Thread: General Info
+
Add Report
Results 1,666 to 1,680 of 7222
-
04-12-20 05:02 #5557
Posts: 3160Originally Posted by TjBrazil [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by TjBrazil [View Original Post]
Given that we had 24,000 people die of the flu last year and it kills you in weeks versus 13,000 who died of AIDS when it takes decades, why are you not doing influenza swabs?
-
04-11-20 22:40 #5556
Posts: 225BroScience
Originally Posted by TjBrazil [View Original Post]
-
04-10-20 10:26 #5555
Posts: 1165Originally Posted by SeekingHead [View Original Post]
-
04-09-20 14:40 #5554
Posts: 225Originally Posted by Uthred [View Original Post]
-
04-09-20 04:39 #5553
Posts: 46Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
Also during this time we had Nancy Reagan on TV preaching morality. This had an effect on the CDC began advising to abstain from sex & if you had to have sex then use a condom.
-
04-09-20 02:05 #5552
Posts: 97Originally Posted by YyzTravel [View Original Post]
http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/...=Abbreviations#t.
-
04-08-20 21:16 #5551
Posts: 225Originally Posted by Jockey16 [View Original Post]
-
04-07-20 00:54 #5550
Posts: 16Originally Posted by Bienenstich [View Original Post]
-
04-06-20 07:18 #5549
Posts: 3160Originally Posted by Duncan216 [View Original Post]
Back in the early 90's heterosexual AIDS transmission were listed as 6% of all cases. That number was used as the basis for the USA Exploding to having 60 million cases of AIDS which never happened. The important thing that was not asked was how the numbers were obtained. In short, people were asked their risk factors. That is it. That was the science. It was assumed back then that no one lie about shooting up drugs or being gay. It was stupid as fuck.
When you look at results, and you get 0-0. 011 transmission results, and you get results that suggest there is zero to 11 in 100,000 rates of transmission. How do you know those 11 in 100,000 transmissions didn't occur due to some other behavior? You don't. In fact, it is insulting to me to even suggest that there that is HIV transmission due to normal heterosexual activity. The only reason to list it is because you believe it is true versus some kind of error in testing.
Then you look at how effective testing is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OajiyoWmKiE.
And the testing is nowhere specific or sensitive enough to make that determination.
If you really want to go in depth, this is a great read about HIV and AIDS in Africa: https://abrahamson.medill.northweste..._22Nov2001.pdf.
Hetreosexual AIDS was a myth concocted by the CDC in the late 1980's to make money. Period. That is it.
Read this here: https://capitalresearch.org/article/...v-and-the-cdc/.
What is not listed in the article is that in 1996 after the CDC bilked the heterosexual AIDS bullshit for all it is worth, they guessed there were only 500,000 cases of AIDS.
I think heterosexual AIDS is bullshit. Maybe if a guy fucks a girl in the ass really hard and cums on it, which would be like gay sex, it is possible for the girl to get it, but quite frankly, I think worrying about a guy getting AIDS with heterosexual sex is a waste of time. You have a better chance dying due to a crazy woman or pimp pulling a knife on you and stabbing you or having an allergic reaction to the latex in a condom than dying of AIDS.
-
04-06-20 05:48 #5548
Posts: 106Originally Posted by Bienenstich [View Original Post]
-
04-05-20 18:06 #5547
Posts: 61Bbfs
How much of a nuisance is it to get BBFS from pros in Bogota or Medellin?
I'm assuming it's not as convenient as in the Philippines where I feel like it's standard.
In Thailand I have to run around asking a lot but the success rate is acceptable.
-
04-05-20 15:26 #5546
Posts: 106Originally Posted by TjBrazil [View Original Post]
-
04-04-20 22:09 #5545
Posts: 2891Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
One way to define "win" is to increase market share regardless of price. You take the most amount of money available even if it is less then before.
Hedge has a time limit. The oil company can't simply shutdown a well like a faucet or stop for various reasons. If it keeps up, eventually some producers have to pay someone to take the oil when they don't have a place to store it or go bankrupt. I read that the cost basis differs widely among shale wells so it is not a static condition.
-
04-04-20 06:16 #5544
Posts: 2891Originally Posted by SeekingHead [View Original Post]
-
04-04-20 06:09 #5543
Posts: 3160Originally Posted by SeekingHead [View Original Post]
Interest rates are way down now. Big companies can borrow at lower rates, and if you can lock in a price via oil futures, which is pretty much insurance against falling prices, the downside to investing in oil is limited.
There was a lot of dumb money in oil. The peak oil nuts convinced themselves that oil companies would not produce more oil and demand for oil was inelastic, and both assumptions were dead wrong. If the Saudis action has any effect, IMO what you will see is the dumb money move out of shale production, and the smart money moving in.
BTW, I have been told that we are going to take out Maduro in Venezuela. Trump or someone in his administration has presented Maduro with the same plan as Noriega in Panama was given. If Maduro refuses, he will be taken out like Noriega was.
People against this are saying it is because "we want their oil" which is kind of funny because I think we have plenty of our own now.
It will be interesting to see what will happen in Colombia and Venezuelan chicas if this does come to reality and Maduro goes. Will we able to go there and be welcomed? Is Corona ravaging Venezuela now or is it not that bad? Sure is interesting times for us mongers.