Thread: Monterrey
+
Add Report
Results 2,236 to 2,250 of 4900
-
06-03-11 20:04 #2665
Posts: 1383Originally Posted by Monterreydude [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Monterreydude [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Monterreydude [View Original Post]
And for your information, AK47s are NOT mass produced in the US. They are manufactured in what were formerly Russian States, Eastern European Countries like Romania, Bulagaria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, etc...and CHINA!!!
They are illegal to even import from China into the US, by order of Bill Clinton, and they can not be imported from Eastern Block Countries without their having to make significant modifications to their design so as to conform with the Gun Control Act of 1968.
The cartels, and other criminal syndicates, are getting AK47s from other sources, most likely through countries like Guatemala, Russia, Eastern Block Countries...Those countries are where the mass production of AK47s occurs in the world, and especially with respect to fully automatic AKs, which are illegal in the US. Simply put, they are smuggled in. They do not originate in Mexico from the US in great numbers through a corrupt US Gun Registration System, nor is the AK47s issued to US Military personnel.
Originally Posted by Monterreydude [View Original Post]
That really is an infinitesimal number of weapons in the big scheme of things, correct???
That is less than 6% of the total that was legally sent to the Government of Mexico at their request, $177,000,000 of legally sold weapons sold to Mexico by the State Department. If you research the expenditures for arms purchased by the Mexican Government, that $177,000,000 is probably infinitesimal in and of itself. But, you are talking about 6% of just the expenditure for arms by the Mexican Government made legally through the US.
The majority of illegal weapons entering Mexico do not come through ill-legitimate sources in the US... So,
I stand by what I said...of the amount in addition to the $1777,000,000 sold legally to the Mexican Government by the US State Department, there are Millions upon millions of additional dollars sold to the Mexican government via other countries, sold to the Mexican Government for the Mexican Government's Arsenals, weapons not manufactured in the US, weapons not issue to US Military personnel, and weapons not permitted to be imported into the US for sale to the civilian general public.
Some of what is recovered in Mexico in possession of the cartels is probably part of the $177, 000, 000 worth of arms sold legally to the Mexican Government by the US State Department. But, that has absolutely NOTHING to do with some kind of leniency loophole in US Gun Registration Requirements for average US citizens. It has more to do with corruption at every level of Mexican Government.
Some like to blame the Civilian Market in the US for all of Mexico's illegal guns, but where in the HELL is the $177,000,000 worth of LEGAL arms sold to the country of Mexico that are unaccounted for?
-
06-03-11 19:50 #2664
Posts: 74Originally Posted by Unspongebob [View Original Post]
-
06-03-11 19:31 #2663
Posts: 1383Originally Posted by El Cazador [View Original Post]
-
06-03-11 16:44 #2662
Posts: 1388Let me point out one thing.
Mexican Federal Police, army, marines do not carry AK-47's.
This is pure BS from the NRA:
"Millions upon millions of additional dollars have been sold to the Mexican government via South American governments (ie: Guatemala, etc.) , a number of European Governments, and the Chinese government, hundreds of millions of dollars in total, consisting mostly of surplus armaments, all of which were sold at the request of the "MEXICAN GOVERNMENT" for their own arsenals."
This is not the Iran-Contra dealings.
Mexico buys from the US directly. They do not need to triangulate their deals.
Again: A sure sign that if Mexico would be buying from Asia would be the armament and every single piece of weapons and ordenance in the hands of Mexico comes from the US.
Again: Why the hell would Mexico buy weapons from China if we have the US to the North!
"The arms flowing into the hands of criminals in Mexico are NOT coming solely from a civilian US market through a corrupt firearms registration system as has been accused. The numbers of those weapons finding their way into Mexico is infinitesimally small, and of NO CONSEQUENCE WHAT SO EVER."
