|
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
Posts: 2579
Should MC et al, have internet free speech veto powers
Originally Posted by GeneHickman
[View Original Post]
This may just mean a shift in the venue of this activity, but I have seen so many chicas on this platform that I guess I will see how this plays out. However word is the equity backers have urged them to cut with pornography. The pandemic increased the amount of this on the internet for sure. Hope this gets the working girls working again. Jajaja.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ing-in-october
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/24/o...x-workers.html
Long live BC.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 1643
Loved your numbers
Originally Posted by NilAdmirari
[View Original Post]
Tall Man, I tend to agree with you on the rarity of 10's and 9's and that most, if not all, Victoria's Secret Angels would qualify. That said, I'm also on board with those who would allow other types of looks and bodies to qualify for the pantheon. By way of illustration, consider the variety of faces, figures, and heights in the following list of Hollywood ladies from decades long past (when in their most nubile, early 20's primes): Bo Derek (the original, eponymous "Ten" was just 5 ft. 3 in.), Elizabeth Taylor (5'2" Grace Kelly (5'5" Penelope Cruz (5'5" Sophia Loren (5'6" Catherine Deneuve (5' 5" Rita Hayworth (5'6" Marylyn Monroe 5'5", Bridgette Bardot (5'5" Gina Lollogrigida (5'4" Julie Christie (5'2" Perhaps none of these ladies would have met VA's standards for recruiting their models, but I imagine that most BMs over 50 would rate at least some of these ladies a solid 10.
As a postscript: Sad to say, Victoria's Secrets seems to have gone wokewith the Angels apparently well on their way to becoming a relic of times gone by. See: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/b...n-rapinoe.html
Great examples, Agree, they all deserve the highest grade possible, and yet look how different they are. Viva la difference!
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1749
Originally Posted by MrEnternational
[View Original Post]
That means that I must not know my ass from a hole in the ground. Tyra Banks was a VS model and I have never been attracted to her.
Ha! I totally agree. She has nice tits. The rest is nothing special.
I also never thought Giselle Bunchen was that great.
But obviously in both cases, I'm in the minority.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 1643
Two hours is an important nexus point in time with a Pay for Play
Originally Posted by JonesLover
[View Original Post]
Hey friend,
But if I like to take her in my apartment for 2 hours how much the I ave to pay her (around)?
Thanks.
Once you go one minute over two hours, you have entered "all night" land. The rate after two hours goes up to 300 mil COP, which also happens to be the overnight rate. You can kick her out when you want, but she will stay overnight for 300 mil COP. A puta exit is at dawn, literally. If you are really Jonezin and groovin and want to do breakfast or fuck her after the sun comes up, that is negotiable or malleable or whatever. As aways, she will expect tip and taxi as separate. You can stone wall her and say no and that will be the last time you see her. No problem. A great overnight I will tip 50 mil COP, standard 20-30. Taxi, 20 mil COP or tell her you will get her an Uber (obvio app on your smart phone), it will be cheaper and then you know where she went in case she ripped you off. I wrote this like it is set in stone, and obviously, it's not. There are variations and variables. Keep On Keepin' On! Oh fuck, I didn't answer your question. 2 hours, 200 mil COP. All the stuff I wrote above starts the minute after two hours.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1782
Originally Posted by Rainman306
[View Original Post]
5 - Completely average looking, not ugly or attractive, no impressive tits or ass, etc.
6 - Slightly cute on average, to some maybe average to others maybe attractive, might have better than average tits or ass.
7 - The general attractive person, may still look average compared next to a model type, more than likely nice tits or ass, if lacking curves then stronger in face.
7. 5 - This starts getting toward the attractive people who are more fit, well groomed, nicer body tone, getting towards more really nice tits or ass.
8 - This is a bona fide all around good looking person, in top shape, probably with a really desirable ass and / or fits.
9 - This is the level of good looks where becoming a model or actor happens, great hits and ass, good height, all features sound.
10 - the best of the 9's, perfect shape, perfect height, 6-2 to 6-4 for men, 5-7 to 5-9 for women, great tits, ass, lips.
