Stupid shit in Medellin

[Villainy]

I got the jab twice. The first was by choice when the vaccine effectively prevented a person from getting Covid.

The second was ten months later when the vaccine did not work and was mandated for travel.

I guess your little brain does not understand the difference between the words voluntary and mandate or the words effective and not effective. All it can handle is provaxx and antivaxx.

Maybe your brain is as alcohol and aluminum soaked as Huacho's is.

I am delighted to be among the group (with Huacho) who have a brai. Not surprisingly, you are conspicuously absent from that group.

[Mr Enternational]

You're confusing beliefs with science.

Not at all. You do not think many beliefs of yesteryear were based on the science of that day? So people just threw leaches on each other because they believed it would do something? No. The science of that day was enough to prove it would do what they were saying. The same as some science of today is enough to prove some things that will be discredited in years to come. One day Pluto is a planet and the next day it is not. Pluto has not changed in billions of years, but science has.

[MoonShot]

I think we can all agree on one point. No one is going to change their mind.

Anti-covid vaccine believers think the other side are idiots and mindless sheep.

Covid vaccine believers think the other side are idiots and uneducated.

You can go back and forth but it accomplishes nothing. Isn't there better things to do?

[JjBee62]

Didn't Bayer say the same thing when they started selling heroin over the counter to treat coughs and headaches? Didn't the universe used to revolve around the earth? Science is always real until it is proven to be dead wrong.

You're confusing beliefs with science.

Science is never "dead wrong (explanationat end). " Scientists can be dead wrong, but that's extremely rare. Most often, when a scientist turns out to be dead wrong it's because they falsified data for their own benefit. Take Andrew Wakefield for a relevant example.

In order for science to be accepted as valid (based on the data currently available) it has to be repeatable and observable by other scientists, the peer review process. Most of the "science" which is supposedly being suppressed won't be submitted for peer review and is only published in fringe publications which don't require peer review.

Putting it in golf terms, in any tournament play, each golfer scores his own round, but his card must be reviewed by his opponent. Any errors result in penalties. Now imagine a tournament, 72 players. At the end of the round, 71 players had their card reviewed by someone they played with. All good. However, number 72 refused to let anyone check his card and claimed to have shot 20 under par for the round. He's disqualified, canceled, suppressed and it's all big golf trying to control the world, and not a guy cheating at golf.

Science is a constant attempt to find better answers, not right answers, better answers. Opium probably works quite well on headaches, heroin is derived from opium, as is morphine. Now we have aspirin, ibuprofen, acetaminophen and others to provide better answers for headaches. We've also found better answers to using leeches or fire to remove evil from a person.

All those planes you fly on, science did that. Your car, your guns, your food and the bed you sleep on all brought to you by science.

[JustTK]

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345

In an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, multinational, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned 44,165 participants 16 years of age or older and 2264 participants 12 to 15 years of age to receive two 30-956;g doses, at 21 days apart, of BNT162 b2 or placebo.

And before you say the vaccines "worked" against Covid, keep in mind the all time high number of Covid cases by far were in Spring 2022 one year after the vaccines were made widely available. The boosters were made available because the vaccines were not working.

More and more data comes out regularly to support the Skeptics position, but it is supressed, ridiculed and ignored by the establishment bcos it is inconvenient and often points at erronous, criminal and negligent actions. That's how the establishment does it. That's what I have been talking about here for so long. Unfortunately the establishment is very powerful and relies on sheeple ignorance for them to get away with it. The sheeples with their eyes closed will just smear skeptics like Elvis w adhoms bocs it's all they have got. Sure, Elvis is wrong about many things, but not about covid. Attack the argument, not the man.

[Elvis 2008]

Science has progressed a little bit since the 16th century yet some people still believe the earth is flat.

Heroin was widely available, legal and marketed in the USA in the late 19th not 16th century.

[Elvis 2008]

Science has progressed a little bit since the 16th century yet some people still believe the earth is flat.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345

In an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, multinational, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned 44,165 participants 16 years of age or older and 2264 participants 12 to 15 years of age to receive two 30-956;g doses, at 21 days apart, of BNT162 b2 or placebo.

Reactogenicity events among the participants who were not in the reactogenicity subgroup were reported as adverse events, which resulted in imbalances between the BNT162 b2 group and the placebo group with respect to adverse events (30% vs. 14% related adverse events (24% vs. 6% and severe adverse events (1. 2% vs. 0. 7% New adverse events attributable to BNT162 b2 that were not previously identified in earlier reports included decreased appetite, lethargy, asthenia, malaise, night sweats, and hyperhidrosis. Few participants had serious adverse events or adverse events that led to trial withdrawal.

During the blinded, placebo-controlled period, 15 participants in the BNT162 b2 group and 14 in the placebo group died; during the open-label period, 3 participants in the BNT162 b2 group and 2 in the original placebo group who received BNT162 b2 after unblinding died. None of these deaths were considered to be related to BNT162 b2 by the investigators.