Lets see the "infinitesimally small" numbers:
This represents 700 guns:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/01/26...-smuggle-ring/
This is "over" 300 guns.
http://www.kpho.com/news/26908225/detail.html
And this is the US allowing the sales of guns to Mexico via Fast and Furious BS.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/...20039031.shtml
The "ifinitesimally small" numbres go way above 2000 weapons in less than 6 months. And these are the ones we know of.
No of course not.
Weapons in Mexico do not come from the US.
Originally Posted by Unspongebob [View Original Post]
-
06-03-11 15:01 #2661
Posts: 51Originally Posted by Unspongebob [View Original Post]
You insult monterrey and mexicans born and live here with you know everything atitude. I never go to united stated foro and try to behave that I know everything because I do not.
You appear to be the fool to everyone that live here in monterrey and mexico. I feel bad for you monterrey friend here on this foro as anyone that live here know that you are a fool. You insult and embarass when you speak.
-
06-03-11 13:46 #2660
Posts: 1383Originally Posted by El Cazador [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by El Cazador [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by El Cazador [View Original Post]
In Mexico, one has to be "SIGNIFICANTLY" discriminating when choosing friends. Not too many are even eligible. My friends have passed the test with flying colors.
In Mexico, there are simply too many people whose sole objective is to sabotage others if it gains them even as little as 5 pesos.
There are simply too many whose self serving motivations cancel out any sense of loyalty with respect to true friendship.
With friends like that who needs enemies...
Originally Posted by El Cazador [View Original Post]
The primary motivation of some seems to be aimed at discrediting my perceptions of Mexico. But, while the reader may not be familiar with the affiliations and activities of some of my detractors, the offenders know that I am savvy to the scope of their activities and motivations.
Some Mexicanos are a part of the problem in Mexico, capitalizing on the mayhem, and not particularly caring that their country is being destroyed in the process. Unfortunately, an disproportionate percentage of Mexican society is engaged in profiteering. They don't care that their own activities are contributing to the demise of Mexico as we know it. They're perfectly content selling out their country by participating in, and/or promoting the mayhem in an effort to profit modestly from their own contribution, and/or through their complicit "do nothing" acceptance of how things are.
-
06-03-11 08:39 #2659
Posts: 74SpongeBob,
I don't think your "unpredictable" lifestyle in Monterrey really buys you as much as you think it is. If you become a target, it doesn't matter where you are: in a crowded restaurant, in a military convoy, in an underground bunker, wherever you are the bad guys would be able to track you down. Guys have tracked you down from info you posted on the forums, so I don't think the professionals who hunt down elusive rivals, would have much challenge. You claim to reside in Monterrey now, so does that mean you sleep under the same roof every night? (I haven't figured out if you actually do live in Monterrey now, or if you just say so on the forums in order to try to boost your credibility and maybe to elude people who might try to find you).
Your real only defense is in not becoming a target. Keep being nice to folks you meet in Monterrey, because I really don't think you realize how defenseless you would be if you ever became a target. I think the risk of a misunderstanding when regularly associating with the type of people who work in clubs where drug use flourishes, with ties to criminal syndicates, and with the illicit sexual intimacy the risk is non-negligible. The clubs themselves have not been venues for violence but I think there are a lot of dangerous people there, and mixing with them could be hazardous.
You say it's all in the past and that now you only go to different clubs, and talk to different people. Maybe so, but the sex underworld in Monterrey is not that big, so if you are still active it'd be tough to hide. Or maybe you don't go to clubs at all any more, which to me is an admission that you think the risk has become too high. I do believe the risk for visitors coming down for a few days is very low, but it is when you establish relationships and become a regular that you are more likely to encounter the types of problems which happen in Monterrey. It is perfectly possible to monger in stealth mode, but the manner in which you have operated is anything but stealthy.
-
06-02-11 22:27 #2658
Posts: 1383Originally Posted by Dad Fun 555 [View Original Post]
It occurs to me that you do not even subscribe to your own advice if you attend the clubs yourself, enough to know the reputation of Unspongebob among them, and yet you still choose to patronize them, apparently enough that you have been questioned numerous times about our knowing each other.
