy at 4 o'clock in the morning while she watched lesbian porn on her phone, then making her cum hard, pushing me away from her sweet juicy fuckhole. When am I alone, I prefer genuine, unscripted amateur porn, capturing glimpses of sincere lust between the partners.
Staying in touch and chatting with FKK girls helps me to cope with my basic needs in these horrible times. They are my angels, my lovely fuck mates, my buddies and friends. I love them. My last FKK visit was New Years Eve in January. I had 5 rooms and filled the rubber each and every time, all 5 standard 30-minute rooms! These ugly stats on sex per year per month per country per men per women sicken me. I wish all people loved sex as a healthy gift from nature without prejudice and poison of fictitious societal "norms".
-
10-04-20 02:37 #1529
Posts: 4759EL: including the new promising virus covid 19 which seems to be a very good offer.
-
10-03-20 23:23 #1528
Posts: 1385Originally Posted by Mursenary [View Original Post]
At best, these types of ranks can be done for a few western countries. I regard these articles as being more for fun. I of course enjoy reading them. But they should never be treated as any sort of definitive reference points on sexual activity.
Secondly, look at a few other links. These are from quick Google searches, I am not vouching for any of their authenticity.
https://www.healthline.com/health/ba...uples-have-sex#The-Average.
The link above says "According to David Schnarch, PhD, through a study conducted with more than 20,000 couples, he found that only 26% of couples are hitting the once-a-week mark, with the majority of the respondents reporting sex only once or twice a month, or less!
Mind you, these are couples. It may be even less (or more; I don't know) for singles. For example, a single person w / o a partner may not have sex for several months or even years. I would not be shocked if many middle aged or older single women are totally inactive sexually. Some single men may be playing the field or seeing pros, but many single men may also be quite inactive. I had roommates in college and grad school who were quite shy and had almost no sex for many months or years. None. I know these people exist, and these were actually educated guys who were pleasant and nice, just shy or had no game.
To be measuring this across the population, it has to be a true sample: 18 years to 85 years, across all types of health conditions, ethnicity, income levels, etc. (healthy young people to older, obese, handicapped, ailing, homeless to what not). Limiting such a study to just couples in the 30-55 age bracket for example gives bogus interpretation.
https://flowingdata.com/2017/07/03/married-people-sex/
This above link says 25% of all adults have sex 2 or more times a week. So, 75% are at less than twice a week. 18% did not have sex even once in prior 12 months, 10% had sex just once or twice in the past 12 M, 13% had sex once per month. That is, 41% of all adults had sex in the range of 0 to 12 times a year.
If you look at the age groups, 64% of the 55 and older are in that 0 to 12 times a year range. If you look at the same stats by marital status, 48% of separated people, 50% of divorced people, 86% of widowed people have sex anywhere from 0 to 12 times a year. The most sexually active people are the married people and never married people. The last chart in the article shows sexually activity is higher if a person is married vs never married in each age group.
It is obvious from those numbers in the above link that sexual activity decreases with age. So, as western societies age, it would make sense that people are sexually less active than they were 40 or 50 years ago.
I think the data for this link above is US survey; I have no idea if this applies to other countries.
When I google for sexual activity in third world countries, the amount of data that can be pulled up is scant. Which was my original point.
Here is one link:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...2.2009.02283.x
"Global Better Sex Survey sexual aspirations and unmet needs of men and women from Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand.
Methods:8195; To qualify, respondents must have had sexual intercourse at least once in the past 12 months. Women must have had heterosexual intercourse. Data were weighted by population size between countries.
Results:8195; Of 3538 Asian respondents (1776 men and 1762 women), 52% were aged <40 years, 40% were aged 40–59 years, and 8% were aged ≥60 years. The majority were married or in a relationship. Men and women reported having sexual intercourse 5. 1 and 4. 0 times monthly, respectively. ".
So, it seems this survey was (in multiple Asian countries, but developed Asian countries in fact) limited the survey to people who had sex at least once in the last year. Of those, the average activity is 5. 1 times a month for men and 4 times for women. That is 61 times for men, 48 for women. Neither one comes to the 100 number, and remember this is of those people who had sex at least once. In the flowing data study, nearly a fifth of adults did not have sex even once in the last 12 M. Plus, I don't know how honestly this link above in the Asian study balanced the population to include all the other factors (people with bad health, low income, etc).