OMG this tells you everyhitng you need ti know. What about the folks that don't really value tits or arse. They value shape or curves or face or colour or height?
Originally Posted by Rainman306
[View Original Post]
7 - The general attractive person, may still look average compared next to a model type, more than likely nice tits or ass, if lacking curves then stronger in face..
OMG again. You mean like Wynona rider and Anthony Hopkins?
Ok, I promise I am going to back off this rating scale now. I have said it enough times already.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 246
Tougher Grading Scale Than Me
Originally Posted by TheTallMan
[View Original Post]
I have had some truly beautiful women in my life and get it that there is usually a marked difference between their beauty and their performance.
I like others have had a 6 that after spending a few hours with them became an 8 or better and also have had a truly 8 or arguably a 9 (Moscow in 1994 and Czech Republic circa 1998 and Rio circa 2001) and would never even think of a repeat as their was little connection on any level with them, but it was fun.
So there is always talk about the rating 1 to 10 and I see some photos that have been posted on these boards in the past 15 years or so and the comments that go along with them as I too have posted many photos of women from my adventures but it is time for a reality check for all of us.
Here is the baseline, it is the Victoria Secret women, undoubtedly every one is a 10. So using this as the benchmark we all need to reset out view of what a 10 is, myself included.
Here in Medellin over the past 10 years I have encountered a handful of beautiful women, probably 3 that have stood out in 10 years and maybe close to a thousand encounters.
So using the new VS as a baseline the best most beautiful woman I have been with in the all of Colombia has been at best an 8 on the scale.
Typically I weekly have a few 5's, a few others who are 6 to 7's and seldom an 8 and never ever a 9 or above and this is in 10 years and a thousand encounters including the clubs, the mall, the FB chicas, the high end clubs and discos and everywhere else including the elite clubs / bars of high end Bogota bars.
As this VS photo shows that to be a 10 is a complete anomaly as you need height, above 5'-10" minimum, lean body / MBI, shapely legs and body with a perfectly symmetrical face. There are perhaps a few thousand women in the whole planet of 8 billion people who fall into this category. This is what is needed to be a 10.
Much love and respect to all! Now I return you all to the normal broadcast, just keep in mind the new reference point.
The Tall Man.
I agree 10's are rare and even 9's too, when you get down to 7's that starts to become fairly common. Here is my scale of 1-10 from 5 up:
5 - Completely average looking, not ugly or attractive, no impressive tits or ass, etc.
6 - Slightly cute on average, to some maybe average to others maybe attractive, might have better than average tits or ass.
7 - The general attractive person, may still look average compared next to a model type, more than likely nice tits or ass, if lacking curves then stronger in face.
7. 5 - This starts getting toward the attractive people who are more fit, well groomed, nicer body tone, getting towards more really nice tits or ass.
8 - This is a bona fide all around good looking person, in top shape, probably with a really desirable ass and / or fits.
9 - This is the level of good looks where becoming a model or actor happens, great hits and ass, good height, all features sound.
10 - the best of the 9's, perfect shape, perfect height, 6-2 to 6-4 for men, 5-7 to 5-9 for women, great tits, ass, lips.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 122
Originally Posted by TheTallMan
[View Original Post]
Here is the baseline, it is the Victoria Secret women, undoubtedly every one is a 10. So using this as the benchmark we all need to reset out view of what a 10 is, myself included.....Here in Medellin over the past 10 years I have encountered a handful of beautiful women, probably 3 that have stood out in 10 years and maybe close to a thousand encounters......So using the new VS as a baseline the best most beautiful woman I have been with in the all of Colombia has been at best an 8 on the scale....The Tall Man.
Tall Man, I tend to agree with you on the rarity of 10's and 9's and that most, if not all, Victoria's Secret Angels would qualify. That said, I'm also on board with those who would allow other types of looks and bodies to qualify for the pantheon. By way of illustration, consider the variety of faces, figures, and heights in the following list of Hollywood ladies from decades long past (when in their most nubile, early 20's primes): Bo Derek (the original, eponymous "Ten" was just 5 ft. 3 in.), Elizabeth Taylor (5'2" Grace Kelly (5'5" Penelope Cruz (5'5" Sophia Loren (5'6" Catherine Deneuve (5' 5" Rita Hayworth (5'6" Marylyn Monroe 5'5", Bridgette Bardot (5'5" Gina Lollogrigida (5'4" Julie Christie (5'2" Perhaps none of these ladies would have met VA's standards for recruiting their models, but I imagine that most BMs over 50 would rate at least some of these ladies a solid 10.