You call attention to yourself just by being a Gringo, and draw even further attention to yourself, whether you think you are or not, by acknowledging you know of me. You are as recognizable in the clubs as I am therefore.
Why then, do you believe that you're not susceptible to the same dangers that you say I endure, and you say all mongers endure when they enter the clubs?
The difference between us is this...If I truly believed the clubs were as dangerous as you say you believe they are, I would not patronize them at all. Yet, you're right there in the barrel of snakes yourself.
You do not believe your own rhetoric or you would not be in the clubs. And, if you really do believe all your rhetoric, do you think you're untouchable? Do you think that just because I am recognized by a few hungry waiters and few MILFS that remember me from five years ago that I am somehow more vulnerable than you are, or that I am more vulnerable than all the hombres that frequent these bars on a much more regular basis than I do?
If you frequent the bars enough times to be asked if you know me, and you don't apparently have the trepidation that you say we all should have because we're supposedly just two steps away from offending hordes of drug dealers and their girlfriends, why are you there???
You are the one advocating that we all stay home due to the insurmountable dangers, not me. See how inconsistent your comments are with respect to your own behavior? Your own behavior betrays your true opinion...
-
06-02-11 21:52 #2657
Posts: 51Originally Posted by Unspongebob [View Original Post]
And you mention pro. There is no need for pro or no-pro because nothing is to be done against the cartels. They are enforcing there own law and order and victimizing the people here. You insult us with your know everything atitude.
You are not to be qualify to make the opinion of what is happen here in mexico or monterrey right now. I feel bad for your monterrey friend here on the foro because he live here and knows you say very foolish things.
Nobody want to have a fool as the friend.
-
06-02-11 20:18 #2656
Posts: 1383Originally Posted by Dad Fun 555 [View Original Post]
At that time, the risks associated with being recognized were not nearly as great as they are today. Suffice it to say that my reputation lingers in places that I no longer frequent, and with some girls and waiters that I rarely ever see.
Simply put, I don't do things that risk some kind of retaliatory reaction from individuals in the clubs. And, while it may seem that I am active in the clubs, my patronage of them has diminished considerably over the years compared to ten years ago. My activities in the clubs are not nearly as predictable these days, and my reputation live on in my absence. With respect to some kind of conspiracy that someone might want to perpetrate upon me, what most of them have is a memory of me, and very little opportunity to actually plan much of anything. My activities are not predictable.
I freely admit that I am a little more vulnerable than the average one time visitor due to my having some visibility in a very finite number of clubs. My reputation and "familiarity" lingers with some that rarely, if ever, actually still see me.
But, that is exactly my point when making recommendations to people visiting Monterrey for the first time, or even when advising the occasional visitor. The average visitor has no little or no recognition in the clubs, and risks even less than we do.
After all, they now associate you with me, whether you like it or not. Better not go, or you may be targeted as a friend of the Gringo.
Anyone can be targeted for criminal activity. And, with respect to Mexico, I do assume some risks as a result of my presence in Mexico, and due to the recognition factor in some of the bars, not because it is dangerous for the average visitor, but because my notoriety in the bars contradicts my preference to maintain a low key presence. And, even then, I am still infinitely safer than those that are immersed in Mexican society on a
day-to-day basis.
Remember, my own notoriety in the bars is a result of my patronage of those bars over a period of ten years, long before the dangers had risen to their current level in Mexico. My persona and reputation in the bars has been well established for many years. Reversing that trend for me is much more difficult than others heeding my advise to lay low.
-
06-02-11 18:27 #2655
Posts: 74SpongeBob,
The idea that you are a "phantom in the night" is a laughing riot, because as a gringo in the clubs I am automatically asked if I know the "the man who brings cookies" upon meeting anybody in the clubs. The amount of personal information available which you have either posted directly on the forums, or easily available for the cost of a couple of ladies drinks is unprecedented. You are one of the most famous and prolific patrons of Monterrey's commercial illicit sex district, an area of town so notorious that 99% of local guys are too scared to even take a [CodeWord140] there.