India has a billion people and China has a billion (actually, more like 1. 35 to 1. 4 B each). Together, they make 36% of world population. I could not find any good links on how often people have sex in those nations, across all sections of population. You can find some specific sub-sections of population but not the entire population.
So, I come back to my original question: How can any publication claim to rank countries by sexual activity when there is no accurate data available about incidence of sex across the entire population in even the advanced countries let alone all 200 odd countries in the world?
-
10-03-20 22:36 #1527
Posts: 6729Interestingly the legalization of P6 has been voiced as a a positive in regards to reducing sex repression. I haven't read studies regarding this, but the idea is floating around. So there is something moving in regards to our hobby.
We just have to tackle the feminists main argument first: abusive pimps. And this can be hard to track. But this is also why I am a supporter of blockchain money. It would be over and out for pimps. And also for the feminists main argument. Thus opening up for p6 in a lot more countries.
And Amnesty International is an avid supporter of p6 too as it even can empower poor women.
-
10-03-20 22:30 #1526
Posts: 6729I don't know what the reason for sexual repression levels are in certain countries, but I have a strong feeling that these things could change with the right social programming through media channels and schooling system.
Actually it seems my country has some PR companies working on improving these things. And I bet more countries might be looking at the same thing.
I also lived in one of the Asian countries, and discussed the topic with a lot of people there. Male and female. And I got a sense that the reasons were a bit different in Asia. At least seemingly it seemed to be highly work related to long working days. But one may also argue that is part of the reason also in some European countries.
If people are more at home, they will generally fuck more.
-
10-03-20 21:06 #1525
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by Turgid [View Original Post]
-
10-03-20 20:48 #1524
Posts: 1385Originally Posted by Turgid [View Original Post]
-
10-03-20 20:45 #1523
Posts: 2073Originally Posted by Turgid [View Original Post]
Cross-referencing "most religious nations" against Global Peace Index: The most "warlike" as measured by GPI would be Afghanistan. Not surprisingly, Afghanistan's population has a median age of 19 and is near the bottom in terms of GDP (PPP) per capita. Citizens of UAE and Qatar consider themselves religious (91 and 95 percent respectively). However, both rank relatively high on Global Peace Index. I think we can attribute this to their high GDP (PPP) per capita: Qatar's is highest in the world. UAE is 7th highest.
https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/gdp-per-capita/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Import...ion_by_country
http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uplo...019-web003.pdf
Originally Posted by Mursenary [View Original Post]
-
10-03-20 20:32 #1522
Posts: 22334Originally Posted by BrahmaPoutre [View Original Post]
-
10-03-20 20:31 #1521
Posts: 2344Originally Posted by Pessimist [View Original Post]
Also, remember you are looking from your point of view, some one who appears to be educated and might have spent a large part of your youth getting your education and career building. That population generally spends more time in a stressed state and makes less time for sex. Carefree young couples generally spend more time in the sack than the high achieving, career-driven pair.
But you are right, polling for questions like these has to be taken with a great degree of doubt. It reminds me of polling for penis size. I imagine guys inflate their numbers. And as far as I can tell, women are terrible at gauging measurement of penis size. From their point of view (hopefully waist height) and to great benefit to our ego's, I think it looks bigger to them than it really is. A girl once quoted 18 cm for me and I had to grab her 20 cm heels for comparison to show her that I fell several cm short of that mark, hah!
-
10-03-20 17:16 #1520
Posts: 5670Originally Posted by McAdonis [View Original Post]
-
10-03-20 04:41 #1519
Posts: 1385Originally Posted by McAdonis [View Original Post]
I personally don't believe most of those numbers. The average person is not having sex 80 or 90 times a year if you take all the people of population, from young to middle age to old, from married to unmarried to shy to no GF / BF for long stretches, unattractive people, people averse to sex, shy people, homeless people, drug addicts, frigid women, so on so forth. Even well off middle aged couples in marriage who work 40 hrs a week with children have so little energy during a week to have sex. May be once or twice is a great week. And when they have no steady relationship, there is no sex for many months at a stretch.
Frankly that whole article is BS in my view.