As a postscript: Sad to say, Victoria's Secrets seems to have gone woke—with the Angels apparently well on their way to becoming a relic of times gone by. See: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/b...n-rapinoe.html.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 15925
Originally Posted by TheTallMan
[View Original Post]
Here is the baseline, it is the Victoria Secret women, undoubtedly every one is a 10. So using this as the benchmark we all need to reset out view of what a 10 is, myself included.
That means that I must not know my ass from a hole in the ground. Tyra Banks was a VS model and I have never been attracted to her.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3801
Originally Posted by Blakman
[View Original Post]
I always laugh at the guy who thinks the girls under 5 ft 7 could be a 10. Thats why I love Kenya. There's more tall choices, but I won't say more beauty, but more with natural bodies. But I like Colombia as well. Don't mistake me.
Nobody would ever mistake you here! LOL.
Not sure what you mean by natural bodies.
Are you saying that a lot of Colombian women don't have natural bodies compared to Kenyans.
And are you also saying that not many Colombian women taller than 5 ft 7 could be a 10?
I don't think many of the board members here would agree with that.
Sounds like you've found your "go to" mongering destination.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by JonesLover
[View Original Post]
Hey friend,
But if I like to take her in my apartment for 2 hours how much the I ave to pay her (around)?
Thanks.
You need to negotiate the terms. Like if you want 2 hours / multiple shots, make sure she agrees to it before she comes over.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1782
Originally Posted by Osteoknot
[View Original Post]
So a numerical rating system could have some utility in those situations. But overall I still say it's too subjective to be useful.
Great is Great, OK is ok, Rubbish is Rubbish. For more practical rating system. Am sure we would agree on most of the individuals ratings. We just need to cross-check a few. Haha.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1782
Originally Posted by TheTallMan
[View Original Post]
Here is the baseline, it is the Victoria Secret women,
Much love and respect to all! Now I return you all to the normal broadcast, just keep in mind the new reference point.
My god, they are average. HahahahAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 1643
Point taken
Originally Posted by Kerty9
[View Original Post]
Even if it is subjective, it is useful in most cases. I am not going to find a girl on 3 or 4 scale to be actually 7 or 8. A 7 may be 8 on somebody's scale, or 10 girl may be really be 8 on my scale, but it is still useful to screen whom I would want to see.
You may have a point.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 1643
Squordidiborp Hominah homiinah
Originally Posted by Kerty9
[View Original Post]
Even if it is subjective, it is useful in most cases. I am not going to find a girl on 3 or 4 scale to be actually 7 or 8. A 7 may be 8 on somebody's scale, or 10 girl may be really be 8 on my scale, but it is still useful to screen whom I would want to see.
Thank you for playing. Please come again.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 917
Amen. Well said tall man
I always laugh at the guy who thinks the girls under 5 ft 7 could be a 10. Thats why I love Kenya. There's more tall choices, but I won't say more beauty, but more with natural bodies. But I like Colombia as well. Don't mistake me.
Originally Posted by TheTallMan
[View Original Post]
I have had some truly beautiful women in my life and get it that there is usually a marked difference between their beauty and their performance.
I like others have had a 6 that after spending a few hours with them became an 8 or better and also have had a truly 8 or arguably a 9 (Moscow in 1994 and Czech Republic circa 1998 and Rio circa 2001) and would never even think of a repeat as their was little connection on any level with them, but it was fun.
So there is always talk about the rating 1 to 10 and I see some photos that have been posted on these boards in the past 15 years or so and the comments that go along with them as I too have posted many photos of women from my adventures but it is time for a reality check for all of us.
Here is the baseline, it is the Victoria Secret women, undoubtedly every one is a 10. So using this as the benchmark we all need to reset out view of what a 10 is, myself included..
Posting Limitations
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|