Bogota Reports

[Silver Turtle]

Would you recommend any (legitimate) literature or books about this finding?

Monogamy was not a Biblical or Christian construct but a response to syphilis in the 1500's. This is also when sexuality and morality really came into play because syphilis may be as bad a disease as there is with some people.

[Mr Enternational]

All I said is that it's not a lot to expect for someone to wait a week or two after fucking cheap street hookers without a condom before they fuck regular girls without a condom.

This begs the question, how long are these cheap street hookers waiting until they fuck the next guy without a condom? Or is it only the guys' responsibility? Are you even from this planet? Turn your TV on to Maury or Paternity Court or better yet visit a real court so you can wake up and see not even women that are not hookers wait 2 weeks before they fuck the next guy without a condom. And you really have the nerve to put SA hookers on a pedestal. LOL. People are going to be people. Welcome to planet earth.

[Member #4682]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely antagonistic. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

[MistaDynamite]

All I am saying is that when people pay more, they expect more. You are talking like $10 Santa Fe chicks pull out all the stops when they don't. You see all the time reports saying they had to pay extra for this that and the other at casas and the like.

Guys are not paying $90 per month for a subscription plus top money to these chicks to be limited in what they will do and be centavoed and pesoed for extras. The extras are coming with the price of admission.

It is the same with the middle east guys flying chicks in to let them number 2 on them. Those are not $10 Santa Fe chicks agreeing to be shit on believe it or not. Those are chicks that probably not many of us on this board can afford.

Alrighty then. I'm about to eat. I'll come back later roflmao.

[MistaDynamite]

They are not GF-- not sure how much -- go to Hotel San Francisco-- There are many other cheap hotels in that area.

Sweet. I will file that one away if I don't AirBnB. Thanks.

[MistaDynamite]

First one is free. 54,000 pesos for each additional. Must have ID. That being said, I found this out the hard way with non-pros. If you intend on bringing hookers there then your luck may be different.

Good to know. Thanks.

[MarquisdeSade1]

Nobody ever said that DFK was completely safe, or if they did then it wasn't me. But strep throat goes away. And anything permanent you can get from kissing you pretty much have a zero chance of getting unless you have a cut or open sore. I'm seeing a lot of mental gymnastics going on on this board from people trying to shake off guilt. All I said is that it's not a lot to expect for someone to wait a week or two after fucking cheap street hookers without a condom before they fuck regular girls without a condom. While I agree that the church and the government overstates the risk of disease, that doesn't mean that it's all based on a big lie. People do get AIDS and other uncurable diseases and comparing them to a strep throat is just a sign that you're too far gone to be reasoned with. I'm starting to realize that a willingness to pay for sex is not enough of a commonality for people to share a forum together.

Don't let the door hit you in the ass, adios Pastor Ted Haggard.

[MarquisdeSade1]

LOL. They shit on the girls. Rich mfs don't have anything else to do with their money. Just google emirates shit on women.

"Anonymous IG Model Breaks Down How Much Money She Makes Going To Dubai To Get Pooped On".

Sounds like putas getting treated like the putas that they are.

Just an illustration of what greedy putas will do for money.

There is scat porn and beastiality porn all over the internet.

How much do they get paid to make a scene? $10 usd?

This is a perfect example why I laugh at mongers that overpay for sex.

[Mr Enternational]

American sex prison policies are bullshit or you believe it and feel guilty about it. The first few times I did this and was not faithful to my ex-wife, I considered myself a loser. So I went through things researched a ton and realized that my behavior was normal. Monogamy was not a Biblical or Christian construct but a response to syphilis in the 1500's.

Well it did not start being illegal in the USA until the early 20th century with the introduction of the Mann Act.

[TalkYes]

I understand the thinking too whether it is correct or not is a different matter. If you are a monger, you fall into one of two categories: either you realize American sex prison policies are bullshit or you believe it and feel guilty about it. The first few times I did this and was not faithful to my ex-wife, I considered myself a loser. So I went through things researched a ton and realized that my behavior was normal. Monogamy was not a Biblical or Christian construct but a response to syphilis in the 1500's. This is also when sexuality and morality really came into play because syphilis may be as bad a disease as there is with some people.

Given the history of the Catholic Church, which actually ran brothels prior to syphilis hitting Europe, the whole concept of the church in charge of sexuality is kind of absurd, but they took over the role of deciding what was normal with sexuality and morality. With that comes an enormous amount of power. So when penicillin comes around and is readily available and cures syphilis did the church come out and say "You all can fuck like bunnies now?" Of course not. Shoot, church leaders and political leaders probably were probably preaching monogamy came from Christ. But eventually people saw that others were having sex and not dying. This led to the free love era of the 60's and 70's right, and abortion being legalized in 1973 was a sexual freedom movement as well. If people were dropping dead with syphilis, I do not think abortion would have been legalized.

So if you are in church or government, what do you do if you want to retain or assume more power with the power associated with sexuality, what do you do now? Well, you designate some diseases as being sexual and associate guilt with them..

Nobody ever said that DFK was completely safe, or if they did then it wasn't me. But strep throat goes away. And anything permanent you can get from kissing you pretty much have a zero chance of getting unless you have a cut or open sore. I'm seeing a lot of mental gymnastics going on on this board from people trying to shake off guilt. All I said is that it's not a lot to expect for someone to wait a week or two after fucking cheap street hookers without a condom before they fuck regular girls without a condom. While I agree that the church and the government overstates the risk of disease, that doesn't mean that it's all based on a big lie. People do get AIDS and other uncurable diseases and comparing them to a strep throat is just a sign that you're too far gone to be reasoned with. I'm starting to realize that a willingness to pay for sex is not enough of a commonality for people to share a forum together.