Fortunately you have a reputation of being a nice guy and being harmless, but should you ever become a target, the odds aren't in your favor. The bad guys are equipped to battle military and disposing a defenseless gringo without a trace would be an easy job. Mongering is inherently a social activity. It doesn't take much imagination to think of many scenarios where a monger could become a target, and could easily be the result of a misunderstanding where you did nothing wrong. What if a lady you're close to gets knocked up? Think they're going to wait around for the paternity tests and the court case, or maybe they just want revenge for deflowering their darling princess? Mexican justice.
I haven't seen much published about the subject, but it has always been my operating assumption that the various criminal syndicates are heavily involved in prostitution in Monterrey. That a large number of patrons are low level gang members. It is true pretty much everywhere so is probably a safe assumption about Monterrey also. A big portion of the women are drug users so you are two degrees from all sorts of drug dealers. With all that is known about the drug situation in Mexico, it just seems like playing with fire to willingly insert yourself right into that world.
-
06-02-11 16:04 #2654
Posts: 1383Again, for the millionth time, my contention has always been that Mexicanos, living in Monterrey, and forming social bonds and affiliations, not only with individuals, but also with many different private institutions, schools, government agencies, social organizations, banking affiliations, etc...are much more prominently on the radar than visiting Gringos, or Gringos living in Monterrey.
Due to this fact, the Mexicanos living in Monterrey have a much greater likelihood of being the victims of the violence and mayhem.
That has always been my contention. I have never disputed that for Mexican Nationals, that the potential for violence is significantly greater with respect to cartel violence and criminal victimization. Anyone that represents my position otherwise is being disingenuous with my representations. All these years of issuing recommendations, I have always qualified my statements that those recommendations are made to the benefit of visitors, and Gringo residents that are smart.
My recommendations with respect to visiting Monterrey, have always been directed toward Gringos, either Gringos visiting Monterrey, or Gringos living a low key existence in Monterrey, and not directed toward Mexican Nationals living in Monterrey, who should know the score, but seemingly often fail to actually prove it by revealing any details to back up their own recommendations with respect to the purpose of the ISG.
My comments concerning the abduction of individuals, and some of the targeting that goes on with respect to criminal activities, most recently this incident in Bario Antiqua for example, just confirms my theory that Mexicanos are their own worst enemies, sometime innocently and through no fault of their own, at least with respect to exposure to the dangers through their inclusion into the fabric of Mexican society. That is what escalates their danger level significantly, their membership in Mexican society.
We Gringos, Gringo residents of Monterrey, or Visitors, have little or no inclusion into Mexican society compared to the Mexican National, and we enjoy a significant insulation from that single fact. We also suffer the exclusion that comes with that reality. But, our goals and objectives don't adversely affect our mongering, just our legitimate social lives. But, not to the extent that we really care too much. Our priorities are what they are.
After all, we are not a part of Mexican society, and we do not appreciate what we are apparently missing. What we don't know, and haven't had the pleasure of experiencing with respect to the positive aspects of inclusion in Mexican society doesn't adversely affect us...Ignorance is bliss.
Mexican Nationals have a much greater degree of exposure to the violence that exists. In my own case for example, I do have a very small group of friends and acquaintances. I am simply not on the radar in Monterrey like I would otherwise be on the radar were I a life long resident of Monterrey, nor am I on the radar in Mexico to the extent that I am on the radar in the US, where I grew up, and where I still have significant ties to Gringo society.
In Mexico, I do not fraternize with a large circle of friends, I have no institutional affiliations, I have little or no contact with government, other than application for Visas, I have no bank account, deal in cash, etc...That's why I say that visitors, and/or Gringo residents, if they are wise, are significantly less likely to be targeted by the cartels if they remain low key.