Then there was this study from 9 months earlier.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups.

LOL Whoops!

And this was the line that got the vaccine approved: A two-dose regimen of BNT162 b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older.

The science is real, even if you can't understand it.

Yeah, this is such a Democratic douche thing to say by someone who thinks he is super smart because he reads the Times and watches MSNBC. If you told me that mRNA vaccines are the future because of politics, the media, and that people particularly Democratic douches still think of them as wonder drugs that saved millions of lives, we totally agree, but you mentioned science when you meant "science" and when I say "science", I mean political science based on feeling and not data.

Because any sane person who looks at the data and the projections made when the vaccines came out knows the vaccine is / was a fucking joke. Without the 3.5% death rate hysteria made up to get Trump out of office, these vaccines NEVER would have been approved nor should they have been.

And before you say the vaccines "worked" against Covid, keep in mind the all time high number of Covid cases by far were in Spring 2022 one year after the vaccines were made widely available. The boosters were made available because the vaccines were not working.

[AmorPorFavor]

Didn't Bayer say the same thing when they started selling heroin over the counter to treat coughs and headaches? Didn't the universe used to revolve around the earth? Science is always real until it is proven to be dead wrong.

Science has progressed a little bit since the 16th century yet some people still believe the earth is flat.

[Mr Enternational]

The science is real, even if you can't understand it.

Didn't Bayer say the same thing when they started selling heroin over the counter to treat coughs and headaches? Didn't the universe used to revolve around the earth? Science is always real until it is proven to be dead wrong.

[Elvis 2008]

You mean the same as I did not take the last one and did not get sick or anything either? It has been 35 years since I have taken any vaccines. That is when I joined the military. So I do not see myself taking any in the foreseeable future.

Just like military guys have a different perspective on prostitution and foreigners if they have traveled abroad, a lot of the smarter guys in the military are questioning vaccines too.

If vaccines were looked at for what they are, poisons you are trying to get your body used to, instead of as a measure that lowers your immediate risk of disease, the military might be the place for people to get more rational. As it stands now, I was talking to one military man, and the new recruits were just pounded them with vaccines their first day. The military assured the recruits the vaccines were safe, but the next day they had a slew of doctors around checking for side effects. He wondered to himself and later said to me, "Hey, if these vaccines are so safe, why were there so many doctors around the next day?

There was controversy with the MMR vaccine, and there was an autism doctor I knew who questioned it. He was not anti-vaccine but he said why are you packaging three diseases (measles, mumps, rubella) at one time. No one gets all three of those diseases at once in real life. Why don't you split it up? It makes perfect sense if you look at vaccines as mimicking nature and if you look at vaccines as poison you are trying to get used to. I suspect they are lumped together because of money.

The military is one group that could stand up to the drug companies. It would be interesting to see if some general allowed for his soldiers to opt out of getting vaccines and study which group was healthier, the vaxxed or unvaxxed.

After looking at the data from that doctor Paul Thomas, I would suspect the people not getting massive doses of poison all at once would be healthier.

[AmorPorFavor]

You mean the same as I did not take the last one and did not get sick or anything either? It has been 35 years since I have taken any vaccines. That is when I joined the military. So I do not see myself taking any in the foreseeable future. Thanks for the advice though doc.

The science is real, even if you can't understand it.

[Elvis 2008]

No kidding! One of the most outspoken critics of the vaccine (at least on ISG) was first in line to get the CoVid vaccination. Right Elvis?

I got the jab twice. The first was by choice when the vaccine effectively prevented a person from getting Covid.

The second was ten months later when the vaccine did not work and was mandated for travel.

I guess your little brain does not understand the difference between the words voluntary and mandate or the words effective and not effective. All it can handle is provaxx and antivaxx.

Maybe your brain is as alcohol and aluminum soaked as Huacho's is.

[Villainy]

MRNA vaccines are the future. The next pandemic and many other viruses will be attacked using them. Do me a favor and don't take the shot when that time comes ok?

No kidding! One of the most outspoken critics of the vaccine (at least on ISG) was first in line to get the CoVid vaccination. Right Elvis?

[Mr Enternational]

MRNA vaccines are the future. The next pandemic and many other viruses will be attacked using them. Do me a favor and don't take the shot when that time comes ok?

You mean the same as I did not take the last one and did not get sick or anything either? It has been 35 years since I have taken any vaccines. That is when I joined the military. So I do not see myself taking any in the foreseeable future. Thanks for the advice though doc.

[Huacho]

The interesting thing is they did a poll of party affiliation on marriage and sex. There were more Republicans in every group (married men and women, single men) but one. That one was single moms.

I'm just flat out calling bullshit on your poll. Let's see it.