[Elvis 2008]

About STD, I think I understand your thinking. I had a long term SB last year and we both had STD check before. She is an US expat working in the country that I was in at the time. She can be considered a regular girl because she has a good paying job and does not have much experience about sex. I was actually worrying about giving her STD the whole time for that reason.

I understand the thinking too whether it is correct or not is a different matter. If you are a monger, you fall into one of two categories: either you realize American sex prison policies are bullshit or you believe it and feel guilty about it. The first few times I did this and was not faithful to my ex-wife, I considered myself a loser. So I went through things researched a ton and realized that my behavior was normal. Monogamy was not a Biblical or Christian construct but a response to syphilis in the 1500's. This is also when sexuality and morality really came into play because syphilis may be as bad a disease as there is with some people.

Given the history of the Catholic Church, which actually ran brothels prior to syphilis hitting Europe, the whole concept of the church in charge of sexuality is kind of absurd, but they took over the role of deciding what was normal with sexuality and morality. With that comes an enormous amount of power. So when penicillin comes around and is readily available and cures syphilis did the church come out and say "You all can fuck like bunnies now?" Of course not. Shoot, church leaders and political leaders probably were probably preaching monogamy came from Christ. But eventually people saw that others were having sex and not dying. This led to the free love era of the 60's and 70's right, and abortion being legalized in 1973 was a sexual freedom movement as well. If people were dropping dead with syphilis, I do not think abortion would have been legalized.

So if you are in church or government, what do you do if you want to retain or assume more power with the power associated with sexuality, what do you do now? Well, you designate some diseases as being sexual and associate guilt with them. You elevated a nothing disease like herpes into this horrible condition. That did not work too well so then there is HIV and AIDS, and that worked for a while. Thing is eventually people figured out that they could have sex and not die of syphilis and straight people could have sex without condoms and not die of AIDS.

So I got strep throat once from kissing a stripper. I was sick as hell for 5 days, but you said you were only worried about a sexual disease and Strep throat is not listed as one. Why were you not worried about strep? Because the government is dictating to you with certain diseases it is your fault with spreading it and other ones there is not. Is that logical? Fuck no. It is designed for power. Why else would you associate disease with sex?

So the whole concept that goes on in the monger world that DFK is safe and BBFS is risky is based on the government campaign on AIDS, and the irony is that the CDC actually lied about the AIDS numbers, and they admitted it. The chairman for the CDC admitted there was no downside to inflating the AIDS numbers and in 1996, with a stroke of the pen, they cut the numbers in half. The concept that DFK is safe and BBFS is not is not logical; it is literally batshit crazy.

So yeah, I get the fear. If you are at the stage you still feel guilt about your sexuality, it makes sense to me to be afraid. However, that is an illogical fear. Why are you afraid of spreading disease with sex and not in other ways? Why are you more worried about sexual diseases than other ones?

If you are rejecting the government's advice on prostitution, why are you accepting it with regards to sex and diseases? Well, maybe you are not okay with your sexuality and feel guilty about it.

It is amazing though you accept giving a disease to someone else as being all your fault. The government says you are a bad boy, and you go along with it. You are conditioned to take on something if a woman feels badly. How do you know the STD came from you and not someone else? Better yet, how do you know it is from you and not from her having a shitty immune system because of her lifestyle choices?

So we have a monger on here being a white knight to the working girls which is funny right? To cure STDs, men need to change. LOL. That is why the USA is a sex prison. What do you think would happen if I went to the stripper and said, "Hey, you gave me strep throat?

[John Clayton]

LOL. They shit on the girls. Rich mfs don't have anything else to do with their money. Just google emirates shit on women...

I think in '91 I was the only person rooting for Sadaam because I hated the emiratis and kuwaitis so much.

[Mr Enternational]

Meaning, they'd pay to let a girl shit on them -- or they would pay to shit on the girl? (Seems like a strange thing to do, either way).

LOL. They shit on the girls. Rich mfs don't have anything else to do with their money. Just google emirates shit on women.

"Anonymous IG Model Breaks Down How Much Money She Makes Going To Dubai To Get Pooped On".

[John Clayton]

...It is the same with the middle east guys flying chicks in to let them number 2 on them...

Meaning, they'd pay to let a girl shit on them -- or they would pay to shit on the girl? (Seems like a strange thing to do, either way).

[Mr Enternational]

Dude,

I don't know why you're making this more complicated than it is. Your steakhouse vs McDonalds example does not apply within the context of anything I said,

All I am saying is that when people pay more, they expect more. You are talking like $10 Santa Fe chicks pull out all the stops when they don't. You see all the time reports saying they had to pay extra for this that and the other at casas and the like.

Guys are not paying $90 per month for a subscription plus top money to these chicks to be limited in what they will do and be centavoed and pesoed for extras. The extras are coming with the price of admission.

It is the same with the middle east guys flying chicks in to let them number 2 on them. Those are not $10 Santa Fe chicks agreeing to be shit on believe it or not. Those are chicks that probably not many of us on this board can afford.