Thread: Lima
+
Add Report
Results 2,236 to 2,250 of 5937
-
01-09-16 20:38 #3702
Posts: 765Connie, not Kelly
Originally Posted by Cons68 [View Original Post]
-
01-09-16 11:34 #3701
Posts: 1192Originally Posted by JimmyBoy99 [View Original Post]
-
01-09-16 00:34 #3700
Posts: 1335Kelly just posted a video of her dog on Facebook, so she seems to be at liberty.
-
01-03-16 08:21 #3699
Posts: 247Time to ponder?
Lrminnout,
You kissed up to David while he could respond but now you dislike him, when he cannot?
I also hate to see or think he could have been involved in this but I am going by. "he is innocent until proven guilty" and all I have seen is a press side of the case.
It remains to be seen, as his lawyer has stated, that when the mother, who brought her daughters to "John" and was caught, she declared that. "he offered her $12,000". "he" being John Larson and not David.
I have also heard of so many cases where a corrupt cop has planted evidence for whatever reasons or entrap an innocent citizen.
For what I have read, John Larson joined ISG recently and soon after, offered $6,000 to pay for Kelly's cancer treatment. Also, that he offered David to buy his business and a series of demonstrations of how rich he was:
". I have all the books and tax returns as I was about to invest 750 K. ". After convincing David that he had all that money, supposedly, he asked David to set him up with 15 or so girls. So I find it credible to think that David called his contacts and asked them to contact and bring whoever they could find.
Think of it. Many times, including in your case, it was difficult for David to make sure a girls could show up on time, let alone 15 girls. If this is the case, It could be, that one of the contacts brought minors just to fill the request. I am not saying that this is the case, just entertaining the idea as possible.
I have never read that David had offered anyone to be setup with a minor.
That is my take Lrminnout, and incidentally, I also found him to be rude and many of the adjectives you have used.
Regarding re posting his picture from a news program, picture this. John has already written in ISG the following:
". It is illegal in Peru to even set up anyone with prostitutes minors or others. ".
And:
". Anyone have any chica reports. I know I do but afraid they will get lost in the d33 drama. Kaitlin was sent to me by this guy some of you probably know. ".
Now, picture this, what if John Larson needs to fill his quota of arrests and decides to join ISG with another handle.
And.
1. contacts you and offers to set you up with a chica and she shows up, And you spend an hour with her and all of the sudden the police comes in the apt and arrests you because, the chica is under 18 despite of her having shown you her ID or.
2. he asks you if you know any chica. You set him up with a chica you met last time your were in Lima and again. The police shows up and arrests you for ". Setting up anyone with prostitutes. ".
My obvious question, wouldn't you want to know or see the picture of someone who is capable of doing this?
Too bad this forum has gone cold. .
Later.
Originally Posted by Lrninnout [View Original Post]
-
01-02-16 03:24 #3698
Posts: 7I'm literally in shock. Complete fucking shock. I've always disliked David. He was very offstandish, rude, and even offensive. I never met him, but he was a prick via email. I fucking loathe those child molesting pieces of shit and think that every one of them should be executed. I'm trained to identify them, but totally missed the signs. Thailand and Indonesia are known for that shit. I just never knew Peru was. I'm deeply saddened to have even spoken to him let alone cowtail to him because of all the positive reviews of his help. I wanted badly to call him out as an asshole, but knew it would not behoove me. I hope that piece of shit gets jail.
On a side note to Jockey16. Why in the fuck would you try to out an undercover agent stopping child prostitution? Why would you repost the photo?
Originally Posted by Jockey16 [View Original Post]
-
12-25-15 10:00 #3697
Posts: 2415Age of Consent vs Age of Majority
=============================================
Greetings Gentlemen,
The Age of Consent is the age in which girls can participate in consensual, non-commercial sex with their teen-age boyfriend without said teen-age boyfriend being charged with statutory [CodeWord123].