Mexican Nationals, especially those that have lived in Monterrey for long periods of time, and have all the social and institutional connections to Mexican society, they are the ones at a considerably higher risk of being victimized. I freely admit that, and I was one of the first ones to point it out, even as my detractors like to misrepresent my position by calling me naive.
I am criticized that I must be naively denying the potential danger, and the large numbers of victims of the violence. Because, according to them, I don't live in Monterrey, and don't know large groups of people here...
They say that I must be a casual visitor to the area with little or no appreciation for what is really going on.
But, it isn't a matter of my knowing large statistical numbers of people that have been victimized. I choose not to know large groups of people, or immerse myself in Mexican society, and for a very good reason, out of self preservation.
Just because I make recommendations for visitors that they're subject to very slight danger levels by visiting the clubs, doesn't mean that I don't understand the dangers inherent in Mexican society as a whole for Mexicanos.
The reality is that there is a much lower likelihood that a very low key Gringo, living in Monterrey, or a visitor to Monterrey, with little or no quantifiable social connections to what is undeniably a corrupt society, will fall victim to that same corruption that plagues the Mexicano that is socially and institutionally immersed in the fabric of that corrupt and dangerous society.
You stick out like a sore thumb, and I am a phantom in the night, and so are visitors to Monterrey, if they're smart. That is the distinction!
So, in your zeal to discredit my interpretation of what is and is not safe, apparently out of hatred and jealousy, you eagerly attempt to distort my published assessment of things as it relates to how things really are within the context I've described.
Things are relatively safe for a vast majority of visitors to Monterrey, especially infrequent Gringo visitors with little or no affiliations to expose them to the dangers, as compared to the average Mexican citizen who has all the connections to what can only be described as a corrupt and criminally oriented society.
My detractors, in their zeal to contradict me, fail to think logically, actually agreeing with me more often than not. But, they miss the point of my recommendations to others, and what I predicate those recommendations on, that those recommendations are not directed toward Mexican Nationals living in Monterrey.
I know my own strategy, and my relative low key existence compared to the average Mexican, that it significantly insulates me and other visitors as well from what plagues the fabric of Mexico society. The immersion of Mexican citizens into a corrupt society is what plagues them, while simultaneously insulating "us," to a certain extent, at least to an extent whose risk is justified with respect to dividends.
Someone once accused me of knowing all of (7) people in Monterrey. Well, I know many more than that, but I am aloof, distant, close to the vest, cautious, and private with all others. My own strategy with respect to protecting myself is to limit contacts socially, to limit contact with government, to limit institutional contact and affiliations, to limit financial reporting (ie: banking), and to limit as much exposure to Mexican society as possible.
This is not something the average Mexican has the luxury of doing, nor do they want to engage in that kind of discipline to remain safe, even if they could. It is very hard to disappear in your own ethnic society, nor would most people want to do it.
I realize that. But, I also realize that the average visitor, and for most wise Gringos living in Mexico, it is the best strategy. And, it is also what protects the average visitor from the dangers that expose the average Mexicano, and this must be what makes my detractors so incredulous at hearing my recommendations.
My recommendations on ISG concerning whether to monger here, Mr. Mexicano, are not directed at you. They are for the average visitor, and the wise Gringo living in Monterrey. I am sorry you're a victim of your own society, the corruption, the criminal acts, the thievery, etc...Truly, I am very sorry.
But, I also know that by my having the ability to insulate myself from your world, I am protected more thoroughly. That is my recommendations to visitors as well. Stay low key, and you will be fine...
-
06-02-11 12:41 #2653
Posts: 1383First, the means by which a group can perpetrate civil war is entirely dependent on their ability to procure weapons.
Some blame the supposed "leniency" of US guns laws for the weapons being discovered in the hands of the cartel members, and independent criminals.
It has now been revealed that $177,000,000 worth of military grade weapons were "SOLD" to the "MEXICAN GOVERNMENT," authorized by the US State Department at the request of the Mexican government, not the types of weapons manufactured or even made available for civilian consumption. Of that $177,000,000, the Mexican government can not account for the disposition of those weapons once they were received.
