Thread: Lisbon
+
Add Report
Results 16 to 30 of 5320
-
03-22-24 09:04 #5305
Posts: 16Report on Rebecca Diniz
I met with Rebecca while in Lisbon. I had a great time with Rebecca. She lives up to the hype and her other positives reviews here and on the local site. Easy incall setup in central part of town at 150/ HR includes just about everything. Rebecca has a good body and is a true service queen with DFK, BBBJ, DATY, CFS, and A level all done enthusiastically and with great skill. On top of the service Rebecca is nice and easy to talk with when catching your breath after doing the deed. I would definitely see her again.
Thank you Rebecca! Take care until next time.
-
03-22-24 05:23 #5304
Posts: 1159Originally Posted by ExExpatriate [View Original Post]
-
03-21-24 23:59 #5303
Posts: 25Wayang
Had a good experience at Wayang. It is not for everyone. I appreciated the vibe of the place and the attractive provider and her skills at therapeutic as well as erotic massage. HJ finish, but I wasn't looking for FS. Went for full nude option, mutual touching (no penetration), two pops, 60 minutes, $$.5. A bit spendy but it was what I was looking for. Safe, clean, nice environment including shower. I only had two providers to choose from, but both were Europeans and very attractive. Most of my experience is with AMPS for half the price in the us, and this was much, much better than those.
-
03-21-24 19:10 #5302
Posts: 355Checked with Aurora Vaz
I checked in with Aurora Vaz. I approached by asking if her rate was still 150/ h, and she said yes. But then she tried to nickel and dime me in other ways. I asked about doing 90 minutes, and she wanted her 30 minute rate (100) + her hour rate (150/ h) instead of 150% of the hour rate (250 vs 225). I really don't like that stunt. Some ladies in Lisbon do that normally, but not many, and it's a pretty stupid tactic. And then she asked for +50 because I asked her to wear something, which most ladies would take as simply good service.
It's a shame she is being so mercenary. Oh well -- her loss.
So, if you go this way, just ask about the 150 upfront. Do it in Portuguese (use translate if you must), and stick to the basic one hour. Mercenary or not, she is still a Portuguese (not Brasilian), very hot spinner in her late 30s, and ahe is very good in bed.
-
03-20-24 20:29 #5301
Posts: 106This will also be my last post on 'photoshopping' but not because I think it's a "nothingburger" or an insignificant topic; it's more because I'm debating with people who don't understand what 'photoshopping' means despite it being a widely used term. Moreover, the rationale displayed in some of the arguments below seems to lack basic common sense, to put it mildly.
It's one thing doing make-up, using lighting or the photos being "touched up some". It's another thing entirely when for example, you blow up a small pair of breasts and a flat ass and shine a bright light on it. Taken from the oxford dictionary, photoshopping is 'altering an image especially in a way that distorts reality as for deliberately deceptive purposes'. A bit different to being "touched up some". Duh.
As for the most important point being whether a site is verified, well that clearly isn't the most important point as photo verified sites can also paint horribly distorted images (as we're debating). Duh.
Finally, the suggestion that we should be grateful if a site is photo-verified, and shouldn't complain even if we believe pictures are distorted, is utterly bizarre. Again it's not about whether a site is photo-verified, instead it's about the reality of the pictures displayed (photo-verified or not). If we believe they are heavily distorted, we've every right to complain.
The logic used in this photoshopping debate reminds of a discussion last year on incall rates where we named 3 or 4 ladies who charged the rate we were trying to justify, and said "that's the going rate because X, Y and Z charge it". Never mind the dozens of girls who don't charge that rate and the fact that almost every recent report on the local board also indicated different rates. Indeed, we initially used this same logic earlier to justify why we believe a particular site doesn't photoshop. Duh.
-
03-20-24 09:34 #5300
Posts: 355I've backed away from Escort Privada altogether for two reasons:
200/ h.
And half their roster is now made up of girls who have changed their working name three times or more. Not all of those are bad actors, but keeping track of the baddies under these circumstances has become tiresome. Calling a seemingly new girl is like shooting dice nowadays.
Originally Posted by NoTimezone [View Original Post]
-
03-20-24 09:29 #5299
Posts: 355I think dwelling on this photoshopping nothingburger is taking up too much space, so I'm going to drop out after this. My point in engaging was to point to the most salient issue: if you aren't familiar with the Portuguese scene, you should know that verified photoshoot is verified for when it was taken, which may have been a long time ago. So, it helps to ask how up to date it is. Some of us will remember.
As for the rest, well, the girls are paying to put their best look out there. Do you think Emily Ratajkowski looks like that on the street? Of course they do their hair and makeup; of course they have lighting (that is a matter of the photographer's kit and skill); of course the photos are touched up some. Duh.
Complaining about all that, well, I can only ask the (rhetorical) question: would you prefer no photo verification at all? If you think you get rude surprises with that feature, well, go on looking that gift horse in the mouth, by all means.
-
03-20-24 07:17 #5298
Posts: 2Flora
Originally Posted by NoTimezone [View Original Post]
-
03-19-24 22:28 #5297
Posts: 106There may well be sites, for example classificados, where lots of pictures are out of date or 'fake'.
However, not being 'fake' or out of date doesn't mean the pics can't be guilty of heavy photoshopping.
Personally, if I see a lady with pictures on different sites which are slightly different, I ask myself whether i'd be prepared to see a lady who looks like the worst set of pictures. If the answer is no, i'd then do further research to determine which set of pictures may be most realistic; that's when you take into account your own opinion of the various sites.
It's awkward when a lady turns up to an outcall at your hotel and your first impressions are negative. It can sometimes be nothing to do with photoshopping or 'fakes' but simply due to an unattractive face which isn't shown at all in lots of pictures.
Originally Posted by CarlosPrimeros [View Original Post]
-
03-19-24 22:11 #5296
Posts: 3Originally Posted by Astroglider31 [View Original Post]
-
03-19-24 19:24 #5295
Posts: 546Photoshop croaking
ExExpatriate is right. Old and heavily photoshoped pictures are used in the different sites. CassificadosX -- is the most notorious - 60 % of the pictures are either fake or totally out of date.
As usual the girls have ads on various web-sites and I do a search using their mobile-number. You encounter under the same phone-numer various ads on various sites with various pictures and different names. - Simply avoid -.
-
03-18-24 20:34 #5294
Posts: 4Originally Posted by NoTimezone [View Original Post]
-
03-18-24 15:24 #5293
Posts: 16Sofia
Originally Posted by ExExpatriate [View Original Post]
-
03-18-24 13:21 #5292
Posts: 3Looking for reviews for Leticia Ramos. If anyone has anything to share, please do.
-
03-18-24 12:07 #5291
Posts: 2953Originally Posted by TigerMuskie [View Original Post]
The good news is that Sofia Scarlett got an 8 out of 10 in her only review on the local board based on her actually being a very hot 18-22 year old just like the pictures show.
The very bad news is that she is CBJ only, didn't even do much oral despite the condom being on, and checked constantly to see if the condom was still on during vaginal.
She was 200 euros an hour.
And when you look closer, an 8 out of 10 is actually the lowest score that reviewer gives out. Most of his other reviews are 9's out of 10.
So personally I would do a hard pass on her, given the importance of BBBJ to me.