However, the Age of Consent is irrelevant to the members of this forum.
What you need to focus on is the Age of Majority, which among other things is the age in which they can vote, get married, enlist in the military, and participate in commercial sex activities.
Please exercise caution and govern yourself accordingly.
Thanks,
Jackson
-
12-25-15 04:34 #3696
Posts: 1807Originally Posted by LukeSkywalker [View Original Post]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEcOglbG8s0
Based on that and press reports, police do appear to be trying to link Brown to the situation with the young children. It wouldn't surprise me though, if you're right. Salazar said on camera that no organization was involved in pimping her kids.
Originally Posted by LukeSkywalker [View Original Post]
A personal thought, on the whole, the participants on this web site have gone out of their way to condemn abuse of children and [CodeWord908]. Anyone who has come here seeking that sort of thing has been promptly chased off. The indication that one or more of our own was involved in it is disheartening. Most of us maintain that what willing adults do behind closed doors is nobody's damn business. But we also agree that only applies when they are indeed willing and adults. This type of incident promotes the ridiculous prejudices of feminists and some others about mongers, sport fuckers, whatever it is that we are. It's rightly considered abhorrent to believe that a gay man would molest young boys, but for some reason it's perfectly acceptable to believe men who see prostitutes are also [CodeWord914] and [CodeWord127]. This is a dark episode in the history of this site.
-
12-24-15 17:29 #3695
Posts: 821The war against terrors
I agreed that a lot of those terrorists cases smack of inducement, set ups, entrapment by LE. The victims would have very hard times fighting the skills and resources of the federal government. LE try to inflate the risks of terrorists getting caught. Also It's natural that agents, young and old, are overzealous to get their raises and promotions. Meanwhile there are still fanatics who planned and executed their terrors, like the Boston marathon bombers and the shooters in San Bernardino.
In this case, it appears Josh David Brown was approached by a special agent, most likely for illegal services. He referred him to Connie Salazar. She has 2 daughters age 4 and 7. There was mentions of an offer for $12 K for these 2 girls. When Salazar brought the girls to the special agent, she was arrested. She admitted to fucking, prostituting and trafficking in girls for Josh David Brown, starting when she was 14. She admitted to pimping her 2 girls.
Peru police raided 8 locations and arrested J the Brown with multiple evidence of child pornography and pedophilia. They claimed to rescue about 10 children who wrote to josh David brown for sex? Could they be just children living with those sex workers? As usual the police will exaggerate and make wild claims, throwing a lot of shit at the arrests to see what sticks.
The evidence I have seen in video tapes, plus confessions from Connie Salazar, are more than enough to land J the Brown and his associates long times in prison. The arrested prostitutes may also spill out a lot more alleged crimes, true or untrue, that will make their case worse.
A few other guys also posted invitations for sex parties in Peru. They are suddenly very quiet. Perhaps we should maintain very low profiles just in case.
Originally Posted by Cons68 [View Original Post]
-
12-24-15 00:37 #3694
Posts: 765Larson aka Paradise69
Originally Posted by Paradise69 [View Original Post]
Regarding videos, was David involved in these videos in any way, even not participating in them or were just downloaded from the internet for sale?
As John is a undercover agent, you have access to David's account. How about naming the punters who asked David for sex with minors and who actually did? This should help Jackson from banning these folks for life from this site as it is not a [CodeWord910] site.
-
12-23-15 22:45 #3693
Posts: 1192Actually based on what we know oh how homeland security has been operating the "war on terror" on the US I would say that it is quite the opposite. Most, if not all, arrests of home grown plotters have been induced, materials supplied and essentially designed by the FBI.
I have no means to know if the accusations are real, but given the scale of the accusations, well, extraordinary claims and all that.