The $177,000,000 were military grade weapons, ie: machine guns, grenades, etc..., which consists of the majority of the kinds of weapons that are being found in the possession of cartel members, and in the possession of independent criminals with no cartel affiliation, (ie:freelancers).
These are not the types of weapons consumed by the US civilian market, and regulated by the Gun Control Act of 1968, the regulations that govern civilian sales of firearms in the USA.
Millions upon millions of additional dollars have been sold to the Mexican government via South American governments (ie: Guatemala, etc...), a number of European Governments, and the Chinese government, hundreds of millions of dollars in total, consisting mostly of surplus armaments, all of which were sold at the request of the "MEXICAN GOVERNMENT" for their own arsenals.
WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY IS IT TO ACCOUNT FOR THE DISPOSITION AND SECURITY OF THOSE WEAPONS ONCE THE WEAPONS ARE SOLD AT THE REQUEST OF THE "MEXICAN GOVERNMENT," AND DELIVERED INTO THE HANDS OF MEXICAN GOVERNMENT OFFICALS?
This is about rampant wide scale organized, and many individual disorganized, criminal enterprises, perpetrated by a statistically small number of professional criminals, and a disproportionately high number of average Mexican Citizens, Soldiers, Mexican Government Officials, and corrupt Mexican Military Officials, etc...all engaged in criminal activity for profit, and in some cases at the lower level, for their very survival.
The arms flowing into the hands of criminals in Mexico are NOT coming solely from a civilian US market through a corrupt firearms registration system as has been accused. The numbers of those weapons finding their way into Mexico is infinitesimally small, and of NO CONSEQUENCE WHAT SO EVER.
The political rhetoric aimed at blaming US leniency for the availability of weapons in Mexico is ludicrous at best. The US civilian firearms market has not substantially contributing to the illicit arms problem in Mexico. The instance of 1000-2000 weapons that the ATF permitted to be sold to straw party purchasers by US gun dealers along the border, with the permission of the inept Obama Justice Department, are totally and completely inconsequential statistically.
Now we know that those weapons are coming into Mexico at the request of the Mexican Government, and sold on the black market to the cartels and independent criminals by a huge disproportionately high number of dishonest, traitorous Mexican Government Officials, and low level government workers having control of the arms inventory itself.
We have always known that Mexicans themselves are fueling the destabilization Mexico, while Mexicans point the finger at the US, blaming the US with their anti gun political rhetoric. But, Mexicans aren't doing it for some political "civil war" kind of motivation. They are doing it for economic reasons, and not to acquire "power," or for organized political reasons. Undoubtedly, there are those desiring to destabilize the government to acquire their own brand of power. But, they could not prevail without the complicit cooperation of a disproportionately high number of average citizens joining the mahem for economic reasons.
That is criminal enterprise for profit, and TREASON...But, it is NOT a civil war...Criminal Enterprise is out of control within Mexico, and with a disproportionately high government and civilian participation for "profit."
Mexico is on the road to potential civil war...but, they are not there yet. If civil war develops, it will be because the a greater proportion of average Mexican citizens feel they are so deprived of economic opportunity that they receive greater support from the criminal enterprises than they do from the opportunity provided by government policies.
If an ever increasing number of average Mexicans continue to feel a greater sense of security through their participation in crimes, and support of organized crime, then government will become a failed state.
If government fails to make opportunity available, and it fails to discipline the traitors within their own ranks through trial and eventual execution of the guilty, then civil war will likely develop over time.
-
06-02-11 01:18 #2652
Posts: 51Originally Posted by Dad Fun 555 [View Original Post]
This subject of this war is no longer drugs. This is about power. This is a civil war.
I would take the avise of some foolish americans that don't actually live here with a grain of salt even if the person claim to come here for thirty years.
-
05-30-11 18:45 #2651
Posts: 74Originally Posted by Bbond [View Original Post]