Originally Posted by LukeSkywalker [View Original Post]
-
12-23-15 20:19 #3692
Posts: 765John Larson, alias Paraside69
Originally Posted by Paradise69 [View Original Post]
-
12-23-15 17:47 #3691
Posts: 821The entrapment
Based on these infos, it appears Gringo agent John Larson offered Salazar the $12 K for child prostitution. Salazar, being hungry and dirt poor, agreed to supply him with her own 4 and 7 years-old daughters, and probably furthered the intent by bringing the girls to agent John Larsen.
Looks like a crude entrapment but it worked. LE must have collected enough evidence and proofs of intent to prosecute everyone, so they moved in for the bust. Salazar further admitted to her pimping minors on video after the arrest.
Paradise69 has only been posting in ISG since Oct 2015. He's brand-new and is still broadcasting his intent to buy sex. Knowing a little bit about how ICE and Homeland Security operate, they would not have put that much resources into this case unless they have found evidence of many serious violations of the laws that must be stopped. The sting and entrapment are just the last nails into the case to net the whole syndicate. ICE and FBI are up to their asses in alligators trying to prevent more mas shooting and sabotage by Muslims terrorists, they would not have cared about minor crimes in Peru.
Originally Posted by Tiny12 [View Original Post]
-
12-23-15 16:21 #3690
Posts: 16Interesting notes
Ohn Larson's involvement is described in the following.
At D33 houses they found at least in the 20+ videos 100's of child porn videos 1 that stood out was called nino con nino or boy with boy which in Spanish means child. Connie states she was part of D33 band since she was 14, the letters read on the news were from minors and explicitly claim the minors planned to once again engage in sex for money with D33 not as new idea but repetitive. The idea that J Brown was an informant I don't see anywhere. I do see he is being described by both police and D33 lawyer as a special agent. Big difference between that and "informant" The daughter claims all the evidence found at D33 house was hers. So I guess she is into child porn and based on her statement should be arrested right? [Forum Complaint deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: The general posting sections of the Forum are not the place to voice your personal complaints about the Forum's rules or operating procedures. In the future, please send any complaints about the Forum to me personally by email or PM, or post them in the Comment on Forum Rules section. Thanks!
-
12-23-15 10:32 #3689
Posts: 2415Originally Posted by Paradise69 [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Tiny 12 [View Original Post]
-
12-23-15 05:40 #3688
Posts: 1807Originally Posted by Paradise69 [View Original Post]
http://larepublica.pe/sociedad/72614...ia-de-su-padre
Joshua David Brown's daughter claims that Larson is the actual leader of the [CodeWord908] network. The police report however indicates Larson was an undercover agent. Brown's lawyer says Brown met Larson on a sexually-oriented internet forum. Brown put Larson in contact with Connie Salazar, as he wanted her help finding girls.
If you take a look at LifeIsABeach's first video, it's completely damning. You see Connie Salazar admit on camera to knowing Brown since she was 14. Now she's 26 years old. According to the reporters, during the last 12 years in addition to having an affectionate relationship with Brown, she also procured women for him. On camera Salazar admits to offering her two children, four and seven years old, for sex in return for $12,000 and two toy cars. A man, presumably Brown, gives her the money a day before the children come. The next day Salazar pulls up to the house with her kids to deliver them to the perpetrator, and she's arrested. This is also caught on camera.
What throws me for a loop, in the article linked above, Brown's attorney appears to say that Salazar's accusations are directed towards Larson, not towards Brown. In other words, I'm wondering if Larson, not Brown, was supposed to molest the 4 year old and the 7 year old. That's complete speculation though. While this would in no way absolve Brown from certain other things he allegedly did, Larson may have entrapped Brown by offering to pay him lots of money, more than the $12,000 that ended up with Salazar, to molest her two young children. Or maybe Larson made the offer directly to Salazar, bypassing Brown. My extreme praise for the informant may have been unjustified. Could Larson be some scumbag [CodeWord910] working with the Feds to avoid jail? Hell if I know. Anyway it's a very sordid situation.